Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Testing $\gamma\delta$CDM Model in the Redshift Bins

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.07538 v2 pith:AKASLVLC submitted 2025-01-13 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

Furkan Şakir Dilsiz , Cemsinan Deliduman , Selinay Sude Binici This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords modelconstanthubblecosmologicalobservationsredshiftdatadelta
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The Hubble crisis is the discrepancy in the values of the Hubble constant inferred from diverse observations in the late and early Universe, being of the order 5$\sigma$. Instead of resolution, the conflict is getting larger with further late-time observations. A fundamental constant should be and remain constant throughout the cosmological history and thus at all redshifts. The fact that it turns out to be a function of redshift in the $\Lambda$CDM model points out that either there is a problem with the current cosmological model, indicating unknown new physics, or there are unknown systematics in some of the observations. In this work, we investigate the redshift dependence of the Hubble constant in the $\gamma\delta$CDM cosmological model, which is a new cosmological model based on $f(R)$ gravity in an anisotropic background. Through data analysis with the Pantheon+ type Ia supernovae, the cosmic chronometers Hubble, and both the old and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) baryon acoustic oscillation data, we establish that the Hubble constant in our model does not evolve with redshift. We also confirm that our model fits the aforementioned data better than the $\Lambda$CDM model by checking various information criteria. The value of the Hubble constant obtained in the $\gamma\delta$CDM model is in the 1$\sigma$ bound of the late Universe observations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BAO miscalibration cannot rescue late-time solutions to the Hubble tension

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Even after rescaling BAO data to prefer H0≈73 km/s/Mpc, none of six tested late-time dark-energy models can resolve the Hubble tension once unanchored SNeIa and CMB geometry are included.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

136 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    ΛCDM model The Hubble parameter in the ΛCDM model is given by H(z) = H0 h Ωe0 + Ωm0 (1 + z)3 + Ωr0 (1 + z)4 i1/2 . (28) Since the radiation density today, Ωr0, is very small Ω r0 ∼ O(10−4) [105] compared to Ω e0 ∼ Ωm0 ∼ O(10−1) [2], in the case of observations in the late Universe, i.e., observations with low redshift values, we can ignore contribution of...

  2. [2]

    γδCDM model The Hubble parameter in the γδCDM model is given by: H(z) = H0 Ωe0 bγ (1 + z)γ−δ + Ωm0 b3 (1 + z)3−δ + Ωr0 b4 (1 + z)4−δ + Ωs0 1 − δ (1 + z)6−2δ 1/2 . (31) Since the anisotropic shear, dimensionlessly quantified by Ω s0, is very small Ω s0 ∼ O(10−12) [55] compared to Ω e0 and Ω m0 [2], we can ignore the contribution of the anisotropic shear an...

  3. [3]

    Bins in the mid- z range have widths ∆ z = 0.2 or ∆z = 0.3

    Binning with Equal-Width Method In the equal-width binning method, we divide the data into ten bins, the widths being ∆z = 0.1 for the first four bins and ∆ z = 0.4 or ∆ z = 0.5 for the last three bins. Bins in the mid- z range have widths ∆ z = 0.2 or ∆z = 0.3. The width of the bins are increased with the redshift so that there are enough data points in ...

  4. [4]

    Analysis with the full dataset To keep the uncertainty in H0,z to be less than 1 .0, the authors of [37, 49] fixed the dimensionless matter density parameter, Ω m0 = 0.3 and chose uniform prior distribution 50 ≤ H0,zi ≤ 80 (km/s/M pc) for all zi. When we constrain the flat ΛCDM model with the full CC+eBOSS+Pan+ dataset, with the same choices, the Bayesian...

  5. [5]

    In Bayesian analysis, there is only one free parameter in each bin: H0,zi for i = 1,

    Binning with Equal-Number Method In the equal-number binning method, we divide the data into eight bins, with, on average, 200 data points in each bin, as summarized in Table I. In Bayesian analysis, there is only one free parameter in each bin: H0,zi for i = 1, . . . ,8. Uniform prior distribution 50 ≤ H0,zi ≤ 80 (km/s/M pc) is used in each bin. After ob...

  6. [6]

    A buyer’s guide to the Hubble constant,

    P. Shah, P. Lemos and O. Lahav, “A buyer’s guide to the Hubble constant,” Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 29, no.1, 9 (2021) doi:10.1007/s00159-021-00137-4 [arXiv:2109.01161 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    The model comparison criteria takes into account this disparity by penalizing the existence of extra free parameters

    Comparison of the cosmological models It is expected that a model with extra free parameters would have a higher maximum value of the likelihood function (34) compared to the model with a lower number of parameters. The model comparison criteria takes into account this disparity by penalizing the existence of extra free parameters. The most widely used in...

  8. [8]

    In Bayesian analysis with the BAO data, the sound horizon at the baryon drag is taken to be rd = 147.1 Mpc [2] for the ΛCDM model

    Analysis with the full dataset When we constrain the flat ΛCDM model with the full CC+DESI+Pan+ dataset, with the choice Ωm0 = 0.3 and uniform prior distribution 50 ≤ H0,zi ≤ 80 ( km/s/M pc) for all zi, the Bayesian analysis resulted in a posterior value for the only free parameter to be H0 = 73.06 ± 0.12 km/s/M pc. In Bayesian analysis with the BAO data,...

Show all 136 references
  1. [9]

    We present the uncorrelated results for each bin in Table IV for both the cases of the γδCDM and the ΛCDM models

    Binning with Equal-Number Method We divide the data into bins with equal number of data points, and perform data analysis as described in section V A 2. We present the uncorrelated results for each bin in Table IV for both the cases of the γδCDM and the ΛCDM models. We also pl...

  2. [10]

    We present the uncorrelated results for each bin in Table V for both the cases of the γδCDM and the ΛCDM models

    Binning with Equal-Width Method In the equal-width binning method we divide the data into ten bins, and perform the data analysis as described in Section V A 3. We present the uncorrelated results for each bin in Table V for both the cases of the γδCDM and the ΛCDM models. We ...

