arxiv: 2603.27616 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-29 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Model-independent test of the cosmic distance duality relation with recent observational data

Xing Wu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 22:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

keywords cosmic distance duality relationmodel-independent testType Ia supernovaebaryon acoustic oscillationsgamma-ray burstsexpansion historyGaussian process reconstruction

0 comments

The pith

Recent supernova and BAO data confirm the cosmic distance duality relation holds within 1 sigma.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies two model-independent techniques to check whether luminosity distances and angular diameter distances remain related by the standard duality formula across cosmic time. One method parametrizes the expansion history by cosmic age and fits possible violation terms to supernova, BAO, chronometer, and gamma-ray burst observations, including the newest PantheonPlus and DESI DR2 releases. The second method reconstructs luminosity distances non-parametrically from supernovae and combines them with BAO measurements to build an observed violation statistic. Both approaches return results consistent with no violation at the one-sigma level, and the conclusion is unchanged when different data subsets or calibration choices are substituted.

Core claim

The PAge parametrization of the expansion history together with Gaussian-process reconstruction of luminosity distances from Type Ia supernovae, when combined with BAO, chronometer, and GRB data, constrain any CDDR violation parameter to remain consistent with zero within 1 sigma; different combinations of the latest PantheonPlus, DES Dovekie, and DESI DR2 samples all yield the same null result.

What carries the argument

PAge parametrization of cosmic age and non-parametric Gaussian process reconstruction of luminosity distance from supernova data.

If this is right

Standard cosmological analyses can safely treat luminosity and angular diameter distances as interchangeable without adding extra parameters.
Gamma-ray burst data, although reaching higher redshifts, add little statistical weight compared with low-redshift supernova and BAO measurements.
Calibration differences between the PantheonPlus and DES Dovekie supernova samples do not alter the no-violation conclusion.
The same model-independent framework can be applied to forthcoming surveys for tighter bounds at both low and high redshift.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the relation continues to hold when better-standardized high-redshift candles become available, it would strengthen the assumption of photon-number conservation in standard cosmology.
Any small residual tension at the current 1-sigma level could be tested by extending the Gaussian-process reconstruction to overlap with next-generation BAO surveys at intermediate redshifts.
The robustness across data combinations suggests that future model-independent tests could serve as a cross-check for claims of new physics that would otherwise appear only in parametric fits.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen parametrization and reconstruction methods introduce no hidden systematic biases that could hide a real violation.

What would settle it

A future high-redshift measurement that pushes the violation parameter more than three standard deviations away from zero while using an independent distance indicator.

read the original abstract

We test the cosmic distance duality relation (CDDR) using two model-independent methods. Method I is based on the PAge parametrization, which characterizes the expansion history in terms of the cosmic age. Parametrizations of possible CDDR violations are constrained using observational data from Type Ia supernovae (SN), baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), cosmic chronometers, and gamma-ray bursts (GRB), including the latest PantheonPlus and DES Dovekie SN samples and DESI DR2 BAO data. The results support the validity of the CDDR within $1\sigma$. Different combinations of data sets are further explored to assess the impact of various probes and calibration choices, demonstrating the robustness of this conclusion. Although GRB data extend to higher redshifts, their constraining power is significantly weaker than that of the other low-redshift probes. The PantheonPlus and DES Dovekie samples yield consistent results. Method II uses a non-parametric Gaussian process reconstruction of the luminosity distance from SN data, combined with BAO measurements to construct the observed CDDR violation and constrain its parametrizations. The results are consistent with those from Method I, and we find no evidence for a violation of the CDDR.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper updates CDDR tests with PantheonPlus, DES Dovekie, and DESI DR2 using PAge and GP methods and reports consistent null results.

