Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Evaluating Subjective Cognitive Appraisals of Emotions from Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.14389 v1 pith:AEZJ5FK2 submitted 2023-10-22 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords appraisalscognitivemodelslanguageassesscovidet-appraisalsdatasetemotions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The emotions we experience involve complex processes; besides physiological aspects, research in psychology has studied cognitive appraisals where people assess their situations subjectively, according to their own values (Scherer, 2005). Thus, the same situation can often result in different emotional experiences. While the detection of emotion is a well-established task, there is very limited work so far on the automatic prediction of cognitive appraisals. This work fills the gap by presenting CovidET-Appraisals, the most comprehensive dataset to-date that assesses 24 appraisal dimensions, each with a natural language rationale, across 241 Reddit posts. CovidET-Appraisals presents an ideal testbed to evaluate the ability of large language models -- excelling at a wide range of NLP tasks -- to automatically assess and explain cognitive appraisals. We found that while the best models are performant, open-sourced LLMs fall short at this task, presenting a new challenge in the future development of emotionally intelligent models. We release our dataset at https://github.com/honglizhan/CovidET-Appraisals-Public.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Emotionally-Aware Agents for Dispute Resolution

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM emotion labeling of dispute dialogues explains up to ~40% of variance in subjective outcomes (vs ~5% in prior negotiation work) and reveals anger escalation and compassion de-escalation patterns.

Pith tools