pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21697 · v1 · pith:AIJQYYVKnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Enhancement in Magnetic and Magnetocaloric Properties of CoFe2O4 Nanofibers at Lower Temperatures

Salma El Mouloua , Youness Hadouch , Salma Ayadh , Salma Touili , Daoud Mezzane , M barek Amjoud , Said Ben Moumen , Abdelhadi Alimoussa
show 4 more authors
Abdelilah Lahmar Zvonko Jaglicic Zdravko Kutnjak Mimoun El Marssi
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 08:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords cobalt ferritenanofibersmagnetocaloric effectmagnetic entropy changeelectrospinninglow temperaturespinel structure
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cobalt ferrite nanofibers exhibit a maximum magnetic entropy change of 1.71 J/K near 32 K.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper investigates the magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of one-dimensional cobalt ferrite nanofibers fabricated by sol-gel electrospinning, with measurements taken from 10 to 300 K. The nanofibers show ferromagnetic behavior and the authors apply the Maxwell relation to magnetization data to determine entropy changes, reporting a peak value of 1.71 J K^{-1} around 32 K together with an adiabatic temperature change of 0.93 K and relative cooling power of 7.58 J kg^{-1} at 180 K. A sympathetic reader would care because these figures indicate the material may suit low-temperature cooling needs in electronic and electromagnetic devices. The study positions the one-dimensional nanofiber geometry as a way to achieve these responses in nanostructured form.

Core claim

The calcined CoFe2O4 nanofibers possess a pure cubic close-packed spinel structure with Fd-3m space group and an average diameter of 210 nm. They display ferromagnetic ordering across the measured temperature range with saturation magnetization reaching 75.87 emu g^{-1} at room temperature. Indirect calculation via the Maxwell approach on field-dependent magnetization yields a maximum magnetic entropy change Delta S of 1.71 J K^{-1} near 32 K. At 180 K the associated adiabatic temperature change is 0.93 K with a relative cooling power of 7.58 J kg^{-1}, values described as reasonably high for the corresponding nanoparticles and suggestive of utility in low-temperature applications.

What carries the argument

The one-dimensional CoFe2O4 nanofibers and the magnetic entropy change Delta S obtained from the Maxwell relation applied to temperature- and field-dependent magnetization measurements.

If this is right

  • The 1D nanofibers offer a promising route for nanostructured magnetic materials in low-temperature electronic and electromagnetic devices.
  • The measured Delta S, Delta T, and RCP values indicate suitability for magnetocaloric cooling applications.
  • The pure spinel phase and observed ferromagnetic response across 10-300 K support consistent performance over a broad temperature window.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar electrospinning of other spinel ferrites could be used to shift the temperature of peak entropy change while retaining the nanofiber morphology.
  • Comparison of these nanofibers with bulk or spherical nanoparticle counterparts of the same composition would isolate the role of one-dimensional geometry on the reported entropy values.
  • Embedding the nanofibers in a composite or thin-film form could test whether the cooling power scales to device-relevant geometries.

Load-bearing premise

The indirect Maxwell-relation calculation from magnetization data accurately captures the true magnetocaloric entropy change without significant contributions from sample inhomogeneity, irreversibility, or measurement artifacts at the reported low temperatures.

