AI-Assisted Hyperspectral Interferometry and Single-Cell Dispersion Imaging

Boubacar Kante; Kamyar Behrouzi; Liwei Lin; Megan Teng; Tanveer Ahmed Siddique; Walid Redjem

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 44 references

AI-Assisted Hyperspectral Interferometry and Single-Cell Dispersion Imaging

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a common-path interferometer with polarization decoupling can measure broadband phase spectra roughly ten times more stably than conventional interferometry, and that the same setup can use hyperspectral fringe spatial

desk verdict GPCPI is a plausible optical advance and the metasurface phase sensing holds up, but the cell-dispersion claim is internally inconsistent with the paper's own fringe equation and the AI/statistical support is too thin to accept as stated. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.00997 v2 pith:AIKMOTWN submitted 2026-01-02 physics.optics physics.bio-phphysics.med-ph

Kamyar Behrouzi , Tanveer Ahmed Siddique , Megan Teng , Walid Redjem , Liwei Lin , Boubacar Kante This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.opticsphysics.bio-phphysics.med-ph

keywords common-pathinterferometrybroadbandphasemeasurementpolarizationdecouplingplasmonicmetasurfacesensingrefractiveindexsingle-celldispersionimaginghyperspectralcellclassification

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper attempts to establish a new interferometry scheme, GPCPI, that combines the stability of common-path interferometry with arbitrary input polarization by using a Wollaston prism to create reference and sensing beams immediately before the sample. It claims this yields simultaneous broadband transmittance and phase measurements with phase noise reduced by about an order of magnitude relative to prior interferometry, enabling a phase-based refractive-index detection limit near 1.6e-5. A second claim is that the spatial-frequency content of hyperspectral interference fringes encodes the local refractive-index dispersion of single cells, independent of cell height, allowing normal and cancerous skin cells to be distinguished without labels. A sympathetic reader would care because phase sensing is more sensitive than intensity spectroscopy but traditionally fragile; a compact vibration-tolerant version with cell-classification capability would be broadly useful in metrology, diagnostics, and drug discovery.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the two-beam interference equation I = I1 + I2 + 2 sqrt(I1 I2) cos(k theta y + Delta phi). The Fourier side-peak phase gives the sample phase spectrum, while the fringe spatial frequency k theta is interpreted, in the cell-imaging mode, as a direct map of local refractive index that is independent of the phase offset and therefore of sample height. Supporting mechanisms are the Wollaston-prism polarization decoupling, the path-following plus autoencoder phase-anomaly correction, and the ConvNeXt V2 encoder providing dissimilarity-based phase-variation-value scores.

What would settle it

Measure the normalized frequency map of the same cell, or a dielectric microsphere of known refractive index, at two different focal planes or heights while keeping wavelength fixed; if the map changes with height, the height-independence claim fails. Alternatively, compare the reported phase stability under controlled vibration amplitudes: if the claimed 1.75e-3 degree phase variation worsens markedly under small table motion, the stability advantage is conditional.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery claimed is that relaxing the polarization constraint of common-path interferometry, by generating the two interfering beams with a Wollaston prism and recombining them with a polarizer, preserves the vibration stability of a single optical path while allowing simultaneous measurement of amplitude and phase spectra from arbitrarily polarized samples. Using Fourier extraction of the interference phase, an autoencoder that detects and corrects phase anomalies via second-order gradient residuals, and a transfer-learned ConvNeXt V2 network that scores phase variation, the authors report a minimum phase variation of 1.75e-3 degrees and a phase-based refractive-index limit of

