Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

The paper combines 270 million galaxies into a 13,000-square-degree lensing map, tripling the covered area, and uses it to detect cosmic filaments directly.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A 13,000 square degree weak lensing mass map, the largest to date, with a first demonstration of filament detection from lensing alone.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection A genuinely useful new lensing map, with a filament detection that is more suggestive than demonstrated. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.03798 v1 pith:AJJPMHVY submitted 2025-09-04 astro-ph.CO

DECADE+DES Y3 Weak Lensing Mass Map: A 13,000 deg² View of Cosmic Structure from 270 Million Galaxies

M. Gatti , D. Anbajagane , C. Chang , D. J. Bacon , J. Prat , M. Adamow , A. Alarcon , M. R. Becker
show 32 more authors
J. A. Carballo-Bello N. Chicoine C. Doux A. Drlica-Wagner P. S. Ferguson D. Gruen R. A. Gruendl K. Herron N. Jeffrey D. J. James A. Kov\'acs C. E. Mart\'inez-V\'azquez P. Massana S. Mau J. McCullough G. E. Medina B. Mutlu-Pakdil N. E. D. No\"el A. B. Pace G. Pollina A. H. Riley D. J. Sand L. F. Secco G. S. Stringfellow D. Suson C. Y. Tan R. Teixeira E. J. Tollerud M. A. Troxel L. Whiteway A. Zenteno Z. Zhang
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords weak lensingmass mapconvergence fieldcosmic filamentscosmic webWiener filterKaiser-Squires inversionSunyaev-Zeldovich clusters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to build the largest map yet of dark matter in the late Universe, reconstructed from the weak gravitational lensing distortions of 270 million galaxies. Combining two surveys taken with the same camera and similar pipeline, it covers 13,000 square degrees—about three times the area of the previous DES Y3 map. The map is made with both Kaiser-Squires inversion and a Wiener filter with a Gaussian prior, and it passes null tests against observing conditions such as seeing, depth, and sky brightness. Then, applying a spherical ridge-finding algorithm to the Wiener map, the paper traces cosmic filaments directly from lensing alone—reportedly for the first time—and shows that Sunyaev-Zeldovich-selected galaxy clusters sit significantly closer to those filaments than random positions. If the filament detection is real, lensing mass maps become a standalone probe of the cosmic web that does not depend on modeling galaxy bias.

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that the shear catalogs from DECADE and DES Y3—270 million galaxies, all measured from the same camera with the same Metacalibration pipeline—can be stitched into one coherent convergence map covering 13,000 square degrees, roughly three times the sky area of the previous DES Y3 map. The authors validate the map in two ways: against simulations, where the Wiener-filter MAP solution outperforms smoothed Kaiser-Squires in RMSE and pixel correlation, and against the data, where correlations with observing-condition maps are not significant. They then run the spherical ridge finder SCONCE on the Wiener MAP and obtain a network of filament curves whose pixels si

What carries the argument

The central object is the Wiener-filter MAP estimate of the convergence field on the sphere, computed with the Dante messenger-field sampler under a Gaussian prior with the FLAGSHIP cosmology and a diagonal shape-noise covariance; it yields both the map and posterior samples for uncertainty. The companion machinery is SCONCE, a spherical generalization of the subspace-constrained mean-shift (SCMS) ridge finder that traces filament curves by adaptive gradient ascent on the pixel-weighted convergence map. The Kaiser-Squires E/B-mode inversion plays a supporting role as the flat-prior baseline. The load-bearing move is applying a density-ridge finder designed for galaxy samples directly to the

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the filament ridges visible in the smoothed, noise-dominated lensing map are real cosmic filaments rather than artifacts of the smoothing or of the Gaussian prior used in the reconstruction.

