Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Orbit: Probabilistic Forecast with Exponential Smoothing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.08492 v4 pith:ABTXO3AB submitted 2020-04-18 stat.CO stat.ME

Orbit: Probabilistic Forecast with Exponential Smoothing

classification stat.CO stat.ME
keywords dataexponentialforecastingmethodsmodelmodelsprobabilisticseries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Time series forecasting is an active research topic in academia as well as industry. Although we see an increasing amount of adoptions of machine learning methods in solving some of those forecasting challenges, statistical methods remain powerful while dealing with low granularity data. This paper introduces a refined Bayesian exponential smoothing model with the help of probabilistic programming languages including Stan. Our model refinements include additional global trend, transformation for multiplicative form, noise distribution and choice of priors. A benchmark study is conducted on a rich set of time-series data sets for our models along with other well-known time series models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Contextual Deconvolution for Variance-Stable Demand Sensing: Kernel-Modulated Operators in Promotional Retail

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    A smooth-baseline-plus-sparse-shock decomposition lowers forecast variance and safety stock but increases stockout costs, reducing total inventory cost only when holding costs exceed ~20% of stockout costs.