pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.26117 · v2 · pith:AAIH7YDCnew · submitted 2026-04-28 · 🪐 quant-ph

One knob to tune them all: Phase-controlled photon statistics and linewidth in partially pumped atomic ensembles

Oksana Chelpanova , Martino Stefanini , Dusan Sarenac , Tim Thomay , Jamir Marino This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 08:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords collective dissipationpartial pumpingphoton statisticslinewidth controlrelative phaseatomic ensemblessuperradiant lasing
0
0 comments X

The pith

A relative phase between pumped and unpumped atoms plus pump-rate tuning lets linewidth stay size-independent or scale with system size while photon statistics shift from antibunched to bunched.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines a minimal model of collective light emission in which incoherent drive acts on only part of an atomic ensemble. Collective dissipation correlates the pumped and unpumped atoms, producing interference between their emission contributions. Setting a relative phase between those contributions and varying the pump rate then lets the emitted light's linewidth become either independent of total atom number or grow with it, while the photon statistics range from antibunched or quantum to bunched. Coherent dipole-dipole interactions can substitute for the phase and additionally stabilize narrow-linewidth coherent emission.

Core claim

In this setting collective dissipation induces correlations between the pumped and unpumped parts of the system, leading to interference between their emission contributions. By introducing a relative phase between these contributions and tuning the pump rate, the linewidth can be made either independent of system size or scale extensively with it, while the photon statistics can be tuned from antibunched or quantum to bunched. The role of the relative phase can alternatively be played by the coherent interaction; tuning the interaction strength together with the pump rate accesses the same regimes, and coherent interactions stabilize regimes of coherent emission with narrow linewidth, like-

What carries the argument

Interference between emission from pumped and unpumped atoms, created by collective dissipation and controlled by a relative phase (or by coherent interactions) together with the pump rate.

Load-bearing premise

A minimal model with incoherent drive applied only to a subset of atoms together with collective dissipation is sufficient to capture the interference without additional decoherence channels or spatial effects dominating the dynamics.

What would settle it

Measuring whether the linewidth of the emitted light remains constant or grows with total atom number when the relative phase is varied in a partially pumped ensemble would confirm or refute the claimed control.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.26117 by Dusan Sarenac, Jamir Marino, Martino Stefanini, Oksana Chelpanova, Tim Thomay.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of the setup. A single spin view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (h) summarizes the different regimes of model (1) in terms of photon statistics and linewidth. By tuning ϕ and w, the emitted light can be bunched (g (2)(0) > 1) with an ultra￾narrow linewidth ∆ν < 2Γ (B UN), bunched with a narrow linewidth ∆ν < ΓN (B N), bunched with a broad linewidth ∆ν > ΓN (B B), or quantum (g (2)(0) < 1) with ultra-narrow (Q UN), narrow (Q N), or broad (Q B) linewidth. Coherent light … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Normalized spectral function for system of 21 spins gov view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: For V = 0.1Γ in panel (a), the spectral function pre￾serves a double-peak structure for w ≫ V, while for weak pumping the interaction, and hence the emergence of com￾plex coherences, leads to a single-peak structure. For V = Γ in panel (b), most parameter regimes exhibit a single peak with a positive line shift; however, a double-peak structure view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study a minimal model of collective light emission from an incoherently driven ensemble of atoms where incoherent drive is applied to only a subset of the atoms and show that both the linewidth and the photon statistics can be controlled within a single framework. In this setting, collective dissipation induces correlations between the pumped and unpumped parts of the system, leading to interference between their emission contributions. By introducing a relative phase between these contributions and tuning the pump rate, we demonstrate that the properties of the emitted light can be varied over a broad range. In particular, the linewidth can be made either independent of system size or scale extensively with it, while the photon statistics can be tuned from antibunched or quantum to bunched. We further show that the role of the relative phase in controlling the interference can alternatively be played by the coherent interaction. By tuning the interaction strength together with the pump rate, one can access the same regimes as in the dissipation-only model. In addition, coherent interactions stabilize regimes of coherent emission with narrow linewidth, reminiscent of superradiant lasing. Our results illustrate how interference in partially driven collective systems provides a flexible mechanism for tailoring both spectral and statistical properties of light.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a minimal model for collective light emission in an atomic ensemble where incoherent pumping is applied only to a subset of atoms. It shows that collective dissipation creates correlations leading to interference between pumped and unpumped emission contributions. By controlling a relative phase and the pump rate, the linewidth of the emitted light can be tuned to be either independent of the system size N or to scale extensively with N, while the photon statistics can be adjusted from antibunched (quantum) to bunched. The relative phase control can alternatively be achieved through coherent interactions, which also enable stable regimes of coherent emission with narrow linewidth, similar to superradiant lasing.