What would settle it

Take the same shear data, rotate galaxy ellipticities randomly to erase true lensing, rebuild the Wiener MAP, and run SCONCE; if the real filament-cluster distance distribution is not significantly tighter than the noise-only ensemble's, the filaments are not physical. Also rebuild the map with a non-Gaussian prior (e.g., lognormal) and check whether the same filament network and cluster alignment survive.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The combined map extends lensing mass maps to 13,000 square degrees, about three times the DES Y3 area, without a visible discontinuity where the two surveys meet.
  • Null tests against observing conditions indicate the map is clean enough at large scales for cross-correlation studies with CMB lensing, thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich, and cluster catalogs without per-pixel systematics corrections.
  • If the filaments are real, the cosmic web can be traced from lensing alone, avoiding the galaxy-bias and selection modeling required by spectroscopic filament finders.
  • Wiener posterior samples give per-pixel uncertainty estimates, making the map usable for peak counts, moments, topology, and simulation-based inference ahead of LSST and Euclid.
  • The SZ-cluster-to-filament alignment offers a new, map-based way to test structure growth and gas feedback by stacking Compton-y or other gas tracers along the ridges.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The filament detection is more fragile than the map itself: SCONCE runs on a heavily smoothed map whose pixel signal-to-noise is order unity and whose filaments are only about 0.5 S/N above the background, so part of the ridge network could come from the Gaussian prior or the 28-arcmin smoothing. A decisive test is to rerun SCONCE on shape-noise-only reconstructions and on maps made with a non-Gau
  • If the filament network survives prior changes, the cluster-filament correlation could be turned into a quantitative stacked profile—e.g., mean cluster distance or filament-aligned shear—rather than a distance distribution, giving a cleaner null hypothesis test.
  • The paper defers the effect of survey masks on filament detection; quantifying completeness and purity as a function of distance to the mask edge would determine how much of the filament web near boundaries is trustworthy and would guide application to the larger Rubin and Euclid footprints.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a weak lensing convergence map covering ~13,000 deg^2 by combining DECADE and DES Y3 shear catalogs (270 million galaxies), using both Kaiser-Squires (KS) and Wiener filter reconstructions on the sphere. The map is validated via mock simulations and null tests against observing-condition systematics. As a scientific application, the authors apply the SCONCE ridge finder to the Wiener MAP to identify filamentary structures and report that SZ-selected clusters from Planck and ACT DR6 preferentially lie near these filaments. The main claims are (i) the largest galaxy weak lensing mass map to date and (ii) the first detection of cosmic filaments directly from a weak lensing mass map.

Significance. If fully established, the map itself is a valuable community resource: it triples the area of existing DES Y3 lensing maps while maintaining consistency between the two DECam-based datasets. The validation on mocks and null tests follows standard practice and supports the map construction. The filament detection, however, is a more ambitious claim: weak lensing maps are shape-noise dominated, and the authors themselves note the map has S/N rms ~1 and filament pixels only ~0.5 higher S/N than the rest of the map. The current evidence falls short of a quantitative detection: there is no noise-only null test, no stated significance for the cluster-filament alignment, and masking effects near survey boundaries are deferred. The map claim is sound; the filament claim, as presented, is not yet load-bearing evidence for a 'first detection.'

major comments (3)
  1. [Structures in the reconstructed maps (Fig. 3 and surrounding text)] The paper states that 'filament pixels have an S/N about 0.5 higher than the rest of the map' as evidence of signal. This statement is not a detection statistic: SCONCE is a ridge finder that, by construction, selects locally overdense pixels from a heavily smoothed, Wiener-filtered map that is dominated by shape noise. A higher S/N on ridges is expected even for pure noise. A quantitative claim of filament detection requires a null test, e.g., running SCONCE on maps built from randomly rotated galaxy ellipticities (or on Wiener reconstructions of noise-only mocks) and comparing the number, length, and S/N distribution of ridges. Without such a control, the reported 0.5 S/N excess cannot be interpreted as a detection of physical filaments.
  2. [Fig. 4 and cluster-filament validation] The cluster-filament alignment is shown as two distance distributions compared to 'ACT DR6 randoms,' but no p-value or significance is quoted. Moreover, the random sample is not area-matched to the Planck cluster footprint: Planck SZ clusters cover the full sky, while ACT DR6 covers a smaller region, and the randoms are described only as 'ACT DR6 randoms.' The comparison should use an area-matched random distribution (separately for Planck and ACT) and report a two-sample test statistic (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov or permutation p-value). As it stands, the visual 'preferential alignment' is not quantified and could be affected by footprint differences and mask geometry.
  3. [Masking and survey-boundary effects (end of 'Structures in the reconstructed maps')] The paper explicitly defers 'a systematic assessment of this impact' of masking near survey boundaries to future work. Given that DECADE is a combination of many programs with inhomogeneous depth and coverage, masked or low-density regions can imprint coherent patterns in the Wiener MAP, which SCONCE may trace as spurious ridges. The absence of any masking or boundary null test weakens the filament claim, even though the map itself may be unaffected at the level of the presented systematics tests. A boundary-masked noise realization, or an analysis restricted to the well-covered DES footprint, would be a minimal check.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction / Abstract] Typos in the extracted text ('W eak', 'DA T A', 'despitetheir') should be corrected. The phrase 'tank-shaped grey area' in the Fig. 1 caption is unclear; presumably 'blank-shaped' or 'masked region' is meant.
  2. [Section 'Mass map inference'] Eq. (2) writes the log-likelihood with a normalization constant omitted; this is fine, but the text says 'multi-variate Gaussian' while the equation is written for the log; a brief mention of the constant would avoid confusion.
  3. [Section 'Systematic tests on data maps'] The choice ℓ<10 removal is stated but not justified; a one-sentence explanation of why these modes are dominated by survey geometry would help. Also, the jackknife error estimation is mentioned but the number of regions and the pixelization used for the systematic maps are not specified.
  4. [Supplementary material, Table I] The RMSE and Pearson coefficient for raw KS (0.0371, 0.193) are reported, but the raw KS map is unsmoothed; the comparison with smoothed KS is clear, yet a reader might wonder whether the raw KS RMSE is dominated by small-scale noise. A brief note would help.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Filament 'first detection' evidence is partly definitional: the S/N excess of filament pixels is guaranteed by SCONCE's ridge-finding construction; the Wiener prior and mock validation share the same cosmology, so the validation is self-consistent rather than independent.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Structures in the reconstructed maps (between 'Systematic tests on data maps' and 'Conclusions')]
    "By construction, the filaments avoid the most underdense regions of the map, instead tracing overdense ridges. ... The strength of the signal can be quantified by comparing the average S/N of pixels belonging to filaments with that of the remaining pixels: on average, filament pixels have an S/N about 0.5 higher than the rest of the map (the map itself has a S/N∼0 with root-mean-square fluctuations of∼1)."