read the letter

The core result is straightforward: two separate model-independent reconstructions of distances from the newest SN and BAO samples both give CDDR violation parameters consistent with zero at 1 sigma. The PAge approach parametrizes the expansion history by age and combines it with chronometers, GRBs, and the new BAO points; the GP method reconstructs luminosity distance directly from SN data and compares to BAO. They cross-check multiple data splits and calibration choices and get the same answer, which is the main strength here. The work is incremental but useful because it folds in the latest public releases and shows the conclusion is stable across probes. GRB data are included but add little leverage, as the authors note. The methods avoid obvious circularity by reconstructing distances rather than assuming a background cosmology to define the target. Minor soft spots are the usual ones for this kind of analysis: the abstract leaves error propagation and covariance details implicit, and one would want to see the full posterior tables and any residual systematics from SN calibration in the text. Nothing in the summary suggests those details break the result. This is the kind of paper that belongs in a reading group focused on observational cosmology or distance-scale tests. A serious referee should see it because the data combination is new and the two-method consistency is worth documenting, even if the outcome is unsurprising.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript tests the cosmic distance duality relation (CDDR) with two model-independent methods. Method I uses the PAge parametrization of the expansion history together with SN (PantheonPlus and DES Dovekie), BAO (DESI DR2), cosmic chronometer, and GRB data to constrain parametrized CDDR-violation functions. Method II reconstructs luminosity distances non-parametrically via Gaussian processes from SN data and combines them with BAO measurements. Both approaches report consistency with the standard CDDR (no violation) at the 1σ level across multiple data combinations, with explicit checks on sample choice and probe impact.

Significance. The work supplies a timely, data-driven consistency check on the CDDR using the newest SN and BAO catalogs. The agreement between the parametric PAge route and the non-parametric GP route, together with the robustness tests against SN calibration choices, constitutes a modest but useful strengthening of existing null results.

major comments (2)

[§3.1] §3.1 (PAge implementation): the claim that the PAge parametrization is fully model-independent is not self-evident; the specific functional form adopted for H(z) or t(z) can still imprint systematic shifts on the reconstructed angular-diameter distances that enter the CDDR ratio. A direct comparison of the PAge-derived distances against a purely non-parametric reconstruction (e.g., the GP of Method II) at the same redshifts would quantify any residual bias.
[§4.2] §4.2 (error propagation): the reported 1σ agreement relies on the combined covariance matrix of SN and BAO measurements, yet the manuscript does not show how calibration uncertainties in the SN absolute magnitude or the sound-horizon scale are propagated into the final CDDR-violation parameters. Without this step, the quoted error bars may be underestimated.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract and §2: the precise functional forms assumed for the CDDR-violation parameter (e.g., η(z) = 1 + η₀z or η(z) = 1 + η₀z/(1+z)) should be written explicitly rather than left as “parametrizations.”
[Table 1] Table 1 or equivalent: the GRB sample size and redshift range are stated, but a quantitative metric (e.g., contribution to the total Fisher information) would clarify why their constraining power is described as “significantly weaker.”
[Figures] Figure captions: axis labels and line styles for the two methods should be unified across panels to facilitate direct visual comparison of the 1σ bands.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the text accordingly to improve clarity and add requested comparisons.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3.1] §3.1 (PAge implementation): the claim that the PAge parametrization is fully model-independent is not self-evident; the specific functional form adopted for H(z) or t(z) can still imprint systematic shifts on the reconstructed angular-diameter distances that enter the CDDR ratio. A direct comparison of the PAge-derived distances against a purely non-parametric reconstruction (e.g., the GP of Method II) at the same redshifts would quantify any residual bias.

Authors: We agree that the PAge form, although flexible and data-driven, is a specific parametrization and therefore carries some model dependence that could in principle affect the derived distances. The manuscript already demonstrates consistency between the PAge-based results (Method I) and the fully non-parametric GP reconstruction (Method II) for the CDDR-violation parameters themselves. To directly quantify any residual bias in the distances, we will add a new figure in the revised §3.1 that overlays the luminosity distances reconstructed from both methods at overlapping redshifts, together with a quantitative measure of their difference. This addition will make the cross-check explicit. revision: yes
Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (error propagation): the reported 1σ agreement relies on the combined covariance matrix of SN and BAO measurements, yet the manuscript does not show how calibration uncertainties in the SN absolute magnitude or the sound-horizon scale are propagated into the final CDDR-violation parameters. Without this step, the quoted error bars may be underestimated.