What would settle it

A direct calorimetric measurement of the adiabatic temperature change on the same nanofibers under comparable magnetic fields that deviates substantially from the reported 0.93 K value at 180 K.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21697 by Abdelhadi Alimoussa, Abdelilah Lahmar, Daoud Mezzane, M barek Amjoud, Mimoun El Marssi, Said Ben Moumen, Salma Ayadh, Salma El Mouloua, Salma Touili, Youness Hadouch, Zdravko Kutnjak, Zvonko Jaglicic.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Fig.1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Fig.2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Fig.8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This research paper investigates new and first insights into the magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of one-dimensional (1D) cobalt ferrite CoFe2O4 (CFO) nanofibers elaborated by sol gel based electrospinning technique, particularly focusing on their behavior at low temperatures for specific applications. The calcined CFO nanofibers microstructural, structural, magnetic, and magnetocaloric properties were explored. The nanofibers (NFs) microstructure, with an average diameter of 210 nm, was examined by scanning and transmission electron microscopies (SEM, TEM). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) of the CFO nanofibers showed a pure cubic close-packed (c.c.p) spinel crystalline structure with the F d 3 -m space group. The Raman spectroscopic studies further confirm the cubic inverse spinel phase. The Magnetic properties were explored as a function of temperature, ranging from 10 to 300 K, a ferromagnetic behaviour was observed with the highest saturation magnetization of 75.87 emu g(-1) and a coercivity of 723 Oe at room temperature. The variation of the magnetic entropy was measured indirectly using the Maxwell approach with an increasing magnetic field. A maximum of Delta(S)=1.71 J K-1 was reached around 32 K. At 180 K, the associated adiabatic temperature change, Delta (Tmax), was 0.93 K, with a large RCP value of 7.58 J kg-1 was measured, which is reasonably high for the corresponding nanoparticles (NPs). This work may suggest that 1D CFO nanofibers offer a promising route for the production of nanostructured magnetic materials, potentially impacting various electronic and electromagnetic device applications at low temperatures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the synthesis of CoFe2O4 nanofibers by sol-gel electrospinning, followed by structural (XRD, Raman), morphological (SEM/TEM), and magnetic characterization from 10–300 K. It claims ferromagnetic behavior with Ms = 75.87 emu g^{-1} and Hc = 723 Oe at room temperature, and reports magnetocaloric quantities obtained via the Maxwell relation: maximum |ΔS| = 1.71 J K^{-1} near 32 K, ΔT_ad = 0.93 K at 180 K, and RCP = 7.58 J kg^{-1}, concluding that the 1D nanofibers are promising for low-temperature applications.

Significance. If the reported low-temperature magnetocaloric values are confirmed to be free of systematic artifacts, the work supplies useful experimental data on electrospun spinel-ferrite nanofibers in the cryogenic regime. The combination of a scalable synthesis route with standard characterization techniques offers a reproducible platform for exploring morphology effects on magnetocaloric performance, which could be relevant for niche cooling applications below 50 K.

major comments (2)
  1. [Magnetocaloric properties] Magnetocaloric properties section: The Maxwell-relation integration used to obtain ΔS from M(T,H) isotherms assumes reversible, equilibrium magnetization. No data or discussion is provided to confirm loop closure, absence of ZFC/FC bifurcation, or agreement between heating and cooling branches near 32 K, where the reported ΔS_max = 1.71 J K^{-1} occurs. With the measured room-temperature coercivity of 723 Oe and the known high anisotropy of CoFe2O4, irreversible contributions from surface disorder or minor-loop effects could inflate the entropy change; explicit validation is required to support the central numerical claim.
  2. [Results on RCP and ΔT] Results on RCP and ΔT: The quoted RCP = 7.58 J kg^{-1} and ΔT = 0.93 K are presented without uncertainty estimates, raw M(H) isotherms, or tabulated comparison to literature values for bulk or nanoparticulate CoFe2O4, weakening the assertion that these quantities represent an enhancement.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The sentence 'with a large RCP value of 7.58 J kg-1 was measured, which is reasonably high for the corresponding nanoparticles (NPs)' contains a grammatical error and incorrectly refers to nanoparticles when the manuscript concerns nanofibers; this should be rephrased.
  2. [Throughout manuscript] Notation: Entropy change is inconsistently written as Delta(S) or Δ(S); adopt uniform ΔS (or |ΔS|) with proper units throughout.
  3. [Experimental section] Experimental details: Magnetic measurement protocols (field sweep rate, temperature equilibration time, demagnetization correction) are not specified, which is essential for low-temperature data used in the Maxwell integration.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments on the magnetocaloric analysis. We address each major point below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Magnetocaloric properties section: The Maxwell-relation integration used to obtain ΔS from M(T,H) isotherms assumes reversible, equilibrium magnetization. No data or discussion is provided to confirm loop closure, absence of ZFC/FC bifurcation, or agreement between heating and cooling branches near 32 K, where the reported ΔS_max = 1.71 J K^{-1} occurs. With the measured room-temperature coercivity of 723 Oe and the known high anisotropy of CoFe2O4, irreversible contributions from surface disorder or minor-loop effects could inflate the entropy change; explicit validation is required to support the central numerical claim.