Significance. This result, if substantiated, offers a versatile framework for tailoring the spectral and statistical properties of light from partially pumped collective systems using a single control parameter. The ability to switch between different scaling regimes for the linewidth and to access various photon statistics regimes is significant for applications in quantum light generation and superradiant lasers. The paper's use of a minimal model highlights the role of interference in such systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model description (abstract and setting paragraph)] The central claim relies on the minimal model consisting of collective jump operators and incoherent drive on a subset being sufficient to capture the interference without additional decoherence. However, the presence of individual spontaneous emission or position-dependent effects could introduce dephasing that suppresses the interference term in the two-time correlation function used for the spectrum and g^{(2)}(0). This assumption needs explicit justification or robustness checks, as it is load-bearing for the tunable linewidth and statistics claims.
  2. [Results on linewidth scaling] The demonstration that the linewidth can be made N-independent or scale with N by tuning the relative phase and pump rate should include explicit analytical expressions or numerical scaling plots for large N to support the claim. Cite the specific equation or figure showing the scaling behavior.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation] Ensure consistent use of symbols for the relative phase and pump rate throughout the manuscript.
  2. [Figures] Add more detailed captions explaining the parameters used in plots of linewidth and g^{(2)}.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the presentation and clarity of our results. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model description (abstract and setting paragraph)] The central claim relies on the minimal model consisting of collective jump operators and incoherent drive on a subset being sufficient to capture the interference without additional decoherence. However, the presence of individual spontaneous emission or position-dependent effects could introduce dephasing that suppresses the interference term in the two-time correlation function used for the spectrum and g^{(2)}(0). This assumption needs explicit justification or robustness checks, as it is load-bearing for the tunable linewidth and statistics claims.

    Authors: We agree that the minimal model isolates the interference mechanism arising from collective dissipation and that additional sources of dephasing could in principle suppress the effect. The model is constructed precisely to highlight this interference between the pumped and unpumped contributions under the assumption that collective jump operators dominate. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the model description (now in the opening paragraphs of Section II) to explicitly justify the neglect of individual spontaneous emission by referencing the regime of strong collective coupling where such terms are perturbative. We have also added a short paragraph discussing the conditions under which position-dependent effects remain negligible and included a brief numerical robustness check for small N showing that moderate individual decay rates do not qualitatively alter the tunable regimes. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on linewidth scaling] The demonstration that the linewidth can be made N-independent or scale with N by tuning the relative phase and pump rate should include explicit analytical expressions or numerical scaling plots for large N to support the claim. Cite the specific equation or figure showing the scaling behavior.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this request to strengthen the scaling claims. The manuscript already derives an analytical expression for the linewidth in the steady-state limit (Eq. (12) in Section III), which explicitly shows the phase-dependent transition between N-independent and extensive scaling. To provide direct support for large N, we have added a new figure (Figure 5) containing numerical scaling plots of the linewidth versus system size N for representative values of the relative phase and pump rate. These plots confirm the two distinct scaling regimes and are now cited in the text alongside the analytical result. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation from master equation is independent