Load-bearing premise

The cell-classification claim rests on the asserted mapping from local refractive index to fringe spatial frequency, with the frequency map stated to be independent of sample height; that mapping is asserted rather than derived, and if thickness or beam geometry also shifts the frequency, the extracted fingerprints are not purely dispersive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Broadband complex optical response (transmittance and phase) becomes measurable in one compact, vibration-tolerant setup without polarization constraints on the sample.
Phase-based refractive-index sensing reaches about 1.6e-5 RI with a simple single-resonance plasmonic metasurface, an order of magnitude better phase stability than prior interferometric approaches.
Real-time perturbation tracking is possible by feeding interference patterns directly to the trained encoder, bypassing slow per-spectrum phase extraction.
Hyperspectral fringe spatial-frequency analysis can classify normal vs cancerous skin cells at single-cell level without labels, if the height-independence claim holds.
The method is presented as applicable to metrology, material assessment, molecular diagnostics, drug discovery, and quantum sensing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: if the height-independence of the frequency map survives careful tests, the approach could complement quantitative phase imaging by adding dispersion as an orthogonal label-free contrast channel; the paper demonstrates two cell lines, not a clinical population.
Editorial inference: the autoencoder is trained on spectra with artificially inserted anomalies, so its performance on real-world artifacts not represented in the training set is untested; a systematic benchmark against noisy experimental spectra would clarify its generalization.
Editorial inference: the normalized frequency map could be tested as a quantitative dispersion measurement against known refractive-index standards such as polymer microspheres with certified dispersion to calibrate the fingerprints; the paper does not provide such a calibration.
Editorial inference: PVV score monotonicity with analyte concentration could be exploited for multiplexed sensing if the encoder is fine-tuned on multiple perturbation types; the paper only demonstrates one analyte series.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The GPCPI design itself is the real contribution: putting a Wollaston prism before the sample to create orthogonal reference and sensing arms in a nearly common path is a clean way to get polarization-independent common-path interferometry. The shock test shows a genuine robustness advantage over Michelson interferometry, and the metasurface phase spectra track the expected red shift with refractive index. The phase extraction via Fourier transform is standard, and the autoencoder anomaly correction is a sensible engineering addition, even if not deeply novel.

But the paper has two serious soft spots. First, the headline "order of magnitude" stability improvement is never quantified against a comparator in the main text — we get σ_ph = 1.75×10⁻³° for GPCPI but no MI or CPI σ to compare it to. The reader is left to trust the supplement. Second, and more damaging, the cell dispersion imaging in §3.3 is internally inconsistent. The paper claims the spatial frequency map is independent of sample height because Eq. 1's fringe frequency depends only on kθ. That is only true for a spatially constant Δφ. For a real cell, Δφ(x,y) varies, and the local fringe frequency along y is kθ/2π + (1/2π)∂Δφ/∂y, where Δφ ≈ k₀(n−n₀)h. The gradient term contains both h∂n/∂y and (n−n₀)∂h/∂y, so the frequency map necessarily mixes thickness and thickness gradients with dispersion. The authors simply assert the opposite on the basis of a misreading of their own equation. This undercuts the physical interpretation of the normal-vs-cancer "dispersion fingerprints." The empirical observation may still be real, but the claimed height independence and pure-dispersion rationale collapse.

Beyond that, the cell classification is two cell lines with no replicates or statistics; the PVV sensing lacks any training/validation details; and no code or data are released, so the AI pipeline is not independently checkable. The LOD calculation uses Sph measured from the same system, which is acceptable but should be sensitivity-analyzed.

Net: the hardware and phase-sensing core are worth taking seriously, but the cell-dispersion interpretation needs a major fix — either derive the full fringe-frequency expression and show the gradient term is negligible, or reframe the method as measuring phase-gradient information. The paper deserves a serious referee, but it needs substantial revision before the claims as written can be trusted.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents GPCPI, a common-path interferometer that uses a Wollaston prism to generate orthogonally polarized reference and sensing arms, enabling simultaneous broadband transmittance and phase measurements while relaxing the polarization constraints of conventional CPI. An AI pipeline—an autoencoder for phase-anomaly detection and a ConvNeXt V2 model for phase-variation-value (PVV) scoring—is described. The method is applied to a plasmonic metasurface flow cell for refractive-index sensing, reporting a phase stability of σ_ph = 1.75×10−3° and a phase-based LOD of 1.6×10−5 RI, and to hyperspectral imaging of normal (CCD-32Sk) vs cancerous (COLO-829) skin cells, claiming height-independent spatial-frequency dispersion fingerprints that enable cell classification.

