pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21910 · v1 · pith:AJ6ZJIUCnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · 🌀 gr-qc

Vacuum breakdown in a misaligned magnetized Kerr spacetime

Ruixin Yang , Songbai Chen , Jiliang Jing This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 06:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords vacuum breakdownKerr black holemisaligned magnetic fieldelectron-positron pair creationdyadoregionelectromagnetic invariantsgamma-ray bursts
0
0 comments X

The pith

Misaligned magnetic fields around spinning black holes lower the threshold for vacuum electron-positron pair creation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies vacuum breakdown around a Kerr black hole in an asymptotically uniform magnetic field tilted relative to the spin axis. It identifies the dyadoregion where the induced electric field exceeds the critical value using electromagnetic invariants, showing this region splits into multiple lobes whose number, size, and orientation shift with the tilt angle. Estimates of available electromagnetic energy, a beaming factor for observed isotropic energy, and the thermodynamics of the resulting electron-positron-photon plasma follow, with the plasma initially magnetically dominated. The central result is that the minimum magnetic field strength needed for significant pair creation is lower when the field is misaligned than when aligned.

Core claim

In the misaligned magnetized Kerr spacetime the dyadoregion consists of several lobes whose number, size, and orientation vary with the inclination angle of the background magnetic field. The electromagnetic energy available for pair creation is estimated together with a beaming factor that converts the intrinsic dyadoregion energy into observed isotropic energy. Thermodynamic properties of the electron-positron-photon plasma are derived, revealing initial magnetic dominance. The minimum magnetic field required for pair creation is smaller for misaligned configurations than for aligned ones.

What carries the argument

The dyadoregion identified via electromagnetic invariants, which marks where the induced electric field exceeds the Schwinger critical value and vacuum breakdown can occur.

If this is right

  • The dyadoregion breaks into multiple lobes whose number and orientation change with the inclination angle.
  • Electromagnetic energy available for pair creation can be converted to observed isotropic energy via a derived beaming factor.
  • The electron-positron-photon plasma begins in a magnetically dominated thermodynamic state.
  • Misaligned magnetic fields require a weaker minimum field strength to trigger significant pair creation than aligned fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Models of gamma-ray burst engines may need to incorporate inclination effects to predict pair-production efficiency more accurately.
  • Observable signatures such as anisotropic gamma-ray emission patterns could arise from the lobed geometry of the dyadoregion.
  • Extending the analysis to slowly varying or disk-generated fields would test whether the inclination advantage persists beyond the uniform-field assumption.

Load-bearing premise

The background magnetic field is taken to be asymptotically uniform and inclined at a fixed angle to the black hole spin axis, allowing the dyadoregion to be located solely through electromagnetic invariants.

What would settle it

A calculation or observation showing that the minimum magnetic field strength for appreciable pair creation is equal to or higher in misaligned cases than in aligned cases would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21910 by Jiliang Jing, Ruixin Yang, Songbai Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic representation of the electric fields measured by ZAMOs for selected inclinations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The dyadoregion in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The minimum magnetic field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Left: Dyadoregion electromagnetic energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Plot of the beaming factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Left panel: normalized plasma temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Left: north-pole horizon temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Ratio of plasma pressure to magnetic pressure at the north pole of the horizon, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Electron-positron ($e^{+}e^{-}$) pair creation by vacuum breakdown around compact objects is believed to power high-energy astrophysical transients like gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). In this work, we focus on vacuum breakdown around a Kerr black hole (BH) immersed in an asymptotically uniform magnetic field that is inclined with respect to the BH spin axis. The dyadoregion, the region where the induced electric field exceeds the critical value $E_{\text{c}}=m_{e}^{2}c^{3}/(e\hbar)$, is identified via the electromagnetic invariants. It is found that the dyadoregion consists of several lobes whose number, size, and orientation vary with the inclination. We also estimate the electromagnetic energy available for pair creation and derive a beaming factor that allows a conversion between the intrinsic dyadoregion energy and the observed isotropic energy. The thermodynamic properties of the resulting electron-positron-photon ($e^{+}e^{-}\gamma$) plasma are included, revealing an initial magnetic dominance. The evaluation of the minimum magnetic field required shows that misaligned magnetic fields generally favor pair creation more than aligned ones.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates vacuum breakdown and electron-positron pair creation around a Kerr black hole immersed in an asymptotically uniform magnetic field inclined relative to the black hole spin axis. The dyadoregion is identified using the electromagnetic invariants, revealing a multi-lobe structure whose number, size, and orientation depend on the inclination angle. The work estimates the available electromagnetic energy, derives a beaming factor to relate intrinsic dyadoregion energy to observed isotropic energy, analyzes the thermodynamics of the resulting e^{+}e^{-}γ plasma (showing initial magnetic dominance), and concludes that misaligned fields generally lower the minimum magnetic field strength required for pair creation compared to aligned configurations.