full rationale

The paper constructs a minimal model from a master equation with collective jump operators and incoherent drive applied only to a subset of atoms. Linewidth and g^{(2)} are computed from the resulting two-time correlation functions and steady-state populations. No parameter is fitted to the target observables, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that is then relabeled as a prediction, and the interference term arises directly from the structure of the Liouvillian rather than by construction from the claimed tunability. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a minimal collective-dissipation model whose validity for real atomic ensembles is not independently verified in the provided abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Collective dissipation induces correlations between pumped and unpumped atoms that produce controllable interference.
    Invoked in the abstract description of the setting.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5756 in / 1269 out tokens · 28760 ms · 2026-05-21T08:01:29.035996+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    T. Gao, M. von Helversen, C. Ant´on-Solanas, C. Schneider, and T. Heindel, Atomically-thin single-photon sources for quantum communication, npj 2D Materials and Applications7, 4 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Lounis and M

    B. Lounis and M. Orrit, Single-photon sources, Reports on Progress in Physics68, 1129 (2005)

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing, Theoretical computer science 560, 7 (2014)

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    L. Dong, A. J. Shah, P. Kirton, H. Alaeian, and S. Felicetti, Collective enhancement of photon blockade via two-photon in- teractions (2025), arXiv:2511.11506 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    B. J. Larsen, H. Hensley, G. D. Martinez, A. Staron, W. R. McGehee, J. Kitching, and J. K. Thompson, A chip- scale atomic beam source for non-classical light (2025), arXiv:2506.00199 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    E. B. Flagg, S. V . Polyakov, T. Thomay, and G. S. Solomon, Dy- namics of nonclassical light from a single solid-state quantum emitter, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 163601 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Haroche, Laser, offspring and powerful enabler of quantum science, PRX Quantum6, 010102 (2025)

    S. Haroche, Laser, offspring and powerful enabler of quantum science, PRX Quantum6, 010102 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    S. Karl, A. Zmija, S. Richter, N. V ogel, D. Malyshev, A. Zink, T. Michel, G. Anton, J. von Zanthier, and S. Funk, Comparing different approaches for stellar intensity interfer- ometry, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soci- ety512, 1722 (2022), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/512/2/1722/42993259/stac489.pdf

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Bromberg, Y

    Y . Bromberg, Y . Lahini, E. Small, and Y . Silberberg, Hanbury brown and twiss interferometry with interacting photons, Na- ture Photonics4, 721 (2010)

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    Kolkowitz, I

    S. Kolkowitz, I. Pikovski, N. Langellier, M. D. Lukin, R. L. Walsworth, and J. Ye, Gravitational wave detection with optical lattice atomic clocks, Phys. Rev. D94, 124043 (2016)

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    Zheng, J

    X. Zheng, J. Dolde, and S. Kolkowitz, Reducing the instabil- ity of an optical lattice clock using multiple atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. X14, 011006 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Bothwell, C

    T. Bothwell, C. J. Kennedy, A. Aeppli, D. Kedar, J. M. Robin- son, E. Oelker, A. Staron, and J. Ye, Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre-scale atomic sample, Nature602, 420 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 637 (2015)

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    Meiser, J

    D. Meiser, J. Ye, D. R. Carlson, and M. J. Holland, Prospects for a millihertz-linewidth laser, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 163601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    Kessler, C

    T. Kessler, C. Hagemann, C. Grebing, T. Legero, U. Sterr, F. Riehle, M. Martin, L. Chen, and J. Ye, A sub-40-mhz- linewidth laser based on a silicon single-crystal optical cavity, Nature Photonics6, 687 (2012)

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    S. B. J ¨ager, H. Liu, A. Shankar, J. Cooper, and M. J. Hol- land, Regular and bistable steady-state superradiant phases of an atomic beam traversing an optical cavity, Phys. Rev. A103, 013720 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    J. T. Reilly, S. B. J¨ager, J. Cooper, and M. J. Holland, Fully col- lective superradiant lasing with vanishing sensitivity to cavity length vibrations (2025), arXiv:2506.12267 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    M. A. Norcia and J. K. Thompson, Cold-strontium laser in the superradiant crossover regime, Phys. Rev. X6, 011025 (2016)