  3. [11]

    As described in the preceding sections, we performed the Bayesian analysis with the full dataset, with equal-number bins and also with equal-width bins

    Comparison of the cosmological models Now we would like to compare how well the γδCDM and the ΛCDM models are constrained by the CC+DESI+Pan+ dataset. As described in the preceding sections, we performed the Bayesian analysis with the full dataset, with equal-number bins and a...

  4. [12]

    A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s−1 Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team,

    A. G. Riess, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri, D. Scolnic, D. Brout, S. Casertano, D. O. Jones, Y. Murakami, L. Breuval and T. G. Brink, et al. “A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s−1 Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH...

    2022 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,

    N. Aghanim et al. [Planck], “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020) [erratum: Astron. Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)] doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 [arXiv:1807.06209 [astro- ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Tensions in Perspective,

    W. L. Freedman, “Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Tensions in Perspective,” Astrophys. J. 919, no.1, 16 (2021) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0e95 [arXiv:2106.15656 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe,

    L. Verde, T. Treu and A. G. Riess, “Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe,” Nature Astron. 3, 891 doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0 [arXiv:1907.10625 [astro-ph.CO]]

    1907 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astro- physics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies,

    E. Abdalla, G. Franco Abell´ an, A. Aboubrahim, A. Agnello, O. Akarsu, Y. Akrami, G. Alestas, D. Aloni, L. Amendola and L. A. Anchordoqui, et al. “Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astro- physics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions a...

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Hubble constant hunter’s guide,

    L. Knox and M. Millea, “Hubble constant hunter’s guide,” Phys. Rev. D 101, no.4, 043533 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.043533 [arXiv:1908.03663 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    The Megamaser Cosmology Project. XIII. Combined Hubble constant constraints,

    D. W. Pesce, J. A. Braatz, M. J. Reid, A. G. Riess, D. Scolnic, J. J. Condon, F. Gao, C. Henkel, C. M. V. Impel- lizzeri and C. Y. Kuo, et al.“The Megamaser Cosmology Project. XIII. Combined Hubble constant constraints,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 891, no.1, L1 (2020) doi:10.3847/204...

    2020 arXiv

  11. [19]

    The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VIII. An Independent Determination of the Hubble Constant Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch,

    W. L. Freedman, B. F. Madore, D. Hatt, T. J. Hoyt, I. S. Jang, R. L. Beaton, C. R. Burns, M. G. Lee, A. J. Monson and J. R. Neeley, et al. “The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VIII. An Independent Determination of the Hubble Constant Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch,”...

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    H0LiCOW – XIII. A 2.4 per cent measurement of H0 from lensed quasars: 5.3 σ tension between early- and late-Universe probes,

    K. C. Wong, S. H. Suyu, G. C. F. Chen, C. E. Rusu, M. Millon, D. Sluse, V. Bonvin, C. D. Fassnacht, S. Tauben- berger and M. W. Auger, et al.“H0LiCOW – XIII. A 2.4 per cent measurement of H0 from lensed quasars: 5.3 σ tension between early- and late-Universe probes,” Mon. Not....

    2020 arXiv

  13. [21]

    H0LiCOW - IX. Cosmographic analysis of the doubly imaged quasar SDSS 1206+4332 and a new measurement of the Hubble constant,

    S. Birrer, T. Treu, C. E. Rusu, V. Bonvin, C. D. Fassnacht, J. H. H. Chan, A. Agnello, A. J. Shajib, G. C. F. Chen and M. Auger, et al. “H0LiCOW - IX. Cosmographic analysis of the doubly imaged quasar SDSS 1206+4332 and a new measurement of the Hubble constant,” Mon. Not. Roy....

    2019 arXiv

  14. [22]

    A new measurement of the Hubble constant and matter content of the Universe using extragalactic background light γ-ray attenuation,

    A. Dom ´ ınguez, R. Wojtak, J. Finke, M. Ajello, K. Helgason, F. Prada, A. Desai, V. Paliya, L. Marcotulli and D. Hartmann, “A new measurement of the Hubble constant and matter content of the Universe using extragalactic background light γ-ray attenuation,” doi:10.3847/1538-43...

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant,

    B. P. Abbott et al. [LIGO Scientific, Virgo, 1M2H, Dark Energy Camera GW-E, DES, DLT40, Las Cumbres Observatory, VINROUGE and MASTER], “A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant,” Nature 551, no.7678, 85-88 (2017) doi:10.1038/nature24471 [arXiv:171...

    2017 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic growth and expansion,

    M. Moresco and F. Marulli, “Cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic growth and expansion,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 471, no.1, L82-L86 (2017) doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx112 [arXiv:1705.07903 [astro- ph.CO]]

    2017 arXiv

  17. [25]

    In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions,

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess and J. Silk, “In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions,” Class. Quant. Grav. 38, no.15, 153001 (2021) doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d [arXiv:2103.01183 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Challenges for ΛCDM: An update,

    L. Perivolaropoulos and F. Skara, “Challenges for ΛCDM: An update,” New Astron. Rev. 95, 101659 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.newar.2022.101659 [arXiv:2105.05208 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022

  19. [27]

    The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models,

    N. Sch¨ oneberg, G. Franco Abell´ an, A. P´ erez S´ anchez, S. J. Witte, V. Poulin and J. Lesgourgues, “The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models,” Phys. Rept. 984, 1-55 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.07.001 [arXiv:2107.10291 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    JWST Validates HST Distance Measurements: Selection of Supernova Subsample Explains Differences in JWST Estimates of Local H 0,

    A. G. Riess, D. Scolnic, G. S. Anand, L. Breuval, S. Casertano, L. M. Macri, S. Li, W. Yuan, C. D. Huang and S. Jha, et al. “JWST Validates HST Distance Measurements: Selection of Supernova Subsample Explains Differences in JWST Estimates of Local H 0,” Astrophys. J. 977, no.1...

