Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 59 references

The paper reports a JWST spectroscopic redshift of z=3.1999 for the underlying galaxy at the position of EP250207b and proposes that this background galaxy—not the nearby z=0.082 galaxy—is the true host, making a collapsar origin viable.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

JWST spectroscopy shows a z=3.2 background galaxy at the position of the fast X-ray transient EP250207b, overturning the earlier z=0.082 merger association.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Solid new JWST/HST data give a credible z=3.2 background host for EP250207b, but the host association is only ~8:1 over the foreground alternative and the afterglow fit is too free to carry much weight. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2608.03582 v1 pith:AIG44ZXL submitted 2026-08-04 astro-ph.HE

A JWST redshift for the host galaxy of EP250207b of z=3.2: a collapsar origin is viable

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords fast X-ray transientsEP250207bgamma-ray burstshost galaxy redshiftcollapsarneutron star mergersafterglow modellingJWST NIRSpec
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents JWST NIRSpec spectroscopy and HST imaging of the field of the Einstein Probe fast X-ray transient EP250207b, revealing a compact, star-forming galaxy at redshift z=3.1999 underneath the transient position. It argues that this background galaxy, not the foreground galaxy at z=0.082 previously proposed as host, is the actual host, so the transient itself lies at z=3.2. That changes the event's rest-frame energetics: the X-ray luminosity becomes about 3e49 erg/s, and the multi-wavelength afterglow is well described by an on-axis tophat-jet gamma-ray-burst afterglow. The host's properties (compact size, high specific star formation, low gas-phase metallicity, stellar mass near 1e9 solar masses) resemble collapsar-GRB hosts. The paper's central claim is that at this redshift a collapsar origin is viable and cannot be ruled out, even though a merger origin also remains possible.

Core claim

The discovery is a spectroscopic redshift of z=3.1999±0.002 for a previously unresolved galaxy at the position of EP250207b, based on clear emission lines (Hα, Hβ, [OIII], [SII], [SIII]) in a JWST NIRSpec IFU spectrum, together with HST images showing the source is extended and has faded between epochs. Treating this galaxy as the host, the paper re-derives the transient's distance, luminosity, and afterglow properties: the rest-frame X-ray luminosity is about 3e49 erg/s, radio upper limits fall in the GRB-afterglow range, and a tophat jet afterglow model gives an on-axis fit with jet energy around 6e51 erg, opening angle about 14 degrees, and viewing angle about 11 degrees. The host galaxy

What carries the argument

The central object is the emission-line redshift z=3.1999±0.002 of the underlying galaxy, measured with the JWST NIRSpec integral-field unit; this single number sets the distance scale that converts every observed flux into a rest-frame luminosity and timescale. All subsequent arguments—the X-ray luminosity, radio luminosity limits, afterglow-model fit, supernova detectability, and host-galaxy physical properties—are evaluated at this redshift. The afterglow modelling uses a tophat jet afterglow model with parameters for jet energy, opening angle, viewing angle, ISM density, electron index, and microphysical fractions, fitted jointly to X-ray, optical, near-infrared, and radio data; the best

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion depends on the transient being associated with the z=3.2 background galaxy; that association rests on a chance-alignment probability of about 0.06% computed with a formula calibrated on lower-redshift galaxies, and if the true host is instead the foreground z=0.082 galaxy, the revised energetics and collapsar-viability argument collapse.