    Authors: We agree that explicit confirmation of reversible behavior strengthens the application of the Maxwell relation. The M(H) isotherms were acquired under standard equilibrium protocols with adequate stabilization times at each field and temperature. To directly address the concern, the revised manuscript will include ZFC/FC curves measured at low fields to demonstrate the absence of bifurcation near 32 K, together with a short discussion of heating/cooling branch agreement and the limited impact of surface anisotropy on the reported ΔS. These additions will substantiate the numerical value without altering the central claim. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Results on RCP and ΔT: The quoted RCP = 7.58 J kg^{-1} and ΔT = 0.93 K are presented without uncertainty estimates, raw M(H) isotherms, or tabulated comparison to literature values for bulk or nanoparticulate CoFe2O4, weakening the assertion that these quantities represent an enhancement.

    Authors: We accept that uncertainty estimates and contextual comparisons improve clarity. The revised version will report uncertainties on RCP and ΔT_ad derived from the magnetometer resolution and repeated measurements. Representative raw M(H) isotherms at temperatures around the ΔS peak and at 180 K will be placed in the supplementary information. A concise comparison table with selected literature values for bulk and nanoparticulate CoFe2O4 will also be added to place the nanofiber results in perspective. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Direct experimental report using standard Maxwell relation shows no circularity

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental measurements of microstructure, XRD, Raman, and magnetic properties (M vs T and H from 10-300 K) for CoFe2O4 nanofibers. Magnetocaloric quantities including Delta S are obtained by applying the standard Maxwell relation to the measured magnetization data. No equations, parameters, or results reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the reported values (e.g., Delta S = 1.71 J K^{-1} at 32 K) are computed outputs from experimental curves without renaming or circular reduction. The derivation chain is self-contained experimental analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard materials-science assumptions about phase purity from XRD/Raman and the validity of the Maxwell relation for entropy calculation; no free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Magnetization data obtained via vibrating sample magnetometry can be integrated via the Maxwell relation to yield magnetic entropy change.
    Invoked when the abstract states 'variation of the magnetic entropy was measured indirectly using the Maxwell approach'.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5907 in / 1387 out tokens · 48190 ms · 2026-05-22T08:37:44.858835+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The structural, magnetic and magnetic entropy changes on CoFe2O4/CoFe2 composites for magnetic refrigeration application,

    T. Prabhakaran, R. V. Mangalaraja, and J. C. Denardin, “The structural, magnetic and magnetic entropy changes on CoFe2O4/CoFe2 composites for magnetic refrigeration application,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 444, pp. 297–306, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.08.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.08.008 2017

  2. [2]

    Inverse magnetocaloric effect in sol–gel derived nanosized cobalt ferrite,

    E. V. Gopalan, I. A. Al-Omari, D. S. Kumar, Y. Yoshida, P. A. Joy, and M. R. Anantharaman, “Inverse magnetocaloric effect in sol–gel derived nanosized cobalt ferrite,” Appl. Phys. A, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 497–503, May 2010, doi: 10.1007/s00339- 010-5573-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s00339- 2010

  3. [3]

    Raghu Ram, M

    N. R. Ram et al., “Review on Magnetocaloric Effect and Materials,” J. Supercond. Nov. Magn., vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1971–1979, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10948-018-4666-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s10948-018-4666-z 1971

  4. [4]

    Phan, S.C

    M.-H. Phan and S.-C. Yu, “Review of the magnetocaloric effect in manganite materials,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 308, no. 2, pp. 325–340, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.07.025

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.07.025 2007

  5. [5]

    Study of the Magnetocaloric Effect in (Pr, Dy)2Fe17 and Pr2(Fe, Al)17 Intermetallic Compounds,

    K. Zehani, R. Guetari, N. Mliki, and L. Bessais, “Study of the Magnetocaloric Effect in (Pr, Dy)2Fe17 and Pr2(Fe, Al)17 Intermetallic Compounds,” Phys. Procedia, vol. 75, pp. 1435–1441, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.phpro.2015.12.163

    work page doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2015.12.163 2015

  6. [6]

    A comparative study of the structural, electronic, magnetic properties and magnetocaloric effect of perovskite LaRO3 (R = Mn, Cr and Fe),

    S. Belhamra, R. Masrour, A. Jabar, and E. K. Hlil, “A comparative study of the structural, electronic, magnetic properties and magnetocaloric effect of perovskite LaRO3 (R = Mn, Cr and Fe),” Polyhedron, vol. 193, p. 114891, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.poly.2020.114891

    work page doi:10.1016/j.poly.2020.114891 2021

  7. [7]

    Enhanced Relative cooling Power and large inverse magnetocaloric effect of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles synthesized by auto-combustion method,