    SCONCE is a ridge finder: it estimates a density field from the input map values and identifies filaments via adaptive gradient ascent along ridges. Therefore the pixels labeled as filaments are, by construction, locations of locally elevated map values, and their average S/N is definitionally higher than the rest of the map. Quoting this difference as evidence that the ridges trace 'real projected filamentary structures' is circular: the statistic is an algorithmic tautology, not an independent detection of cosmic filaments. A noise-only or null-map control would be required to show that such S/N contrast is not produced by shape noise and the Wiener prior alone, and no such control is provided.

  2. other [Results on data (Wiener prior choice) and Supplementary material: validation on simulations]
    "For the Wiener prior, we assume the FLAGSHIP cosmology [60], consistent with constraints from the DECADE and DES Y3 cosmic shear analyses [9, 61, 62]. ... We validate the KS and Wiener methods using mock catalogs derived from a full-sky N-body simulation run with the PKDGRAV3 code [72] at the FLAGSHIP cosmology [60]."

    The Wiener filter's signal covariance Sκ (Eq. 5) is computed from the assumed FLAGSHIP cosmology. The mock catalogs used to validate the reconstruction are generated from the same FLAGSHIP N-body simulation, so the reconstructed map is tested against a truth that already shares the prior's cosmological parameters. This demonstrates self-consistency but cannot detect whether the prior is wrong or whether the reconstruction is sensitive to the assumed cosmology. The cited justification for the prior is the DES/DECADE cosmic shear analyses, which use the same datasets as the map. Thus the validation and prior choice are mutually consistent rather than independently tested, a mild circularity in the validation logic—distinct from the externally grounded KS map and SZ cluster checks.

full rationale

The main map construction is largely self-contained: shear maps are built from measured ellipticities and weights, the Kaiser-Squires inversion is a standard linear operation, and systematic null tests compare the reconstructed maps against observing-condition maps. The 'largest map' claim is an area statement based on survey footprints, not a fitted prediction. The circularity is concentrated in the filament application. SCONCE is a ridge finder applied to the Wiener MAP, so the quoted ~0.5 S/N excess of filament pixels is guaranteed by the algorithm's definition and cannot by itself demonstrate that the ridges correspond to cosmic filaments. The cluster-alignment test is external and suggestive, but the paper reports no p-value or significance level for the distance distributions, and the random comparison uses ACT DR6 randoms rather than an area-matched null for the all-sky Planck sample. Masking effects near survey boundaries are explicitly deferred to future work, weakening the filament claim further. A secondary issue is that the Wiener prior adopts FLAGSHIP cosmology and the validation mocks are built from the same FLAGSHIP cosmology, so the simulation validation is a self-consistency check rather than an independent test of the prior. These issues affect the 'first filament detection' claim, not the map itself, so the paper is only partially circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The map relies on standard mass-mapping assumptions (Gaussian likelihood, Wiener prior) and on the choice of FLAGSHIP cosmology for the prior. The filament detection adds a novel assumption: that the ridges of the noisy, smoothed reconstruction trace true cosmic filaments. No new particles or physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • KS smoothing scale = 20 arcminutes (null tests); 28 arcmin pixel (NSIDE=128) for filaments
    Adopted from prior DES Y3 analysis [42] as the scale maximizing correlation between KS and true convergence; not fitted in this paper, but a hand-chosen analysis setting.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Pixel likelihood is Gaussian with diagonal noise covariance (Eq. 2)
    Assumed noise-dominated limit with ~60 galaxies per pixel; standard in mass mapping.
  • domain assumption Wiener filter assumes a Gaussian convergence prior with no B-mode power
    Used for the Wiener MAP and samples; acknowledged as approximation.
  • domain assumption The signal covariance S_k is taken from FLAGSHIP cosmology
    Prior cosmology chosen because it is consistent with DECADE and DES Y3 cosmic shear analyses, i.e., informed by the same data.
  • ad hoc to paper Ridges of the reconstructed Wiener map traced by SCONCE correspond to physical filaments
    The central assumption behind the filament detection; only weakly validated by cluster alignment and an S/N contrast of ~0.5.
  • domain assumption DECADE and DES Y3 shear maps can be combined coherently with minimal discontinuity
    Both use DECam and similar pipelines; the combination is checked by visual smoothness but not a quantitative calibration.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of DECADE+DES Y3 Weak Lensing Mass Map: A 13,000 deg$^2$ View of Cosmic Structure from 270 Million Galaxies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AJJPMHVY