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    JWST Observations Reject Unrecognized Crowding of Cepheid Photometry as an Explanation for the Hubble Tension at 8 sigma Confidence,

    A. G. Riess, G. S. Anand, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri, S. Casertano, A. Dolphin, L. Breuval, D. Scolnic, M. Perrin and R. I. Anderson, “JWST Observations Reject Unrecognized Crowding of Cepheid Photometry as an Explanation for the Hubble Tension at 8 sigma Confidence,” [arXiv:2401.04...

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    Tip of the Red Giant Branch Distances with JWST: An Absolute Calibration in NGC 4258 and First Applications to Type Ia Supernova Hosts,

    G. S. Anand, A. G. Riess, W. Yuan, R. Beaton, S. Casertano, S. Li, D. I. Makarov, L. N. Makarova, R. B. Tully and R. I. Anderson, et al.“Tip of the Red Giant Branch Distances with JWST: An Absolute Calibration in NGC 4258 and First Applications to Type Ia Supernova Hosts,” [ar...

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Recon- naissance with JWST of the J-region Asymptotic Giant Branch in Distance Ladder Galaxies: From Irregular Luminosity Functions to Approximation of the Hubble Constant,

    S. Li, A. G. Riess, S. Casertano, G. S. Anand, D. M. Scolnic, W. Yuan, L. Breuval and C. D. Huang, “Recon- naissance with JWST of the J-region Asymptotic Giant Branch in Distance Ladder Galaxies: From Irregular Luminosity Functions to Approximation of the Hubble Constant,” [ar...

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Progress in direct measurements of the Hubble constant,

    W. L. Freedman and B. F. Madore, “Progress in direct measurements of the Hubble constant,” JCAP 11, 050 (2023) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/11/050 [arXiv:2309.05618 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    DESI Peculiar Velocity Survey – Fundamental Plane,

    K. Said, C. Howlett, T. Davis, J. Lucey, C. Saulder, K. Douglass, A. G. Kim, A. Kremin, C. Ross and G. Aldering, et al. “DESI Peculiar Velocity Survey – Fundamental Plane,” [arXiv:2408.13842 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    The Hubble Tension in our own Backyard: DESI and the Nearness of the Coma Cluster,

    D. Scolnic, A. G. Riess, Y. S. Murakami, E. R. Peterson, D. Brout, M. Acevedo, B. Carreres, D. O. Jones, K. Said and C. Howlett, et al. “The Hubble Tension in our own Backyard: DESI and the Nearness of the Coma Cluster,” [arXiv:2409.14546 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Calibrating the Tully-Fisher Relation to Measure the Hubble Constant,

    D. Scolnic, P. Boubel, J. Byrne, A. G. Riess and G. S. Anand, “Calibrating the Tully-Fisher Relation to Measure the Hubble Constant,” [arXiv:2412.08449 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    An improved Tully–Fisher estimate of H0,

    P. Boubel, M. Colless, K. Said and L. Staveley-Smith, “An improved Tully–Fisher estimate of H0,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 533, no.2, 1550-1559 (2024) doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1925 [arXiv:2408.03660 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    to infer the Hubble constant values in redshift intervals. We now replace the Hubble constant H0 in (29) with the piecewise function H0,z with constant values H0,zi in each redshift bin, labeled by i, to reach an expression for the Hubble parameter given as H(z) = NX i=1  H0...

  30. [38]

    SN H0pe: The First Measurement of H0 from a Multiply-Imaged Type Ia Supernova, Discovered by JWST,

    M. Pascale, B. L. Frye, J. D. R. Pierel, W. Chen, P. L. Kelly, S. H. Cohen, R. A. Windhorst, A. G. Riess, P. S. Kamieneski and J. M. Diego, et al.“SN H0pe: The First Measurement of H0 from a Multiply-Imaged Type Ia Supernova, Discovered by JWST,” [arXiv:2403.18902 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    No rungs attached: A distance-ladder free determination of the Hubble constant through type II supernova spectral modelling,

    C. Vogl, S. Taubenberger, G. Cs¨ ornyei, B. Leibundgut, W. E. Kerzendorf, S. A. Sim, S. Blondin, A. Fl¨ ors, A. Holas and J. V. Shields, et al. “No rungs attached: A distance-ladder free determination of the Hubble constant through type II supernova spectral modelling,” [arXiv...

  32. [40]

    Narrowing down the Hubble tension to the first two rungs of distance ladders,

    L. Huang, R. G. Cai, S. J. Wang, J. Q. Liu and Y. H. Yao, “Narrowing down the Hubble tension to the first two rungs of distance ladders,” [arXiv:2410.06053 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  33. [41]

    Reassessing the Cepheid-based distance ladder: implications for the Hubble con- stant,

    M. H¨ og ˚ as and E. M¨ ortsell, “Reassessing the Cepheid-based distance ladder: implications for the Hubble con- stant,” [arXiv:2412.07840 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Status Report on the Chicago-Carnegie Hubble Program (CCHP): Three Independent Astrophysical Determinations of the Hubble Constant Using the James Webb Space Telescope,

    W. L. Freedman, B. F. Madore, I. S. Jang, T. J. Hoyt, A. J. Lee and K. A. Owens, “Status Report on the Chicago-Carnegie Hubble Program (CCHP): Three Independent Astrophysical Determinations of the Hubble Constant Using the James Webb Space Telescope,” [arXiv:2408.06153 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Reevaluating H0 Tension with Non-Planck CMB and DESI BAO Joint Analysis,

    Y. H. Pang, X. Zhang and Q. G. Huang, “Reevaluating H0 Tension with Non-Planck CMB and DESI BAO Joint Analysis,” [arXiv:2411.14189 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Newest measurements of Hubble constant from DESI 2024 BAO observations,

    W. Guo, Q. Wang, S. Cao, M. Biesiada, T. Liu, Y. Lian, X. Jiang, C. Mu and D. Cheng, “Newest measurements of Hubble constant from DESI 2024 BAO observations,” [arXiv:2412.13045 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Deep Learning Based Recalibration of SDSS and DESI BAO Alleviates Hubble and Clustering Tensions,