    Y. Hadouch et al., “Enhanced Relative cooling Power and large inverse magnetocaloric effect of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles synthesized by auto-combustion method,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 563, no. March, p. 169925, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169925

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169925 2022

  8. [8]

    Spinel ferrites (MFe2O4): Synthesis, improvement and catalytic application in environment and energy field,

    H. Qin et al., “Spinel ferrites (MFe2O4): Synthesis, improvement and catalytic application in environment and energy field,” Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., vol. 294, p. 102486, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2021.102486

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cis.2021.102486 2021

  9. [9]

    Unique magnetic properties and magnetization reversal process of CoFe2O4 nanotubes fabricated by electrospinning,

    J. Fu et al., “Unique magnetic properties and magnetization reversal process of CoFe2O4 nanotubes fabricated by electrospinning,” Nanoscale, vol. 4, no. 13, p. 3932, 2012, doi: 10.1039/c2nr30487b

    work page doi:10.1039/c2nr30487b 2012

  10. [10]

    Magnetic properties of different CoFe 2 O 4 nanostructures: nanofibers versus nanoparticles,

    R. E. Lu et al., “Magnetic properties of different CoFe 2 O 4 nanostructures: nanofibers versus nanoparticles,” J. Mater. Chem. C, vol. 2, no. 40, pp. 8578–8584, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1039/C4TC01415D

    work page doi:10.1039/c4tc01415d 2014

  11. [12]

    High magnetic moment of nanoparticle-sphere-like Co, Fe based composites and alloys prepared by proteic sol-gel synthesis: Structure, magnetic study and OER activity,

    R. A. Raimundo et al., “High magnetic moment of nanoparticle-sphere-like Co, Fe based composites and alloys prepared by proteic sol-gel synthesis: Structure, magnetic study and OER activity,” J. Alloys Compd., vol. 940, p. 168783, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.168783

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.168783 2023

  12. [13]

    NiFe 2 O 4 : A Versatile Spinel Material Brings New Opportunities for Spintronics,

    U. Lüders et al., “NiFe 2 O 4 : A Versatile Spinel Material Brings New Opportunities for Spintronics,” Adv. Mater., vol. 18, no. 13, pp. 1733–1736, Jul. 2006, doi: 10.1002/adma.200500972

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.200500972 2006

  13. [14]

    Size and Surface Effects on the MRI Relaxivity of Manganese Ferrite Nanoparticle Contrast Agents,

    U. I. Tromsdorf et al., “Size and Surface Effects on the MRI Relaxivity of Manganese Ferrite Nanoparticle Contrast Agents,” Nano Lett., vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 2422–2427, Aug. 2007, doi: 10.1021/nl071099b

    work page doi:10.1021/nl071099b 2007

  14. [15]

    Effect of cation distributions on structural and magnetic properties of Ni1-xCoxFe2O4 spinel ferrites,

    R. Borah and S. Ravi, “Effect of cation distributions on structural and magnetic properties of Ni1-xCoxFe2O4 spinel ferrites,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 538, p. 168276, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168276

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168276 2021

  15. [16]

    Magnetic and structural studies on CoFe 2O 4 nanoparticles synthesized by co-precipitation, normal micelles and reverse micelles methods,

    I. Sharifi, H. Shokrollahi, M. M. Doroodmand, and R. Safi, “Magnetic and structural studies on CoFe 2O 4 nanoparticles synthesized by co-precipitation, normal micelles and reverse micelles methods,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 324, no. 10, pp. 1854– 1861, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.01.015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.01.015 2012

  16. [17]

    Impact of different morphologies of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles for tuning of structural, optical and magnetic properties,

    Y. Kumar, A. Sharma, and P. M. Shirage, “Impact of different morphologies of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles for tuning of structural, optical and magnetic properties,” J. Alloys Compd., vol. 778, pp. 398–409, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.128

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.128 2019

  17. [18]

    Changing the Magnetic Properties of Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles with Different Fabrication Conditions,

    N. N. Huyen, N. T. Minh Hong, P. Duc Thang, T. Dang Thanh, and H. T. Anh, “Changing the Magnetic Properties of Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles with Different Fabrication Conditions,” VNU J. Sci. Math. - Phys., vol. 37, no. 2, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.25073/2588-1124/vnumap.4514

    work page doi:10.25073/2588-1124/vnumap.4514 2021

  18. [19]

