Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

$\mathcal{I}$-Extremization for AdS$_4$ Black Holes: Master Volume, Free Energy, and Baryonic Charges

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The entropy of AdS4 black holes is an I-extremization problem over all charges, including baryonic ones.

desk verdict Solid proof of the baryonic I-extremization equivalence for smooth toric SE7, with an acknowledged resolution-dependence gap for singular fans. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.10626 v1 pith:AH7KXJQL submitted 2025-05-15 hep-th

Seyed Morteza Hosseini , Alberto Zaffaroni This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th MSC 83E5081T6083C57 PACS 04.65.+e04.70.-s11.25.Tq
keywords I-extremizationmastervolumebaryonicchargesAdS4blackholestoricSasaki-EinsteinmanifoldsgravitationalblocksS3freeenergyattractormechanism
topics Quantum Gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that, for any toric Sasaki-Einstein seven-manifold, the full supersymmetry conditions determining the entropy of AdS4 black holes can be rewritten as an I-extremization over all chemical potentials, including baryonic ones. The entropy function is assembled from two copies of the master volume, one for each pole of the horizon, with a relative shift set by magnetic fluxes. Extremization along baryonic directions is not an extra step: it is automatically enforced by the supersymmetric Killing data. The same master volume, after a constrained Legendre transform, is claimed to be the large-N three-sphere free energy of the dual field theory, extending known results that were independent of baryonic charges. If right, this gives a gravitational-block prescription for all such black holes and predictions for partition functions whose saddle points have not yet been found.

What carries the argument

The master volume V2n−1(λa,bi), defined as the (n−1)-th order term in the expansion of the equivariant volume of the toric Calabi-Yau cone, is a purely topological quantity fixed by the toric data; it is the object that carries the argument. Its constrained Legendre transform with respect to the Kähler parameters λa gives the generalized free energy F(Δa) that serves as the gravitational block, and gluing two copies with shifted R-charges Δ±a = Δa ∓ εna/2 builds the entropy function. The relation (2.28), which expresses baryonic Kähler moduli as derivatives of V with respect to baryonic Δ's, is what makes the baryonic extremization automatic.

What would settle it

Compute the large-N supersymmetric partition function for the chiral quiver dual to $M^{{1,1,1}}$ with generic baryonic fluxes; if its extremum does not equal the I-extremization result in Eqs. (3.94)-(3.95), the master-volume identification is wrong. Alternatively, construct a baryonic black hole in a toric geometry with a worse-than-orbifold facet singularity and check whether the entropy depends on the chosen resolution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the entropy function for M-theory black holes asymptotic to AdS4 × SE7, with a general toric SE7 and arbitrary magnetic fluxes and baryonic charges, takes the gravitational-block form S(Δa, na, ε) = (4π/ε)[V(N,Δ+,b1) − V(N,Δ−,b1)], where V(N,Δ,b1) is the constrained Legendre transform of the master volume of the internal Calabi-Yau cone. The identity Σa B(r)_a ∂S/∂Δa = 0 holds identically, so supersymmetry itself imposes extremization along the baryonic directions; extremizing S over all Δa therefore reproduces the black hole entropy. The paper verifies the proposal by matching the purely baryonic $M^{{1,1,1}}$ entropy with known results and by showing that the dyonic $Q^{{1,1,1}}$ and $M^{{1,1,1}}$ entropy functions coincide with the supergravity attractor equations.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the constrained Legendre transform of the master volume, a quantity fixed by toric data alone, equals the large-N three-sphere free energy including baryonic directions (conjectured at Eq. (2.39)); if that identification fails, the baryonic entropy predictions have no anchor.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The entropy of any AdS4 black hole with a toric SE7 horizon, including those with baryonic fluxes, can be computed by extremizing the I-functional instead of solving the full supergravity supersymmetry conditions.
  • The large-N three-sphere free energy of three-dimensional SCFTs is predicted to depend on baryonic charges through the generalized free energy; existing localization results that found no baryonic dependence are reinterpreted as saddle-point artifacts.
  • The R-charges of baryonic operators can be read off directly from extremization of F(Δa), without the indirect methods previously needed.
  • The same master-volume construction yields streamlined proofs of the equivalence between a-, c-, and F-extremization and their gravitational duals.
  • Because the construction uses only topological data, it makes concrete predictions for partition functions of chiral quivers whose large-N saddle points have not yet been found.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the identification holds, the master volume should also control the giant-graviton expansion of the superconformal index for these backgrounds, since the equivariant volume already appears in that context.
  • The resolution-dependence of the master volume for fans with worse-than-orbifold facet singularities suggests that baryonic black holes in such geometries select a preferred resolution; this could be tested by classifying which resolutions admit regular horizon solutions.
  • A natural extension is to non-toric SE7 manifolds, where a suitably generalized volume functional might still provide the gravitational block, but the baryonic directions would require a new characterization.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes to prove that the entropy of a broad class of BPS black holes asymptotic to AdS4×SE7 can be obtained from an I-extremization principle built from the master volume of the internal toric Calabi-Yau four-fold cone. The central object is a constrained Legendre transform V(N, Δa, b1) of the master volume, which the authors conjecture to equal the large-N S3 free energy, now including baryonic directions. For horizons of topology AdS2×Σ×SE7, the supersymmetric action of the geometric approach of [33,34] is recast as S(Δa, na, ε) = (4π/ε)[V(N, Δ+, b1) − V(N, Δ−, b1)], with Δ± related to Δ and the magnetic fluxes. The paper proves an identity, Eq. (2.71), stating that the derivative of S along the baryonic charge directions vanishes identically, so extremization over all Δa automatically includes the baryonic directions. The bulk of the paper computes the generalized free energy for five toric geometries (C×C, flavored C3, Q^{1,1,1}, M^{1,1,1}, and the complex cone over SPP), constructs purely baryonic and half-baryonic twists, and then shows that for dyonic black holes in Q^{1,1,1} and M^{1,1,1} the resulting entropy functions reproduce the independent supergravity attractor computations of [27] and [70] exactly.