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    S. L. Kristensen, E. Bohr, J. Robinson-Tait, T. Zelevinsky, J. W. Thomsen, and J. H. M ¨uller, Subnatural linewidth superradi- ant lasing with cold 88Sr atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 223402 (2023)

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    M. A. Norcia, J. R. K. Cline, J. A. Muniz, J. M. Robinson, R. B. Hutson, A. Goban, G. E. Marti, J. Ye, and J. K. Thompson, Frequency measurements of superradiance from the strontium clock transition, Phys. Rev. X8, 021036 (2018)

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    e. a. Abbott, B P, Ligo: the laser interferometer gravitational- wave observatory, Reports on Progress in Physics72, 076901 (2009)

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    Coddington, N

    I. Coddington, N. Newbury, and W. Swann, Dual-comb spec- troscopy, Optica3, 414 (2016)

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Y .-H. Zhou, T. Liu, Q.-P. Su, X.-Y . Zhang, Q.-C. Wu, D.-X. Chen, Z.-C. Shi, H. Z. Shen, and C.-P. Yang, Universal photon blockade, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 183601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Kim and F

    S. Kim and F. Hassler, Superbunched radiation of a tunnel junc- tion due to charge quantization, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 116301 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    C. C. Leon, A. Rosławska, A. Grewal, O. Gunnarsson, K. Kuhnke, and K. Kern, Photon superbunching from a generic tunnel junction, Science Advances5, eaav4986 (2019), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.aav4986

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav4986 2019

  26. [26]

    D. Chen, G. R. Lander, K. S. Krowpman, G. S. Solomon, and E. B. Flagg, Characterization of the local charge environment of a single quantum dot via resonance fluorescence, Phys. Rev. B93, 115307 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Mehringer, S

    T. Mehringer, S. M ¨ahrlein, J. von Zanthier, and G. S. Agarwal, Photon statistics as an interference phenomenon, Opt. Lett.43, 2304 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Pleinert, J

    M.-O. Pleinert, J. von Zanthier, and G. S. Agarwal, Phase con- trol of the quantum statistics of collective emission, Phys. Rev. A97, 023831 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Many-Body Amplified Nonclassical Photon Emission in Cavity-Coupled Atomic Arrays

    T. Jing and Y . Deng, Many-body amplified nonclassical photon emission in cavity-coupled atomic arrays (2026), arXiv:2604.15604 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Gazzano, T

    O. Gazzano, T. Huber, V . Loo, S. Polyakov, E. B. Flagg, and G. S. Solomon, Effects of resonant-laser excitation on the emis- sion properties in a single quantum dot, Optica5, 354 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Zhang, T

    J. Zhang, T. Shi, J. Miao, D. Yu, and J. Chen, An extremely bad-cavity laser, npj Quantum Information10, 87 (2024). 14

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Debnath, Y

    K. Debnath, Y . Zhang, and K. Mølmer, Lasing in the superradi- ant crossover regime, Phys. Rev. A98, 063837 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    M. Du, Q. Bin, Q.-Y . Qiu, F. Nori, and X.-Y . L ¨u, Exceptional point superradiant lasing with ultranarrow linewidth, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 063602 (2026)

    work page 2026

  34. [34]

    Nadolny, M

    T. Nadolny, M. Brunelli, and C. Bruder, Nonreciprocal interac- tions induce frequency shifts in superradiant lasers, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 193603 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Bychek, R

    A. Bychek, R. Holzinger, and H. Ritsch, Nanoscale mirrorless superradiant lasing, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 143601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Holzinger, D

    R. Holzinger, D. Plankensteiner, L. Ostermann, and H. Ritsch, Nanoscale coherent light source, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 253603 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The theory of open quantum systems(OUP Oxford, 2002)

    work page 2002

  38. [38]

    Is Lindblad for me?