@misc{pith2026250903798,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: DECADE+DES Y3 Weak Lensing Mass Map: A 13,000 deg$^2$ View of Cosmic Structure from 270 Million Galaxies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AJJPMHVY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03798}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We present the largest galaxy weak lensing mass map of the late-time Universe, reconstructed from 270 million galaxies in the DECADE and DES Year 3 datasets, covering 13,000 square degrees. We validate the map through systematic tests against observational conditions (depth, seeing, etc.), finding the map is statistically consistent with no contamination. The large area covered by the mass map makes it a well-suited tool for cosmological analyses, cross-correlation studies and the identification of large-scale structure features. We demonstrate its potential by detecting cosmic filaments directly from the mass map for the first time and validating them through their association with galaxy clusters selected using the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect from Planck and ACT DR6.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.03798 by A. Alarcon, A. B. Pace, A. Drlica-Wagner, A. H. Riley, A. Kov\'acs, A. Zenteno, B. Mutlu-Pakdil, C. Chang, C. Doux, C. E. Mart\'inez-V\'azquez, C. Y. Tan, D. Anbajagane, D. Gruen, D. J. Bacon, D. J. James, D. J. Sand, D. Suson, E. J. Tollerud, G. E. Medina, G. Pollina, G. S. Stringfellow, J. A. Carballo-Bello, J. McCullough, J. Prat, K. Herron, L. F. Secco, L. Whiteway, M. Adamow, M. A. Troxel, M. Gatti, M. R. Becker, N. Chicoine, N. E. D. No\"el, N. Jeffrey, P. Massana, P. S. Ferguson, R. A. Gruendl, R. Teixeira, S. Mau, Z. Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Wiener-MAP solution for the DECADE+DES Y3 mass map. Overdense lines of sight appear red; blue indicates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Significance of the test for linear dependence (squares) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Filaments identified from the Wiener MAP, with SZ-selected clusters from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Distribution of the distance to the nearest filament [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Power spectrum of the recovered simulated mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Backlighting the Cosmic Web with Fast Radio Bursts: An Anthology of Dispersion Measure Cross-Correlations with Large-Scale Structure and Baryon Tracers

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FRB DMs correlate at 2.6-5 sigma with galaxies, weak lensing, CIB, CMB lensing, tSZ, X-ray clusters, SXRB and radio continuum, consistent with moderate feedback models while ruling out weak feedback at 3.5 sigma via SXRB-DM.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 20 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Bartelmann and P

    M. Bartelmann and P. Schneider,Weak gravitational lensing, Phys. Rep. 340 (2001) 291 [astro-ph/9912508]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  2. [2]

    Mandelbaum,Weak Lensing for Precision Cosmology, ARA&A 56 (2018) 393 [1710.03235]

    R. Mandelbaum,Weak Lensing for Precision Cosmology, ARA&A 56 (2018) 393 [1710.03235]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Kuijken, C

    K. Kuijken, C. Heymans, H. Hildebrandt, R. Nakajima, T. Erben, J.T.A. de Jong et al.,Gravitational lensing analysis of the kilo-degree survey, MNRAS 454 (2015) 3500

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Aihara, N

    H. Aihara, N. Arimoto, R. Armstrong, S. Arnouts, N.A. Bahcall, S. Bickerton et al.,The hyper suprime-cam ssp survey: Overview and survey design, PASJ 70 (2018) S4

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Collaboration,The dark energy survey: more than dark energy - an overview, MNRAS 460 (2016) 1270

    D.E.S. Collaboration,The dark energy survey: more than dark energy - an overview, MNRAS 460 (2016) 1270

    work page 2016

  6. [7]

    Anbajagane, A

    D. Anbajagane, A. Alarcon, R. Teixeira, C. Chang, L.F. Secco, C.Y. Tan et al.,The DECADE cosmic shear project II: photometric redshift calibration of the source galaxy sample, arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2502.17675 [2502.17675]

    arXiv 2025

  7. [8]

