Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 107 references

Learning General Causal Structures with Hidden Dynamic Process for Climate Analysis

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that a time-series generative model can recover both the hidden dynamic process and the causal graph among observed climate variables, and implements this as CaDRe.

desk verdict Promising framework for joint latent-process and observed-graph identification, but the central theorem's proof has a gap that is likely not patchable without extra assumptions. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.12500 v3 pith:ABCA4JEE submitted 2025-01-21 cs.LG stat.ME

Minghao Fu , Biwei Huang , Zijian Li , Yujia Zheng , Ignavier Ng , Guangyi Chen , Yingyao Hu , Kun Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LGstat.ME MSC 62D2062M10
keywords causaldiscoveryrepresentationlearninglatentdynamicprocessestimeseriesclimateanalysisidentifiabilitynonlinearindependentcomponentvariationalautoencoder
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that a single time-series model can simultaneously recover two things that are usually treated separately: the hidden dynamic process driving a system (the latent variables and their causal interactions over time) and the causal graph among the measured variables themselves. This matters for climate analysis because temperature and precipitation records are driven by unmeasured processes such as pressure and solar radiation while also influencing each other across nearby regions; knowing both kinds of structure turns forecasting into something interpretable. The paper establishes identifiability conditions under which both structures are recoverable from observational data alone, without interventions, and instantiates the theory in CaDRe, a variational autoencoder with flow-based priors and structural penalties. If the central claim is right, climate scientists could read real causal structure off historical records rather than only chase predictive accuracy.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are Jacobian matrices of two equivalent views of the same generation process: $J_g(x_t)$, whose support encodes direct causal edges among observed variables, and $J_m(s_t)$, the ICA mixing Jacobian from noise sources to observations, with $D_m$ its diagonal part. The identity $J_g J_m = J_m - D_m$ converts the mixing structure into a causal graph in one step, $J_g = I - D_m J_m^{-1}$. On the estimation side, CaDRe uses two encoders, flow-based prior networks whose inverse transition functions encode latent causal structure, and sparsity plus DAG penalties applied to the recovered Jacobians; CaDRe is the name of the resulting variational-autoencoder method.

What would settle it

Construct a simulated system that satisfies the other assumptions but violates A5 by giving every noise source the same linear dependence on $z_t$ (identical second and third derivatives of $\log p(s_{t,k}|z_t)$); run CaDRe and compare the estimated support of $J_g$ with ground truth. The paper already reports that violating A5 drops source-recovery MCC from about 0.96 to 0.71, so a clean pass/fail test is whether the causal-graph SHD degrades correspondingly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central result is Theorem 3: under the Markov/faithfulness assumption on the full graph, functional faithfulness of the observed Jacobian, and a generation-variability condition (A5), the support of the Jacobian matrix of the learned observation map is identical to the support of the true observation-level causal graph, $\mathrm{supp}(J_g(x_t))=\mathrm{supp}(J_{\hat g}(\hat x_t))$. The proof chains three identifiability results: latent space is recoverable up to an invertible differentiable map from three consecutive observations (Theorem 1); the structural equation model is equivalent to a nonlinear ICA mixing model (Lemma 2), which yields the functional identity $J_g J_m = J_m - D_m$ (Theorem 2); and from that identity the observation-level causal graph is computed as $J_g = I - D_m J_m^{-1}$. The same machinery also gives ordered component-wise identifiability of the latent process, so individual latent components and their time-lagged and instantaneous dependencies are recoverable, not just the subspace.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the generation-variability condition (A5): the second- and third-order derivatives of each noise source's log-density with respect to the latent variables must be sufficiently varied across time steps, otherwise the method cannot tell the noise components apart and the recovered observation graph loses its guarantee.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A generative model trained only to reconstruct time-series observations can output the true causal graph among measured variables, even when hidden drivers exist and the mapping from latent to observed variables is non-invertible and noisy.
  • Latent drivers identified by the model are component-wise aligned with physical quantities, so learned factors such as solar radiation or cloud cover can be read as interpretable climate variables.
  • The recovered graph and latent dynamics are produced in one forward pass, giving causal structure learning without the repeated conditional-independence tests of constraint-based methods.
  • Because the framework carries identifiability guarantees into the nonparametric regime, it applies to forecasting benchmarks beyond climate, including health, electricity, and traffic series.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A practical consequence the paper does not spell out: before trusting a recovered climate graph, a user should test whether the generation-variability condition (A5) plausibly holds, since heterogeneity across time is precisely what makes latent sources separable; a homogeneity diagnostic would be a natural companion tool.
  • The Jacobian identity suggests a transferable principle: in any spatiotemporal system where hidden drivers modulate noise, the observed causal graph is one matrix inversion away from the mixing Jacobian, so a similar decoder-plus-Jacobian architecture could be adapted to neuroscience or economics.
  • The paper's wind-based evaluation is a correlation surrogate, not a causal gold standard; a stronger test would perturb one grid variable in a climate simulation and check whether the recovered graph predicts the resulting response pattern.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes CaDRe, a time-series generative model that jointly learns latent dynamic processes and causal relations among observed variables. The theoretical part claims, in Theorem 3, that under Assumptions 1, 2, and A1–A5, the causal graph over observed variables is identifiable, i.e., supp(J_g(x_t)) = supp(J_ĝ(ẑ_t, ŝ_t)), building on a latent-space identifiability result (Theorem 1) and a functional equivalence between the SEM and nonlinear ICA (Theorem 2). The method instantiates this via a variational autoencoder with flow-based priors, Jacobian-based structural penalties, and DAG constraints. Experiments on synthetic data show strong recovery of latent components and causal structure, and experiments on climate benchmarks report competitive forecasting and graphs that align with a wind-field surrogate.