    Synthesis and magnetic properties of CoFe2O4 ferrite nanoparticles,

    Z. Zi, Y. Sun, X. Zhu, Z. Yang, J. Dai, and W. Song, “Synthesis and magnetic properties of CoFe2O4 ferrite nanoparticles,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 321, no. 9, pp. 1251–1255, May 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.11.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.11.004 2009

  19. [20]

    A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites,

    Z.-M. Huang, Y.-Z. Zhang, M. Kotaki, and S. Ramakrishna, “A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites,” Compos. Sci. Technol., vol. 63, no. 15, pp. 2223–2253, Nov. 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0266- 3538(03)00178-7

    work page doi:10.1016/s0266- 2003

  20. [21]

    Highly porous cobalt oxide-decorated carbon nanofibers fabricated from starch as free-standing electrodes for supercapacitors,

    L. Kebabsa, J. Kim, D. Lee, and B. Lee, “Highly porous cobalt oxide-decorated carbon nanofibers fabricated from starch as free-standing electrodes for supercapacitors,” Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 511, p. 145313, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145313

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145313 2020

  21. [22]

    Fabrication and magnetic properties of NiFe2O4 nanofibers obtained by electrospinning,

    O. Saensuk, S. Phokha, A. Bootchanont, S. Maensiri, and E. Swatsitang, “Fabrication and magnetic properties of NiFe2O4 nanofibers obtained by electrospinning,” Ceram. Int., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 8133–8141, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.03.019

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.03.019 2015

  22. [23]

    Electrospun Nanofibrous Composite Membranes for Separations,

    Z. Meng, L. Zhu, X. Wang, and M. Zhu, “Electrospun Nanofibrous Composite Membranes for Separations,” Accounts Mater. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 180–192, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1021/accountsmr.2c00219

    work page doi:10.1021/accountsmr.2c00219 2023

  23. [24]

    Comparative Study of Cobalt Ferrite and Polyacrylamide Decorated Cobalt Ferrite Microspheres in Structural, Optical, Magnetic, Photoluminescence, and Photocatalytic Properties,

    Yumei Guo, C. Ren, L. Li, and X. Zhang, “Comparative Study of Cobalt Ferrite and Polyacrylamide Decorated Cobalt Ferrite Microspheres in Structural, Optical, Magnetic, Photoluminescence, and Photocatalytic Properties,” Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A, vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 2614–2621, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1134/S003602442012033X

    work page doi:10.1134/s003602442012033x 2020

  24. [25]

    Synthesis and Characterization of Cobalt Ferrite CoxFe3-xO4 Nanoparticles by Raman Spectroscopy and X-Ray Diffraction,

    G. A Flores, B. O, V. S Martínez, M. L De La Cruz, and C. C Patiño, “Synthesis and Characterization of Cobalt Ferrite CoxFe3-xO4 Nanoparticles by Raman Spectroscopy and X-Ray Diffraction,” Int. J. Metall. Met. Phys., vol. 5, no. 1, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.35840/2631-5076/9247

    work page doi:10.35840/2631-5076/9247 2020

  25. [26]

    Annealing temperature effects on the cation distribution in CoFe2O4 nanofibers,

    N. Liu et al., “Annealing temperature effects on the cation distribution in CoFe2O4 nanofibers,” Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 532, p. 147440, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147440

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147440 2020

  26. [27]

    Analysis of Stress-Coupled Magneto-Electric Effect in BaTiO3- CoFe2O4 Composites using Raman Spectroscopy,

    M. G. Majumdar, “Analysis of Stress-Coupled Magneto-Electric Effect in BaTiO3- CoFe2O4 Composites using Raman Spectroscopy,” Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 1–7, 2012, [Online]. Available: http://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?Analysis-of-Stress-Coupled- Magneto-Electric-Effect-in-BaTiO3-CoFe2O4-Composites-using-Raman- Spectroscopy.pdf

    work page 2012

  27. [28]

    Magnetic and crystallographic properties of rare-earth substituted yttrium-iron garnet,

    V. Sharma and B. K. Kuanr, “Magnetic and crystallographic properties of rare-earth substituted yttrium-iron garnet,” J. Alloys Compd., vol. 748, pp. 591–600, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.086

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.086 2018

  28. [29]