    Anbajagane, C

    D. Anbajagane, C. Chang, N. Chicoine, L.F. Secco, C.Y. Tan, P.S. Ferguson et al.,The DECADE cosmic shear project III: validation of analysis pipeline using spatially inhomogeneous data, arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2502.17676 [2502.17676]

    arXiv 2025

  8. [9]

    Anbajagane, C

    D. Anbajagane, C. Chang, A. Drlica-Wagner, C.Y. Tan, M. Adamow, R.A. Gruendl et al.,The DECADE cosmic shear project IV: cosmological constraints from 107 million galaxies across 5,400 deg2 of the sky, arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2502.17677 [2502.17677]

    arXiv 2025

  9. [10]

    Gatti, B

    M. Gatti, B. Jain, C. Chang, M. Raveri, D. Zürcher, L. Secco et al.,Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology with moments of weak lensing mass maps, Phys. Rev. D106 (2022) 083509

    work page 2022

  10. [11]

    Porth and R.E

    L. Porth and R.E. Smith,Fast estimation of aperture-mass statistics - II. Detectability of higher order statistics in current and future surveys, MNRAS 508 (2021) 3474

    work page 2021

  11. [12]

    Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: simulation-based cosmological inference with wavelet harmonics, scattering transforms, and moments of weak lensing mass maps I: validation on simulations

    M. Gatti, N. Jeffrey, L. Whiteway, J. Williamson, B. Jain, V. Ajani et al.,Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Simulation-based cosmological inference with wavelet harmonics, scattering transforms, and moments of weak lensing mass maps. Validation on simulations, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 063534 [2310.17557]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [13]

    Gatti, G

    M. Gatti, G. Campailla, N. Jeffrey, L. Whiteway, A. Porredon, J. Prat et al.,Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Simulation-based cosmological inference with wavelet harmonics, scattering transforms, and moments of weak lensing mass maps. II. cosmological results, Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 063504 [2405.10881]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [14]

    Harnois-Déraps, S

    J. Harnois-Déraps, S. Heydenreich, B. Giblin, N. Martinet, T. Tröster, M. Asgari et al.,KiDS-1000 and DES-Y1 combined: cosmology from peak count statistics, MNRAS 534 (2024) 3305 [2405.10312]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [15]

    Marques, J

    G.A. Marques, J. Liu, M. Shirasaki, L. Thiele, D. Grandón, K.M. Huffenberger et al.,Cosmology from weak lensing peaks and minima with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey first-year data, MNRAS 528 (2024) 4513 [2308.10866]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  15. [16]

    Cosmology from HSC Y1 Weak Lensing with Combined Higher-Order Statistics and Simulation-based Inference

    C.P. Novaes, L. Thiele, J. Armijo, S. Cheng, J.A. Cowell, G.A. Marques et al.,Cosmology from HSC Y1 Weak Lensing with Combined Higher-Order Statistics and Simulation-based Inference, arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2409.01301 [2409.01301]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  16. [17]

    Jeffrey, L

    N. Jeffrey, L. Whiteway, M. Gatti, J. Williamson, J. Alsing, A. Porredon et al.,Dark energy survey year 3 results: likelihood-free, simulation-based wCDM inference with neural compression of weak-lensing map statistics, MNRAS 536 (2025) 1303 [2403.02314]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [18]

    Kratochvil, E.A

    J.M. Kratochvil, E.A. Lim, S. Wang, Z. Haiman, M. May and K. Huffenberger,Probing cosmology with weak lensing minkowski functionals, Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 103513

    work page 2012

  18. [19]

    Grewal, J

    N. Grewal, J. Zuntz, T. Tröster and A. Amon, Minkowski functionals in joint galaxy clustering & weak lensing analyses, The Open Journal of Astrophysics5 (2022) 13 [2206.03877]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  19. [20]

    J. Prat, M. Gatti, C. Doux, P. Pranav, C. Chang, N. Jeffrey et al.,Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: wCDM cosmology from simulation-based inference with persistent homology on the sphere, arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2506.13439 [2506.13439]

    arXiv 2025

  20. [21]

    Fluri, T

    J. Fluri, T. Kacprzak, A. Lucchi, A. Refregier, A. Amara, T. Hofmann et al.,Cosmological constraints with deep learning from KiDS-450 weak lensing maps, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 063514

    work page 2019

  21. [22]

    Jeffrey, J

    N. Jeffrey, J. Alsing and F. Lanusse,Likelihood-free inference with neural compression of DES SV weak lensing map statistics, MNRAS 501 (2021) 954

    work page 2021

  22. [23]

    Cross-correlating Planck tSZ with RCSLenS weak lensing: Implications for cosmology and AGN feedback