What would settle it

A late-time JWST NIRSpec or NIRCam observation that resolves the z=3.2 galaxy and shows the transient position is offset from its light, or a detection of an afterglow or supernova at z=0.082, would break the host association. Alternatively, recalculating the chance-alignment probability using the z≈3 galaxy surface-density and half-light-radius distribution and finding it much larger than 0.06% would undermine the identification.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • At z=3.2, the rest-frame X-ray luminosity of EP250207b (about 3e49 erg/s) is in the range of collapsar GRBs and too high for post-merger millisecond magnetar spin-down, so the earlier merger-only interpretation is no longer required.
  • The afterglow being consistent with an on-axis tophat jet means EP250207b can be counted as a GRB-like fast X-ray transient; the multi-wavelength data are described well by a typical GRB afterglow.
  • A supernova at z=3.2 would only be detectable redward of about 13000 Å; the current HST epochs do not rule out an emerging type Ic-BL supernova, leaving a collapsar origin viable.
  • The host galaxy properties (compact, high specific star formation, low gas-phase metallicity, mass near 1e9 solar masses) resemble collapsar-GRB hosts more than most short-GRB hosts, although a merger origin cannot be excluded.
  • The case illustrates that chance-alignment host associations can be overturned by deep JWST observations; the true host may lie behind the brightest apparent candidate.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the z=3.2 association is correct, a sizable fraction of Einstein Probe fast X-ray transients with faint candidate hosts may be distant collapsar bursts viewed through foreground galaxies; systematic JWST follow-up of candidate-host fields would test this.
  • The chance-alignment formula used here was calibrated on lower-redshift galaxies; recomputing the chance-alignment probability with a z≈3 galaxy surface-density and size distribution would either strengthen or weaken the host identification for EP250207b and similar events.
  • Continued radio monitoring could break degeneracies in the afterglow fit; a rising afterglow or a later detection would sharpen the on-axis jet parameters, while deeper limits at late times would test the low-density environment.
  • A single deep near-infrared epoch at late rest-frame time could search for the supernova component and discriminate collapsar from merger more directly than energetics alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents HST/WFC3 and JWST/NIRSpec IFU observations of the field of the Einstein Probe fast X-ray transient EP250207b, which had previously been associated with a z=0.082 galaxy. The authors detect an underlying compact galaxy at the transient position and measure a spectroscopic redshift of z=3.1999±0.002 from multiple emission lines. Adopting this galaxy as the host (P_chance≈0.06%, computed with the Bloom et al. 2002 formula), they recalculate the rest-frame energetics, show that a type Ic-BL supernova cannot be excluded at the revised redshift, model the multi-wavelength afterglow with Redback as an on-axis tophat jet, and fit the host-galaxy spectrum with BAGPIPES. They conclude that a collapsar origin is viable and that the data cannot distinguish between a collapsar and a merger-driven event.

Significance. If the z=3.2 host association is secure, this is an important result: it would move EP250207b from a rare low-redshift merger candidate to a high-redshift FXT/GRB, with implications for the progenitor populations of fast X-ray transients. The JWST/NIRSpec spectroscopic redshift is well supported by multiple lines, the data are public, and the paper is transparent about its assumptions (e.g., the Bloom et al. formula caveat and the inability to rule out a supernova). The main weakness is that the host association itself remains statistical and is not confirmed by a transient spectrum, so the derived energetics and the collapsar-viability conclusion are conditional on that association.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3 (P_chance) and Conclusion] The host association is load-bearing and not secure. The paper states that P_chance≈0.06% comes from the Bloom et al. (2002) formula, which it notes is calibrated for lower-redshift galaxies, and that it 'assumes' this galaxy is the host. Against the previously proposed z=0.082 host (P_chance≈0.5%), the relative odds are only ~8:1. An order-of-magnitude systematic error in the z≈3.2 galaxy surface density—plausible for this extrapolation, and not accounting for lensing/clustering by the foreground galaxy—would make the association ambiguous. All downstream results (§3.1, §3.2, §3.3) and the title's 'host galaxy' claim depend on this assumption. Either compute a z~3-specific chance-alignment probability with an uncertainty and compare it to the foreground hypothesis, or reframe the results as explicitly conditional on a candidate host.
  2. [Table 1, 'Jet opening angle' row; §3.2] The reported posterior for the jet opening angle lies outside its stated prior. The prior is listed as (0.01, 0.1) and the posterior as 0.24^{+0.04}_{-0.08}; if these are radians, the posterior is 2.4 times the upper boundary, which cannot arise from a bounded prior. The text converts the same quantity to 14°, confirming the posterior is in radians. Either the prior should be (0.01, 1.0) rad or the entry is mislabeled. Because the on-axis conclusion depends on these angular parameters, the fit must be rerun with correct priors and the actual posterior reported.
  3. [§3.2, Fig. B1] The afterglow fit is offered as evidence that the data are consistent with a typical on-axis GRB afterglow, but no goodness-of-fit or model comparison is provided. With eight free parameters and sparse photometry plus upper limits (X-ray, optical/NIR, radio), the posteriors are broad (e.g., log E0 spans ~1.5 dex, log n_ism spans >2 dex). A residual analysis or comparison with e.g. an off-axis/structured-jet model would make the 'typical GRB afterglow' statement more than a statement of prior compatibility. This is secondary to the host-association issue but relevant to the collapsar-viability conclusion.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Title/Abstract] Until the host association is strengthened, the wording 'host galaxy of EP250207b' overstates the evidence; 'candidate host' would be more accurate given the statistical association.
  2. [Table 1] Use consistent symbols and units for the angular parameters: 'thc' should be 'θ_c', and the units (radians or degrees) should be stated explicitly for both θ_observer and θ_c.
  3. [§2, Fig. 1] The redshift rests on the detection of multiple emission lines, but no line fluxes, equivalent widths, or signal-to-noise values are reported. A short table would allow the reader to assess the line identification.
  4. [Data Availability] Typo: 'can de accessed' should read 'can be accessed'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the z=3.2 redshift is an external spectroscopic measurement, and the afterglow/host properties are fitted or measured rather than derived from the claim itself.

