REVIEW 1 cited by
Learning under Distribution Mismatch and Model Misspecification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study learning algorithms when there is a mismatch between the distributions of the training and test datasets of a learning algorithm. The effect of this mismatch on the generalization error and model misspecification are quantified. Moreover, we provide a connection between the generalization error and the rate-distortion theory, which allows one to utilize bounds from the rate-distortion theory to derive new bounds on the generalization error and vice versa. In particular, the rate-distortion based bound strictly improves over the earlier bound by Xu and Raginsky even when there is no mismatch. We also discuss how "auxiliary loss functions" can be utilized to obtain upper bounds on the generalization error.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Subgroups Matter for Robust Bias Mitigation
Subgroup choice determines whether bias mitigation helps or hurts, and the minimum KL divergence to the unbiased test distribution predicts success.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.