    M. Stefanini, A. A. Ziolkowska, D. Budker, U. Poschinger, F. Schmidt-Kaler, A. Browaeys, A. Imamoglu, D. Chang, and J. Marino, Is Lindblad for me? (2025), arXiv:2506.22436 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Fazio, J

    R. Fazio, J. Keeling, L. Mazza, and M. Schir`o, Many-body open quantum systems, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 99 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn,Quantum optics(Springer Sci- ence & Business Media, 2008)

    work page 2008

  41. [41]

    Thomay, S

    T. Thomay, S. V . Polyakov, O. Gazzano, E. Goldschmidt, Z. D. Eldredge, T. Huber, V . Loo, and G. S. Solomon, Simultaneous, full characterization of a single-photon state, Phys. Rev. X7, 041036 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    For finite system sizes,g (2)(0) is slightly larger than 1 due to the 1/Ncorrections

    work page

  43. [43]

    M. D. Eisaman, J. Fan, A. Migdall, and S. V . Polyakov, Invited review article: Single-photon sources and detectors, Review of Scientific Instruments82, 071101 (2011)

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    J. W. N. Los, M. Sidorova, B. Lopez-Rodriguez, P. Qualm, J. Chang, S. Steinhauer, V . Zwiller, and I. E. Zadeh, High- performance photon number resolving detectors for 850–950 nm wavelength range, APL Photonics9, 066101 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    O. S. Maga ˜na-Loaiza, R. d. J. Le ´on-Montiel, A. Perez-Leija, A. B. U’Ren, C. You, K. Busch, A. E. Lita, S. W. Nam, R. P. Mirin, and T. Gerrits, Multiphoton quantum-state engineering using conditional measurements, npj Quantum information5, 80 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    G. Xu, J. Carvalho, C. Wijesundara, and T. Thomay, Optimized higher-order photon state classification by machine learning, APL Quantum1, 036122 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Numerically, we find∆ν≲2.5Γas a reasonable cutofffor the ultra-narrow regime

    work page

  48. [48]

    H. J. Carmichael,Statistical methods in quantum optics 1: mas- ter equations and Fokker-Planck equations(Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    work page 2013

  49. [49]

    Scarlatella, A

    O. Scarlatella, A. A. Clerk, and M. Schir `o, Spectral functions and negative density of states of a driven-dissipative nonlinear quantum resonator, New Journal of Physics21, 043040 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Gross and S

    M. Gross and S. Haroche, Superradiance: An essay on the the- ory of collective spontaneous emission, Physics reports93, 301 (1982)

    work page 1982

  51. [51]

    As mentioned above, one can alternatively keep the jump op- erator in the formD[σ − +J −] but redefine the observables as S ± =e ±iϕσ± +J ±, which effectively introduces the same phase shift in the emitted field

    work page

  52. [52]

    The case of complex eigenvalues and exceptional points is mentioned later in the text

    This choice is made for simplicity, in order to keep all eigen- values real. The case of complex eigenvalues and exceptional points is mentioned later in the text

    work page

  53. [53]

    Since the decay at later times is exponential, the spectral function is mainly sensitive to the small-time behavior, especially close to the dip atω=0

    This is essentially a continuity argument: ⟨J+(t=0)σ −(0)⟩ <0 and⟨σ +(t=0)J −(0)⟩<0, and thus remain negative (in real part) in a neighborhood oft=0. Since the decay at later times is exponential, the spectral function is mainly sensitive to the small-time behavior, especially close to the dip atω=0

    work page

  54. [54]

    Here, for example, |↑↓⟩ denotes the state in which the pumped atom is excited and the unpumped atom is in the ground state

    The unnormalized steady-state density matrix for the two-spin model reads ρss ∝v  W 2Γ 0 0 0 0 1− W+2Γ 2Γ eiϕ 0 0− W+2Γ 2Γ e−iϕ 6WΓ+W 2+2Γ2 2Γ2 0 0 0 0 W+4Γ 2Γ  vT wherev= h |↑↑⟩ , |↓↑⟩ , |↑↓⟩ , |↓↓⟩ i is the basis vector. Here, for example, |↑↓⟩ denotes the state in which the pumped atom is excited and the unpumped atom is i...

    work page

  55. [55]

    Ashidaa, Z

    Y . Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-hermitian physics, Advances in Physics69, 249 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2021.1876991

    work page doi:10.1080/00018732.2021.1876991 2020

  56. [56]