full rationale

The paper's central new result is a spectroscopic redshift of z=3.1999±0.002 from JWST/NIRSpec emission lines (Hα, Hβ, [OIII], [SII], [SIII]). This is an independent external measurement, not an output of the transient model or of the host-association statistic. The afterglow analysis fits a Redback tophat-jet model to the multi-wavelength data at a fixed redshift; the paper states that the data 'can be described well by a typical GRB afterglow' and does not present the fit as an out-of-sample prediction. The host association is explicitly conditional ('we assume that this is the host galaxy'), based on a chance-alignment probability computed from the observed F606W magnitude with the Bloom et al. (2002) formula, and the paper itself notes that this formula is calibrated on lower-redshift galaxies. That caveat is a correctness/robustness concern, not circularity: the P_chance value is not derived from the afterglow model, the redshift, or the conclusion. Citations to Jonker et al. (2026) and Becerra et al. (2026) provide the prior observations and context, but the new HST/JWST data independently constrain the redshift and host properties. No load-bearing step reduces to its own input or to a self-citation chain. If the true host were the foreground z=0.082 galaxy, the revised energetics and the collapsar-viability conclusion would not follow, but that is a stated assumption rather than a circular derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

9 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the statistical host association (Bloom formula), the line identification, and the afterglow model, all of which are standard but not independently verified in this paper. The afterglow fit introduces eight free parameters, and the host SED fit adds more, so the derived energetics are not uniquely constrained.