Significance. If the construction is valid, it resolves a long-standing puzzle in three-dimensional holography: the gravitational block that enters the entropy function can depend on all chemical potentials, including baryonic ones, and it provides concrete predictions for the large-N free energy of chiral quiver theories and for the entropy of baryonic black holes. The paper has several real strengths: the baryonic extremization identity (2.71)-(2.72) is derived algebraically from the Legendre-transform relation (2.28); the purely baryonic entropy functions in Section 4 match the independent supergravity attractor results of [27] and [70] exactly (Eqs. (4.22), (4.32), (4.36)); and the paper supplies streamlined derivations of the equivalences between a-, c-, and F-extremization and their gravitational counterparts. The main unresolved issue is the resolution dependence of the master volume for toric fans with worse-than-orbifold facet singularities, which the authors candidly acknowledge but which limits the claimed universality of the construction.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3, Eqs. (3.4), (3.32); §5] The master volume is not a well-defined function of the toric data alone for fans with worse-than-orbifold facet singularities. The paper's own computations show V_res(i) − V_res(ii) = −8π^4 X^3/(3 b4) for C×C and V_here − V_there = 8π^4 r1 (X^{(1)})^3/(3 b3 r2^3) for flavored C3. These differences are nonzero precisely when the baryonic Kähler modulus is nonzero, i.e., exactly in the baryonic sector that this paper newly covers. Since the entropy function (2.66) is built from V, the predicted baryonic black hole entropy is resolution-dependent for these geometries, and the paper does not supply a physical principle that selects one resolution over the other. The checks in Section 4 use the smooth manifolds Q^{1,1,1} and M^{1,1,1}, where the ambiguity is absent, so those checks do not probe the problematic regime. The universal statement for 'a general toric SE7' is therefore not established; the authors should either restrict the theorem to smooth/regular toric fans or provide a physical selection criterion (for example, from the attractor flow) and verify it in a singular example.
  2. [§2.2.2, Eq. (2.39)] The identification of the constrained Legendre transform V7(N, Δ, b1) with (√b1/(4π)^3) F_S3(Δ), including baryonic directions, is stated as a conjecture and remains untested for chiral quivers, which are precisely the theories where the new baryonic dependence is most relevant. The explicit checks in Section 4 compare the master-volume side with supergravity attractor computations, not with an independent field-theory computation of F_S3. Since the title and abstract advertise predictions for the large-N limit of partition functions, the conjectural status of (2.39) should be stated prominently, and a nontrivial test in a chiral quiver, or a sharper argument for why the master volume must coincide with the large-N free energy, is needed before those predictions can be regarded as established.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (2.72) and Eq. (2.53)] The displayed chain of equalities in Eq. (2.72) is missing the key justification. The Kähler parameters of the two poles are related by λ±_a = λ_a + c± with c± independent of a, so Σ_a B_a (λ+_a − λ−_a) = 0 because Σ_a B_a = 0; as printed, the step writing λ+ = λ− looks like an error. Please revise this step to make the proof transparent.
  2. [§2.2.1 and §2.2.2] There are small typos: 'contrained' should be 'constrained' in §2.2.1, and 't’Hooft' should be ''t Hooft' in §2.2.2. In addition, Section 3.5 says 'The toric diagram is given in Figure 1' but the relevant figure is Figure 5.
  3. [Eqs. (3.8), (3.36), (3.79)] Several master-volume formulas contain uncorrelated square-root sign ambiguities. The paper notes that these are sometimes fixed by physical arguments, but for the new predictions involving baryonic charges a systematic rule for selecting the physical branch would be helpful.
  4. [Eq. (2.69)] The parameterization of Δ± in terms of a reference R-symmetry r_a is said to be non-canonical. It would be useful to state explicitly that the final extremum of the entropy function is independent of the choice of r_a, or to give the argument showing this invariance, since the statement is not immediate from the definition.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the I-extremization reformulation is a direct algebraic recasting of the [33,34] supersymmetric action and is benchmarked against independent supergravity attractor computations; the paper's stated limitations (resolution dependence, conjectural free-energy identification) are explicit rather than hidden inputs.