Significance. If the central results hold, the paper offers a useful extension of vacuum breakdown models to more astrophysically realistic misaligned configurations, with potential relevance to gamma-ray burst engines and other high-energy transients. The inclination-dependent lobe structure, beaming factor derivation, and plasma thermodynamics provide concrete handles for modeling. The comparison of minimum B thresholds between aligned and misaligned cases is the key quantitative claim; its robustness hinges on the accuracy of the dyadoregion identification.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Dyadoregion identification via invariants): The dyadoregion is located solely by the conditions on the invariants F F and *F F that imply an induced electric field exceeding E_c. In the Kerr geometry with an inclined asymptotic field, frame-dragging couples differently to poloidal and toroidal components, so the invariants alone do not guarantee that the frame-dependent |E| measured by a local observer (ZAMO or static) exceeds E_c at the same coordinate locations or B strengths. An explicit projection onto a local orthonormal tetrad at representative points inside the lobes, together with a direct comparison to the aligned case, is required to substantiate the claim that misaligned fields favor pair creation at lower B.
  2. [§5] §5 (Minimum magnetic field evaluation): The conclusion that misaligned fields require lower minimum B rests on the dyadoregion volumes and energy estimates derived from the invariant method. Without reported checks against the exact aligned limit (inclination = 0), error estimates on the lobe volumes, or sensitivity tests to the choice of observer frame, it is unclear whether the reported preference for misalignment is robust or an artifact of the invariant-based identification.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the beaming factor 'allows a conversion' but does not indicate whether it is derived from first principles or normalized to a specific observer; a one-sentence clarification would help readers.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the lobe visualizations should explicitly state the inclination angles shown and the coordinate system used for the projections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments in detail below and outline the revisions we plan to make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Dyadoregion identification via invariants): The dyadoregion is located solely by the conditions on the invariants F F and *F F that imply an induced electric field exceeding E_c. In the Kerr geometry with an inclined asymptotic field, frame-dragging couples differently to poloidal and toroidal components, so the invariants alone do not guarantee that the frame-dependent |E| measured by a local observer (ZAMO or static) exceeds E_c at the same coordinate locations or B strengths. An explicit projection onto a local orthonormal tetrad at representative points inside the lobes, together with a direct comparison to the aligned case, is required to substantiate the claim that misaligned fields favor pair creation at lower B.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's observation on the distinction between invariant-based identification and local frame measurements. The electromagnetic invariants provide a covariant way to identify regions where pair production is possible, as they determine the existence of a frame in which the electric field dominates. Nevertheless, to strengthen the manuscript and directly address this concern, we will add an appendix or subsection in §3 that computes the electric and magnetic field components in the ZAMO orthonormal tetrad at several representative points within the identified lobes for a range of inclination angles, including a direct comparison to the aligned (inclination = 0) configuration. This will confirm that the local |E| indeed exceeds E_c in those regions and support the claim regarding misaligned fields. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (Minimum magnetic field evaluation): The conclusion that misaligned fields require lower minimum B rests on the dyadoregion volumes and energy estimates derived from the invariant method. Without reported checks against the exact aligned limit (inclination = 0), error estimates on the lobe volumes, or sensitivity tests to the choice of observer frame, it is unclear whether the reported preference for misalignment is robust or an artifact of the invariant-based identification.