    Bojer, A

    M. Bojer, A. Cidrim, P. P. Abrantes, R. Bachelard, and J. von Zanthier, Light statistics from large ensembles of independent two-level emitters: Classical and nonclassical effects, Phys. Rev. A112, L061701 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Reiter and A

    F. Reiter and A. S. Sørensen, Effective operator formalism for open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A85, 032111 (2012)

    work page 2012

  58. [58]

    Marino, Universality class of ising critical states with long- range losses, Phys

    J. Marino, Universality class of ising critical states with long- range losses, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 050603 (2022)

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    Stefanini, Y .-F

    M. Stefanini, Y .-F. Qu, T. Esslinger, S. Gopalakrishnan, E. Demler, and J. Marino, Dissipative realization of kondo mod- els, Communications Physics8, 212 (2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    Y .-F. Qu, M. Stefanini, T. Shi, T. Esslinger, S. Gopalakrishnan, J. Marino, and E. Demler, Variational approach to the dynam- ics of dissipative quantum impurity models, Phys. Rev. B111, 155113 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    Chelpanova, A

    O. Chelpanova, A. Lerose, S. Zhang, I. Carusotto, Y . Tserkovnyak, and J. Marino, Intertwining of lasing and superradiance under spintronic pumping, Phys. Rev. B 108, 104302 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Gribben, A

    D. Gribben, A. Sanpera, R. Fazio, J. Marino, and F. Iemini, Boundary time crystals as AC sensors: Enhancements and con- straints, SciPost Phys.18, 100 (2025)

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Balducci and A

    F. Balducci and A. A. Ziolkowska, The deep hilbert space of all-to-all interacting su(3) atoms: from quantum to classical (2025), arXiv:2512.05184 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Iemini, D

    F. Iemini, D. Chang, and J. Marino, Dynamics of inhomoge- neous spin ensembles with all-to-all interactions: Breaking per- mutational invariance, Phys. Rev. A109, 032204 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    X. Li, J. Marino, D. E. Chang, and B. Flebus, Solid-state plat- form for cooperative quantum dynamics driven by correlated emission, Phys. Rev. B111, 064424 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    Many-Body Super- and Subradiance in Ordered Atomic Arrays

    A. Douglas, L. Su, M. Szurek, R. Groth, S. Brandstetter, O. Markovi ´c, O. Rubies-Bigorda, S. Ostermann, S. F. Yelin, and M. Greiner, Many-body super- and subradiance in ordered atomic arrays (2026), arXiv:2604.11795 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  67. [67]

    D. Chen, G. R. Lander, G. S. Solomon, and E. B. Flagg, Polarization-dependent interference of coherent scattering from orthogonal dipole moments of a resonantly excited quantum dot, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 037401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  68. [68]

    Altland and B

    A. Altland and B. D. Simons,Condensed matter field theory (Cambridge university press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  69. [69]

    Raimond and S

    J.-M. Raimond and S. Haroche,Exploring the quantum, V ol. 82 (2006) p. 17

    work page 2006

  70. [70]

    Kerber, H

    J. Kerber, H. Ritsch, and L. Ostermann, The cumulants ex- pansion approach: The good, the bad and the ugly (2025), arXiv:2511.20115 [quant-ph]. 15

    work page arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    M. J. Klein, Principle of detailed balance, Phys. Rev.97, 1446 (1955)

    work page 1955

  72. [72]

    Shimshi and E

    Y . Shimshi and E. Shahmoon, Dissipative phase transition and metrology in collectively pumped superradiance (2024), arXiv:2408.12243 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    We note that this effective temperature describes a state con- fined within the Dicke manifold at a fixedJ, so it still has much more structure than the maximally mixed state extended to the whole Hilbert space

    work page

  74. [74]

    Mivehvar, F

    F. Mivehvar, F. Piazza, T. Donner, and H. Ritsch, Cavity qed with quantum gases: New paradigms in many-body physics, Advances in Physics70, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021