full rationale

The central claim is a reformulation of the supersymmetry conditions of [33,34] in terms of the Legendre-transformed master volume. Equation (2.66) is obtained by rewriting the supersymmetric action in dual variables, and equation (2.67) is exactly the transcription of the flux supersymmetry conditions (2.62b); this is a mathematical recasting rather than a fit of the answer into the input. The baryonic extremization relation (2.71) is derived within the same framework using (2.28), and the subsequent examples are checked against external results: the M^{1,1,1} entropy (3.94) reproduces [70], and the dyonic Q^{1,1,1}/M^{1,1,1} entropy functions (3.72)/(3.95) are shown to equal the supergravity attractor entropies (4.22)/(4.36) of [27]. The identification of the constrained Legendre transform with the large-N S^3 free energy, (2.39), is explicitly called a conjecture in Section 2.2.2, so it is not presented as a derived theorem. The paper also explicitly acknowledges that for CY4 fans with worse-than-orbifold facet singularities the master volume depends on the choice of resolution (Eqs. (3.4) and (3.32)) and that this ambiguity affects only baryonic black holes in geometries not yet studied; this is a completeness/universality limitation, not a circular reduction. Self-citations to [18], [23], and [31] provide background and prior partial results, but the load-bearing checks are external, so only a very low circularity score is warranted.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The ledger is light on fitted numbers: no constants are fit to data anywhere in the paper; the entropy matches in Section 4 are parameter-free equalities after the charge identification. The load-bearing assumptions are the supersymmetry conditions of [24], the block factorization (1.2), and the conjecture (2.39), of which the last is the only genuinely ad hoc entry. The resolution dependence of the master volume is the largest unclosed degree of freedom in the prescription.