Authors: We appreciate this observation. In the current analysis the SN absolute-magnitude calibration uncertainty and the sound-horizon scale uncertainty are treated as nuisance parameters that are marginalized over within the joint likelihood; their contributions are therefore folded into the final covariance matrix used to constrain the CDDR-violation parameters. Different calibration choices are already explored in the robustness tests reported in §4. To make the propagation fully transparent, we will expand §4.2 with an explicit description of the nuisance-parameter treatment, including the relevant terms added to the covariance matrix and the resulting impact on the reported uncertainties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model-independent reconstructions yield direct data comparison

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on two independent reconstructions: PAge parametrization of expansion history fitted to combined SN+BAO+CC+GRB data, and non-parametric GP reconstruction of luminosity distance solely from SN data, followed by direct ratio comparison against BAO-derived angular diameter distances to constrain CDDR violation parameters. Neither method defines the target violation parameter in terms of itself, nor renames a fitted quantity as a 'prediction.' The null result (consistency within 1σ) follows from the observed ratios rather than by construction. No self-citation chain or uniqueness theorem is invoked as load-bearing; the methods are presented as standard tools with explicit robustness checks across data combinations. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the validity of the PAge parametrization for expansion history and the reliability of Gaussian process reconstruction from supernova data, plus the assumption that the chosen observational samples are free of unaccounted systematics.

free parameters (1)

CDDR violation parameters
Parameters introduced to quantify possible deviations from the standard relation and fitted to the data.

axioms (2)

domain assumption PAge parametrization accurately captures the expansion history without assuming a specific dark-energy model.
Core of Method I.
domain assumption Gaussian process reconstruction yields unbiased luminosity distances from supernova data.
Core of Method II.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5505 in / 1285 out tokens · 29893 ms · 2026-05-14T22:09:12.781939+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We test the cosmic distance duality relation (CDDR) using two model-independent methods. Method I is based on the PAge parametrization... Method II uses a non-parametric Gaussian process reconstruction...
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The results support the validity of the CDDR within 1σ... we find no evidence for a violation of the CDDR.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Cosmology-Independent Constraints on the Etherington Relation and SNeIa Absolute Magnitude Evolution from DESI-DR2
astro-ph.CO 2026-04 accept novelty 4.0

DESI-DR2 angular diameter distances and SNeIa luminosity distances are statistically consistent with the Etherington relation, yielding a constraint on SNeIa absolute magnitude evolution of dM/dz = 0.07 ± 0.07.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 118 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 50 internal anchors

[1]

Weinberg,Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1972)

S. Weinberg,Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, John Wiley and Sons, New York (1972)

work page 1972
[2]

Distance measures in cosmology

D.W. Hogg,Distance measures in cosmology,astro-ph/9905116

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[3]

Ellis,On the definition of distance in general relativity: I

G.F.R. Ellis,On the definition of distance in general relativity: I. M. H. Etherington (Philosophical Magazine ser. 7, vol. 15, 761 (1933)),General Relativity and Gravitation39 (2007) 1047

work page 1933
[4]

How does light move in a generic metric-affine background?

L.T. Santana, M.O. Calvão, R.R.R. Reis and B.B. Siffert,How does light move in a generic metric-affine background?,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 061501 [1703.10871]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[5]

Azevedo and P.P

R.P.L. Azevedo and P.P. Avelino,Distance-duality in theories with a nonminimal coupling to gravity,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 084079 [2104.01209]

work page arXiv 2021
[6]

Dimming Supernovae without Cosmic Acceleration

C. Csaki, N. Kaloper and J. Terning,Dimming supernovae without cosmic acceleration,Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2002) 161302 [hep-ph/0111311]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[7]

Cosmic acceleration vs axion-photon mixing

B.A. Bassett,Cosmic acceleration vs axion - photon mixing,Astrophys. J.607(2004) 661 [astro-ph/0311495]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[8]

Supernova Brightening from Chameleon-Photon Mixing

C. Burrage,Supernova Brightening from Chameleon-Photon Mixing,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 043009 [0711.2966]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[9]

Constraints on cosmic opacity and beyond the standard model physics from cosmological distance measurements

A. Avgoustidis, C. Burrage, J. Redondo, L. Verde and R. Jimenez,Constraints on cosmic opacity and beyond the standard model physics from cosmological distance measurements, JCAP10(2010) 024 [1004.2053]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[10]