    Authors: We agree that explicit validation against the aligned limit and quantitative error analysis would enhance the robustness of our conclusions. In the revised manuscript, we will include a new figure or table in §5 showing the minimum B threshold as a function of inclination angle, explicitly demonstrating the continuous limit as inclination approaches zero, where it matches the aligned case results from previous literature. We will also report numerical error estimates on the computed dyadoregion volumes based on grid resolution and provide a brief discussion of the observer frame choice, noting that the invariant method is supplemented by ZAMO frame checks as added in §3. These revisions will clarify that the preference for misalignment is not an artifact. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation follows from metric, field ansatz and invariants

full rationale

The paper sets up the Kerr metric with an asymptotically uniform magnetic field at fixed inclination, computes the electromagnetic field, locates the dyadoregion via the two standard invariants, estimates available energy from the resulting volume, and obtains a beaming factor from the region's angular extent. These steps are direct consequences of the chosen background and Maxwell solution; they do not reduce to self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or definitions that presuppose the final comparison of minimum B values. The aligned-versus-misaligned contrast arises simply by varying the inclination parameter inside the same equations. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Kerr metric, the definition of the critical electric field for vacuum breakdown, and the assumption of an asymptotically uniform inclined magnetic field; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • magnetic field inclination angle
    Varied parametrically to map changes in dyadoregion geometry and minimum field strength.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Spacetime is described by the Kerr metric
    Used as the fixed background geometry for the magnetized black hole.
  • domain assumption Magnetic field is asymptotically uniform and inclined
    Enables identification of the dyadoregion via electromagnetic invariants.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5726 in / 1335 out tokens · 33494 ms · 2026-05-22T06:12:58.307231+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    J. S. Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polar- ization, Phys. Rev.82, 664 (1951)

    work page 1951

  2. [2]

    Ruffini, G

    R. Ruffini, G. Vereshchagin, and S.-S. Xue, Electron- positron pairs in physics and astrophysics: from heavy nuclei to black holes, Phys. Rept.487, 1 (2010)

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Popham, S

    R. Popham, S. E. Woosley, and C. Fryer, Hyperaccreting black holes and gamma-ray bursts, Astrophys. J.518, 356 (1999)

    work page 1999

  4. [4]

    Narayan, T

    R. Narayan, T. Piran, and P. Kumar, Accretion models of gamma-ray bursts, Astrophys. J.557, 949 (2001)

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Kohri and S

    K. Kohri and S. Mineshige, Can neutrino cooled accretion disk be an origin of gamma-ray bursts?, Astrophys. J. 577, 311 (2002)

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    Di Matteo, R

    T. Di Matteo, R. Perna, and R. Narayan, Neutrino trap- ping and accretion models for gamma-ray bursts, Astro- phys. J.579, 706 (2002)

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    Kohri, R

    K. Kohri, R. Narayan, and T. Piran, Neutrino-dominated accretion and supernovae, Astrophys. J.629, 341 (2005)

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    W. H. Lee, E. Ramirez-Ruiz, and D. Page, Dynamical evolution of neutrino-cooled accretion disks: Detailed mi- crophysics, lepton-driven convection, and global energet- ics, Astrophys. J.632, 421 (2005)

    work page 2005

  9. [9]

    W.-M. Gu, T. Liu, and J.-F. Lu, Neutrino-Dominated Accretion Models for Gamma-Ray Bursts: Effects of General Relativity and Neutrino Opacity, Astrophys. J. Lett.643, L87 (2006)

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    Chen and A

    W.-X. Chen and A. M. Beloborodov, Neutrino-Cooled Accretion Disks around Spinning Black Hole, Astrophys. J.657, 383 (2007)

    work page 2007

  11. [11]

    Kawanaka and S

    N. Kawanaka and S. Mineshige, Neutrino Cooled Disk and Its Stability, Astrophys. J.662, 1156 (2007)

    work page 2007

  12. [12]

    Janiuk and Y.-F

    A. Janiuk and Y.-F. Yuan, The role of black hole spin and magnetic field threading the unstable neutrino disk in Gamma Ray Bursts, Astron. Astrophys.509, A55 (2010)

    work page 2010

  13. [13]