Significance. If the identifiability results were fully established, the paper would make a useful advance: it extends causal representation learning from invertible, deterministic mixing to settings with noisy, non-invertible generation and causally related observed variables, and it provides an integrated algorithm with code. Strengths of the submission include explicit assumptions, ablation studies that test assumption violations, extensive comparisons to constraint-based and CRL baselines, and reproducible experimental protocols. However, the central theoretical claim is not currently established: the proof of Theorem 3 contains a false statement about the Jacobian J_{h_s}, and Theorem 1's proof invokes a spectral decomposition without justifying the required operator conditions. These are load-bearing issues, so the paper needs substantial revision before the theoretical claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A.7, Eq. (A38)] The proof of Theorem 3 differentiates Eq. (A37) with respect to z_{t,l} and drops all terms involving derivatives of J_{h_s}(ŝ_t), asserting that 'entries of J_{h_s}(ŝ_t) do not depend on z_{t,l}'. This assertion is false as stated: h_s is defined as m^{-1}∘ĝ_m, and since x_t = g_m(z_t,s_t) = ĝ_m(ẑ_t,ŝ_t) with ẑ_t = h_z(z_t), both J_m and J_ĝ_m, hence J_{h_s}, generically depend on z_t. The omitted ∂J_{h_s}/∂z_{t,l} terms are not controlled by Assumption A5, which only constrains derivatives of A_{t,k} = log p(s_{t,k}|z_t). Consequently Eq. (A38) does not establish that [J_{h_s}]_{k,i}[J_{h_s}]_{k,j} = 0 for i≠j, and the monomial-matrix step, ordered component-wise identifiability, and the final support equality supp(J_g)=supp(J_ĝ) are unsupported. The proof needs either a correct treatment of the dropped terms or an additional explicit condition, such as the mixing Jacobian being independent of z_t.
  2. [Appendix A.2, Eqs. (A11)–(A13)] Theorem 1's proof obtains Eq. (A13) by invoking the uniqueness of a spectral decomposition of L_{x_{t+1}|z_t} D_{x_t|z_t} L^{-1}_{x_{t+1}|z_t}. The stated hypotheses are injectivity and boundedness of the operators, but these do not imply that the operator is normal or that it admits a unique spectral decomposition in the sense of the cited theorems (Conway Ch. VII; Dunford & Schwartz, Theorem XV 4.5). For a general injective bounded operator L, the factorization L D L^{-1} is not unique, so the identification of the eigenfunctions {p(x_{t+1}|z_t)} up to permutation and scaling is not justified. This gap is load-bearing because Theorem 3 uses Theorem 1 to obtain ẑ_t = h_z(z_t) and to justify the change of variables leading to Eq. (A35).
  3. [Appendix A.7, Eqs. (A39)–(A41)] The step that removes the permutation indeterminacy is also not rigorously established. From J_{g_L}(x_t) = P_{d_x} J_g(x_t) P_{d_x}^ op and the relations in Corollary 2.2, direct algebra gives J_g = P^ op J_{g_L} P and hence J_m = P^ op J_{m_L} D_{m_L}^{-1} P D_m, rather than the expression in Eq. (A40), which appears to swap P and P^ op. Moreover, the transition from Eq. (A41) to 'Using Lemma 3, we obtain ... = I' is asserted without showing that the product in question satisfies the hypotheses of Lemma 3. This step is needed to conclude that J_ĝ_m and J_m have the same support, and it is therefore load-bearing for the final causal graph identifiability claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4, Eq. (6)] The text says 's-encoder ψ and decoder η', but Eq. (6) defines ŝ_t = η(x_{1:T}) and ẑ_t = ψ(ẑ_t, ŝ_t); the roles of ψ and η should be swapped in the prose for consistency.
  2. [Section 3 introduction] The sentence referring to the 'latent causal process in Theorem A.3' appears to point to a non-existent theorem; the component-wise latent identifiability result in Appendix A.3 is Theorem A1.
  3. [Appendix D.1, ablation study] The assumption labels in the bullet list are inconsistent with Table A11: item i is labeled 'Violation of Assumption 1' while the table says 'Violate A2', and item iii is labeled 'Violation of Assumption 3' while the table says 'Violate A5'. These should be aligned.
  4. [Section 5.2 and Appendix C.1.2(vii)] The text should state more explicitly that WSHD and WTPR compare the learned graph to the wind-field surrogate B_ref, which is a physically motivated proxy and not a validated causal ground truth; as written, 'Quantitative Results on CD' could be read as claiming direct validation of causal structure.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 3 derives support equality from the SEM–ICA Jacobian identity and the A5 variability condition rather than assuming it.