    R. Shah, P. Mukherjee, S. Saha, U. Garain and S. Pal, “Deep Learning Based Recalibration of SDSS and DESI BAO Alleviates Hubble and Clustering Tensions,” [arXiv:2412.14750 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Running Hubble Tension and a H0 Diagnostic,

    C. Krishnan, E. ´O. Colg´ ain, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and T. Yang, “Running Hubble Tension and a H0 Diagnostic,” Phys. Rev. D 103, no.10, 103509 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103509 [arXiv:2011.02858 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  39. [47]

    H0 as a Universal FLR W Diagnostic,

    C. Krishnan and R. Mondol, “ H0 as a Universal FLR W Diagnostic,” [arXiv:2201.13384 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Evidence of a decreasing trend for the Hubble constant,

    X. D. Jia, J. P. Hu and F. Y. Wang, “Evidence of a decreasing trend for the Hubble constant,” Astron. Astrophys. 674, A45 (2023) doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346356 [arXiv:2212.00238 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2023 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Seven Hints That Early-Time New Physics Alone Is Not Sufficient to Solve the Hubble Tension,

    S. Vagnozzi, “Seven Hints That Early-Time New Physics Alone Is Not Sufficient to Solve the Hubble Tension,” Universe 9, no.9, 393 (2023) doi:10.3390/Universe9090393 [arXiv:2308.16628 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    TDCOSMO. I. An exploration of systematic uncertainties in the inference of H0 from time- delay cosmography,

    M. Millon, A. Galan, F. Courbin, T. Treu, S. H. Suyu, X. Ding, S. Birrer, G. C. F. Chen, A. J. Shajib and D. Sluse, et al. “TDCOSMO. I. An exploration of systematic uncertainties in the inference of H0 from time- delay cosmography,” Astron. Astrophys. 639, A101 (2020) doi:10.1...

    2020 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Is there an early Uni- verse solution to Hubble tension?,

    C. Krishnan, E. ´O. Colg´ ain, Ruchika, A. A. Sen, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and T. Yang, “Is there an early Uni- verse solution to Hubble tension?,” Phys. Rev. D 102, no.10, 103525 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.103525 [arXiv:2002.06044 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  44. [52]

    On the Hubble constant tension in the SNe Ia Pantheon sample,

    M. G. Dainotti, B. De Simone, T. Schiavone, G. Montani, E. Rinaldi and G. Lambiase, “On the Hubble constant tension in the SNe Ia Pantheon sample,” Astrophys. J. 912, no.2, 150 (2021) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abeb73 [arXiv:2103.02117 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Running Hubble constant from the SNe Ia Pantheon sample?,

    T. Schiavone, G. Montani, M. G. Dainotti, B. De Simone, E. Rinaldi and G. Lambiase, “Running Hubble constant from the SNe Ia Pantheon sample?,” [arXiv:2205.07033 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    On the Evolution of the Hubble Constant with the SNe Ia Pantheon Sample and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations: A Feasibility Study for GRB-Cosmology in 2030,

    M. G. Dainotti, B. De Simone, T. Schiavone, G. Montani, E. Rinaldi, G. Lambiase, M. Bogdan and S. Ugale, 24 “On the Evolution of the Hubble Constant with the SNe Ia Pantheon Sample and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations: A Feasibility Study for GRB-Cosmology in 2030,” Galaxies 10, n...

    2022 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Gamma-ray bursts, supernovae Ia, and baryon acous- tic oscillations: A binned cosmological analysis,

    M. G. Dainotti, G. Sarracino and S. Capozziello, “Gamma-ray bursts, supernovae Ia, and baryon acous- tic oscillations: A binned cosmological analysis,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap. 74, no.5, 1095-1113-1113 (2022) doi:10.1093/pasj/psac057 [arXiv:2206.07479 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  48. [57]

    High redshift ΛCDM cosmology: To bin or not to bin?,

    E. ´O. Colg´ ain, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and R. Solomon, “High redshift ΛCDM cosmology: To bin or not to bin?,” Phys. Dark Univ. 40, 101216 (2023) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101216 [arXiv:2211.02129 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2023

  49. [58]

    On redshift evo- lution and negative dark energy density in Pantheon + Supernovae,

    M. Malekjani, R. M. Conville, E. ´O. Colg´ ain, S. Pourojaghi and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “On redshift evo- lution and negative dark energy density in Pantheon + Supernovae,” Eur. Phys. J. C 84, no.3, 317 (2024) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12667-z [arXiv:2301.12725 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2024 arXiv

  50. [59]

    ΛCDM Tensions: Localising Missing Physics through Consistency Checks,

    ¨O. Akarsu, E. ´O. Colg´ ain, A. A. Sen and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “ΛCDM Tensions: Localising Missing Physics through Consistency Checks,” Universe 10, no.8, 305 (2024) doi:10.3390/universe10080305 [arXiv:2402.04767 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [60]

    Uncorrelated estimations of H0 redshift evolution from DESI baryon acoustic oscillation observations,

    X. D. Jia, J. P. Hu and F. Y. Wang, “Uncorrelated estimations of H0 redshift evolution from DESI baryon acoustic oscillation observations,” [arXiv:2406.02019 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  52. [61]

    Is there a dynamical tendency in H0 with late time measurements?,

    M. Lopez-Henandez and J. De-Santiago, “Is there a dynamical tendency in H0 with late time measurements?,” [arXiv:2411.00095 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  53. [62]

    Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter,

    M. Chevallier and D. Polarski, “Accelerating universes with scaling dark matter,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 10, 213-224 (2001) doi:10.1142/S0218271801000822 [arXiv:gr-qc/0009008 [gr-qc]]

    2001 arXiv

  54. [63]

    Exploring the expansion history of the universe,

    E. V. Linder, “Exploring the expansion history of the universe,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 091301 (2003) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.091301 [arXiv:astro-ph/0208512 [astro-ph]]