    A. Hojjati, T. Tröster, J. Harnois-Déraps, I.G. McCarthy, L. van Waerbeke, A. Choi et al., Cross-correlating Planck tSZ with RCSLenS weak lensing: implications for cosmology and AGN feedback, MNRAS 471 (2017) 1565 [1608.07581]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  23. [24]

    Davies, M

    C.T. Davies, M. Cautun and B. Li,Weak lensing by voids in weak lensing maps, MNRAS 480 (2018) L101 [1803.08717]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [25]

    Miyazaki, M

    S. Miyazaki, M. Oguri, T. Hamana, M. Shirasaki, M. Koike, Y. Komiyama et al.,A large sample of shear-selected clusters from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program S16A Wide field mass maps, PASJ 70 (2018) S27 [1802.10290]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [26]

    Oguri, S

    M. Oguri, S. Miyazaki, X. Li, W. Luo, I. Mitsuishi, H. Miyatake et al.,Hundreds of weak lensing shear-selected clusters from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program S19A data, PASJ 73 (2021) 817 [2103.15016]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  26. [27]

    Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: imprints of cosmic voids and superclusters in the Planck CMB lensing map

    A. Kovács, P. Vielzeuf, I. Ferrero, P. Fosalba, U. Demirbozan, R. Miquel et al.,Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Imprints of cosmic voids and superclusters in the Planck CMB lensing map, MNRAS 515 (2022) 4417 [2203.11306]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  27. [28]

    Kovács, N

    A. Kovács, N. Jeffrey, M. Gatti, C. Chang, L. Whiteway, N. Hamaus et al.,The DES view of the Eridanus supervoid and the CMB cold spot, MNRAS 510 (2022) 216 [2112.07699]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  28. [29]

    Kaiser and G

    N. Kaiser and G. Squires,Mapping the Dark Matter with Weak Gravitational Lensing, Astrophys. J.404 (1993) 441

    work page 1993

  29. [30]

    Wiener,Extrapolation, interpolation, and smoothing of stationary time series, vol

    N. Wiener,Extrapolation, interpolation, and smoothing of stationary time series, vol. 7, MIT (1949). 7

    work page 1949

  30. [32]

    Fiedorowicz, E

    P. Fiedorowicz, E. Rozo, S.S. Boruah, C. Chang and M. Gatti,KaRMMa - kappa reconstruction for mass mapping, MNRAS 512 (2022) 73 [2105.14699]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  31. [33]

    Boruah, P

    S.S. Boruah, P. Fiedorowicz and E. Rozo,Bayesian mass mapping with weak lensing data using KARMMA: Validation with simulations and application to Dark Energy Survey year 3 data, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 023524 [2403.05484]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  32. [34]

    High Resolution Weak Lensing Mass-Mapping Combining Shear and Flexion

    F. Lanusse, J.L. Starck, A. Leonard and S. Pires,High resolution weak lensing mass mapping combining shear and flexion, A&A 591 (2016) A2 [1603.01599]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [35]

    Spherical Bayesian mass-mapping with uncertainties: full sky observations on the celestial sphere

    M.A. Price, J.D. McEwen, L. Pratley and T.D. Kitching, Sparse Bayesian mass-mapping with uncertainties: Full sky observations on the celestial sphere, MNRAS 500 (2021) 5436 [2004.07855]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  34. [36]

    Starck, K.E

    J.L. Starck, K.E. Themelis, N. Jeffrey, A. Peel and F. Lanusse,Weak-lensing mass reconstruction using sparsity and a Gaussian random field, A&A 649 (2021) A99 [2102.04127]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [37]

    B. Remy, F. Lanusse, Z. Ramzi, J. Liu, N. Jeffrey and J.-L. Starck,Probabilistic Mapping of Dark Matter by Neural Score Matching, arXiv e-prints(2020) arXiv:2011.08271 [2011.08271]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  36. [38]

    Deep learning dark matter map reconstructions from DES SV weak lensing data

    N. Jeffrey, F. Lanusse, O. Lahav and J.-L. Starck,Deep learning dark matter map reconstructions from DES SV weak lensing data, MNRAS 492 (2020) 5023 [1908.00543]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  37. [39]

    Whitney, T.I

    J.J. Whitney, T.I. Liaudat, M.A. Price, M. Mars and J.D. McEwen,Generative modelling for mass-mapping with fast uncertainty quantification, arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2410.24197 [2410.24197]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [40]

    Diffusion-based mass map reconstruction from weak lensing data

    S.S. Boruah, M. Jacob and B. Jain,Diffusion-based mass map reconstruction from weak lensing data, arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2502.04158 [2502.04158]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [41]

    Flaugher, H.T

    B. Flaugher, H.T. Diehl, K. Honscheid, T.M.C. Abbott, O. Alvarez, R. Angstadt et al.,The Dark Energy Camera, AJ 150 (2015) 150 [1504.02900]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  40. [42]