full rationale

The central identifiability claim (Theorem 3) is not an input to the derivation. The proof starts from the functional equivalence theorem J_g(x_t)J_m(s_t) = J_m(s_t) - D_m(s_t) (Eq. 4), which is obtained by the chain rule from the SEM/ICA representations, and from Theorem 1's block-level latent recovery; the target equality supp(J_g(x_t)) = supp(J_\hat g(\hat x_t)) is then derived through an ICA-style component-wise argument under A5. A5 is a condition on the derivatives of the true conditional log-density log p(s_{t,k}|z_t), not on the estimated graph or on the conclusion. The method's graph output is computed as J_\hat g = I - D_\hat m J_\hat m^{-1} and evaluated against an external wind-field surrogate (Rasp et al., 2020); no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The only notable self-citation is Theorem A1, which imports component-wise latent identifiability from Li et al. (2025); that is a published, externally checkable result and the main observational-graph theorem does not depend on it. Any issue with the 'entries of J_hs(\hat s_t) do not depend on z_{t,l}' step in Eq. (A38) would be a proof-validity concern, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The theoretical claims rest on a chain of strong nonparametric assumptions (A1-A5 plus faithfulness), an unstated nonzero-noise-derivative condition, and a borrowed sparsity condition. The estimator adds several hand-tuned hyperparameters and a data-dependent spatial mask. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • λ1, λ2 (ELBO KL weights) = λ1=4e-3, λ2=1e-2
    Hyperparameters in Eq. (5), chosen for stable training; not part of the identifiability theory.
  • α, β (structure penalty weights) = α=1e-4, β=5e-5
    Weights for sparsity and DAG penalties in Eq. (10), tuned for best performance.
  • τ (graph threshold) = 0.15
    Threshold for binarizing the estimated Jacobian into a causal graph (Appendix C.2.2, Eq. A46); directly affects reported graph metrics.
  • Spatial mask from SAR model = λ=1, distance threshold 50
    Binary mask M_init derived from a spatial autoregressive fit on the data; restricts admissible edges and shapes the final causal graph.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Markov and faithfulness to a DAG (Assumption 1)
    Used throughout to justify DAG-based factorization, Jacobian support, and operator injectivity.
  • domain assumption Functional faithfulness (Assumption 2): support of J_g equals causal adjacency
    Edge minimality convention; if zero derivatives occur along true edges, graph recovery fails.
  • domain assumption A2 Contextual Variability: injectivity of L_{x_{t+1}|z_t} and L_{x_{t-1}|x_{t+1}}
    Needed for the spectral decomposition in Theorem 1; not verifiable from finite data.
  • domain assumption A3 Latent Drift: distinct z_t give distinct p(x_t|z_t)
    Prevents repeated eigenvalues in the spectral decomposition.
  • domain assumption A4 Differentiability: functional F exists and maps conditionals to differentiable h_z
    Makes the relabeling map differentiable; usually satisfied by neural networks.
  • domain assumption A5 Generation Variability: linear independence of V and U vectors
    Sufficient variability for component-wise identification of s_t; strong and data-dependent.
  • domain assumption Nonzero direct noise effects: ∂x_i/∂s_i ≠ 0
    Unstated but required for D_m invertibility in Corollary 2.1.
  • ad hoc to paper Sparse latent process with empty intimate neighbor sets (Theorem A1)
    Imported from Li et al. 2025 to get component-wise latent identification; no climate-specific justification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Learning General Causal Structures with Hidden Dynamic Process for Climate Analysis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ABCA4JEE

@misc{pith2026250112500,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Learning General Causal Structures with Hidden Dynamic Process for Climate Analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ABCA4JEE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.12500}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding climate dynamics requires going beyond correlations in observational data to uncover the underlying causal process. Latent drivers such as atmospheric processes play a central role in temporal dynamics, while direct causal influences also exist among geographically proximate observed variables. Traditional Causal Representation Learning (CRL) typically focuses on latent factors but overlooks such observable-to-observable causal relations, which limits its applicability to climate analysis. In this paper, we introduce a unified framework that jointly uncovers (i) causal relations among observed variables and (ii) latent driving forces together with their interactions. We establish conditions under which both the hidden dynamic process and the causal structure among observed variables are simultaneously identifiable from time-series data, and our guarantees continue to hold in the nonparametric setting through contextual information that recovers latent variables and causal relations. Building on these insights, we propose CaDRe (Causal Discovery and Representation learning), a time-series generative model with structural constraints that integrates CRL and causal discovery. Experiments on synthetic datasets validate our theoretical results. On real-world climate datasets, CaDRe delivers competitive forecasting accuracy and recovers visualized causal graphs aligned with domain expertise, thereby offering interpretable insights into climate systems. Code is available at https://github.com/MinghaoFu/CaDRe.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.12500 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. From climate system to causal graph. xt represent observed data and zt denotes unobserved variables behind xt, ϵ z t denotes the stochasticity in latent causal process, and st denotes the noise variable varying with zt, e.g., human activities (Chen & Wang, 1995). both observational dependencies and stochastic noise, violating these assumptions and limiting the applicability of existing CRL approaches. This problem c… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Equivalent SEM and ICA. The gray line in SEM denotes the influence xt,2 → xt,1 through the observation causal relation, which is equivalently represented as an indirect effect (the orange line): st,2 99K xt,1 in ICA, which can be decomposed into st,2 → xt,2 and xt,2 → xt,1. After building this equivalence, we proceed to perform CD via the nonlinear ICA with latent variables. We begin by introducing the Jacobian matr… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The estimation procedure of CaDRe. The model framework includes two encoders: z-encoder for extract￾ing latent variables zt, and s-encoder for extracting nonstationary noise st. A decoder reconstructs xt from them. Additionally, prior networks estimate the prior distribution using a normalizing flow, focusing on learning the causal structures based on the Jacobian matrix. Ls imposes a sparsity constraint and Ld enfo… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Estimated latent variables, latent causal process, and causal graph over the observed climate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures

    Kashif Abbass, Muhammad Zeeshan Qasim, Huaming Song, Muntasir Murshed, Haider Mahmood, and Ijaz Younis. A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 0 (28): 0 42539--42559, 2022

    2022

  2. [2]

    Dyngfn: Towards bayesian inference of gene regulatory networks with gflownets

    Lazar Atanackovic, Alexander Tong, Bo Wang, Leo J Lee, Yoshua Bengio, and Jason S Hartford. Dyngfn: Towards bayesian inference of gene regulatory networks with gflownets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024

    2024

  3. [3]

    An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling

    Shaojie Bai, J Zico Kolter, and Vladlen Koltun. An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.\ 899--908. PMLR, 2018

    2018

  4. [4]

    Climate coupling between temperature, humidity, precipitation, and cloud cover over the canadian prairies