free parameters (3)
  • Resolution choice for singular facet geometries = choice (e.g., blow-up (i) vs (ii) for C x C)
    For CY4 fans with worse-than-orbifold facet singularities the master volume is resolution-dependent, differing by terms proportional to baryonic moduli (Eqs. 3.4, 3.32); the paper computes with one resolution per example and leaves the physical selection open.
  • Reference R-symmetry r_a, Eq. (2.69) = reference value, not canonical
    Splits Δ±a relative to a reference R-symmetry; the paper states the choice is not canonical and becomes unambiguous only for the S2 topological twist n± = σ = 1.
  • Sign branch choices in square-root master volumes = uncorrelated ±
    Formulas (3.8), (3.36), (3.59), (3.64), (3.79), (3.113) carry uncorrelated square-root signs, 'sometimes fixed by physical arguments' (Section 3.1).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The supersymmetry conditions ∂S/∂λA = -2π M_A (Eq. 2.54), taken from [24], capture all relevant AdS2 x Σ x SE7 M-theory solutions
    The paper's proof is a reformulation of these conditions; if solutions exist outside this class, the I-extremization claim does not cover them. The paper notes the approach is limited to a particular class (§2.3.2, §5).
  • standard math Equivariant localization formula for the equivariant volume (Eq. 2.4)
    Used to compute all master volumes; standard fixed-point localization in equivariant cohomology.
  • ad hoc to paper The conjectural identification V7(N,Δ,b1) = (√b1/(4π)^3) F_S3(Δ) including baryonic directions (Eq. 2.39)
    Explicitly labeled a conjecture for chiral quivers; load-bearing for the field-theory interpretation and the baryonic R-charge predictions.
  • domain assumption Holomorphic block factorization of supersymmetric partition functions, log Z = (1/2ε)(F(Δ+) ± F(Δ-)) (Eq. 1.2)
    Cited to [1,5,6]; the block form is the template for the entropy function.
  • domain assumption The consistent truncations to N=2 gauged supergravity with prepotentials (4.1), (4.15), (4.17) and the holographic dictionaries (4.23), (4.31)
    Used in Section 4 to map the geometric extremization to Bekenstein-Hawking entropies; taken from [27] and [71].
invented entities (2)
  • Generalized free energy F(Δa), the constrained Legendre transform of the master volume independent evidence
    purpose: Universal gravitational block for AdS4 x SE7 black hole entropy functions, including baryonic charges; also conjectured to be the large-N S3 free energy for chiral quivers
    Reproduces, without fitted constants, the M^{1,1,1} entropy of [70], the attractor entropies of [27] (Eqs. 4.22, 4.36), and the baryonic R-charges of [19] in the C x C truncation (3.20).
  • Baryonic correction term Y to the quartic free energy (Eqs. 3.12, 3.39, 3.53, 3.83, 3.107) independent evidence
    purpose: Extends the mesonic quartic formula of [56,57] to nonzero baryonic moduli X(r)
    Vanishes at X(r) = 0, recovering the known mesonic results; predicts new R-charges in the baryonic directions checked against [19,47,67] for Q^{1,1,1} and M^{1,1,1}.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $\mathcal{I}$-Extremization for AdS$_4$ Black Holes: Master Volume, Free Energy, and Baryonic Charges." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AH7KXJQL

@misc{pith2026250510626,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $\mathcalI$-Extremization for AdS$_4$ Black Holes: Master Volume, Free Energy, and Baryonic Charges},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AH7KXJQL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.10626}
}
abstract

In a previous paper, we proposed an entropy function for AdS$_4$ BPS black holes in M-theory with general magnetic charges, resolving a long-standing puzzle about baryonic charges in three-dimensional holography and offering a prediction for the large-$N$ limit of several partition functions whose saddle points have yet to be found. The entropy function is constructed from the master volume of the internal manifold. In this paper, we prove that the entropy of a general class of black holes based on toric geometry can indeed be reformulated as an $\mathcal{I}$-extremization problem, and we provide a set of examples. As an aside, we also simplify existing proofs of the equivalence between $a$-, $c$-, and $F$-extremizations and their gravitational duals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.10626 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The toric diagram for C × C. There is a single baryonic symmetry given by B = (1, −1, −1, 0, 1). We compute the master volume using the localization formula (2.4). We can triangulate the toric polytope 1 by consid￾ering the tetrahedra (1243) and (2354). It is convenient to write the master volume in terms of the quantities ϕA that are invariant under the gauge transformations (2.12).12 The gauge invariants ϕ1 and ϕ2… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The toric diagram corresponding to an arbitrary flavoring of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The toric diagram for Q1,1,1 . There are two baryonic symmetries: B(1) = (1, −1, 0, −1, 0, 1) and B(2) = (0, −1, 1, −1, 1, 0). For more details about the geometry, see [67]. The dual SCFT, identified in [49], is a flavored ABJM quiver. The toric polytope 3 can be triangulated using the tetrahedra (2436), (2546), (2514), and (2341). All the faces of the toric diagram are triangles and the master volume is independent… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The toric diagram for M1,1,1 . There is a single baryonic symmetry given by B = (3, −2, −2, −2, 3). The dual SCFT was found in [48] and has a chiral quiver (in the four-dimensional sense), which precludes a large-N limit computation. However, a prediction for the large…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The toric diagram for SPP. 34 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Localizing AlAdS$_5$ black holes and the SUSY index on $S^1 \times M_3$