    Kawanaka, T

    N. Kawanaka, T. Piran, and J. H. Krolik, Jet Luminosity From Neutrino-Dominated Accretion Flows in Gamma- Ray Bursts, Astrophys. J.766, 31 (2013)

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Luo and F

    S. Luo and F. Yuan, Global Neutrino Heating in Hyper- accretion Flows, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.431, 2362 (2013)

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    L. Xue, T. Liu, W.-M. Gu, and J.-F. Lu, Relativistic global solutions of neutrino-dominated accretion flows, Astrophys. J. Suppl.207, 23 (2013)

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    Liu, W.-M

    T. Liu, W.-M. Gu, and B. Zhang, Neutrino-dominated accretion flows as the central engine of gamma-ray bursts, New Astron. Rev.79, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    J. D. Uribe, E. A. Becerra-Vergara, and J. A. Rueda, Neutrino oscillations in a neutrino-dominated accretion disk around a Kerr BH, Universe7, 7 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    A. G. Aksenov, R. Ruffini, and G. V. Vereshchagin, Ther- malization of nonequilibrium electron-positron-photon plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 125003 (2007)

    work page 2007

  19. [19]

    A. G. Aksenov, R. Ruffini, and G. V. Vereshchagin, Ther- malization of the mildly relativistic plasma, Phys. Rev. D79, 043008 (2009)

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    The dyadosphere of black holes and gamma-ray bursts

    G. Preparata, R. Ruffini, and S.-S. Xue, The Dyado- sphere of black holes and gamma-ray bursts, Astron. As- trophys.338, L87 (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9810182

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  21. [21]

    Cherubini, A

    C. Cherubini, A. Geralico, J. A. Rueda H., and R. Ruffini, e−e+ pair creation by vacuum polarization around elec- tromagnetic black holes, Phys. Rev. D79, 124002 (2009)

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    R. M. Wald, Black hole in a uniform magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D10, 1680 (1974)

    work page 1974

  23. [23]

    Cherubini, R

    C. Cherubini, R. Moradi, J. A. Rueda, and R. Ruffini, Vacuum breakdown around a Kerr black hole surrounded by a magnetic field, Astron. Astrophys.704, A69 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Moradi, J

    R. Moradi, J. A. Rueda, R. Ruffini, L. Li, C. L. Bianco, S. Campion, C. Cherubini, S. Filippi, Y. Wang, and S. S. Xue, Nature of the ultrarelativistic prompt emis- sion phase of GRB 190114C, Phys. Rev. D104, 063043 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Rastegarnia, R

    F. Rastegarnia, R. Moradi, J. A. Rueda, R. Ruffini, L. Li, S. Eslamzadeh, Y. Wang, and S. S. Xue, The structure of the ultrarelativistic prompt emission phase and the properties of the black hole in GRB 180720B, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 778 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Obergaulinger, P

    M. Obergaulinger, P. Cerda-Duran, E. Muller, and M. A. Aloy, Semi-global simulations of the magneto-rotational instability in core collapse supernovae, Astron. Astro- phys.498, 241 (2009). 14

    work page 2009

  27. [27]

    Obergaulinger and M

    M. Obergaulinger and M. ´A. Aloy, Protomagnetar and black hole formation in high-mass stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.469, L43 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Kiuchi, K

    K. Kiuchi, K. Kyutoku, Y. Sekiguchi, M. Shibata, and T. Wada, High resolution numerical-relativity simula- tions for the merger of binary magnetized neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D90, 041502 (2014)

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    Kiuchi, P

    K. Kiuchi, P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, K. Kyutoku, Y. Sekiguchi, and M. Shibata, Efficient magnetic-field amplification due to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in binary neu- tron star mergers, Phys. Rev. D92, 124034 (2015)

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    Proga and M

    D. Proga and M. C. Begelman, Accretion of low angular momentum material onto black holes: 2-D magnetohy- drodynamical case, Astrophys. J.592, 767 (2003)

    work page 2003

  31. [31]

    Liska, C

    M. Liska, C. Hesp, A. Tchekhovskoy, A. Ingram, M. van der Klis, and S. Markoff, Formation of Precessing Jets by Tilted Black-hole Discs in 3D General Relativis- tic MHD Simulations, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.474, L81 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    El-Badryet al., A red giant orbiting a black hole, Mon