    Alan K Betts, Raymond Desjardins, Devon Worth, and Brian Beckage. Climate coupling between temperature, humidity, precipitation, and cloud cover over the canadian prairies. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 119 0 (23): 0 13--305, 2014

    2014

  5. [5]

    Provably Constant-time Planning and Replanning for Real-time Grasping Objects off a Conveyor Belt

    Tom Beucler and et al. Climatenet: Bringing the power of deep learning to climate science at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.07148, 2021

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Land--sea contrast, soil-atmosphere and cloud-temperature interactions: interplays and roles in future summer european climate change

    Julien Bo \'e and Laurent Terray. Land--sea contrast, soil-atmosphere and cloud-temperature interactions: interplays and roles in future summer european climate change. Climate dynamics, 42 0 (3): 0 683--699, 2014

    2014

  7. [7]

    Causal representation learning in temporal data via single-parent decoding

    Philippe Brouillard, S \'e bastien Lachapelle, Julia Kaltenborn, Yaniv Gurwicz, Dhanya Sridhar, Alexandre Drouin, Peer Nowack, Jakob Runge, and David Rolnick. Causal representation learning in temporal data via single-parent decoding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07013, 2024

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Identification and estimation of nonlinear models using two samples with nonclassical measurement errors

    Raymond J Carroll, Xiaohong Chen, and Yingyao Hu. Identification and estimation of nonlinear models using two samples with nonclassical measurement errors. Journal of nonparametric statistics, 22 0 (4): 0 379--399, 2010

    2010

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    Caring: Learning temporal causal representation under non-invertible generation process

    Guangyi Chen, Yifan Shen, Zhenhao Chen, Xiangchen Song, Yuewen Sun, Weiran Yao, Xiao Liu, and Kun Zhang. Caring: Learning temporal causal representation under non-invertible generation process. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.14535, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    The effects of precipitation on the surface temperature and airflow over the island of hawaii

    Yi-Leng Chen and Jian-Jian Wang. The effects of precipitation on the surface temperature and airflow over the island of hawaii. Monthly weather review, 123 0 (3): 0 681--694, 1995

    1995

  3. [11]

    Independent component analysis, a new concept? Signal processing, 36 0 (3): 0 287--314, 1994

    Pierre Comon. Independent component analysis, a new concept? Signal processing, 36 0 (3): 0 287--314, 1994

    1994

  4. [12]

    A course in functional analysis, volume 96

    John B Conway. A course in functional analysis, volume 96. Springer Science & Business Media, 1994

    1994

  5. [13]

    A versatile causal discovery framework to allow causally-related hidden variables

    Xinshuai Dong, Biwei Huang, Ignavier Ng, Xiangchen Song, Yujia Zheng, Songyao Jin, Roberto Legaspi, Peter Spirtes, and Kun Zhang. A versatile causal discovery framework to allow causally-related hidden variables. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11001, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Schwartz

    Nelson Dunford and Jacob T. Schwartz. Linear Operators. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1971

    1971

  7. [15]

    A correspondence principle for simultaneous equation models

    Franklin M Fisher. A correspondence principle for simultaneous equation models. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp.\ 73--92, 1970

    1970

  8. [16]

    Granger causality and the times series analysis of political relationships

    John R Freeman. Granger causality and the times series analysis of political relationships. American Journal of Political Science, pp.\ 327--358, 1983

    1983

  9. [17]

    High-recall causal discovery for autocorrelated time series with latent confounders

    Andreas Gerhardus and Jakob Runge. High-recall causal discovery for autocorrelated time series with latent confounders. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33: 0 12615--12625, 2020

    2020

  10. [18]

    u gelgen, Vincent Stimper, Bernhard Sch \

    Luigi Gresele, Julius Von K \"u gelgen, Vincent Stimper, Bernhard Sch \"o lkopf, and Michel Besserve. Independent mechanism analysis, a new concept? Advances in neural information processing systems, 34: 0 28233--28248, 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    Efficiently modeling time series with missing data using a state space approach

    Shiyu Gu, Tim Januschowski, and Jan Gasthaus. Efficiently modeling time series with missing data using a state space approach. In NeurIPS Time Series Workshop, 2021 a

    2021

  12. [20]

    Combining latent state-space models and structural time series models for probabilistic forecasting

    Shiyu Gu, David Salinas, Valentin Flunkert, and Jan Gasthaus. Combining latent state-space models and structural time series models for probabilistic forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 37 0 (3): 0 1182--1199, 2021 b

    2021

  13. [21]

    Parameterization of state space models for forecasting with structured latent dynamics

    Shiyu Gu, David Salinas, Valentin Flunkert, Jan Gasthaus, and Tim Januschowski. Parameterization of state space models for forecasting with structured latent dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.09384, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Long short-term memory

    Sepp Hochreiter and J \"u rgen Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9 0 (8): 0 1735--1780, 1997

    1997

  15. [23]

    Nonlinear causal discovery with additive noise models

    Patrik Hoyer, Dominik Janzing, Joris M Mooij, Jonas Peters, and Bernhard Sch \"o lkopf. Nonlinear causal discovery with additive noise models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 21, 2008

    2008

  16. [24]

    Instrumental variable treatment of nonclassical measurement error models

    Yingyao Hu and Susanne M Schennach. Instrumental variable treatment of nonclassical measurement error models. Econometrica, 76 0 (1): 0 195--216, 2008

    2008

  17. [25]

    Nonparametric identification of dynamic models with unobserved state variables

    Yingyao Hu and Matthew Shum. Nonparametric identification of dynamic models with unobserved state variables. Journal of Econometrics, 171 0 (1): 0 32--44, 2012

    2012

  18. [26]

    Causal discovery and forecasting in nonstationary environments with state-space models

