Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The CRAM Cognitive Architecture for Robot Manipulation in Everyday Activities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.14119 v1 pith:A7Y6ZZLP submitted 2023-04-27 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords cramabilitycognitiveeverydayrobotactionactivitiesarchitecture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents a hybrid robot cognitive architecture, CRAM, that enables robot agents to accomplish everyday manipulation tasks. It addresses five key challenges that arise when carrying out everyday activities. These include (i) the underdetermined nature of task specification, (ii) the generation of context-specific behavior, (iii) the ability to make decisions based on knowledge, experience, and prediction, (iv) the ability to reason at the levels of motions and sensor data, and (v) the ability to explain actions and the consequences of these actions. We explore the computational foundations of the CRAM cognitive model: the self-programmability entailed by physical symbol systems, the CRAM plan language, generalized action plans and implicit-to-explicit manipulation, generative models, digital twin knowledge representation & reasoning, and narrative-enabled episodic memories. We describe the structure of the cognitive architecture and explain the process by which CRAM transforms generalized action plans into parameterized motion plans. It does this using knowledge and reasoning to identify the parameter values that maximize the likelihood of successfully accomplishing the action. We demonstrate the ability of a CRAM-controlled robot to carry out everyday activities in a kitchen environment. Finally, we consider future extensions that focus on achieving greater flexibility through transformational learning and metacognition.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Closing the Motion Execution Gap: From Semantic Motion Task Constraints to Kinematic Control

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Motion Statecharts and the open-source Giskard framework close the gap between semantic motion tasks and kinematic execution via parallel/sequential constraints, a unified differentiable world model, and jerk-bounded ...

  2. Closing the Motion Execution Gap: From Semantic Motion Task Constraints to Kinematic Control

    cs.RO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Motion Statecharts with a differentiable kinematic world model and lMPC close the gap between semantic motion constraints and executable kinematic control, demonstrated on eight robot platforms via the open-source Gis...

Pith tools