Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Exploring Personality-Driven Personalization in XAI: Enhancing User Trust in Gameplay

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.04778 v1 pith:ADB2JTGU submitted 2024-08-08 cs.HC cs.RO

Exploring Personality-Driven Personalization in XAI: Enhancing User Trust in Gameplay

classification cs.HC cs.RO
keywords userpersonalitypreferencesenhancingpredicttraitstrustconfidence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Tailoring XAI methods to individual needs is crucial for intuitive Human-AI interactions. While context and task goals are vital, factors like user personality traits could also influence method selection. Our study investigates using personality traits to predict user preferences among decision trees, texts, and factor graphs. We trained a Machine Learning model on responses to the Big Five personality test to predict preferences. Deploying these predicted preferences in a navigation game (n=6), we found users more receptive to personalized XAI recommendations, enhancing trust in the system. This underscores the significance of customization in XAI interfaces, impacting user engagement and confidence.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Large-Language-Models-as-a-Judge in Theory-Agnostic Adaptive Metric-Alignment for Prototypical Networks in Personality Recognition

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    JAM discovers theory-invariant pseudo-facets via attention-pooled graph prototypical networks, Cross-Theory Harmonization, and LLM-as-a-Judge, improving cross-framework balanced accuracy on Essays and Kaggle datasets.