free parameters (9)
  • Viewing angle theta_observer = 0.19 ± 0.05 rad
    Tophat jet fit; posterior from nessai nested sampling of multi-wavelength light curves.
  • Isotropic-equivalent jet energy E0 = log10(E0/erg) = 51.2 (+0.8/-0.6)
    Tophat jet fit; drives normalization of the afterglow.
  • Jet opening angle thc = 0.24 (+0.04/-0.08) rad
    Tophat jet fit; sets jet break time and beaming.
  • ISM number density nism = log10(nism/cm^-3) = -1.0 (+1.1/-1.4)
    Tophat jet fit; affects synchrotron peak flux.
  • Electron power law index p = 2.8 (+0.2/-0.3)
    Tophat jet fit; sets spectral slopes.
  • Electron energy partition fraction eps_e = log10(eps_e) = -0.3 ± 0.2
    Tophat jet fit; fitted parameter from data.
  • Magnetic field partition fraction eps_b = log10(eps_b) = -2.4 (+0.8/-1.0)
    Tophat jet fit; fitted parameter from data.
  • Initial Lorentz factor g0 = 560 ± 300
    Tophat jet fit; prior uniform in (40,1000), weakly constrained.
  • Host galaxy SED parameters (SFR, stellar mass, metallicity, Av, velocity dispersion, SFH weights) = SFR=2.3±0.1 M_sun/yr, stellar mass ~1e9 M_sun, Z*=0.51±0.02 Z_sun, 12+log(O/H)=8.28±0.03, sSFR=10^-8.60 yr^-1
    BAGPIPES fit to JWST/NIRSpec spectrum with continuity SFH model; free parameters in the SED fit.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Standard Lambda CDM cosmology with Planck parameters (H0=67.7 km/s/Mpc, Omega_m=0.31) for luminosity distance and physical scales.
    Invoked in Section 2 and used to convert fluxes to luminosities and to kpc scales.
  • domain assumption Bloom et al. (2002) chance alignment formula, calibrated on lower-redshift galaxy counts, is applicable to estimate the probability that the z=3.2 galaxy is the host.
    Used in Section 3 to claim P_chance ~ 0.06%; the paper itself notes the formula is based on lower-redshift galaxy distributions, so the applicability at z=3.2 is an assumption.
  • domain assumption The emission line identifications (H-alpha, H-beta, [OIII], [SII], [SIII]) at z=3.2 are correct and provide a robust spectroscopic redshift.
    Section 2; the identification relies on the expected line ratios and wavelengths, not on an independent transient spectrum.
  • domain assumption The tophat jet afterglow model (Lamb et al. 2018) adequately describes the multi-wavelength emission of EP250207b at z=3.2.
    Section 3.2; the model includes a uniform jet with on-axis observer and standard synchrotron emission, but no alternative model is tested.
  • domain assumption The foreground z=0.082 galaxy's light is adequately removed by the chosen background subtraction aperture.
    Section 2; the background region is to the NE and a residual feature between 1.01-1.12 micron is masked, implying imperfect subtraction.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A JWST redshift for the host galaxy of EP250207b of z=3.2: a collapsar origin is viable." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AIG44ZXL

@misc{pith2026260803582,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A JWST redshift for the host galaxy of EP250207b of z=3.2: a collapsar origin is viable},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AIG44ZXL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03582}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We present James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and Hubble Space Telescope (HST) observations of the field of the fast X-ray transient (FXT) detected by Einstein Probe, EP250207b, to resolve any ambiguity about the host galaxy and redshift of the FXT. EP250207b was originally associated with a nearby galaxy at z=0.082, based on its low chance alignment probability, and a binary neutron star merger origin was proposed. However, we report the detection of a background galaxy at z=3.2 at the location of EP250207b. Assuming this galaxy is the actual host galaxy, the rest-frame energetics and timescales of the event change. Furthermore, the available data are not able to rule out the presence of a supernova associated with EP250207b if at this redshift. We model the X-ray, optical, near-infrared and radio light curves using a tophat jet model implemented in Redback and find that they are consistent with an on-axis gamma ray burst afterglow. The energetics and host galaxy properties do not allow us to distinguish between a collapsar and a merger driven event.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.03582 by Agnes P. C. van Hoof, Andrea Rossi, Andrew J. Levan, Antonio Martin-Carrillo, Ashley Chrimes, Daniele B. Malesani, Daniel Mata S\'anchez, Francesca Onori, Francesco Carotenuto, Franz E. Bauer, Gregory Corcoran, Hui Sun, Javi S\'anchez-Sierras, Joe Bright, Jonathan Quirola-V\'asquez, Joyce N. D. van Dalen, Laura Cotter, Manuel A.P. Torres, Maria E. Ravasio, Morgan Fraser, Nial R. Tanvir, Nikhil Sarin, Paul O'Brien, Peter G. Jonker, Rob A.J. Eyles-Ferris, Steve Schulze, Ting-Wan Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Top: HST images of the field of EP250207b, ∼289 days after the EP-WXT trigger. A source is clearly visible in both the F606W (left) and the F160W (right) image, as indicated by the magenta markers. Bottom left: Extracted 1D spectrum of the JWST/NIRSpec IFU data in observed wavelength (𝜇m) and flux density in 𝜇Jy. Extraction at the source position is shown in light red, the background region in blue and the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Kann plot showing the absolute 𝑟 ′ -band light curves of a sample of long GRBs (black), a sample of short GRBs (purple) and three well￾studied GRB-SNe: SN 1998bw (blue), SN 2006aj (magenta) and SN 2010bh (green). We overplot the host-subtracted F160W observations of EP250207b in red and the host magnitude as upper limit for epoch 3. The light curve of EP250207b is consistent with that of faint long GRBs bu… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Redback tophat afterglow model fit to the X-ray, optical, NIR and radio observations at a fixed redshift of 𝑧 = 3.2. The last epoch of HST F606W is assumed to be host-galaxy light only and this flux density has been subtracted from the shown F606W measurements. The fit uses the nessai nested sampler with a Gaussian likelihood. (Fig. B1) that it also overlaps with the ISM number density typically seen for l… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top panel: BAGPIPES fit (orange) to the host galaxy spectrum (blue) in 𝐹𝜆 in 10−19 erg s−1 cm−2 Å −1 . The 1𝜎 uncertainty on the spectrum is shown by the blue shaded region. The grey shaded region has been masked during the fit. Bottom panels: Posterior distributions for six fitted parameters: SFR, age, stellar mass, metallicity, velocity dispersion and dust extinction. The vertical dashed lines indicate t… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Is it due to a binary compact object merger?