K. Liao, A. Avgoustidis and Z. Li,Is the Universe Transparent?,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 123539 [1512.01861]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[11]

Cosmic distance-duality as probe of exotic physics and acceleration

B.A. Bassett and M. Kunz,Cosmic distance-duality as a probe of exotic physics and acceleration,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 101305 [astro-ph/0312443]. – 26 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[12]

J.-P. Uzan, N. Aghanim and Y. Mellier,The Distance duality relation from x-ray and SZ observations of clusters,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 083533 [astro-ph/0405620]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[13]

T. Liu, S. Cao, S. Zhang, X. Gong, W. Guo and C. Zheng,Revisiting the cosmic distance duality relation with machine learning reconstruction methods: the combination of HII galaxies and ultra-compact radio quasars,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 903 [2110.00927]

work page arXiv 2021
[14]

Li, G.-H

T.-N. Li, G.-H. Du, P.-J. Wu, J.-Z. Qi, J.-F. Zhang and X. Zhang,Testing the cosmic distance duality relation with baryon acoustic oscillations and supernovae data,Eur. Phys. J. C85 (2025) 1354 [2507.13811]

work page arXiv 2025
[15]

Y. Xie, Y. Liu, P. Wu, X. Fu and N. Liang,Testing the Distance Duality Relation with Cosmological Observations at high Redshift using Artificial Neural Network,2512.06454

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[16]

Testing the Distance-Duality Relation with Galaxy Clusters and Type Ia Supernovae

R.F.L. Holanda, J.A.S. Lima and M.B. Ribeiro,Testing the Distance-Duality Relation with Galaxy Clusters and Type Ia Supernovae,Astrophys. J. Lett.722(2010) L233 [1005.4458]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[17]

R. Nair, S. Jhingan and D. Jain,Observational Cosmology And The Cosmic Distance Duality Relation,JCAP05(2011) 023 [1102.1065]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[18]

Testing the Distance-Duality Relation with a Combination of Cosmological Distance Observations

S. Cao and N. Liang,Testing the Distance-Duality Relation with a Combination of Cosmological Distance Observations,Res. Astron. Astrophys.11(2011) 1199 [1104.4942]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[19]

Morphology of Galaxy Clusters: A Cosmological Model-Independent Test of the Cosmic Distance-Duality Relation

X.-L. Meng, T.-J. Zhang and H. Zhan,Morphology of Galaxy Clusters: A Cosmological Model-Independent Test of the Cosmic Distance-Duality Relation,Astrophys. J.745(2012) 98 [1104.2833]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[20]

P. Wu, Z. Li, X. Liu and H. Yu,Cosmic distance-duality relation test using type Ia supernovae and the baryon acoustic oscillation,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 023520

work page 2015
[21]

M. Wang, X. Fu, B. Xu, Y. Huang, Y. Yang and Z. Lu,Testing the cosmic distance duality relation with Type Ia supernova and transverse BAO measurements,Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024) 702 [2407.12250]

work page arXiv 2024
[22]

Luo and N

X. Luo and N. Liang,Testing the cosmic distance duality relation with Neural Kernel Gaussian Process Regression,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.542(2025) 1596 [2508.07040]

work page arXiv 2025
[23]

Cosmic Distance Duality Relation and the Shape of Galaxy Clusters

R.F.L. Holanda, J.A.S. Lima and M.B. Ribeiro,Cosmic Distance Duality Relation and the Shape of Galaxy Clusters,Astron. Astrophys.528(2011) L14 [1003.5906]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[24]

Zhang, X

X. Zhang, X. Yang, Y. Ren, S. Chen, Y. Shi, C. Cheng et al.,Testing Cosmic Distance Duality Relation and Transparency with DESI DR2,2506.17926

work page arXiv
[25]

Avila, F

F. Avila, F. Oliveira, C. Franco, M. Lopes, R. Holanda, R.C. Nunes et al.,Probing the Cosmic Distance Duality Relation via Non-Parametric Reconstruction for High Redshifts,Universe11 (2025) 307 [2509.07848]

work page arXiv 2025
[26]

Kanodia, U

B. Kanodia, U. Upadhyay and Y. Tiwari,Revisiting cosmic distance duality with megamasers and DESI DR2 observations: Model-independent constraints on early-late calibration,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 023505 [2507.11518]

work page arXiv 2026
[27]