    Jeffrey, M

    N. Jeffrey, M. Gatti, C. Chang, L. Whiteway, U. Demirbozan, A. Kovacs et al.,Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Curved-sky weak lensing mass map reconstruction, MNRAS 505 (2021) 4626 [2105.13539]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  41. [43]

    Wright, B

    A.H. Wright, B. Stölzner, M. Asgari, M. Bilicki, B. Giblin, C. Heymans et al.,KiDS-Legacy: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear with the complete Kilo-Degree Survey, arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.19441 [2503.19441]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [44]

    X. Li, H. Miyatake, W. Luo, S. More, M. Oguri, T. Hamana et al.,The three-year shear catalog of the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey, PASJ 74 (2022) 421 [2107.00136]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  43. [45]

    Gatti, E

    M. Gatti, E. Sheldon, A. Amon, M. Becker, M. Troxel, A. Choi et al.,Dark energy survey year 3 results: weak lensing shape catalogue, MNRAS 504 (2021) 4312 [2011.03408]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  44. [46]

    D. Anbajagane et al.,The Dark Energy Camera All Data Everywhere cosmic shear project V: Constraints on cosmology and astrophysics from 270 million galaxies across 13,000 deg2 of the sky, To be submitted to MNRAS (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [47]

    C.Y. Tan, W. Cerny, A. Drlica-Wagner, A.B. Pace, M. Geha, A.P. Ji et al.,A Pride of Satellites in the Constellation Leo? Discovery of the Leo VI Milky Way Satellite Ultra-faint Dwarf Galaxy with DELVE Early Data Release 3, Astrophys. J.979 (2025) 176 [2408.00865]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [48]

    Sheldon and E.M

    E.S. Sheldon and E.M. Huff,Practical Weak-lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration, Astrophys. J. 841 (2017) 24 [1702.02601]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  47. [49]

    Huff and R

    E. Huff and R. Mandelbaum,Metacalibration: Direct Self-Calibration of Biases in Shear Measurement, arXiv e-prints (2017) 1702.02600 [1702.02600]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [50]

    DES collaboration, Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Redshift Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Galaxies, arXiv e-prints(2020) arXiv:2012.08566 [2012.08566]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  49. [51]

    Górski, E

    K.M. Górski, E. Hivon, A.J. Banday, B.D. Wandelt, F.K. Hansen, M. Reinecke et al.,HEALPix: A Framework for High-Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere, Astrophys. J. 622 (2005) 759 [arXiv:astro-ph/0409513]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  50. [52]

    DES collaboration, DES Y3 results: Blending shear and redshift biases in image simulations, Submitted to MNRAS (2020) [ 2012.08567]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  51. [53]

    B. Remy, F. Lanusse, N. Jeffrey, J. Liu, J.L. Starck, K. Osato et al.,Probabilistic mass-mapping with neural score estimation, A&A 672 (2023) A51 [2201.05561]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  52. [54]

    Chang, A

    C. Chang, A. Pujol, B. Mawdsley, D. Bacon, J. Elvin-Poole, P. Melchior et al.,Dark Energy Survey Year 1 results: curved-sky weak lensing mass map, MNRAS 475 (2018) 3165 [1708.01535]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [55]

    Zaroubi, Y

    S. Zaroubi, Y. Hoffman, K.B. Fisher and O. Lahav, Wiener Reconstruction of the Large-Scale Structure, Astrophys. J.449 (1995) 446 [astro-ph/9410080]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  54. [56]

    Wiener filtering and pure E/B decomposition of CMB maps with anisotropic correlated noise

    D. Kodi Ramanah, G. Lavaux and B.D. Wandelt, Wiener filtering and pure E/B decomposition of CMB maps with anisotropic correlated noise, MNRAS 490 (2019) 947 [1906.10704]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  55. [57]

    Matrix-free Large Scale Bayesian inference in cosmology

    J. Jasche and G. Lavaux,Matrix-free large-scale Bayesian inference in cosmology, MNRAS 447 (2015) 1204 [1402.1763]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  56. [58]

    Alsing, A

    J. Alsing, A. Heavens and A.H. Jaffe,Cosmological parameters, shear maps and power spectra from CFHTLenS using Bayesian hierarchical inference, MNRAS 466 (2017) 3272 [1607.00008]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [59]

    Fast Sampling from Wiener Posteriors for Image Data with Dataflow Engines

    N. Jeffrey, A.F. Heavens and P.D. Fortio,Fast sampling from Wiener posteriors for image data with dataflow engines, Astronomy and Computing25 (2018) 230 [1810.02821]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [60]