    EP250207b is not a collapsar fast X-ray transient. Is it due to a binary compact object merger?. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2021 , archivePrefix =. 2508.13039 , primaryClass =

  2. [2]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The Einstein Probe Mission. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  3. [3]

    Discovery of Three Candidate Magnetar-powered Fast X-ray Transients from Chandra Archival Data

    Discovery of Three Candidate Magnetar-powered Fast X-Ray Transients from Chandra Archival Data. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4fc6 , archivePrefix =. 2201.06754 , primaryClass =

  4. [4]

    Quirola-V

    J. Quirola-V. Extragalactic fast X-ray transient candidates discovered by Chandra (2000. Astronomy. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243047 , url =

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Fast X-Ray Transients in NuSTAR Data. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3f31 , archivePrefix =. 2601.14375 , primaryClass =

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    The Redshift Distribution of Einstein Probe Transients Supports Their Relation to Gamma-Ray Bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae146b , archivePrefix =. 2509.07141 , primaryClass =

  7. [7]

    Black hole to breakout: 3D GRMHD simulations of collapsar jets reveal a wide range of transients , volume =

    Gottlieb, Ore and Lalakos, Aretaios and Bromberg, Omer and Liska, Matthew and Tchekhovskoy, Alexander , doi =. Black hole to breakout: 3D GRMHD simulations of collapsar jets reveal a wide range of transients , volume =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , month = jan, number =. 2022 , bdsk-url-1 =

  8. [8]

    GRB 250704B/EP250704a a Short Gamma-Ray Burst Powered by a Magnetar

    Fraija, Nissim and Galv \'a , Antonio and Betancourt Kamenetskaia, Boris and Dainotti, Maria G. GRB 250704B/EP250704a a Short Gamma-Ray Burst Powered by a Magnetar. 2026. arXiv:2601.15732

  9. [9]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Minutes-long soft X-ray prompt emission from a compact object merger. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.14137 , archivePrefix =. 2601.14137 , primaryClass =

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    Exploring the connection between compact object mergers and fast X-ray transients: The cases of LXT 240402A and EP250207b. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557612 , archivePrefix =. 2510.13015 , primaryClass =

  11. [11]

    Yin, Yi-Han Iris and Zhang, Bin-Bin and Yang, Jun and Sun, Hui and Zhang, Chen and Shao, Yi-Xuan and Hu, You-Dong and Zhu, Zi-Pei and Xu, Dong and An, Li and Gao, He and Wu, Xue-Feng and Zhang, Bing and Castro-Tirado, Alberto Javier and Pandey, Shashi B. and Rau, Arne and Lei, Weihua and Xie, Wei and Ghirlanda, Giancarlo and Piro, Luigi and O’Brien, Paul ...