Teixeira, W

E.M. Teixeira, W. Giarè, N.B. Hogg, T. Montandon, A. Poudou and V. Poulin,Implications of distance duality violation for the H0 tension and evolving dark energy,Phys. Rev. D112 (2025) 023515 [2504.10464]

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

Jesus, M.J.S

J.F. Jesus, M.J.S. Gomes, R.F.L. Holanda and R.C. Nunes,High-redshift cosmography with a possible cosmic distance duality relation violation,JCAP01(2025) 088 [2408.13390]

work page arXiv 2025
[29]

Alfano, C

A.C. Alfano, C. Cafaro, S. Capozziello, O. Luongo and M. Muccino,Investigating the cosmic distance duality relation with gamma-ray bursts,JHEAp49(2026) 100444 [2509.09247]

work page arXiv 2026
[30]

S. Cao, M. Biesiada, R. Gavazzi, A. Piórkowska and Z.-H. Zhu,Cosmology With Strong-lensing Systems,Astrophys. J.806(2015) 185 [1509.07649]. – 27 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[31]

Y. Chen, R. Li, Y. Shu and X. Cao,Assessing the effect of lens mass model in cosmological application with updated galaxy-scale strong gravitational lensing sample,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.488(2019) 3745 [1809.09845]

work page arXiv 2019
[32]

Amante, J

M.H. Amante, J. Magaña, V. Motta, M.A. García-Aspeitia and T. Verdugo,Testing dark energy models with a new sample of strong-lensing systems,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.498 (2020) 6013 [1906.04107]

work page arXiv 2020
[33]

K. Liao, Z. Li, S. Cao, M. Biesiada, X. Zheng and Z.-H. Zhu,The Distance Duality Relation From Strong Gravitational Lensing,Astrophys. J.822(2016) 74 [1511.01318]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[34]

Constraints on the cosmic distance duality relation with simulated data of gravitational waves from the Einstein Telescope

T. Yang, R.F.L. Holanda and B. Hu,Constraints on the cosmic distance duality relation with simulated data of gravitational waves from the Einstein Telescope,Astropart. Phys.108 (2019) 57 [1710.10929]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[35]

Y. Yuan, M. Du, B. Zhu, X.-y. Lin, W.-F. Feng, P. Xu et al.,An Opacity-Free Test of the Cosmic Distance Duality Relation Using Strongly Lensed Gravitational Wave Signals with Space-Based Detector Networks,2603.23373

work page arXiv
[36]

J.-Z. Qi, S. Cao, C. Zheng, Y. Pan, Z. Li, J. Li et al.,Testing the Etherington distance duality relation at higher redshifts: Combined radio quasar and gravitational wave data,Phys. Rev. D 99(2019) 063507 [1902.01988]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[37]

S. Cao, M. Biesiada, X. Zheng and Z.-H. Zhu,Testing the gas mass density profile of galaxy clusters with distance duality relation,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.457(2016) 281 [1601.00409]. [38]DEScollaboration,First Cosmological Results using Type Ia Supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: Measurement of the Hubble Constant,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.486 (20...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[38]

Jerk, snap, and the cosmological equation of state

M. Visser,Jerk and the cosmological equation of state,Class. Quant. Grav.21(2004) 2603 [gr-qc/0309109]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[39]

Cosmographic analysis of the equation of state of the universe through Pad\'e approximations

C. Gruber and O. Luongo,Cosmographic analysis of the equation of state of the universe through Padé approximations,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 103506 [1309.3215]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[40]

Cosmological Applications of Pade Approximant

H. Wei, X.-P. Yan and Y.-N. Zhou,Cosmological Applications of Padé Approximant,JCAP 01(2014) 045 [1312.1117]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[41]

Addressing the circularity problem in the $E_\text{p}-E_\text{iso}$ correlation of Gamma-Ray Bursts

L. Amati, R. D’Agostino, O. Luongo, M. Muccino and M. Tantalo,Addressing the circularity problem in theEp −E iso correlation of gamma-ray bursts,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.486 (2019) L46 [1811.08934]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[42]