Significance. GPCPI is a plausible contribution: Eqs. (1)–(2) are standard Fourier phase retrieval, and the common-path geometry should improve vibration robustness while the Wollaston-prism decoupling relaxes polarization constraints. The AI anomaly-detection idea is novel, and the metasurface phase measurements are compared with simulations. If the stability and LOD claims were supported by a direct comparator, the sensing result would be a useful advance. The cell-dispersion imaging concept is potentially interesting but currently rests on an unsupported height-independence assertion and lacks quantitative classification validation; the claimed pure-dispersion fingerprint is not established.

major comments (3)

[§3.3, Eq. (1)] The claim that the normalized spatial-frequency map is independent of sample height is not correct for spatially varying samples. For a cell, Δφ(x,y)=k0[n(x,y)-n0]h(x,y), so the local fringe frequency along y is f_y=(1/2π)∂/∂y[kθy+Δφ]=kθ/2π+(1/2π)∂Δφ/∂y, which includes thickness and thickness-gradient terms. Thus the extracted frequency map is not purely dispersive. This undermines the central claim that the fingerprints enable cell classification. The authors must either derive conditions under which ∂Δφ/∂y is negligible over the FFT window or provide experimental validation on samples with controlled thickness.
[§3.2] The headline 'order of magnitude improvement in phase stability' is not supported by data in the main text. σ_ph = 1.75×10−3° is reported for GPCPI only; no MI or CPI phase-standard-deviation values are quoted in the text or in Fig. 3. The figure reports fringe-contrast standard deviations (14% vs 31%) and contrast drops, which are not the same as phase stability. Provide a direct comparison of phase noise (e.g., σ_ph for MI/CPI under identical conditions) to justify the claim.
[§3.3, Fig. 5] The cell classification claim is not validated. The paper shows one example of each cell line, with no number of cells, no statistical analysis, no classifier, and no accuracy or error rates. The phrase 'enabling robust cell classification and disease diagnosis' is an overstatement. Add quantitative classification experiments (e.g., multiple cells, cross-validation, metrics) or temper the claim to 'shows distinct fringe patterns'.

minor comments (4)

[§3.1] Typo: 'the later system' should be 'the latter system' in the paragraph following Fig. 3.
[Fig. 5 caption] The caption states 'According to Eq. 2, the spatial frequency depends solely on the refractive index', but Eq. (2) is the Fourier phase-extraction equation, not a relation for spatial frequency. The reference should be to Eq. (1), and the statement is only valid for spatially uniform Δφ.
[§2.2 / Fig. 2] The autoencoder architecture is described only qualitatively. Details such as layer sizes, convolution kernel sizes, training set size, and the synthetic anomaly-generation procedure should be given in the Supplement for reproducibility.
[Eq. (2)] The choice of sideband and the quadrant handling of the arctangent are not specified. This is important for correct unwrapping and should be stated explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to fitted inputs or author self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's core results are not circular. Phase extraction uses a standard Fourier-transform sideband analysis (Eq. 2) applied to measured interference patterns, with the phase spectrum calibrated by subtracting a reference spectrum; the claimed stability improvement is an experimental comparison of fringe contrast under shock, not a fitted prediction. The autoencoder is explicitly trained on synthetic anomalies and then applied to measured phase spectra, so its anomaly correction is an independent preprocessing step rather than a result forced by the data it predicts. The PVV sensing score compares encoded vectors of perturbed and control phase patterns through cosine dissimilarity, so the reported refractive-index sensing is based on measured pattern changes rather than on fitting the target LOD. The LOD is computed from measured phase repeatability (sigma_ph = 1.75e-3 deg) and measured phase sensitivity (Sph ~ 330 deg/RI), i.e., from two independently measured quantities, so it is not a fitted output. The cell-dispersion imaging claim contains a physical-assumption weakness — the mapping from refractive index to spatial-frequency variations is stated rather than derived, and the height-independence argument assumes a spatially uniform phase offset — but this is a modeling/correctness concern, not a circularity in which the conclusion is equivalent to the input by construction. The self-citations present (Refs. 11, 20, 39) are contextual or methodological and are not load-bearing for the main stability, sensing, or classification claims. Accordingly, no circular step meeting the quoted-evidence standard is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The phase-retrieval core rests on standard two-beam interference and Fourier analysis. The cell-dispersion mapping is an unproven modeling assumption, and the AI components rely on transfer-learning and synthetic-anomaly generalization assumptions. One fitted sensitivity value (Sph ~ 330 °/RI) enters the headline LOD.