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    EP240801a/XRF 240801B: An X-Ray Flash Detected by the Einstein Probe and the Implications of Its Multiband Afterglow. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/addebf , archivePrefix =. 2503.04306 , primaryClass =

  13. [13]

    , keywords =

    The Einstein Probe Transient EP240414a: Linking Fast X-Ray Transients, Gamma-Ray Bursts, and Luminous Fast Blue Optical Transients. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adbc7e , archivePrefix =. 2409.19056 , primaryClass =

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    EP 250108a/SN 2025kg: Observations of the Most Nearby Broad-line Type Ic Supernova Following an Einstein Probe Fast X-Ray Transient. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ade7f9 , archivePrefix =. 2504.08889 , primaryClass =

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    JWST and HST Observations of the Host Galaxy and Supernova SN 2024aihh in EP240801a at z = 1.67. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae28db , archivePrefix =. 2512.11572 , primaryClass =

  16. [16]

    Quirola-V\'asquez and F

    J. Quirola-V\'asquez and F. E. Bauer and P. G. Jonker and W. N. Brandt and G. Yang and A. J. Levan and Y. Q. Xue and D. Eappachen and E. Camacho and M. E. Ravasio and X. C. Zheng and B. Luo , title =. Astronomy. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202345912 , url =

  17. [17]

    Probing for the host galaxies of the fast X-ray transients XRT 000519 and XRT 110103 , volume=

    Eappachen, D and Jonker, P G and Fraser, M and Torres, M A P and Dhillon, V S and Marsh, T and Littlefair, S P and Quirola-Vásquez, J and Maguire, K and Mata Sánchez, D and Cannizzaro, G and Kostrzewa-Rutkowska, Z and Wevers, T and Onori, F and Inkenhaag, Anne and Brennan, S J , year=. Probing for the host galaxies of the fast X-ray transients XRT 000519 ...

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    A kilonova following a long-duration gamma-ray burst at 350 Mpc. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05390-w , archivePrefix =. 2204.10864 , primaryClass =

  19. [19]

    New JWST redshifts for the host galaxies of CDF-S XT1 and XT2: understanding their nature

    New JWST redshifts for the host galaxies of CDF-S XT1 and XT2: Understanding their nature. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451825 , archivePrefix =. 2410.10015 , primaryClass =

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    Unveiling the nature of the Einstein Probe transient EP241021a. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2064 , archivePrefix =. 2511.13314 , primaryClass =

  21. [21]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 , archivePrefix =. 1807.06209 , primaryClass =

  22. [22]

    Inferring the star formation histories of massive quiescent galaxies with bagpipes: evidence for multiple quenching mechanisms , journal =

    A C Carnall and R J McLure and J S Dunlop and R Dav. Inferring the star formation histories of massive quiescent galaxies with bagpipes: evidence for multiple quenching mechanisms , journal =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2169 , url =

  23. [23]

    Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

    The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-forming Galaxies. Astrophysical Journal , keywords =. doi:10.1086/308692 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9911459 , primaryClass =

  24. [24]

    How to Measure Galaxy Star Formation Histories. II. Nonparametric Models. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab133c , archivePrefix =. 1811.03637 , primaryClass =

  25. [25]

    A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LONG AND SHORT GRBS

    Li, Ye and Zhang, Bing and Lü, Hou-Jun , year=. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LONG AND SHORT GRBS. I. OVERLAPPING PROPERTIES , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , publisher=. doi:10.3847/0067-0049/227/1/7 , number=

  26. [26]