    Biwei Huang, Kun Zhang, Mingming Gong, and Clark Glymour. Causal discovery and forecasting in nonstationary environments with state-space models. In International conference on machine learning, pp.\ 2901--2910. Pmlr, 2019

    2019

  19. [27]

    Causal discovery from heterogeneous/nonstationary data

    Biwei Huang, Kun Zhang, Jiji Zhang, Joseph Ramsey, Ruben Sanchez-Romero, Clark Glymour, and Bernhard Sch \"o lkopf. Causal discovery from heterogeneous/nonstationary data. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21 0 (89): 0 1--53, 2020

    2020

  20. [28]

    Unsupervised feature extraction by time-contrastive learning and nonlinear ica

    Aapo Hyvarinen and Hiroshi Morioka. Unsupervised feature extraction by time-contrastive learning and nonlinear ica. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29, 2016

    2016

  21. [29]

    Nonlinear ica of temporally dependent stationary sources

    Aapo Hyvarinen and Hiroshi Morioka. Nonlinear ica of temporally dependent stationary sources. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp.\ 460--469. PMLR, 2017

    2017

  22. [30]

    Nonlinear independent component analysis: Existence and uniqueness results

    Aapo Hyv \"a rinen and Petteri Pajunen. Nonlinear independent component analysis: Existence and uniqueness results. Neural networks, 12 0 (3): 0 429--439, 1999

    1999

  23. [31]

    Nonlinear ica using auxiliary variables and generalized contrastive learning

    Aapo Hyvarinen, Hiroaki Sasaki, and Richard Turner. Nonlinear ica using auxiliary variables and generalized contrastive learning. In The 22nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp.\ 859--868. PMLR, 2019

    2019

  24. [32]

    Nonlinear independent component analysis for principled disentanglement in unsupervised deep learning

    Aapo Hyv \"a rinen, Ilyes Khemakhem, and Hiroshi Morioka. Nonlinear independent component analysis for principled disentanglement in unsupervised deep learning. Patterns, 4 0 (10), 2023

    2023

  25. [33]

    Variational autoencoders and nonlinear ica: A unifying framework

    Ilyes Khemakhem, Diederik Kingma, Ricardo Monti, and Aapo Hyvarinen. Variational autoencoders and nonlinear ica: A unifying framework. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp.\ 2207--2217. PMLR, 2020

    2020

  26. [34]

    Auto-encoding variational bayes

    Diederik P Kingma. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013

    2013 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Towards nonlinear disentanglement in natural data with temporal sparse coding

    David Klindt, Lukas Schott, Yash Sharma, Ivan Ustyuzhaninov, Wieland Brendel, Matthias Bethge, and Dylan Paiton. Towards nonlinear disentanglement in natural data with temporal sparse coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.10930, 2020

    2007 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Latent-space forecasting of climate variables using variational autoencoders

    Oleksandr Klushyn and et al. Latent-space forecasting of climate variables using variational autoencoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.01227, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Identification of nonlinear latent hierarchical models

    Lingjing Kong, Biwei Huang, Feng Xie, Eric Xing, Yuejie Chi, and Kun Zhang. Identification of nonlinear latent hierarchical models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36: 0 2010--2032, 2023

    2010

  30. [38]

    xlstm-mixer: Multivariate time series forecasting by mixing via scalar memories

    Maurice Kraus, Felix Divo, Devendra Singh Dhami, and Kristian Kersting. xlstm-mixer: Multivariate time series forecasting by mixing via scalar memories. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.16928, 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    Gradient-based neural dag learning

    S \'e bastien Lachapelle, Philippe Brouillard, Tristan Deleu, and Simon Lacoste-Julien. Gradient-based neural dag learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.02226, 2019

    1906 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Disentanglement via mechanism sparsity regularization: A new principle for nonlinear ica

    S \'e bastien Lachapelle, Pau Rodriguez, Yash Sharma, Katie E Everett, R \'e mi Le Priol, Alexandre Lacoste, and Simon Lacoste-Julien. Disentanglement via mechanism sparsity regularization: A new principle for nonlinear ica. In Conference on Causal Learning and Reasoning, pp.\...

    2022

  33. [41]

    Nonparametric partial disentanglement via mechanism sparsity: Sparse actions, interventions and sparse temporal dependencies

    S \'e bastien Lachapelle, Pau Rodr \' guez L \'o pez, Yash Sharma, Katie Everett, R \'e mi Le Priol, Alexandre Lacoste, and Simon Lacoste-Julien. Nonparametric partial disentanglement via mechanism sparsity: Sparse actions, interventions and sparse temporal dependencies. arXiv...

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Modeling long- and short-term temporal patterns with deep neural networks

    Guokun Lai, Wei-Cheng Chang, Yiming Yang, and Hanxiao Liu. Modeling long- and short-term temporal patterns with deep neural networks. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, pp.\ 95--104, 2018

    2018

  35. [43]

    Graphcast: Learning skillful medium-range global weather forecasting

    Remi Lam and et al. Graphcast: Learning skillful medium-range global weather forecasting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.12794, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Replacing causal faithfulness with algorithmic independence of conditionals

    Jan Lemeire and Dominik Janzing. Replacing causal faithfulness with algorithmic independence of conditionals. Minds and Machines, 23: 0 227--249, 2013

    2013

  37. [45]

    On the identification of temporal causal representation with instantaneous dependence

    Zijian Li, Yifan Shen, Kaitao Zheng, Ruichu Cai, Xiangchen Song, Mingming Gong, Guangyi Chen, and Kun Zhang. On the identification of temporal causal representation with instantaneous dependence. In The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025. URL...