    2003 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Uncorrelated estimates of dark energy evolution,

    D. Huterer and A. Cooray, “Uncorrelated estimates of dark energy evolution,” Phys. Rev. D 71, 023506 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.023506 [arXiv:astro-ph/0404062 [astro-ph]]

    2005 arXiv

  56. [65]

    Model-Agnostic Cosmological Inference with SDSS-IV eBOSS: Simultaneous Probing for Background and Perturbed Universe,

    P. Mukherjee and A. A. Sen, “Model-Agnostic Cosmological Inference with SDSS-IV eBOSS: Simultaneous Probing for Background and Perturbed Universe,” [arXiv:2412.13973 [astro-ph.CO]]

  57. [66]

    Deliduman, O

    C. Deliduman, O. Kasikci and V. K. Tugyanoglu, Phys. Dark Univ. 44, 101469 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101469 [arXiv:2310.02914 [gr-qc]]

    2024

  58. [67]

    The ages of the oldest astrophysical objects in an ellipsoidal universe,

    S. S. Binici, C. Deliduman and F. S ¸. Dilsiz, “The ages of the oldest astrophysical objects in an ellipsoidal universe,” Phys. Dark Univ. 46, 101600 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101600 [arXiv:2402.16646 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2024

  59. [68]

    f(R) gravity in the Jordan frame as a paradigm for the Hubble tension,

    T. Schiavone, G. Montani and F. Bombacigno, “f(R) gravity in the Jordan frame as a paradigm for the Hubble tension,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 522, no.1, L72-L77 (2023) doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad041 [arXiv:2211.16737 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  60. [69]

    Running Hubble constant: evolutionary Dark Energy,

    G. Montani, N. Carlevaro and M. G. Dainotti, “Running Hubble constant: evolutionary Dark Energy,” [arXiv:2411.07060 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  61. [70]

    Exact cosmological solution of a Scalar-Tensor Gravity theory compatible with the ΛCDM model,

    B. Boisseau, “Exact cosmological solution of a Scalar-Tensor Gravity theory compatible with the ΛCDM model,” Phys. Rev. D 83, 043521 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.043521 [arXiv:1011.2915 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2011 arXiv

  62. [71]

    Anisotropic massive Brans-Dicke gravity exten- sion of the standard ΛCDM model,

    ¨O. Akarsu, N. Katırcı, N. ¨Ozdemir and J. A. V´ azquez, “Anisotropic massive Brans-Dicke gravity exten- sion of the standard ΛCDM model,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80, no.1, 32 (2020) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7580-z [arXiv:1903.06679 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  63. [72]

    Is the low-l microwave background cosmic?,

    D. J. Schwarz, G. D. Starkman, D. Huterer and C. J. Copi, “Is the low-l microwave background cosmic?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 221301 (2004) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.221301 [arXiv:astro-ph/0403353 [astro-ph]]

    2004 arXiv

  64. [73]

    The Axis of evil,

    K. Land and J. Magueijo, “The Axis of evil,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 071301 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.071301 [arXiv:astro-ph/0502237 [astro-ph]]

    2005 arXiv

  65. [74]

    Large-scale alignments from WMAP and Planck,

    C. J. Copi, D. Huterer, D. J. Schwarz and G. D. Starkman, “Large-scale alignments from WMAP and Planck,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 449, no.4, 3458-3470 (2015) doi:10.1093/mnras/stv501 [arXiv:1311.4562 [astro- ph.CO]]

    2015 arXiv

  66. [75]

    Observational Challenges for the Standard FLR W Model,

    T. Buchert, A. A. Coley, H. Kleinert, B. F. Roukema and D. L. Wiltshire, “Observational Challenges for the Standard FLR W Model,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 25, no.03, 1630007 (2016) doi:10.1142/S021827181630007X [arXiv:1512.03313 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2016 arXiv

  67. [76]

    CMB Anomalies after Planck,

    D. J. Schwarz, C. J. Copi, D. Huterer and G. D. Starkman, “CMB Anomalies after Planck,” Class. Quant. Grav. 33, no.18, 184001 (2016) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/18/184001 [arXiv:1510.07929 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2016 arXiv

  68. [77]

    Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity,

    Y. Akrami et al. [Planck], “Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity,” Astron. Astro- phys. 641, A9 (2020) doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935891 [arXiv:1905.05697 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  69. [78]

    Planck 2018 results. VII. Isotropy and Statistics of the CMB,

    Y. Akrami et al. [Planck], “Planck 2018 results. VII. Isotropy and Statistics of the CMB,” Astron. Astrophys. 641, A7 (2020) doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935201 [arXiv:1906.02552 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  70. [79]

    Ellipsoidal Universe Can Solve The CMB Quadrupole Problem,

    L. Campanelli, P. Cea and L. Tedesco, “Ellipsoidal Universe Can Solve The CMB Quadrupole Problem,” Phys. 25 Rev. Lett. 97, 131302 (2006) [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 209903 (2006)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.131302 [arXiv:astro-ph/0606266 [astro-ph]]

    2006 arXiv

  71. [80]

    Cosmic Microwave Background Quadrupole and Ellipsoidal Universe,

    L. Campanelli, P. Cea and L. Tedesco, “Cosmic Microwave Background Quadrupole and Ellipsoidal Universe,” Phys. Rev. D 76, 063007 (2007) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.063007 [arXiv:0706.3802 [astro-ph]]

    2007 arXiv

  72. [81]

    Confronting the Ellipsoidal Universe to the Planck 2018 Data,

    P. Cea, “Confronting the Ellipsoidal Universe to the Planck 2018 Data,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, no.2, 150 (2020) doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00166-5 [arXiv:1909.05111 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  73. [82]

    Larger H0 values in the CMB dipole direction,

    O. Luongo, M. Muccino, E. ´O. Colg´ ain, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and L. Yin, “Larger H0 values in the CMB dipole direction,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.10, 103510 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.103510 [arXiv:2108.13228 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  74. [83]