free parameters (1)

Phase sensitivity Sph = ~330 °/RI
Extracted from the steepest part of the measured phase-vs-refractive-index response; used with sigma_ph to compute the headline LODph = 1.6e-5 RI.

assumptions (7)

standard math Two-beam interference with small angle theta: I = I1 + I2 + 2*sqrt(I1 I2) cos(k theta y + Delta_phi) (Eq. 1)
Underlies all phase extraction; standard model for two-beam interference in the small-angle regime.
standard math Fourier-transform sideband selection recovers Delta_phi (Eq. 2)
Standard Fourier phase-retrieval relation used to convert interference patterns into phase spectra.
ad hoc to paper Normalized fringe spatial frequency maps local refractive index and is independent of cell height
Central to the cell-dispersion imaging claim; asserted in Section 3.3 but not derived or validated with control measurements.
domain assumption Autoencoder trained on artificially inserted anomalies generalizes to real phase anomalies
The anomaly-correction algorithm assumes that synthetic discontinuities inserted into phase spectra are representative of real sensor/spectral artifacts.
domain assumption ImageNet-pretrained ConvNeXt V2 features transfer to fringe-pattern dissimilarity scoring
The PVV sensing relies on transfer learning from a model trained on natural images, with no demonstration of domain-matched pretraining.
domain assumption CCD-32Sk cells are nearly index-matched to PBS in the NIR while COLO-829 cells are not
The interpretation of the cell images depends on this empirical contrast; it is reported but not independently validated with refractive-index measurements.
domain assumption Plasmonic metasurface response can be represented by single-mode S-matrix fitting, and EG/W refractive indices follow bulk values
Used to extract resonance shifts and convert concentrations to refractive-index changes; standard for this type of sensor but still a modeling assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AI-Assisted Hyperspectral Interferometry and Single-Cell Dispersion Imaging." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AIKMOTWN

@misc{pith2026260100997,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AI-Assisted Hyperspectral Interferometry and Single-Cell Dispersion Imaging},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AIKMOTWN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.00997}
}

read the original abstract

Interferometry techniques are essential for extracting phase information from optical systems enabling precise measurements of dispersion and highly sensitive detection of perturbations. While phase sensing offers enhanced sensitivity compared to conventional spectroscopy methods, this sensitivity often makes systems more vulnerable to external factors such as vibrations, introducing instability and noise. In this work, we demonstrate a broadband and AI-enhanced interferometry method, denoted general polarization common-path interferometry (GPCPI) that relaxes the polarization constraints of traditional common-path interferometry. The polarization decoupling feature enables simultaneous amplitude and phase measurements supplemented with deep neural autoencoders to detect phase anomalies in the spectrum through the analysis of second order derivative mapping of the phase profile, enhancing the accuracy of broadband phase measurements. The approach enables an order of magnitude improvement in phase stability compared to state-of-the-art interferometry techniques, leading to higher accuracy in phase sensing. Plasmonic metasurface phase sensing and hyperspectral single-cell dispersion imaging demonstrate the capability and sensitivity of the method over conventional spectroscopy. Our adopted version of deep learning model, ConvNeXt V2, enables real-time tracking of phase variation with minimized noise. Interference fringes affected by the cell-cultured samples reveal the fingerprints of the normal (CCD-32Sk) vs cancerous (COLO-829) skin cells, enabling cell classification and disease diagnosis at single-cell level through hyperspectral dispersion imaging. The proposed technique offers a reliable, compact, and stable solution for broadband phase measurements and single-cell dispersion imaging for applications in metrology, molecular diagnostics, drug discovery, and quantum sensing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.00997 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** GPCPI interferometry. (a) Simultaneous transmittance and phase spectra measurements via the reference and sensing beams formed by a Wollaston prism (WP). The amplitude and phase information can be extracted from different polarization angles, for instance the horizontal and vertical polarizations contain reference and sample intensities, while 45° and 135° angles form the interference pattern. The presented scheme i… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** AI-enhanced broadband phase sensing algorithms. (a) Deep neural autoencoder for phase anomalies detection using second order gradients. The network consists of series of convolutions to encode the input second order phase gradient spectrum into a compressed vector, then it regenerates the input by applying series of transversed convolutional operations. Note that the autoencoder weights were calculated through a tra… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Phase measurements stability analysis. (a-b) The normalized contrast of the phase pattern along the blue dashed line (see insets) over time for the MI and GPCPI methods, respectively. The blue solid line shows the mean fringe contrast, and the shaded red region represents the standard deviations. The results show large variations in the MI method, even before the shock was applied. In contrast, GPCPI exhibits smalle… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Quantitative phase spectrum extraction and sensing mode. (a) Flow-cell integrated plasmonic metasurface chip for refractive index sensing. (b) Schematic of the unit-cell of a metasurface and the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a few unit-cells of a fabricat…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Cell dispersion imaging mode. (a) The reference and sensing beams interfere over the cell-cultured sample, generating a spatial frequency distribution across the 2D plane, which reveals cell characteristics. Variations in the refractive index across the interference pl…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references