    2025

  38. [46]

    Factorizing multivariate function classes

    Juan Lin. Factorizing multivariate function classes. Advances in neural information processing systems, 10, 1997

    1997

  39. [47]

    Causal representation learning for instantaneous and temporal effects in interactive systems

    Phillip Lippe, Sara Magliacane, Sindy L \"o we, Yuki M Asano, Taco Cohen, and Efstratios Gavves. Causal representation learning for instantaneous and temporal effects in interactive systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.06169, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Timebridge: Non-stationarity matters for long-term time series forecasting

    Peiyuan Liu, Beiliang Wu, Yifan Hu, Naiqi Li, Tao Dai, Jigang Bao, and Shu-tao Xia. Timebridge: Non-stationarity matters for long-term time series forecasting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.04442, 2024 a

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Causal discovery with mixed linear and nonlinear additive noise models: A scalable approach

    Wenqin Liu, Biwei Huang, Erdun Gao, Qiuhong Ke, Howard Bondell, and Mingming Gong. Causal discovery with mixed linear and nonlinear additive noise models: A scalable approach. In Causal Learning and Reasoning, pp.\ 1237--1263. PMLR, 2024 b

    2024

  42. [50]

    Non-stationary transformers: Exploring the stationarity in time series forecasting

    Yong Liu, Haixu Wu, Jianmin Wang, and Mingsheng Long. Non-stationary transformers: Exploring the stationarity in time series forecasting. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35: 0 9881--9893, 2022

    2022

  43. [51]

    itransformer: Inverted transformers are effective for time series forecasting

    Yong Liu, Tengge Hu, Haoran Zhang, Haixu Wu, Shiyu Wang, Lintao Ma, and Mingsheng Long. itransformer: Inverted transformers are effective for time series forecasting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06625, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Timer-xl: Long-context transformers for unified time series forecasting

    Yong Liu, Guo Qin, Xiangdong Huang, Jianmin Wang, and Mingsheng Long. Timer-xl: Long-context transformers for unified time series forecasting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.04803, 2024 c

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Mathematical and physical ideas for climate science

    Valerio Lucarini, Richard Blender, Corentin Herbert, Francesco Ragone, Salvatore Pascale, and Jeroen Wouters. Mathematical and physical ideas for climate science. Reviews of Geophysics, 52 0 (4): 0 809--859, 2014

    2014

  46. [54]

    Maddison, Andriy Mnih, and Yee Whye Teh

    Chris J. Maddison, Andriy Mnih, and Yee Whye Teh. The concrete distribution: A continuous relaxation of discrete random variables. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017

    2017

  47. [55]

    Some incomplete but boundedly complete location families

    Lutz Mattner. Some incomplete but boundedly complete location families. The Annals of Statistics, pp.\ 2158--2162, 1993

    1993

  48. [56]

    Causal discovery with general non-linear relationships using non-linear ica

    Ricardo Pio Monti, Kun Zhang, and Aapo Hyv \"a rinen. Causal discovery with general non-linear relationships using non-linear ica. In Uncertainty in artificial intelligence, pp.\ 186--195. PMLR, 2020

    2020

  49. [57]

    Causal representation learning made identifiable by grouping of observational variables

    Hiroshi Morioka and Aapo Hyv \"a rinen. Causal representation learning made identifiable by grouping of observational variables. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.15709, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Causal discovery with attention-based convolutional neural networks

    Meike Nauta, Doina Bucur, and Christin Seifert. Causal discovery with attention-based convolutional neural networks. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 1 0 (1): 0 19, 2019

    2019

  51. [59]

    Masked gradient-based causal structure learning

    Ignavier Ng, Shengyu Zhu, Zhuangyan Fang, Haoyang Li, Zhitang Chen, and Jun Wang. Masked gradient-based causal structure learning. In Proceedings of the 2022 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM), pp.\ 424--432. SIAM, 2022

    2022

  52. [60]

    A time series is worth 64 words: Long-term forecasting with transformers

    Yuqi Nie, Nam H Nguyen, Phanwadee Sinthong, and Jayant Kalagnanam. A time series is worth 64 words: Long-term forecasting with transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.14730, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Fourcastnet: Global medium-range weather forecasting with graph neural networks

    Jaideep Pathak and et al. Fourcastnet: Global medium-range weather forecasting with graph neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.11214, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Causality

    Judea Pearl. Causality. Cambridge university press, 2009

    2009

  55. [63]

    Elements of causal inference: foundations and learning algorithms

    Jonas Peters, Dominik Janzing, and Bernhard Sch \"o lkopf. Elements of causal inference: foundations and learning algorithms. The MIT Press, 2017

    2017

  56. [64]

    Learning interpretable concepts: Unifying causal representation learning and foundation models

    Goutham Rajendran, Simon Buchholz, Bryon Aragam, Bernhard Sch \"o lkopf, and Pradeep Ravikumar. Learning interpretable concepts: Unifying causal representation learning and foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.09236, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Weatherbench: a benchmark data set for data-driven weather forecasting

    Stephan Rasp, Peter D Dueben, Sebastian Scher, Jonathan A Weyn, Soukayna Mouatadid, and Nils Thuerey. Weatherbench: a benchmark data set for data-driven weather forecasting. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12 0 (11): 0 e2020MS002203, 2020

    2020

  58. [66]

    Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven earth system science

    Markus Reichstein and et al. Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven earth system science. Nature, 566 0 (7743): 0 195--204, 2019

    2019

  59. [67]

    Jacobian-based causal discovery with nonlinear ica

    Patrik Reizinger, Yash Sharma, Matthias Bethge, Bernhard Sch \"o lkopf, Ferenc Husz \'a r, and Wieland Brendel. Jacobian-based causal discovery with nonlinear ica. Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2023

    2023

  60. [68]

    a us Kleindessner, Chris Russell, Dominik Janzing, Bernhard Sch \

    Paul Rolland, Volkan Cevher, Matth \"a us Kleindessner, Chris Russell, Dominik Janzing, Bernhard Sch \"o lkopf, and Francesco Locatello. Score matching enables causal discovery of nonlinear additive noise models. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.\ 18741--187...