    Hints of FLR W breakdown from supernovae,

    C. Krishnan, R. Mohayaee, E. ´O. Colg´ ain, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and L. Yin, “Hints of FLR W breakdown from supernovae,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.6, 063514 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.063514 [arXiv:2106.02532 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  75. [84]

    The Ellipsoidal Universe and the Hubble tension,

    P. Cea, “The Ellipsoidal Universe and the Hubble tension,” [arXiv:2201.04548 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  76. [85]

    Shear dynamics in Bianchi I cosmologies with R**n-gravity,

    J. A. Leach, S. Carloni and P. K. S. Dunsby, “Shear dynamics in Bianchi I cosmologies with R**n-gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 4915-4937 (2006) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/15/011 [arXiv:gr-qc/0603012 [gr-qc]]

    2006 arXiv

  77. [86]

    Dynamics of Bianchi I cosmologies in f(R) gravity in the Palatini formalism,

    D. K. Banik, S. K. Banik and K. Bhuyan, “Dynamics of Bianchi I cosmologies in f(R) gravity in the Palatini formalism,” Indian J. Phys. 91, no.1, 109-119 (2017) doi:10.1007/s12648-016-0898-6

    2017 doi

  78. [87]

    Constraints on a Bianchi type I spacetime extension of the standard ΛCDM model,

    ¨O. Akarsu, S. Kumar, S. Sharma and L. Tedesco, “Constraints on a Bianchi type I spacetime extension of the standard ΛCDM model,” Phys. Rev. D 100, no.2, 023532 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.023532 [arXiv:1905.06949 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2019 arXiv

  79. [88]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints,

    D. Brout, D. Scolnic, B. Popovic, A. G. Riess, J. Zuntz, R. Kessler, A. Carr, T. M. Davis, S. Hinton and D. Jones, et al. “The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints,” Astrophys. J. 938, no.2, 110 (2022) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8e04 [arXiv:2202.04077 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  80. [89]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full dataset and Light-curve Release,

    D. Scolnic, D. Brout, A. Carr, A. G. Riess, T. M. Davis, A. Dwomoh, D. O. Jones, N. Ali, P. Charvu and R. Chen, et al. “The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full dataset and Light-curve Release,” Astrophys. J. 938, no.2, 113 (2022) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8b7a [arXiv:2112.03863 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  81. [90]

    https://pantheonplussh0es.github.io/

  82. [91]

    Unified transverse diffeomorphism invariant field theory for the dark sector,

    D. Alonso-L´ opez, J. de Cruz P´ erez and A. L. Maroto, “Unified transverse diffeomorphism invariant field theory for the dark sector,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.2, 023537 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023537 [arXiv:2311.16836 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2024 arXiv

  83. [92]

    Constraining cosmological parameters based on relative galaxy ages,

    R. Jimenez and A. Loeb, “Constraining cosmological parameters based on relative galaxy ages,” Astrophys. J. 573, 37-42 (2002) doi:10.1086/340549 [arXiv:astro-ph/0106145 [astro-ph]]

    2002 arXiv

  84. [93]

    H. Yu, B. Ratra and F. Y. Wang, “Hubble Parameter and Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurement Constraints on the Hubble Constant, the Deviation from the Spatially Flat ΛCDM Model, the Deceleration–Acceleration Transition Redshift, and Spatial Curvature,” Astrophys. J. 856, no....

    2018 arXiv

  85. [94]

    Using lower redshift, non-CMB, data to constrain the Hubble constant and other cos- mological parameters,

    S. Cao and B. Ratra, “Using lower redshift, non-CMB, data to constrain the Hubble constant and other cos- mological parameters,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 513, no.4, 5686-5700 (2022) doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1184 [arXiv:2203.10825 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  86. [95]

    Constraints on the equation of state of dark energy and the Hubble constant from stellar ages and the CMB,

    R. Jimenez, L. Verde, T. Treu and D. Stern, “Constraints on the equation of state of dark energy and the Hubble constant from stellar ages and the CMB,” Astrophys. J. 593, 622-629 (2003) doi:10.1086/376595 [arXiv:astro- ph/0302560 [astro-ph]]

    2003

  87. [96]

    Constraints on the redshift dependence of the dark energy potential,

    J. Simon, L. Verde and R. Jimenez, “Constraints on the redshift dependence of the dark energy potential,” Phys. Rev. D 71, 123001 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.123001 [arXiv:astro-ph/0412269 [astro-ph]]

    2005 arXiv

  88. [97]

    Cosmic Chronometers: Constrain- ing the Equation of State of Dark Energy. I: H(z) Measurements,

    D. Stern, R. Jimenez, L. Verde, M. Kamionkowski and S. A. Stanford, “Cosmic Chronometers: Constrain- ing the Equation of State of Dark Energy. I: H(z) Measurements,” JCAP 02, 008 (2010) doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2010/02/008 [arXiv:0907.3149 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2010 arXiv

  89. [98]

    Four new observational H(z) data from luminous red galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey data release seven,

    C. Zhang, H. Zhang, S. Yuan, T. J. Zhang and Y. C. Sun, “Four new observational H(z) data from luminous red galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey data release seven,” Res. Astron. Astrophys. 14, no.10, 1221-1233 (2014) doi:10.1088/1674-4527/14/10/002 [arXiv:1207.4541 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2014 arXiv

  90. [99]

    Improved constraints on the expansion rate of the Universe up to z˜1.1 from the spectroscopic evolution of cosmic chronometers,

    M. Moresco, A. Cimatti, R. Jimenez, L. Pozzetti, G. Zamorani, M. Bolzonella, J. Dunlop, F. Lamareille, M. Mignoli and H. Pearce, et al. “Improved constraints on the expansion rate of the Universe up to z˜1.1 from the spectroscopic evolution of cosmic chronometers,” JCAP 08, 00...