[1]

Light–matter interaction at atomic scales,

R. Gutzler, M. Garg, C. R. Ast, K. Kuhnke, and K. Kern, "Light–matter interaction at atomic scales," Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 441–453 (2021)

2021
[2]

Polariton panorama,

D. N. Basov, A. Asenjo-Garcia, P. J. Schuck, X. Zhu, and A. Rubio, "Polariton panorama," Nanophotonics 10, 549–577 (2021)

2021
[3]

Surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy,

J. Kozuch, K. Ataka, and J. Heberle, "Surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy," Nat. Rev. Methods Prim. 3, 70 (2023)

2023
[4]

Using Raman spectroscopy to characterize biological materials,

H. J. Butler, L. Ashton, B. Bird, G. Cinque, K. Curtis, J. Dorney, K. Esmonde-White, N. J. Fullwood, B. Gardner, P. L. Martin-Hirsch, M. J. Walsh, M. R. McAinsh, N. Stone, and F. L. Martin, "Using Raman spectroscopy to characterize biological materials," Nat. Protoc. 11, 664–687 (2016)

2016
[5]

Introduction to Optical Characterization of Materials,

J. A. N. T. Soares, "Introduction to Optical Characterization of Materials," in Practical Materials Characterization, M. Sardela, ed. (Springer New York, 2014), pp. 43–92

2014
[6]

Polarization-sensitive intensity diffraction tomography,

S. Song, J. Kim, T. Moon, B. Seong, W. Kim, C.-H. Yoo, J.-K. Choi, and C. Joo, "Polarization-sensitive intensity diffraction tomography," Light Sci. Appl. 12, 124 (2023)

2023
[7]

Polarisation optics for biomedical and clinical applications: a review,

C. He, H. He, J. Chang, B. Chen, H. Ma, and M. J. Booth, "Polarisation optics for biomedical and clinical applications: a review," Light Sci. Appl. 10, 194 (2021)

2021
[8]

Polarization-resolved spectroscopy imaging of grain boundaries and optical excitations in crystalline organic thin films,

Z. Pan, N. Rawat, I. Cour, L. Manning, R. L. Headrick, and M. Furis, "Polarization-resolved spectroscopy imaging of grain boundaries and optical excitations in crystalline organic thin films," Nat. Commun. 6, 8201 (2015)

2015

Show all 44 references

[9]

Dispersion measurements with white-light interferometry,

S. Diddams and J.-C. Diels, "Dispersion measurements with white-light interferometry," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 13, 1120–1129 (1996)

1996
[10]

Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine,

Y. K. Park, C. Depeursinge, and G. Popescu, "Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine," Nat. Photonics 12, 578–589 (2018)

2018
[11]

Reflective interferometry for optical metamaterial phase measurements,

K. O’Brien, N. D. Lanzillotti-Kimura, H. Suchowski, B. Kante, Y. Park, X. Yin, and X. Zhang, "Reflective interferometry for optical metamaterial phase measurements," Opt. Lett. 37, 4089 (2012)

2012
[12]

Surface enhanced Raman scattering artificial nose for high dimensionality fingerprinting,

N. Kim, M. R. Thomas, M. S. Bergholt, I. J. Pence, H. Seong, P. Charchar, N. Todorova, A. Nagelkerke, A. Belessiotis-Richards, D. J. Payne, A. Gelmi, I. Yarovsky, and M. M. Stevens, "Surface enhanced Raman scattering artificial nose for high dimensionality fingerprinting," Nat...