    2022

  61. [69]

    Tackling climate change with machine learning

    David Rolnick, Priya L Donti, Lynn H Kaack, Kelly Kochanski, Alexandre Lacoste, Kris Sankaran, Andrew Slavin Ross, Nikola Milojevic-Dupont, Natasha Jaques, Anna Waldman-Brown, et al. Tackling climate change with machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 55 0 (2): 0 1--96, 2022

    2022

  62. [70]

    Discovering contemporaneous and lagged causal relations in autocorrelated nonlinear time series datasets

    Jakob Runge. Discovering contemporaneous and lagged causal relations in autocorrelated nonlinear time series datasets. In Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp.\ 1388--1397. Pmlr, 2020

    2020

  63. [71]

    Inferring causation from time series in earth system sciences

    Jakob Runge, Sebastian Bathiany, Erik Bollt, Gustau Camps-Valls, Dim Coumou, Ethan Deyle, Clark Glymour, Marlene Kretschmer, Miguel D Mahecha, Jordi Mu \ n oz-Mar \' , et al. Inferring causation from time series in earth system sciences. Nature communications, 10 0 (1): 0 2553, 2019 a

    2019

  64. [72]

    Detecting and quantifying causal associations in large nonlinear time series datasets

    Jakob Runge, Peer Nowack, Marlene Kretschmer, Seth Flaxman, and Dino Sejdinovic. Detecting and quantifying causal associations in large nonlinear time series datasets. Science advances, 5 0 (11): 0 eaau4996, 2019 b

    2019

  65. [73]

    Deepar: Probabilistic forecasting with autoregressive recurrent networks

    David Salinas, Valentin Flunkert, Jan Gasthaus, and Tim Januschowski. Deepar: Probabilistic forecasting with autoregressive recurrent networks. In International Journal of Forecasting, volume 36, pp.\ 1181--1191. Elsevier, 2020

    2020

  66. [74]

    Toward causal representation learning

    Bernhard Sch \"o lkopf, Francesco Locatello, Stefan Bauer, Nan Rosemary Ke, Nal Kalchbrenner, Anirudh Goyal, and Yoshua Bengio. Toward causal representation learning. Proceedings of the IEEE, 109 0 (5): 0 612--634, 2021

    2021

  67. [75]

    A linear non-gaussian acyclic model for causal discovery

    Shohei Shimizu, Patrik O Hoyer, Aapo Hyv \"a rinen, Antti Kerminen, and Michael Jordan. A linear non-gaussian acyclic model for causal discovery. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7 0 (10), 2006

    2006

  68. [76]

    An algorithm for fast recovery of sparse causal graphs

    Peter Spirtes and Clark Glymour. An algorithm for fast recovery of sparse causal graphs. Social science computer review, 9 0 (1): 0 62--72, 1991

    1991

  69. [77]

    Causation, prediction, and search

    Peter Spirtes, Clark Glymour, and Richard Scheines. Causation, prediction, and search. MIT press, 2001

    2001

  70. [78]

    On the causal structure between co2 and global temperature

    Adolf Stips, Diego Macias, Clare Coughlan, Elisa Garcia-Gorriz, and X San Liang. On the causal structure between co2 and global temperature. Scientific reports, 6 0 (1): 0 21691, 2016

    2016

  71. [79]

    Toms and Elizabeth A

    Benjamin A. Toms and Elizabeth A. Barnes. Physically interpretable neural networks for the geosciences: Applications to earth system variability. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 12 0 (12), 2020

    2020

  72. [80]

    Human influence on european winter wind storms such as those of january 2018

    Robert Vautard, Geert Jan Van Oldenborgh, Friederike EL Otto, Pascal Yiou, Hylke De Vries, Erik Van Meijgaard, Andrew Stepek, Jean-Michel Soubeyroux, Sjoukje Philip, Sarah F Kew, et al. Human influence on european winter wind storms such as those of january 2018. Earth System ...

    2018

  73. [81]

    Micn: Multi-scale local and global context modeling for long-term series forecasting

    Huiqiang Wang, Jian Peng, Feihu Huang, Jince Wang, Junhui Chen, and Yifei Xiao. Micn: Multi-scale local and global context modeling for long-term series forecasting. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022

    2022

  74. [82]

    Timemixer: Decomposable multiscale mixing for time series forecasting

    Shiyu Wang, Haixu Wu, Xiaoming Shi, Tengge Hu, Huakun Luo, Lintao Ma, James Y Zhang, and Jun Zhou. Timemixer: Decomposable multiscale mixing for time series forecasting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14616, 2024 a

    2024 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Card: Channel aligned robust blend transformer for time series forecasting

    Xue Wang, Tian Zhou, Qingsong Wen, Jinyang Gao, Bolin Ding, and Rong Jin. Card: Channel aligned robust blend transformer for time series forecasting. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023

    2023

  76. [84]

    Timexer: Empowering transformers for time series forecasting with exogenous variables

    Yuxuan Wang, Haixu Wu, Jiaxiang Dong, Guo Qin, Haoran Zhang, Yong Liu, Yunzhong Qiu, Jianmin Wang, and Mingsheng Long. Timexer: Empowering transformers for time series forecasting with exogenous variables. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37: 0 469--498, 2024 b

    2024

  77. [85]

    Autoformer: Decomposition transformers with auto-correlation for long-term series forecasting

    Haixu Wu, Jiehui Xu, Jianmin Wang, and Mingsheng Long. Autoformer: Decomposition transformers with auto-correlation for long-term series forecasting. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34: 0 22419--22430, 2021