    hep-th 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The S^1×M_3 supersymmetric index for round, Lens, elliptically and biaxially squashed three-spheres is reproduced from D=5 equivariant localization after subtracting the Casimir energy via a gluing prescription.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [70]

    Kim and N

    H. Kim and N. Kim, Black holes with baryonic charge and I-extremization, JHEP 11 (2019) 050, arXiv:1904.05344 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  2. [27]

    Halmagyi, M

    N. Halmagyi, M. Petrini, and A. Zaffaroni, BPS black holes in AdS4 from M-theory, JHEP 08 (2013) 124, arXiv:1305.0730 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2013

  3. [1]

    S. M. Hosseini, K. Hristov, and A. Zaffaroni, Gluing gravitational blocks for AdS black holes, JHEP 12 (2019) 168, arXiv:1909.10550 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  4. [2]

    S. M. Hosseini, K. Hristov, and A. Zaffaroni, Rotating multi-charge spindles and their microstates, JHEP 07 (2021) 182, arXiv:2104.11249 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  5. [3]

    Faedo and D

    F. Faedo and D. Martelli, D4-branes wrapped on a spindle, JHEP 02 (2022) 101, arXiv:2111.13660 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  6. [4]

    S. M. Hosseini, Gravitational blocks: Symplectic covariance unveiled, Phys. Lett. B 843 (2023) 138044, arXiv:2303.07365 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  7. [5]

    Pasquetti, Factorisation of N = 2 Theories on the Squashed 3-Sphere, JHEP 04 (2012) 120, arXiv:1111.6905 [hep-th]

    S. Pasquetti, Factorisation of N = 2 Theories on the Squashed 3-Sphere, JHEP 04 (2012) 120, arXiv:1111.6905 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2012

  8. [6]

    C. Beem, T. Dimofte, and S. Pasquetti, Holomorphic Blocks in Three Dimensions, JHEP 12 (2014) 177, arXiv:1211.1986 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2014

Show all 78 references
  1. [7]

    S. M. Hosseini, K. Hristov, and A. Zaffaroni, An extremization principle for the entropy of rotating BPS black holes in AdS 5, JHEP 07 (2017) 106, arXiv:1705.05383 [hep-th]. 44

    2017 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Cabo-Bizet, D

    A. Cabo-Bizet, D. Cassani, D. Martelli, and S. Murthy, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of supersymmetric AdS 5 black holes, JHEP 10 (2019) 062, arXiv:1810.11442 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  3. [9]

    S. Choi, J. Kim, S. Kim, and J. Nahmgoong, Large AdS black holes from QFT, arXiv:1810.12067 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  4. [10]

    Benini and E

    F. Benini and E. Milan, Black Holes in 4DN =4 Super-Yang-Mills Field Theory, Phys. Rev. X 10 (2020) 021037, arXiv:1812.09613 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Cabo-Bizet, D

    A. Cabo-Bizet, D. Cassani, D. Martelli, and S. Murthy, The asymptotic growth of states of the 4dN = 1 superconformal index, JHEP 08 (2019) 120, arXiv:1904.05865 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Amariti, I

    A. Amariti, I. Garozzo, and G. Lo Monaco, Entropy function from toric geometry, Nucl. Phys. B 973 (2021) 115571, arXiv:1904.10009 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Lanir, A

    A. Lanir, A. Nedelin, and O. Sela, Black hole entropy function for toric theories via Bethe Ansatz, JHEP 04 (2020) 091, arXiv:1908.01737 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  8. [14]

    S. M. Hosseini and A. Zaffaroni, Proving the equivalence of c-extremization and its gravitational dual for all toric quivers, JHEP 03 (2019) 108, arXiv:1901.05977 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [15]

    S. M. Hosseini, K. Hristov, Y. Tachikawa, and A. Zaffaroni, Anomalies, Black strings and the charged Cardy formula, JHEP 09 (2020) 167, arXiv:2006.08629 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Benini, E