    Controllable synthesis of CoFe 2 O 4 electrospun nanofibers,

    N. Liu et al., “Controllable synthesis of CoFe 2 O 4 electrospun nanofibers,” CrystEngComm, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1839–1847, 2020, doi: 10.1039/C9CE01825E

    work page doi:10.1039/c9ce01825e 2020

  29. [30]

    Temperature- dependent magnetic response of antiferromagnetic doping in cobalt ferrite nanostructures,

    A. Nairan, M. Khan, U. Khan, M. Iqbal, S. Riaz, and S. Naseem, “Temperature- dependent magnetic response of antiferromagnetic doping in cobalt ferrite nanostructures,” Nanomaterials, vol. 6, no. 4, 2016, doi: 10.3390/nano6040073

    work page doi:10.3390/nano6040073 2016

  30. [31]

    Effect of annealing temperature on morphology and magnetic properties of cobalt ferrite nanofibers,

    S. Kumari, L. K. Pradhan, L. Kumar, M. K. Manglam, and M. Kar, “Effect of annealing temperature on morphology and magnetic properties of cobalt ferrite nanofibers,” Mater. Res. Express, vol. 6, no. 12, p. 1250a3, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab5fa1

    work page doi:10.1088/2053-1591/ab5fa1 2019

  31. [32]

    Synthesis and magnetic properties of cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanoparticles prepared by wet chemical route,

    K. Maaz, A. Mumtaz, S. K. Hasanain, and A. Ceylan, “Synthesis and magnetic properties of cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanoparticles prepared by wet chemical route,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 308, no. 2, pp. 289–295, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.06.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.06.003 2007

  32. [33]

    One-dimensional NiCuZn ferrite nanostructures: Fabrication, structure, and magnetic properties,

    J. Xiang, X. Shen, F. Song, and M. Liu, “One-dimensional NiCuZn ferrite nanostructures: Fabrication, structure, and magnetic properties,” J. Solid State Chem., vol. 183, no. 6, pp. 1239–1244, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2010.03.041

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jssc.2010.03.041 2010

  33. [34]

    Electrospun barium titanate/cobalt ferrite composite fibers with improved magnetoelectric performance,

    A. Baji, Y.-W. Mai, R. Yimnirun, and S. Unruan, “Electrospun barium titanate/cobalt ferrite composite fibers with improved magnetoelectric performance,” RSC Adv., vol. 4, no. 98, pp. 55217–55223, 2014, doi: 10.1039/C4RA09449B

    work page doi:10.1039/c4ra09449b 2014

  34. [35]

    Superior elastomeric nanocomposites with electrospun nanofibers and nanoparticles of CoFe 2 O 4 for magnetorheological applications,

    B. Mordina, R. K. Tiwari, D. K. Setua, and A. Sharma, “Superior elastomeric nanocomposites with electrospun nanofibers and nanoparticles of CoFe 2 O 4 for magnetorheological applications,” RSC Adv., vol. 5, no. 25, pp. 19091–19105, 2015, doi: 10.1039/C5RA00537J

    work page doi:10.1039/c5ra00537j 2015

  35. [36]

    Preparation and Magnetic Properties of CoFe2O4 Oriented Fiber Arrays by Electrospinning,

    C. Cheng, J. Dai, Z. Li, and W. Feng, “Preparation and Magnetic Properties of CoFe2O4 Oriented Fiber Arrays by Electrospinning,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 17, p. 3860, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/ma13173860

    work page doi:10.3390/ma13173860 2020

  36. [37]

    Effect of In on superparamagnetic CoInxFe2-xO4 (x = 0–0.15) synthesized through hydrothermal method,

    A. Ali et al., “Effect of In on superparamagnetic CoInxFe2-xO4 (x = 0–0.15) synthesized through hydrothermal method,” Results Phys., vol. 25, p. 104251, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104251

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104251 2021

  37. [38]

    Synthesis of cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanoparticles using combustion, coprecipitation, and precipitation methods: A comparison study of size, structural, and magnetic properties,

    M. Houshiar, F. Zebhi, Z. J. Razi, A. Alidoust, and Z. Askari, “Synthesis of cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) nanoparticles using combustion, coprecipitation, and precipitation methods: A comparison study of size, structural, and magnetic properties,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 371, pp. 43–48, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.06.059

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.06.059 2014

  38. [39]

    Cobalt Ferrite ( CoFe 2 O 4 ) Spinel as a New Efficient Magnetic Heterogeneous Fenton-like Catalyst for Wastewater Treatment,