    2021

  78. [86]

    Timesnet: Temporal 2d-variation modeling for general time series analysis

    Haixu Wu, Tengge Hu, Yong Liu, Hang Zhou, Jianmin Wang, and Mingsheng Long. Timesnet: Temporal 2d-variation modeling for general time series analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02186, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  79. [87]

    FITS : Modeling time series with \ 10k\ parameters

    Zhijian Xu, Ailing Zeng, and Qiang Xu. FITS : Modeling time series with \ 10k\ parameters. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

    2024

  80. [88]

    Multi-view causal representation learning with partial observability

    Dingling Yao, Danru Xu, S \'e bastien Lachapelle, Sara Magliacane, Perouz Taslakian, Georg Martius, Julius von K \"u gelgen, and Francesco Locatello. Multi-view causal representation learning with partial observability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04056, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Marrying causal representation learning with dynamical systems for science

    Dingling Yao, Caroline Muller, and Francesco Locatello. Marrying causal representation learning with dynamical systems for science. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.13888, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Learning temporally causal latent processes from general temporal data

    Weiran Yao, Yuewen Sun, Alex Ho, Changyin Sun, and Kun Zhang. Learning temporally causal latent processes from general temporal data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05428, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Temporally disentangled representation learning

    Weiran Yao, Guangyi Chen, and Kun Zhang. Temporally disentangled representation learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35: 0 26492--26503, 2022

    2022

  84. [92]

    Frequency adaptive normalization for non-stationary time series forecasting

    Weiwei Ye, Songgaojun Deng, Qiaosha Zou, and Ning Gui. Frequency adaptive normalization for non-stationary time series forecasting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.20371, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Dag-gnn: Dag structure learning with graph neural networks

    Yue Yu, Jie Chen, Tian Gao, and Mo Yu. Dag-gnn: Dag structure learning with graph neural networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.\ 7154--7163. PMLR, 2019

    2019

  86. [94]

    Are transformers effective for time series forecasting? In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 37, pp.\ 11121--11128, 2023

    Ailing Zeng, Muxi Chen, Lei Zhang, and Qiang Xu. Are transformers effective for time series forecasting? In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 37, pp.\ 11121--11128, 2023

    2023

  87. [95]

    A comparison of three occam's razors for markovian causal models

    Jiji Zhang. A comparison of three occam's razors for markovian causal models. The British journal for the philosophy of science, 2013

    2013

  88. [96]

    On the identifiability of the post-nonlinear causal model

    Kun Zhang and Aapo Hyvarinen. On the identifiability of the post-nonlinear causal model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.2599, 2012

    2012 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Kernel-based conditional independence test and application in causal discovery

    Kun Zhang, Jonas Peters, Dominik Janzing, and Bernhard Sch \"o lkopf. Kernel-based conditional independence test and application in causal discovery. arXiv preprint arXiv:1202.3775, 2012

    2012 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Causal representation learning from multiple distributions: A general setting

    Kun Zhang, Shaoan Xie, Ignavier Ng, and Yujia Zheng. Causal representation learning from multiple distributions: A general setting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05052, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Generalizing nonlinear ica beyond structural sparsity

    Yujia Zheng and Kun Zhang. Generalizing nonlinear ica beyond structural sparsity. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36: 0 13326--13355, 2023

    2023

  92. [100]

    On the identifiability of nonlinear ica: Sparsity and beyond

    Yujia Zheng, Ignavier Ng, and Kun Zhang. On the identifiability of nonlinear ica: Sparsity and beyond. Advances in neural information processing systems, 35: 0 16411--16422, 2022

    2022

  93. [101]

    Generalized precision matrix for scalable estimation of nonparametric markov networks

    Yujia Zheng, Ignavier Ng, Yewen Fan, and Kun Zhang. Generalized precision matrix for scalable estimation of nonparametric markov networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11379, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Causal-learn: Causal discovery in python

    Yujia Zheng, Biwei Huang, Wei Chen, Joseph Ramsey, Mingming Gong, Ruichu Cai, Shohei Shimizu, Peter Spirtes, and Kun Zhang. Causal-learn: Causal discovery in python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 25 0 (60): 0 1--8, 2024

    2024

  95. [103]

    Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting

    Haoyi Zhou, Shanghang Zhang, Jieqi Peng, Shuai Zhang, Jianxin Li, Hui Xiong, and Wancai Zhang. Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 35, pp.\ 11106--11115, 2021

    2021

  96. [104]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

  97. [105]

    @esa (Ref

    \@ifxundefined[1] #1\@undefined \@firstoftwo \@secondoftwo \@ifnum[1] #1 \@firstoftwo \@secondoftwo \@ifx[1] #1 \@firstoftwo \@secondoftwo [2] @ #1 \@temptokena #2 #1 @ \@temptokena \@ifclassloaded agu2001 natbib The agu2001 class already includes natbib coding, so you should ...

  98. [106]

    \@lbibitem[] @bibitem@first@sw\@secondoftwo \@lbibitem[#1]#2 \@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@namedef br@#2 \@nameuse br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined b@#2\@extra@b@citeb @num @parse #2 @tmp #1 NAT@b@open@#2 NAT@b@shut@#2 \@ifnum @merge>\@ne @bibitem@firs...

  99. [107]

    causally-related

    @open @close @open @close and [1] URL: #1 \@ifundefined chapter * \@mkboth \@ifxundefined @sectionbib * \@mkboth * \@mkboth\@gobbletwo \@ifclassloaded amsart * \@ifclassloaded amsbook * \@ifxundefined @heading @heading NAT@ctr thebibliography [1] @ \@biblabel @NAT@ctr \@bibset...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.