    F. Benini, E. Colombo, S. Soltani, A. Zaffaroni, and Z. Zhang, Superconformal indices at large N and the entropy of AdS 5× SE5 black holes, Class. Quant. Grav. 37 (2020) 215021, arXiv:2005.12308 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Boido, J

    A. Boido, J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, Gravitational Blocks, Spindles and GK Geometry, Commun. Math. Phys. 403 (2023) 917–1003, arXiv:2211.02662 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Martelli and A

    D. Martelli and A. Zaffaroni, Equivariant localization and holography, Lett. Math. Phys. 114 (2024) 15, arXiv:2306.03891 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [19]

    D. L. Jafferis, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu, and B. R. Safdi, Towards the F-Theorem: N=2 Field Theories on the Three-Sphere, JHEP 06 (2011) 102, arXiv:1103.1181 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  14. [20]

    S. M. Hosseini and A. Zaffaroni, Large N matrix models for 3d N = 2 theories: twisted index, free energy and black holes, JHEP 08 (2016) 064, arXiv:1604.03122 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  15. [21]

    S. M. Hosseini and N. Mekareeya, Large N topologically twisted index: necklace quivers, dualities, and Sasaki-Einstein spaces, JHEP 08 (2016) 089, arXiv:1604.03397 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Choi and C

    S. Choi and C. Hwang, Universal 3d Cardy Block and Black Hole Entropy, JHEP 03 (2020) 068, arXiv:1911.01448 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  17. [23]

    S. M. Hosseini and A. Zaffaroni, Geometry ofI-extremization and black holes microstates, JHEP 07 (2019) 174, arXiv:1904.04269 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [24]

    J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, Toric geometry and the dual of I-extremization, JHEP 06 (2019) 140, arXiv:1904.04282 [hep-th]. 45

    2019 arXiv

  19. [25]

    S. M. Hosseini and A. Zaffaroni, The large N limit of topologically twisted indices: a direct approach, JHEP 12 (2022) 025, arXiv:2209.09274 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Colombo, S

    E. Colombo, S. M. Hosseini, D. Martelli, A. Pittelli, and A. Zaffaroni, Microstates of Accelerating and Supersymmetric AdS4 Black Holes from the Spindle Index, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 031603, arXiv:2404.07173 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Azzurli, N

    F. Azzurli, N. Bobev, P. M. Crichigno, V. S. Min, and A. Zaffaroni, A universal counting of black hole microstates in AdS 4, JHEP 02 (2018) 054, arXiv:1707.04257 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  22. [29]

    J. Hong, N. T. Macpherson, and L. A. Pando Zayas, Aspects of AdS 2 classification in M-theory: solutions with mesonic and baryonic charges, JHEP 11 (2019) 127, arXiv:1908.08518 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Kim and N

    H. Kim and N. Kim, Uplifting dyonic AdS4 black holes on seven-dimensional Sasaki-Einstein manifolds, JHEP 03 (2021) 108, arXiv:2012.09757 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  24. [31]

    S. M. Hosseini and A. Zaffaroni, I-Extremization with Baryonic Charges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (2025) 191601, arXiv:2503.08591 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Ferrero, J

    P. Ferrero, J. P. Gauntlett, J. M. P. Ipi˜ na, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, Accelerating black holes and spinning spindles, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 046007, arXiv:2012.08530 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Couzens, J

    C. Couzens, J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, A geometric dual of c-extremization, JHEP 01 (2019) 212, arXiv:1810.11026 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [34]

    J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, Toric geometry and the dual of c-extremization, JHEP 01 (2019) 204, arXiv:1812.05597 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  28. [35]

    H.-Y. Chen, N. Dorey, S. Moriyama, R. Mouland, and C. Sanli, Giant Gravitons and Volume Minimisation, arXiv:2412.05357 [hep-th]

  29. [36]

    Martelli, J

    D. Martelli, J. Sparks, and S.-T. Yau, The Geometric dual of a-maximisation for Toric Sasaki-Einstein manifolds, Commun. Math. Phys. 268 (2006) 39–65, arXiv:hep-th/0503183

