REVIEW
Recommending Code Understandability Improvements based on Code Reviews
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Developers spend 70% of their time understanding code. Code that is easy to read can save time, while hard-to-read code can lead to the introduction of bugs. However, it is difficult to establish what makes code more understandable. Although there are guides and directives on improving code understandability, in some contexts, these practices can have a detrimental effect. Practical software development projects often employ code review to improve code quality, including understandability. Reviewers are often senior developers who have contributed extensively to projects and have an in-depth understanding of the impacts of different solutions on code understandability. This paper is an early research proposal to recommend code understandability improvements based on code reviewer knowledge. The core of the proposal comprises a dataset of code understandability improvements extracted from code reviews. This dataset will serve as a basis to train machine learning systems to recommend understandability improvements.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.