REVIEW 1 cited by
Near Optimal Adversarial Attacks on Stochastic Bandits and Defenses with Smoothed Responses
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
I study adversarial attacks against stochastic bandit algorithms. At each round, the learner chooses an arm, and a stochastic reward is generated. The adversary strategically adds corruption to the reward, and the learner is only able to observe the corrupted reward at each round. Two sets of results are presented in this paper. The first set studies the optimal attack strategies for the adversary. The adversary has a target arm he wishes to promote, and his goal is to manipulate the learner into choosing this target arm $T - o(T)$ times. I design attack strategies against UCB and Thompson Sampling that only spend $\widehat{O}(\sqrt{\log T})$ cost. Matching lower bounds are presented, and the vulnerability of UCB, Thompson sampling, and $\varepsilon$-greedy are exactly characterized. The second set studies how the learner can defend against the adversary. Inspired by literature on smoothed analysis and behavioral economics, I present two simple algorithms that achieve a competitive ratio arbitrarily close to 1.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Optimism as a Vulnerability: Deceptive Stackelberg Control of UCB Bandit Followers
Under targetability and exploitability, a two-phase honeypot-then-trap leader strictly exceeds the classical SSE utility ceiling against a UCB follower at O(sqrt(T ln T)) signaling cost.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.