    K. El-Badryet al., A red giant orbiting a black hole, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.521, 4323 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    M. V. Barkov, D. V. Khangulyan, and S. B. Popov, Jets and gamma-ray emission from isolated accreting black holes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.427, 589 (2012)

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    K. Kin, R. Kuze, and S. S. Kimura, Galactic Isolated Stellar-mass Black Holes with the Magnetospheric Spark Gap as Possible GeV–TeV Gamma-Ray Unidentified Sources, Astrophys. J.985, 251 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Figueiredo, B

    E. Figueiredo, B. Cerutti, and K. Parfrey, Effect of mag- netic field inclination on black hole jet power and particle acceleration, Astron. Astrophys.700, L19 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    J. C. McKinney, A. Tchekhovskoy, and R. D. Bland- ford, Alignment of Magnetized Accretion Disks and Rel- ativistic Jets with Spinning Black Holes, Science339, 49 (2013)

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    Biˇ c´ ak and L

    J. Biˇ c´ ak and L. Dvoˇ r´ ak, Stationary electromagnetic fields around black holes. ii. general solutions and the fields of some special sources near a kerr black hole, Gen. Rel. Grav.7, 959 (1976)

    work page 1976

  38. [38]

    Biˇ c´ ak and V

    J. Biˇ c´ ak and V. Janiˇ s, Magnetic fluxes across black holes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.212, 899 (1985)

    work page 1985

  39. [39]

    Karas and O

    V. Karas and O. Kopacek, Magnetic layers and neutral points near rotating black hole, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 025004 (2009)

    work page 2009

  40. [40]

    Karas, O

    V. Karas, O. Kopacek, and D. Kunneriath, Influence of frame-dragging on magnetic null points near rotating black hole, Class. Quant. Grav.29, 035010 (2012)

    work page 2012

  41. [41]

    Kop´ aˇ cek and V

    O. Kop´ aˇ cek and V. Karas, Inducing chaos by breaking axial symmetry in a black hole magnetosphere, Astro- phys. J.787, 117 (2014)

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    Kop´ aˇ cek and V

    O. Kop´ aˇ cek and V. Karas, Regular and chaotic motion in general relativity: The case of an inclined black hole magnetosphere, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.600, 012070 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    Biˇ c´ ak, D

    J. Biˇ c´ ak, D. Kubizˇ n´ ak, and T. R. Perche, Migrating Car- rollian particles on magnetized black hole horizons, Phys. Rev. D107, 104014 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Karas, Asymptotically uniform magnetic field near a Kerr black hole, Phys

    V. Karas, Asymptotically uniform magnetic field near a Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D40, 2121 (1989)

    work page 1989

  45. [45]

    Punsly and F

    B. Punsly and F. V. Coroniti, Electrodynamics of the event horizon, Phys. Rev. D40, 3834 (1989)

    work page 1989

  46. [46]

    Dovciak, V

    M. Dovciak, V. Karas, and A. Lanza, Magnetic fields around black holes, Eur. J. Phys.21, 303 (2000)

    work page 2000

  47. [47]

    Neronov and F

    A. Neronov and F. A. Aharonian, Production of TeV gamma-radiation in the vicinity of the supermassive black hole in the giant radiogalaxy M87, Astrophys. J. 671, 85 (2007)

    work page 2007

  48. [48]

    A. Y. Neronov, D. V. Semikoz, and I. I. Tkachev, Ultra- High Energy Cosmic Ray production in the polar cap regions of black hole magnetospheres, New J. Phys.11, 065015 (2009)

    work page 2009

  49. [49]

    O. E. Kalashev, K. V. Ptitsyna, and S. V. Troitsky, To- wards a model of population of astrophysical sources of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays, Phys. Rev. D86, 063005 (2012)

    work page 2012

  50. [50]

    Tursunov, M

    A. Tursunov, M. Zajaˇ cek, A. Eckart, M. Koloˇ s, S. Britzen, Z. Stuchl´ ık, B. Czerny, and V. Karas, Effect of Electromagnetic Interaction on Galactic Center Flare Components, Astrophys. J.897, 99 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    Karas and O

