Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Assessing the effect of lens mass model in cosmological application with updated galaxy-scale strong gravitational lensing sample

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1809.09845 v5 pith:AKHHVV6B submitted 2018-09-26 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords massdensitylensgammamodelcosmologicaldeltaeffect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

By comparing the dynamical and lensing masses of early-type lens galaxies, one can constrain both the cosmological parameters and the density profiles of galaxies. We explore the constraining power on cosmological parameters and the effect of the lens mass model in this method with 161 galaxy-scale strong lensing systems, which is currently the largest sample with both high resolution imaging and stellar dynamical data. We assume a power-law mass model for the lenses, and consider three different parameterizations for $\gamma$ (i.e., the slope of the total mass density profile) to include the effect of the dependence of $\gamma$ on redshift and surface mass density. When treating $\delta$ (i.e., the slope of the luminosity density profile) as a universal parameter for all lens galaxies, we find the limits on the cosmological parameter $\Omega_m$ are quite weak and biased, and also heavily dependent on the lens mass model in the scenarios of parameterizing $\gamma$ with three different forms. When treating $\delta$ as an observable for each lens, the unbiased estimate of $\Omega_m$ can be obtained only in the scenario of including the dependence of $\gamma$ on both the redshift and the surface mass density, that is $\Omega_m = 0.381^{+0.185}_{-0.154}$ at 68\% confidence level in the framework of a flat $\Lambda$CDM model. We conclude that the significant dependencies of $\gamma$ on both the redshift and the surface mass density, as well as the intrinsic scatter of $\delta$ among the lenses, need to be properly taken into account in this method.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Model-independent test of the cosmic distance duality relation with recent observational data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Two model-independent methods applied to latest SN and BAO data find the cosmic distance duality relation consistent with observations within 1 sigma and no evidence of violation.

  2. Testing General Relativity on Galactic Scales via DESI-BAO and Strong Lensing: Circumventing Assumptions on the Hubble Constant, Sound Horizon, and Dark Energy

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    Model-independent BAO+strong-lensing analysis yields γ_PPN ≈ 1.10–1.15 (P1) and 1.32–1.49 (P2), consistent with GR at 1–2.5σ depending on the lens mass model.

  3. A cosmographic analysis using DESI-DR2 and strong lensing: II. Distance Ratio measurements

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A distance-sum-rule cosmographic fit combining strong-lensing distance ratios, three Type Ia supernova compilations, and DESI-DR2 BAO constrains Omega_k0, q0, j0, s0 and finds consistency with flat Lambda-CDM, but wit...

Pith tools