    M. Alice et al., “Cobalt Ferrite ( CoFe 2 O 4 ) Spinel as a New Efficient Magnetic Heterogeneous Fenton-like Catalyst for Wastewater Treatment,” 2023

    work page 2023

  39. [40]

    Facile synthesis of CoFe2O4 magnetic nanomaterial by natural cellulose template and catalytic performance in heterogeneous activation of peroxymonosulfate,

    P. Niu, C. Li, C. Jia, D. Wang, and S. Liu, “Facile synthesis of CoFe2O4 magnetic nanomaterial by natural cellulose template and catalytic performance in heterogeneous activation of peroxymonosulfate,” J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 419–427, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10971-019-05118-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s10971-019-05118-9 2020

  40. [41]

    Spin glasslike behavior and magnetic enhancement in nanosized Ni– Zn ferrite system,

    B. Ghosh et al., “Spin glasslike behavior and magnetic enhancement in nanosized Ni– Zn ferrite system,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 108, no. 3, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1063/1.3456174

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3456174 2010

  41. [42]

    Chemical synthesis and magnetic properties of monodisperse cobalt ferrite nanoparticles,

    Z. Mahhouti et al., “Chemical synthesis and magnetic properties of monodisperse cobalt ferrite nanoparticles,” J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron., vol. 30, no. 16, pp. 14913–14922, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10854-019-01863-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10854-019-01863-3 2019

  42. [43]

    Synthesis of highly magnetostrictive nanostructures and their application in a polymer-based magnetoelectric sensing device,

    R. Gonçalves et al., “Synthesis of highly magnetostrictive nanostructures and their application in a polymer-based magnetoelectric sensing device,” Eur. Polym. J., vol. 84, pp. 685–692, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.09.055

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.09.055 2016

  43. [44]

    Yafet–Kittel-type magnetic order in Zn- substituted cobalt ferrite nanoparticles with uniaxial anisotropy,

    R. Topkaya, A. Baykal, and A. Demir, “Yafet–Kittel-type magnetic order in Zn- substituted cobalt ferrite nanoparticles with uniaxial anisotropy,” J. Nanoparticle Res., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 1359, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11051-012-1359-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11051-012-1359-6 2013

  44. [45]

    Magnetocaloric effect in ferrite nanoparticles,

    P. Poddar et al., “Magnetocaloric effect in ferrite nanoparticles,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 307, no. 2, pp. 227–231, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.04.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.04.007 2006

  45. [46]

    Normal and inverse magnetocaloric effects in ferromagnetic Pr0.58Sr0.42MnO3,

    D. V. Maheswar Repaka, M. Aparnadevi, P. Kumar, T. S. Tripathi, and R. Mahendiran, “Normal and inverse magnetocaloric effects in ferromagnetic Pr0.58Sr0.42MnO3,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 113, no. 17, May 2013, doi: 10.1063/1.4793599

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4793599 2013

  46. [47]

    Theoretical aspects of the magnetocaloric effect,

    N. A. de Oliveira and P. J. von Ranke, “Theoretical aspects of the magnetocaloric effect,” Phys. Rep., vol. 489, no. 4–5, pp. 89–159, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.12.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.12.006 2010

  47. [48]

    Magnetization and magnetocaloric effect in ball-milled zinc ferrite powder,

    J. Gass, H. Srikanth, N. Kislov, S. S. Srinivasan, and Y. Emirov, “Magnetization and magnetocaloric effect in ball-milled zinc ferrite powder,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 103, no. 7, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.1063/1.2829754

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2829754 2008

  48. [49]

    Maqnetocaloric effect and size-dependent study of the magnetic properties of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles prepared by solvothermal synthesis,

    C. Vâzquez-Vázquez et al., “Maqnetocaloric effect and size-dependent study of the magnetic properties of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles prepared by solvothermal synthesis,” Phys. Status Solidi Appl. Mater. Sci., vol. 205, no. 6, pp. 1358–1362, 2008, doi: 10.1002/pssa.200778128

    work page doi:10.1002/pssa.200778128 2008

  49. [50]

    Superparamagnetism and magneto-caloric effect (MCE) in functional magnetic nanostructures,

    S. Hariharan and J. Gass, “Superparamagnetism and magneto-caloric effect (MCE) in functional magnetic nanostructures,” Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 398–402, 2005

    work page 2005