    2012 arXiv

  91. [100]

    Raising the bar: new constraints on the Hubble parameter with cosmic chronometers at z ∼ 2,

    M. Moresco, “Raising the bar: new constraints on the Hubble parameter with cosmic chronometers at z ∼ 2,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 450, no.1, L16-L20 (2015) doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv037 [arXiv:1503.01116 [astro- ph.CO]]

    2015 arXiv

  92. [101]

    A 6% measurement of the Hubble parameter at z ∼ 0.45: direct evidence of the epoch of cosmic re-acceleration,

    M. Moresco, L. Pozzetti, A. Cimatti, R. Jimenez, C. Maraston, L. Verde, D. Thomas, A. Citro, R. Tojeiro and D. Wilkinson, “A 6% measurement of the Hubble parameter at z ∼ 0.45: direct evidence of the epoch of cosmic re-acceleration,” JCAP 05, 014 (2016) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2...

    2016 arXiv

  93. [102]

    Age-dating Luminous Red Galaxies observed with the Southern African Large Telescope,

    A. L. Ratsimbazafy, S. I. Loubser, S. M. Crawford, C. M. Cress, B. A. Bassett, R. C. Nichol and P. V¨ ais¨ anen, “Age-dating Luminous Red Galaxies observed with the Southern African Large Telescope,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 467, no.3, 3239-3254 (2017) doi:10.1093/mnras/stx...

    2017 arXiv

  94. [103]

    Toward a Better Understanding of Cosmic Chronometers: A New Measurement of H(z) at z ∼ 0.7,

    N. Borghi, M. Moresco and A. Cimatti, “Toward a Better Understanding of Cosmic Chronometers: A New Measurement of H(z) at z ∼ 0.7,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 928, no.1, L4 (2022) doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac3fb2 [arXiv:2110.04304 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  95. [104]

    Setting the Stage for Cosmic Chronometers. II. Impact of Stellar Population Synthesis Models Systematics and Full Covariance Matrix,

    M. Moresco, R. Jimenez, L. Verde, A. Cimatti and L. Pozzetti, “Setting the Stage for Cosmic Chronometers. II. Impact of Stellar Population Synthesis Models Systematics and Full Covariance Matrix,” The Astrophy. Journal, 898, Issue 1, id.82 (2020) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9eb0 [...

    2020 arXiv

  96. [105]

    Measuring the expansion history of the Universe with cosmic chronometers,

    M. Moresco, “Measuring the expansion history of the Universe with cosmic chronometers,” [arXiv:2412.01994 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  97. [106]

    Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Measurement of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation scale in the distribution of galaxies to redshift 1,

    T. M. C. Abbott et al. [DES], “Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Measurement of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation scale in the distribution of galaxies to redshift 1,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 483, no.4, 4866-4883 (2019) doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3351 [arXiv:1712.06209 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2019 arXiv

  98. [107]

    Low Redshift Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurement from the Reconstructed 6-degree Field Galaxy Survey,

    P. Carter, F. Beutler, W. J. Percival, C. Blake, J. Koda and A. J. Ross, “Low Redshift Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurement from the Reconstructed 6-degree Field Galaxy Survey,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 481, no.2, 2371-2383 (2018) doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2405 [arXiv:1803.01...

    2018 arXiv

  99. [108]

    J. E. Bautista et al. [eBOSS], “The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurement of the BAO and growth rate of structure of the luminous red galaxy sample from the anisotropic correlation function between redshifts 0.6 and 1,” Mon. Not. Roy. ...

    2020 arXiv

  100. [109]

    H. Gil-Marin et al.[eBOSS], “The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: mea- surement of the BAO and growth rate of structure of the luminous red galaxy sample from the anisotropic power spectrum between redshifts 0.6 and 1.0,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astro...

    2020 arXiv

  101. [110]

    The Completed SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations with Ly α Forests,

    H. du Mas des Bourboux et al. [eBOSS], “The Completed SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations with Ly α Forests,” Astrophys. J. 901, no.2, 153 (2020) doi:10.3847/1538- 4357/abb085 [arXiv:2007.08995 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  102. [111]

    Hou et al

    J. Hou et al. [eBOSS], “The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: BAO and RSD measurements from anisotropic clustering analysis of the Quasar Sample in configuration space between redshift 0.8 and 2.2,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 500, no.1, 1201-...

    2020 arXiv

  103. [112]

    Neveux et al

    R. Neveux et al. [eBOSS], “The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: BAO and RSD measurements from the anisotropic power spectrum of the quasar sample between redshift 0.8 and 2.2,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 499, no.1, 210-229 (2020) doi:10.1093...

    2020

  104. [113]

    Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters,

    P. A. R. Ade et al.[Planck], “Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016) doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 [arXiv:1502.01589 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2016 arXiv

  105. [114]

    DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations,

    A. G. Adame et al.[DESI], “DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations,” [arXiv:2404.03002 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2024 arXiv

  106. [115]

    ΛCDM model against cosmography: a possible deviation after DESI 2024,

    S. Pourojaghi, M. Malekjani and Z. Davari, “ΛCDM model against cosmography: a possible deviation after DESI 2024,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 537, no.1, 436-447 (2025) doi:10.1093/mnras/staf037 [arXiv:2408.10704 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2025 arXiv

  107. [116]

    Physical Foundations of Cosmology,

    V. Mukhanov, “Physical Foundations of Cosmology,” Cambridge University Press, 2005, ISBN 978-0-521-56398-7 doi:10.1017/CBO9780511790553

    2005 doi

  108. [117]

    Cosmological Parameter Inference with Bayesian Statistics,

    L. E. Padilla, L. O. Tellez, L. A. Escamilla and J. A. Vazquez, “Cosmological Parameter Inference with Bayesian Statistics,” Universe 7, no.7, 213 (2021) doi:10.3390/universe7070213 [arXiv:1903.11127 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  109. [118]

    Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data,

    D. W. Hogg, J. Bovy and D. Lang, “Data analysis recipes: Fitting a model to data,” [arXiv:1008.4686 [astro- ph.IM]]

    arXiv

  110. [119]

    emcee: The MCMC Hammer,

    D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang and J. Goodman, “emcee: The MCMC Hammer,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125, 306-312 (2013) doi:10.1086/670067 [arXiv:1202.3665 [astro-ph.IM]]