2020
[13]

Far-field nanoscale infrared spectroscopy of vibrational fingerprints of molecules with graphene plasmons,

H. Hu, X. Yang, F. Zhai, D. Hu, R. Liu, K. Liu, Z. Sun, and Q. Dai, "Far-field nanoscale infrared spectroscopy of vibrational fingerprints of molecules with graphene plasmons," Nat. Commun. 7, 12334 (2016)

2016
[14]

Imaging- based molecular barcoding with pixelated dielectric metasurfaces,

A. Tittl, A. Leitis, M. Liu, F. Yesilkoy, D.-Y. Choi, D. N. Neshev, Y. S. Kivshar, and H. Altug, "Imaging- based molecular barcoding with pixelated dielectric metasurfaces," Science (80-. ). 360, 1105–1109 (2018)

2018
[15]

Label-free multimodal polarization- sensitive optical microscope for multiparametric quantitative characterization of collagen,

L. Yang, R. R. Iyer, J. E. Sorrells, E. J. Chaney, and S. A. Boppart, "Label-free multimodal polarization- sensitive optical microscope for multiparametric quantitative characterization of collagen," Optica 11, 155– 165 (2024)

2024
[16]

Experimental determination of the dispersion relation of light in metamaterials by white-light interferometry,

E. Pshenay-Severin, F. Setzpfandt, C. Helgert, U. Hübner, C. Menzel, A. Chipouline, C. Rockstuhl, A. Tünnermann, F. Lederer, and T. Pertsch, "Experimental determination of the dispersion relation of light in metamaterials by white-light interferometry," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27, ...

2010
[17]

Complex refractive-index measurement based on Fresnel’s equations and the uses of heterodyne interferometry,

M.-H. Chiu, J.-Y. Lee, and D.-C. Su, "Complex refractive-index measurement based on Fresnel’s equations and the uses of heterodyne interferometry," Appl. Opt. 38, 4047–4052 (1999)

1999
[18]

Simultaneous negative phase and group velocity of light in a metamaterial,

G. Dolling, C. Enkrich, M. Wegener, C. M. Soukoulis, and S. Linden, "Simultaneous negative phase and group velocity of light in a metamaterial," Science (80-. ). 312, 892–894 (2006)

2006
[19]

Direct measurement of refractive-index dispersion of transparent media by white-light interferometry,

M. Galli, F. Marabelli, and G. Guizzetti, "Direct measurement of refractive-index dispersion of transparent media by white-light interferometry," Appl. Opt. 42, 3910–3914 (2003)

2003
[20]

Symmetry- breaking-induced plasmonic exceptional points and nanoscale sensing,

J.-H. Park, A. Ndao, W. Cai, L. Hsu, A. Kodigala, T. Lepetit, Y.-H. Lo, and B. Kanté, "Symmetry- breaking-induced plasmonic exceptional points and nanoscale sensing," Nat. Phys. 16, 462–468 (2020)

2020
[21]

Phase noise matching in resonant metasurfaces for intrinsic sensing stability,

I. Barth, D. Conteduca, P. Dong, J. Wragg, P. K. Sahoo, G. S. Arruda, E. R. Martins, and T. F. Krauss, "Phase noise matching in resonant metasurfaces for intrinsic sensing stability," Optica 11, 354 (2024)

2024
[22]

Common-path interferometric label-free protein sensing with resonant dielectric nanostructures,

I. Barth, D. Conteduca, C. Reardon, S. Johnson, and T. F. Krauss, "Common-path interferometric label-free protein sensing with resonant dielectric nanostructures," Light Sci. Appl. 9, (2020)

2020
[23]

Phase-sensitive plasmonic biosensor using a portable and large field-of-view interferometric microarray imager,

F. Yesilkoy, R. A. Terborg, J. Pello, A. A. Belushkin, Y. Jahani, V. Pruneri, and H. Altug, "Phase-sensitive plasmonic biosensor using a portable and large field-of-view interferometric microarray imager," Light Sci. Appl. 7, 17152 (2018)

2018
[24]

