Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

FloMore: Meeting bandwidth requirements of flows

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2108.03221 v1 pith:AAVQ353Y submitted 2021-08-06 cs.NI

FloMore: Meeting bandwidth requirements of flows

classification cs.NI
keywords flomorefailureservicesbandwidthrequirementsschemesstatescritical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Wide-area cloud provider networks must support the bandwidth requirements of diverse services (e.g., applications, product groups, customers) despite failures. Existing traffic engineering (TE) schemes operate at much coarser granularity than services, which we show necessitates unduly conservative decisions. To tackle this, we present FloMore, which directly considers the bandwidth needs of individual services and ensures they are met a desired percentage of time. Rather than meet the requirements for all services over the same set of failure states, FloMore exploits a key opportunity that each service could meet its bandwidth requirements over a different set of failure states. FloMore consists of an offline phase that identifies the critical failure states of each service, and on failure allocates traffic in a manner that prioritizes those services for which that failure state is critical. We present a novel decomposition scheme to handle FloMore's offline phase in a tractable manner. Our evaluations show that FloMore outperforms state-of-the-art TE schemes including SMORE and Teavar, and also out-performs extensions of these schemes that we devise. The results also show FloMore's decomposition approach allows it to scale well to larger network topologies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. NeuroRisk: Physics-Informed Neural Optimization for Risk-Aware Traffic Engineering

    cs.NI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    NeuroRisk is a physics-informed deep unrolled optimizer for risk-aware traffic engineering that achieves small optimality gaps and 100-100000x speedup over solvers while outperforming neural baselines on throughput.