Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning under Distribution Mismatch and Model Misspecification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.05695 v3 pith:AF7P7OUX submitted 2021-02-10 cs.IT math.IT

classification cs.ITmath.IT
keywords errorgeneralizationmismatchboundslearningrate-distortionboundmisspecification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study learning algorithms when there is a mismatch between the distributions of the training and test datasets of a learning algorithm. The effect of this mismatch on the generalization error and model misspecification are quantified. Moreover, we provide a connection between the generalization error and the rate-distortion theory, which allows one to utilize bounds from the rate-distortion theory to derive new bounds on the generalization error and vice versa. In particular, the rate-distortion based bound strictly improves over the earlier bound by Xu and Raginsky even when there is no mismatch. We also discuss how "auxiliary loss functions" can be utilized to obtain upper bounds on the generalization error.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Subgroups Matter for Robust Bias Mitigation

    cs.LG 2025-05 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Subgroup choice determines whether bias mitigation helps or hurts, and the minimum KL divergence to the unbiased test distribution predicts success.

Pith tools