    The Host Galaxies of Short-Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts: Luminosities, Metallicities, and Star Formation Rates

    The Host Galaxies of Short-Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts: Luminosities, Metallicities, and Star-Formation Rates. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/231 , archivePrefix =. 0805.0306 , primaryClass =

  27. [27]

    Are long gamma-ray bursts biased tracers of star formation? Clues from the host galaxies of the Swift/BAT6 complete sample of bright LGRBs. III. Stellar masses, star formation rates, and metallicities at z > 1. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834179 , archivePrefix =. 1901.02457 , primaryClass =

  28. [28]

    Short GRB Host Galaxies. II. A Legacy Sample of Redshifts, Stellar Population Properties, and Implications for Their Neutron Star Merger Origins. The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac91d1 , archivePrefix =. 2206.01764 , primaryClass =

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    The Offset and Host Light Distributions of Long Gamma-Ray Bursts: A New View From HST Observations of Swift Bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/144 , archivePrefix =. 1509.07866 , primaryClass =

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    The Observed Offset Distribution of Gamma-Ray Bursts from Their Host Galaxies: A Robust Clue to the Nature of the Progenitors. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/338893 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0010176 , primaryClass =

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    Short-duration gamma-ray bursts with extended emission from protomagnetar spin-down. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12923.x , archivePrefix =. 0712.1233 , primaryClass =

  32. [32]

    Electromagnetic Emission from Long-lived Binary Neutron Star Merger Remnants. II. Lightcurves and Spectra. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/15 , archivePrefix =. 1508.07939 , primaryClass =

  33. [33]

    and Laskar, T

    Fong, W. and Laskar, T. and Rastinejad, J. and Escorial, A. Rouco and Schroeder, G. and Barnes, J. and Kilpatrick, C. D. and Paterson, K. and Berger, E. and Metzger, B. D. and Dong, Y. and Nugent, A. E. and Strausbaugh, R. and Blanchard, P. K. and Goyal, A. and Cucchiara, A. and Terreran, G. and Alexander, K. D. and Eftekhari, T. and Fryer, C. and Margali...

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    Relativistic Supernovae have Shorter-lived Central Engines or More Extended Progenitors: The Case of SN 2012ap. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/107 , archivePrefix =. 1402.6344 , primaryClass =

  35. [35]

    2026 , eprint=

    Optical observations of candidate host galaxies of eight fast X-ray transients , author=. 2026 , eprint=

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    Long GRBs are Metallicity-biased Tracers of Star Formation: Evidence from Host Galaxies and Redshift Distribution. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/213/1/15 , archivePrefix =. 1406.0568 , primaryClass =

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    Understanding Galaxy Evolution Through Emission Lines. , keywords =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051832 , archivePrefix =. 1910.09730 , primaryClass =

  38. [38]

    Comparing emission- and absorption-based gas-phase metallicities in GRB host galaxies at $z=2-4$ using JWST

    Comparing emission- and absorption-based gas-phase metallicities in GRB host galaxies at z = 2-4 using JWST. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae677 , archivePrefix =. 2310.15967 , primaryClass =

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    The redshift-selected sample of long gamma-ray burst host galaxies: The overall metallicity distribution at z < 0.4 ^. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/pasj/psw133 , archivePrefix =. 1606.01983 , primaryClass =

  40. [41]

    , keywords =

    REDBACK: a Bayesian inference software package for electromagnetic transients. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1238 , archivePrefix =. 2308.12806 , primaryClass =

  41. [42]

    , keywords =

    BILBY: A User-friendly Bayesian Inference Library for Gravitational-wave Astronomy. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab06fc , archivePrefix =. 1811.02042 , primaryClass =

  42. [43]

    nessai: Nested sampling with artificial intelligence

  43. [44]

    , keywords =

    Late-time evolution of afterglows from off-axis neutron star mergers. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2196 , archivePrefix =. 1806.03843 , primaryClass =