    2013 arXiv

  111. [120]

    https://github.com/JoJo20221003/Hz-Code

  112. [121]

    GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples,

    A. Lewis, “GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples,” [arXiv:1910.13970 [astro-ph.IM]]

    1910 arXiv

  113. [122]

    A new look at the statistical model identification,

    H. Akaike, “A new look at the statistical model identification,” IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 19, no.6, 716 (1974) doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

    1974

  114. [123]

    Schwarz, ”Estimating the Dimension of a Model,” The Annals of Statistics 6, no.2, 461 (1978) doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344136

    G. Schwarz, ”Estimating the Dimension of a Model,” The Annals of Statistics 6, no.2, 461 (1978) doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344136

    1978

  115. [124]

    Stoica and Y

    P. Stoica and Y. Selen, ”Model-order selection: a review of information criterion rules,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 21, no.4, 36 (2004) doi: 10.1109/MSP.2004.1311138

    2004 arXiv

  116. [125]

    A doublet of cosmological models to 27 challenge the H0 tension in the Pantheon Supernovae Ia catalog,

    B. De Simone, M. H. P. M. van Putten, M. G. Dainotti and G. Lambiase, “A doublet of cosmological models to 27 challenge the H0 tension in the Pantheon Supernovae Ia catalog,” [arXiv:2411.05744 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  117. [126]

    An alternative to the ΛCDM model: The case of scale invariance,

    A. Maeder, “An alternative to the ΛCDM model: The case of scale invariance,” Astrophys. J. 834, no.2, 194 (2017) doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/194 [arXiv:1701.03964 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2017 arXiv

  118. [127]

    Cosmologically Coupled Compact Objects: A Single-parameter Model for LIGO–Virgo Mass and Redshift Distributions,

    K. S. Croker, M. J. Zevin, D. Farrah, K. A. Nishimura and G. Tarle, “Cosmologically Coupled Compact Objects: A Single-parameter Model for LIGO–Virgo Mass and Redshift Distributions,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 921, no.2, L22 (2021) doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac2fad [arXiv:2109.08146 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  119. [128]

    Observational Evidence for Cosmological Coupling of Black Holes and its Implications for an Astrophysical Source of Dark Energy,

    D. Farrah, K. S. Croker, G. Tarl´ e, V. Faraoni, S. Petty, J. Afonso, N. Fernandez, K. A. Nishimura, C. Pearson and L. Wang, et al.“Observational Evidence for Cosmological Coupling of Black Holes and its Implications for an Astrophysical Source of Dark Energy,” Astrophys. J. L...

    2023 arXiv

  120. [129]

    Implications of Symmetry and Pressure in Friedmann Cosmology. III. Point Sources of Dark Energy that Tend toward Uniformity,

    K. S. Croker, J. Runburg and D. Farrah, “Implications of Symmetry and Pressure in Friedmann Cosmology. III. Point Sources of Dark Energy that Tend toward Uniformity,” Astrophys. J.900, no.1, 57 (2020) doi:10.3847/1538- 4357/abad2f

    2020 doi

  121. [130]

    Implications for the Hubble tension from the ages of the oldest astrophysical objects,

    S. Vagnozzi, F. Pacucci and A. Loeb, “Implications for the Hubble tension from the ages of the oldest astrophysical objects,” JHEAp 36, 27-35 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.07.004 [arXiv:2105.10421 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2022 arXiv

  122. [131]

    Cosmology Intertwined III: f σ8 and S8,

    E. Di Valentino, L. A. Anchordoqui, ¨O. Akarsu, Y. Ali-Haimoud, L. Amendola, N. Arendse, M. Asgari, M. Bal- lardini, S. Basilakos and E. Battistelli, et al. “Cosmology Intertwined III: f σ8 and S8,” Astropart. Phys. 131, 102604 (2021) doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102604 [a...

    2021

  123. [132]

    Arbitrating the S8 discrepancy with growth rate measurements from redshift- space distortions,

    R. C. Nunes and S. Vagnozzi, “Arbitrating the S8 discrepancy with growth rate measurements from redshift- space distortions,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 505, no.4, 5427-5437 (2021) doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1613 [arXiv:2106.01208 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2021 arXiv

  124. [133]

    Revealing intrinsic flat ΛCDM biases with standardizable candles,

    E. ´O. Colg´ ain, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, R. Solomon, G. Bargiacchi, S. Capozziello, M. G. Dainotti and D. Stojkovic, “Revealing intrinsic flat ΛCDM biases with standardizable candles,” Phys. Rev. D 106, no.4, L041301 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.L041301 [arXiv:2203.10558 [as...

    2022 arXiv

  125. [134]

    Implications of DES 5YR SNe Dataset for ΛCDM,

    E. ´O. Colg´ ain, S. Pourojaghi and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “Implications of DES 5YR SNe Dataset for ΛCDM,” [arXiv:2406.06389 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  126. [135]

    The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results with ∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set,

    T. M. C. Abbott et al. [DES], “The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results with ∼1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using the Full 5 yr Data Set,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 973, no.1, L14 (2024) doi:10.3847/2041- 8213/ad6f9f [arXiv:2401.02929 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2024 arXiv

  127. [136]

    S8 increases with effective redshift in ΛCDM cosmology,

    S. A. Adil, ¨O. Akarsu, M. Malekjani, E. ´O. Colg´ ain, S. Pourojaghi, A. A. Sen and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “S8 increases with effective redshift in ΛCDM cosmology,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 528, no.1, L20-L26 (2023) doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slad165 [arXiv:2303.06928 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2023 arXiv

  128. [137]

    Further support forS8 increasing with effective redshift,

    ¨O. Akarsu, E. ´O. Colg´ ain, A. A. Sen and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “Further support forS8 increasing with effective redshift,” [arXiv:2410.23134 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

Pith tools