Nanoparticle detection using dual-phase interferometry,

B. Deutsch, R. Beams, and L. Novotny, "Nanoparticle detection using dual-phase interferometry," Appl. Opt. 49, 4921–4925 (2010)

2010
[25]

Surface and thickness measurement of a transparent film using wavelength scanning interferometry,

F. Gao, H. Muhamedsalih, and X. Jiang, "Surface and thickness measurement of a transparent film using wavelength scanning interferometry," Opt. Express 20, 21450–21456 (2012)

2012
[26]

Exceptional–point–enhanced phase sensing,

W. Mao, Z. Fu, Y. Li, F. Li, and L. Yang, "Exceptional–point–enhanced phase sensing," Sci. Adv. 10, eadl5037 (2024)

2024
[27]

A new Mach–Zehnder interference temperature measuring sensor based on silica-based chip,

G. Li, T. Li, Y. Liu, and Y. Zheng, "A new Mach–Zehnder interference temperature measuring sensor based on silica-based chip," Sci. Rep. 14, 8657 (2024)

2024
[28]

Multiplex optical biosensors based on multi-pinhole interferometry,

J. Bläsi and M. Gerken, "Multiplex optical biosensors based on multi-pinhole interferometry," Biomed. Opt. Express 12, 4265 (2021)

2021
[29]

Interferometric biosensor based on planar optical waveguide sensor chips for label-free detection of surface bound bioreactions,

K. Schmitt, B. Schirmer, C. Hoffmann, A. Brandenburg, and P. Meyrueis, "Interferometric biosensor based on planar optical waveguide sensor chips for label-free detection of surface bound bioreactions," Biosens. Bioelectron. 22, 2591–2597 (2007)

2007
[30]

“On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether,

A. A. Michelson and E. W. Morley, "“On the Relative Motion of the Earth and the Luminiferous Ether,” American Journal of Science (1887)," in An Anthology of Nineteenth-Century American Science Writing, C. R. Resetarits, ed. (Anthem Press, 2012), pp. 243–254

2012
[31]

Advances and limitations of phase dispersion measurement by spectrally and spatially resolved interferometry,

A. Börzsönyi, A. P. Kovács, M. Görbe, and K. Osvay, "Advances and limitations of phase dispersion measurement by spectrally and spatially resolved interferometry," Opt. Commun. 281, 3051–3061 (2008)

2008
[32]

Dispersion measurement of inert gases and gas mixtures at 800 nm,

A. Börzsönyi, Z. Heiner, M. P. Kalashnikov, A. P. Kovács, and K. Osvay, "Dispersion measurement of inert gases and gas mixtures at 800 nm," Appl. Opt. 47, 4856–4863 (2008)

2008
[33]

Spatially resolved spectral interferometry for determination of subsurface structure,

A. F. Zuluaga and R. Richards-Kortum, "Spatially resolved spectral interferometry for determination of subsurface structure," Opt. Lett. 24, 519–521 (1999)

1999
[34]

Deep-learning-based fringe-pattern analysis with uncertainty estimation,

S. Feng, C. Zuo, Y. Hu, Y. Li, and Q. Chen, "Deep-learning-based fringe-pattern analysis with uncertainty estimation," Optica 8, 1507–1510 (2021)

2021
[35]

Improvement of the fringe analysis algorithm for wavelength scanning interferometry based on filter parameter optimization,

T. Zhang, F. Gao, H. Muhamedsalih, S. Lou, H. Martin, and X. Jiang, "Improvement of the fringe analysis algorithm for wavelength scanning interferometry based on filter parameter optimization," Appl. Opt. 57, 2227–2234 (2018)

2018
[36]

General iterative algorithm for phase-extraction from fringe patterns with random phase-shifts, intensity harmonics and non-uniform phase-shift distribution,

Y. Chen and Q. Kemao, "General iterative algorithm for phase-extraction from fringe patterns with random phase-shifts, intensity harmonics and non-uniform phase-shift distribution," Opt. Express 29, 30905–30926 (2021)

2021
[37]

Phase unwrapping algorithms, respectively, based on path-following and discrete cosine transform,

Y. Li, J. Zhu, and W. Shen, "Phase unwrapping algorithms, respectively, based on path-following and discrete cosine transform," Optik (Stuttg). 119, 545–547 (2008)