    V. Karas and O. Kopacek, Near-horizon structure of es- cape zones of electrically charged particles around weakly magnetized rotating black hole: Case of oblique magne- tosphere, Astron. Nachr.342, 357 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Kop´ aˇ cek and V

    O. Kop´ aˇ cek and V. Karas, Near-horizon structure of es- cape zones of electrically charged particles around weakly magnetized rotating black hole. II. Acceleration and es- cape in the oblique magnetosphere, Astrophys. J.900, 119 (2020)

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    S. M. Ressler, E. Quataert, C. J. White, and O. Blaes, Magnetically modified spherical accretion in GRMHD: reconnection-driven convection and jet propagation, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.504, 6076 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [54]

    Chen and Z

    K. Chen and Z. G. Dai, Charging and Electromagnetic Radiation during the Inspiral of a Black Hole–Neutron Star Binary, Astrophys. J.909, 4 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    S. Hu, X. Wu, and E. Liang, Construction of a Second- order Six-dimensional Hamiltonian-conserving Scheme, Astrophys. J. Supp.257, 40 (2021)

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    James, A

    B. James, A. Janiuk, and V. Karas, Black hole out- flows initiated by a large-scale magnetic field - Effects of aligned and misaligned spin, Astron. Astrophys.687, A185 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    V. P. Frolov, Motion of a rotating black hole in a homo- geneous electromagnetic field, Phys. Rev. D109, 064045 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    V. P. Frolov and A. Koek, Motion of a weakly charged ro- tating black hole in a homogeneous electromagnetic field, Phys. Rev. D110, 064052 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Tursunov and N

    A. Tursunov and N. Dadhich, Fifty years of energy ex- traction from rotating black hole: revisiting magnetic Penrose process, Universe5, 125 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    D. V. Galtsov and V. I. Petukhov, Black Hole in an Exter- nal Magnetic Field, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.74, 801 (1978)

    work page 1978

  61. [61]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Chapter 3 - charges in electromagnetic fields, inThe Classical Theory of Fields (Fourth Edition), Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 2 (Pergamon, Amsterdam, 1975) fourth edition ed., pp. 43– 65

    work page 1975

  62. [62]

    Carter, Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger separable solutions of Einstein’s equations, Commun

    B. Carter, Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger separable solutions of Einstein’s equations, Commun. Math. Phys. 10, 280 (1968)

    work page 1968

  63. [63]

    Damour and R

    T. Damour and R. Ruffini, Quantum Electrodynamical Effects in Kerr-Newman Geometries, Phys. Rev. Lett.35, 463 (1975)

    work page 1975

  64. [64]

    S. S. Komissarov and J. C. McKinney, Meissner effect and Blandford-Znajek mechanism in conductive black hole magnetospheres, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.377, L49 (2007)

    work page 2007

  65. [65]

    J. C. McKinney and C. F. Gammie, A Measurement of 15 the electromagnetic luminosity of a Kerr black hole, As- trophys. J.611, 977 (2004)

    work page 2004

  66. [66]

    S. S. Komissarov, Observations of the Blandford-Znajek and the MHD Penrose processes in computer simulations of black hole magnetospheres, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.359, 801 (2005)

    work page 2005

  67. [67]

    Pan and C

    Z. Pan and C. Yu, Analytic Properties of Force-free Jets in the Kerr Spacetime—II, Astrophys. J.816, 77 (2016)

    work page 2016

  68. [68]

    Ruffiniet al., On the classification of GRBs and their occurrence rates, Astrophys

    R. Ruffiniet al., On the classification of GRBs and their occurrence rates, Astrophys. J.832, 136 (2016)

    work page 2016

  69. [69]

    Cipolletta, C

    F. Cipolletta, C. Cherubini, S. Filippi, J. A. Rueda, and R. Ruffini, Fast Rotating Neutron Stars with Realistic Nuclear Matter Equation of State, Phys. Rev. D92, 023007 (2015)

    work page 2015

  70. [70]

    Podolsky and H

    J. Podolsky and H. Ovcharenko, Kerr Black Hole in a Uniform Bertotti-Robinson Magnetic Field: An Exact Solution, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 181401 (2025)

    work page 2025