    Castander, P

    Euclid Collaboration, F.J. Castander, P. Fosalba, J. Stadel, D. Potter, J. Carretero et al.,Euclid. V. The Flagship galaxy mock catalogue: a comprehensive simulation for the Euclid mission, arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2405.13495 [2405.13495]

    arXiv 2024

  59. [61]

    A. Amon, D. Gruen, M.A. Troxel, N. MacCrann, S. Dodelson, A. Choi et al.,Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to data calibration, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 023514

    work page 2022

  60. [62]

    Secco, S

    L.F. Secco, S. Samuroff, E. Krause, B. Jain, J. Blazek, M. Raveri et al.,Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to modeling uncertainty, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 023515

    work page 2022

  61. [63]

    Anbajagane, C

    D. Anbajagane, C. Chang, Z. Zhang, C.Y. Tan, M. Adamow, L.F. Secco et al.,The DECADE cosmic shear project I: A new weak lensing shape catalog of 107 million galaxies, arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2502.17674 8 [2502.17674]

    arXiv 2025

  62. [64]

    Characterising filaments in the SDSS volume from the galaxy distribution

    N. Malavasi, N. Aghanim, M. Douspis, H. Tanimura and V. Bonjean,Characterising filaments in the SDSS volume from the galaxy distribution, A&A 642 (2020) A19 [2002.01486]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  63. [65]

    Laigle, C

    Euclid Collaboration, C. Laigle, C. Gouin, F. Sarron, L. Quilley, C. Pichon et al.,Euclid Quick Data Release (Q1). Galaxy shapes and alignments in the cosmic web, arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.15333 [2503.15333]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  64. [66]

    SCONCE: A cosmic web finder for spherical and conic geometries

    Y. Zhang, R.S. de Souza and Y.-C. Chen,SCONCE: a cosmic web finder for spherical and conic geometries, MNRAS 517 (2022) 1197 [2207.07001]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  65. [67]

    Ridges in the Dark Energy Survey for cosmic trough identification

    B. Moews, M.A. Schmitz, A.J. Lawler, J. Zuntz, A.I. Malz, R.S. de Souza et al.,Ridges in the Dark Energy Survey for cosmic trough identification, MNRAS 500 (2021) 859 [2005.08583]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  66. [68]

    A novel Cosmic Filament catalogue from SDSS data

    J. Carrón Duque, M. Migliaccio, D. Marinucci and N. Vittorio,A novel cosmic filament catalogue from SDSS data, A&A 659 (2022) A166 [2106.05253]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  67. [69]

    Planck Collaboration, P.A.R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont et al.,Planck 2015 results. XXVII. The second Planck catalogue of Sunyaev-Zeldovich sources, A&A 594 (2016) A27 [1502.01598]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [70]

    Hilton, C

    M. Hilton, C. Sifón, S. Naess, M. Madhavacheril, M. Oguri, E. Rozo et al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Catalog of >4000 Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Galaxy Clusters, ApJS 253 (2021) 3 [2009.11043]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  69. [71]

    Superclustering with the Atacama Cosmology Telescope and Dark Energy Survey: II. Anisotropic large-scale coherence in hot gas, galaxies, and dark matter

    M. Lokken, A. van Engelen, M. Aguena, S.S. Allam, D. Anbajagane, D. Bacon et al.,Superclustering with the Atacama Cosmology Telescope and Dark Energy Survey: II. Anisotropic large-scale coherence in hot gas, galaxies, and dark matter, arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2409.04535 [2409.04535]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  70. [72]

    PKDGRAV3: Parallel gravity code

    D. Potter and J. Stadel, “PKDGRAV3: Parallel gravity code.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1609.016, Sept., 2016

    work page 2016

  71. [73]

    Detection of the significant impact of source clustering on higher-order statistics with DES Year 3 weak gravitational lensing data

    M. Gatti, N. Jeffrey, L. Whiteway, V. Ajani, T. Kacprzak, D. Zürcher et al.,Detection of the significant impact of source clustering on higher order statistics with DES Year 3 weak gravitational lensing data, MNRAS 527 (2024) L115 [2307.13860]. SUPPLEMENT AR Y MA TERIAL: V ALIDA TION ON SIMULA TIONS We validate the KS and Wiener methods using mock catalog...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  72. [74]

    The root mean square error (RMSE) between the true and reconstructed convergence fields

    work page

  73. [75]

    The Pearson correlation coefficient quantifying their correlation

    work page

  74. [76]

    Momentum

    The power spectrum of the reconstructed maps (and of the Wiener samples), compared to that of the true convergence field. 9 We report the RMSE and Pearson coefficients in Ta- ble I. Smoothing the KS map improves both metrics compared to the raw version, despite some loss of small- scale information. The Pearson coefficient is maximized at a smoothing scal...

    work page 2016

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.