  44. [45]

    and Berger, E

    Fong, W. and Berger, E. and Margutti, R. and Zauderer, B. A. , year=. A DECADE OF SHORT-DURATION GAMMA-RAY BURST BROADBAND AFTERGLOWS: ENERGETICS, CIRCUMBURST DENSITIES, AND JET OPENING ANGLES , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/815/2/102 , number=

  45. [46]

    Towards an understanding of long gamma-ray burst environments through circumstellar medium population synthesis predictions , volume=

    Chrimes, A A and Gompertz, B P and Kann, D A and van Marle, A J and Eldridge, J J and Groot, P J and Laskar, T and Levan, A J and Nicholl, M and Stanway, E R and Wiersema, K , year=. Towards an understanding of long gamma-ray burst environments through circumstellar medium population synthesis predictions , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomic...

  46. [47]

    , keywords =

    SExtractor: Software for source extraction. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 , adsurl =

  47. [48]

    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    Size distribution of galaxies in SDSS DR7: weak dependence on halo environment. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/19/1/6 , archivePrefix =. 1707.04979 , primaryClass =

  48. [49]

    , keywords =

    Physical Processes Shaping Gamma-Ray Burst X-Ray Afterglow Light Curves: Theoretical Implications from the Swift X-Ray Telescope Observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/500723 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0508321 , primaryClass =

  49. [50]

    Galama, T. J. and Vreeswijk, P. M. and van Paradijs, J. and Kouveliotou, C. and Augusteijn, T. and Böhnhardt, H. and Brewer, J. P. and Doublier, V. and Gonzalez, J.-F. and Leibundgut, B. and Lidman, C. and Hainaut, O. R. and Patat, F. and Heise, J. and in’t Zand, J. and Hurley, K. and Groot, P. J. and Strom, R. G. and Mazzali, P. A. and Iwamoto, K. and No...

  50. [51]

    , keywords =

    GRB 060218/SN 2006aj: A Gamma-Ray Burst and Prompt Supernova at z = 0.0335. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/505177 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0603686 , primaryClass =

  51. [52]

    , keywords =

    XRF 100316D/SN 2010bh and the Nature of Gamma-Ray Burst Supernovae. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/740/1/41 , archivePrefix =. 1104.5141 , primaryClass =

  52. [53]

    , keywords =

    On the average gamma-ray burst X-ray flaring activity. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17504.x , archivePrefix =. 1009.0172 , primaryClass =

  53. [54]

    , keywords =

    The host galaxies and explosion sites of long-duration gamma ray bursts: Hubble Space Telescope near-infrared imaging. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx220 , archivePrefix =. 1701.05925 , primaryClass =

  54. [55]

    A Population of Short-duration Gamma-ray Bursts with Dwarf Host Galaxies

    A Population of Short-duration Gamma-Ray Bursts with Dwarf Host Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad17c0 , archivePrefix =. 2310.12202 , primaryClass =

  55. [56]

    , keywords =

    New light on gamma-ray burst host galaxies with Herschel. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323340 , archivePrefix =. 1402.4006 , primaryClass =

  56. [57]

    , keywords =

    Signatures of Extragalactic Dust in Pre-Swift GRB Afterglows. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/500652 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0512575 , primaryClass =

  57. [58]

    , keywords =

    Multi-color observations of short GRB afterglows: 20 events observed between 2007 and 2010. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219551 , archivePrefix =. 1206.1806 , primaryClass =

  58. [59]

    Core-collapse, superluminous, and gamma-ray burst supernova host galaxy populations at low redshift: the importance of dwarf and starbursting galaxies

    Core-collapse, superluminous, and gamma-ray burst supernova host galaxy populations at low redshift: the importance of dwarf and starbursting galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab174 , archivePrefix =. 1911.09112 , primaryClass =

  59. [60]

    Early X-ray emission of short Gamma-Ray Bursts: insights into physics and multi-messenger prospects

    Early X-ray emission of short gamma-ray bursts: Insights into physics and multi-messenger prospects. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557744 , archivePrefix =. 2510.16108 , primaryClass =

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.