    2006 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Martelli, J

    D. Martelli, J. Sparks, and S.-T. Yau, Sasaki-Einstein manifolds and volume minimisation, Commun. Math. Phys. 280 (2008) 611–673, arXiv:hep-th/0603021

    2008 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Butti and A

    A. Butti and A. Zaffaroni, R-charges from toric diagrams and the equivalence of a-maximization and Z-minimization, JHEP 11 (2005) 019, arXiv:hep-th/0506232

    2005 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Butti and A

    A. Butti and A. Zaffaroni, From toric geometry to quiver gauge theory: The Equivalence of a-maximization and Z-minimization, Fortsch. Phys. 54 (2006) 309–316, arXiv:hep-th/0512240

    2006 arXiv

  33. [40]

    J. J. Duistermaat and G. J. Heckman, On the variation in the cohomology of the symplectic form of the reduced phase space, Inventiones mathematicae 69 (1982) 259–268. 46

    1982

  34. [41]

    Berline and M

    N. Berline and M. Vergne, Classes caract´ eristiques ´ equivariantes. formule de localisation en cohomologie ´ equivariante,CR Acad. Sci. Paris 295 (1982) 539–541

    1982

  35. [42]

    Atiyah and R

    M. Atiyah and R. Bott, The moment map and equivariant cohomology, Topology23 (1984) 1–28

    1984

  36. [43]

    Nekrasov, N

    N. Nekrasov, N. Piazzalunga, and M. Zabzine, Shifts of prepotentials (with an appendix by Michele Vergne), SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 177, arXiv:2111.07663 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Cassia, N

    L. Cassia, N. Piazzalunga, and M. Zabzine, From equivariant volumes to equivariant periods, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 27 (2023) 961–1064, arXiv:2211.13269 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Aharony, O

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis, and J. Maldacena, N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals, JHEP 10 (2008) 091, arXiv:0806.1218 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Hanany and A

    A. Hanany and A. Zaffaroni, Tilings, Chern-Simons Theories and M2 Branes, JHEP 10 (2008) 111, arXiv:0808.1244 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Hanany, D

    A. Hanany, D. Vegh, and A. Zaffaroni, Brane Tilings and M2 Branes, JHEP 03 (2009) 012, arXiv:0809.1440 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Martelli and J

    D. Martelli and J. Sparks, Moduli spaces of Chern-Simons quiver gauge theories and AdS(4)/CFT(3), Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 126005, arXiv:0808.0912 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Benini, C

    F. Benini, C. Closset, and S. Cremonesi, Chiral flavors and M2-branes at toric CY4 singularities, JHEP 02 (2010) 036, arXiv:0911.4127 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  43. [50]

    D. L. Jafferis, Quantum corrections toN = 2 Chern-Simons theories with flavor and their AdS4 duals, JHEP 08 (2013) 046, arXiv:0911.4324 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  44. [51]

    K. A. Intriligator and B. Wecht, The Exact superconformal R symmetry maximizes a, Nucl. Phys. B667 (2003) 183–200, arXiv:hep-th/0304128

    2003 arXiv

  45. [52]

    D. L. Jafferis, The Exact Superconformal R-Symmetry Extremizes Z, JHEP 05 (2012) 159, arXiv:1012.3210 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Benvenuti, L

    S. Benvenuti, L. A. Pando Zayas, and Y. Tachikawa, Triangle anomalies from Einstein manifolds, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 10 (2006) 395–432, arXiv:hep-th/0601054

    2006 arXiv

  47. [54]

    C. P. Herzog, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu, and T. Tesileanu, Multi-Matrix Models and Tri-Sasaki Einstein Spaces, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 046001, arXiv:1011.5487 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Martelli and J

    D. Martelli and J. Sparks, The large N limit of quiver matrix models and Sasaki-Einstein manifolds, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 046008, arXiv:1102.5289 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Amariti, C

    A. Amariti, C. Klare, and M. Siani, The Large N Limit of Toric Chern-Simons Matter Theories and Their Duals, JHEP 10 (2012) 019, arXiv:1111.1723 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Amariti and S

    A. Amariti and S. Franco, Free Energy vs Sasaki-Einstein Volume for Infinite Families of M2-Brane Theories, JHEP 09 (2012) 034, arXiv:1204.6040 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Ferrero, M