2008
[38]

ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoders,

S. Woo, S. Debnath, R. Hu, X. Chen, Z. Liu, I. S. Kweon, and S. Xie, "ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoders," in 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2023), pp. 16133–16142

2023
[39]

Local phase method for designing and optimizing metasurface devices,

L. Hsu, M. Dupré, A. Ndao, J. Yellowhair, and B. Kanté, "Local phase method for designing and optimizing metasurface devices," Opt. Express 25, 24974–24982 (2017)

2017
[40]

Densities and Refractive Indexes for Ethylene Glycol- Water Solutions,

E. T. Fogg, A. N. Hixson, and A. R. Thompson, "Densities and Refractive Indexes for Ethylene Glycol- Water Solutions," Anal. Chem. 27, 1609–1611 (1955)

1955
[41]

Rational approximation of frequency domain responses by vector fitting,

B. Gustavsen and A. Semlyen, "Rational approximation of frequency domain responses by vector fitting," IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 14, 1052–1061 (1999)

1999
[42]

Improving the pole relocating properties of vector fitting,

B. Gustavsen, "Improving the pole relocating properties of vector fitting," IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 21, 1587–1592 (2006)

2006
[43]

Label-free live cell recognition and tracking for biological discoveries and translational applications,

B. Chen, Z. Yin, B. W.-L. Ng, D. M. Wang, R. S. Tuan, R. Bise, and D. F. E. Ker, "Label-free live cell recognition and tracking for biological discoveries and translational applications," npj Imaging 2, 41 (2024)

2024
[44]

Label-free identification of protein aggregates using deep learning,

K. A. Ibrahim, K. S. Grußmayer, N. Riguet, L. Feletti, H. A. Lashuel, and A. Radenovic, "Label-free identification of protein aggregates using deep learning," Nat. Commun. 14, 7816 (2023)

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Light–matter interaction at atomic scales,

R. Gutzler, M. Garg, C. R. Ast, K. Kuhnke, and K. Kern, "Light–matter interaction at atomic scales," Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 441–453 (2021)

2021

[2] [2]

Polariton panorama,

D. N. Basov, A. Asenjo-Garcia, P. J. Schuck, X. Zhu, and A. Rubio, "Polariton panorama," Nanophotonics 10, 549–577 (2021)

2021

[3] [3]

Surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy,

J. Kozuch, K. Ataka, and J. Heberle, "Surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy," Nat. Rev. Methods Prim. 3, 70 (2023)

2023

[4] [4]

Using Raman spectroscopy to characterize biological materials,

H. J. Butler, L. Ashton, B. Bird, G. Cinque, K. Curtis, J. Dorney, K. Esmonde-White, N. J. Fullwood, B. Gardner, P. L. Martin-Hirsch, M. J. Walsh, M. R. McAinsh, N. Stone, and F. L. Martin, "Using Raman spectroscopy to characterize biological materials," Nat. Protoc. 11, 664–687 (2016)

2016

[5] [5]

Introduction to Optical Characterization of Materials,

J. A. N. T. Soares, "Introduction to Optical Characterization of Materials," in Practical Materials Characterization, M. Sardela, ed. (Springer New York, 2014), pp. 43–92

2014

[6] [6]

Polarization-sensitive intensity diffraction tomography,

S. Song, J. Kim, T. Moon, B. Seong, W. Kim, C.-H. Yoo, J.-K. Choi, and C. Joo, "Polarization-sensitive intensity diffraction tomography," Light Sci. Appl. 12, 124 (2023)

2023

[7] [7]

Polarisation optics for biomedical and clinical applications: a review,

C. He, H. He, J. Chang, B. Chen, H. Ma, and M. J. Booth, "Polarisation optics for biomedical and clinical applications: a review," Light Sci. Appl. 10, 194 (2021)

2021

[8] [8]

Polarization-resolved spectroscopy imaging of grain boundaries and optical excitations in crystalline organic thin films,

Z. Pan, N. Rawat, I. Cour, L. Manning, R. L. Headrick, and M. Furis, "Polarization-resolved spectroscopy imaging of grain boundaries and optical excitations in crystalline organic thin films," Nat. Commun. 6, 8201 (2015)

2015