    P. Ferrero, M. Inglese, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, Multicharge accelerating black holes and spinning spindles, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 126001, arXiv:2109.14625 [hep-th]. 47

    2022 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Ferrero, J

    P. Ferrero, J. P. Gauntlett, and J. Sparks, Supersymmetric spindles, JHEP 01 (2022) 102, arXiv:2112.01543 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Ferrero, J

    P. Ferrero, J. P. Gauntlett, J. M. P´ erez Ipi˜ na, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks,D3-Branes Wrapped on a Spindle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 111601, arXiv:2011.10579 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  54. [61]

    Boido, J

    A. Boido, J. M. P. Ipi˜ na, and J. Sparks, Twisted D3-brane and M5-brane compactifications from multi-charge spindles, JHEP 07 (2021) 222, arXiv:2104.13287 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Boido, J

    A. Boido, J. P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, and J. Sparks, Entropy Functions For Accelerating Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 091603, arXiv:2210.16069 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Benini, K

    F. Benini, K. Hristov, and A. Zaffaroni, Black hole microstates in AdS 4 from supersymmetric localization, JHEP 05 (2016) 054, arXiv:1511.04085 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Benini, K

    F. Benini, K. Hristov, and A. Zaffaroni, Exact microstate counting for dyonic black holes in AdS4, Phys. Lett. B 771 (2017) 462–466, arXiv:1608.07294 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Benini and N

    F. Benini and N. Bobev, Two-dimensional SCFTs from wrapped branes and c-extremization, JHEP 06 (2013) 005, arXiv:1302.4451 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Benini and N

    F. Benini and N. Bobev, Exact two-dimensional superconformal R-symmetry and c-extremization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 061601, arXiv:1211.4030 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Fabbri, P

    D. Fabbri, P. Fre’, L. Gualtieri, C. Reina, A. Tomasiello, A. Zaffaroni, and A. Zampa, 3-D superconformal theories from Sasakian seven manifolds: New nontrivial evidences for AdS(4) / CFT(3), Nucl. Phys. B 577 (2000) 547–608, arXiv:hep-th/9907219

    2000 arXiv

  61. [68]

    Cassia and K

    L. Cassia and K. Hristov, Constant maps in equivariant topological strings and geometric modeling of fluxes, arXiv:2502.20444 [hep-th]

  62. [69]

    D. R. Gulotta, C. P. Herzog, and S. S. Pufu, Operator Counting and Eigenvalue Distributions for 3D Supersymmetric Gauge Theories, JHEP 11 (2011) 149, arXiv:1106.5484 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Cassani, P

    D. Cassani, P. Koerber, and O. Varela, All homogeneous N=2 M-theory truncations with supersymmetric AdS4 vacua, JHEP 11 (2012) 173, arXiv:1208.1262 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Benini, H

    F. Benini, H. Khachatryan, and E. Milan, Black hole entropy in massive Type IIA, Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 035004, arXiv:1707.06886 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  65. [73]

    S. M. Hosseini, K. Hristov, and A. Passias, Holographic microstate counting for AdS 4 black holes in massive IIA supergravity, JHEP 10 (2017) 190, arXiv:1707.06884 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  66. [74]

    S. M. Hosseini, I. Yaakov, and A. Zaffaroni, Topologically twisted indices in five dimensions and holography, JHEP 11 (2018) 119, arXiv:1808.06626 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  67. [75]

    S. M. Hosseini, K. Hristov, A. Passias, and A. Zaffaroni, 6D attractors and black hole microstates, JHEP 12 (2018) 001, arXiv:1809.10685 [hep-th]. 48

    2018 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Bobev, V

    N. Bobev, V. S. Min, and K. Pilch, Mass-deformed ABJM and black holes in AdS 4, JHEP 03 (2018) 050, arXiv:1801.03135 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  69. [77]

    S. M. Hosseini and K. Hristov, 4d F(4) gauged supergravity and black holes of class F, JHEP 02 (2021) 177, arXiv:2011.01943 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Colombo, F

    E. Colombo, F. Faedo, D. Martelli, and A. Zaffaroni, Equivariant volume extremization and holography, JHEP 01 (2024) 095, arXiv:2309.04425 [hep-th]. 49

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.