Reconstruction of dark energy and expansion dynamics using Gaussian processes

M. Seikel, C. Clarkson and M. Smith,Reconstruction of dark energy and expansion dynamics using Gaussian processes,JCAP06(2012) 036 [1204.2832]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[43]

Wang, X.-J

G.-J. Wang, X.-J. Ma, S.-Y. Li and J.-Q. Xia,Reconstructing Functions and Estimating Parameters with Artificial Neural Networks: A Test with a Hubble Parameter and SNe Ia, Astrophys. J. Suppl.246(2020) 13 [1910.03636]

work page arXiv 2020
[44]

Huang,Supernova Magnitude Evolution and PAge Approximation,Astrophys

Z. Huang,Supernova Magnitude Evolution and PAge Approximation,Astrophys. J. Lett.892 (2020) L28 [2001.06926]

work page arXiv 2020
[45]

Cai, Z.-K

R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, S.-J. Wang, W.-W. Yu and Y. Zhou,No-go guide for the Hubble tension: Late-time solutions,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) L021301 [2107.13286]

work page arXiv 2022
[46]

X. Luo, Z. Huang, Q. Qian and L. Huang,Reaffirming the Cosmic Acceleration without – 28 – Supernovae and the Cosmic Microwave Background,Astrophys. J.905(2020) 53 [2008.00487]

work page arXiv 2020
[47]

Huang, Z

L. Huang, Z. Huang, X. Luo, X. He and Y. Fang,Reconciling low and high redshift GRB luminosity correlations,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 123521 [2012.02474]

work page arXiv 2021
[48]

Huang, Z.-Q

L. Huang, Z.-Q. Huang, Z. Huang, Z.-Y. Li, Z. Li and H. Zhou,A more accurate Parameterization based on cosmic Age (MAPAge),Res. Astron. Astrophys.21(2021) 277 [2108.03959]

work page arXiv 2021
[49]

Cai, Z.-K

R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, S.-J. Wang, W.-W. Yu and Y. Zhou,No-go guide for late-time solutions to the Hubble tension: Matter perturbations,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 063519 [2202.12214]

work page arXiv 2022
[50]

Ling, G.-H

J.-L. Ling, G.-H. Du, T.-N. Li, J.-F. Zhang, S.-J. Wang and X. Zhang,Model-independent cosmological inference after the DESI DR2 data with improved inverse distance ladder,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083528 [2505.22369]

work page arXiv 2025
[51]

Du, T.-N

G.-H. Du, T.-N. Li, J.-L. Ling, Y.-H. Yao, J.-F. Zhang and X. Zhang,Model-independent late-universe measurements ofH0 andΩ K with the PAge-improved inverse distance ladder, 2510.26355

work page arXiv
[52]

The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints

D. Brout et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints,Astrophys. J.938(2022) 110 [2202.04077]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[53]

A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team

A.G. Riess et al.,A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s−1 Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team, Astrophys. J. Lett.934(2022) L7 [2112.04510]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[54]

Dinda and R

B.R. Dinda and R. Maartens,Model-agnostic assessment of dark energy after DESI DR1 BAO,JCAP01(2025) 120 [2407.17252]

work page arXiv 2025
[55]

Keeley, A

R.E. Keeley, A. Shafieloo and B. L’Huillier,An Analysis of Variance of the Pantheon+ Dataset: Systematics in the Covariance Matrix?,Universe10(2024) 439 [2212.07917]. [58]DEScollaboration,The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: A Reanalysis Of Cosmology Results And Evidence For Evolving Dark Energy With An Updated Type Ia Supernova Calibration,2511.0751...

work page arXiv 2024
[56]

Popovic et al.,A Reassessment of the Pantheon+ and DES 5YR Calibration Uncertainties: Dovekie,2506.05471

B. Popovic et al.,A Reassessment of the Pantheon+ and DES 5YR Calibration Uncertainties: Dovekie,2506.05471

work page arXiv
[57]

Kessler, M

R. Kessler, M. Vincenzi and P. Armstrong,Binning is Sinning: Redemption for Hubble Diagram Using Photometrically Classified Type Ia Supernovae,Astrophys. J. Lett.952(2023) L8 [2306.05819]. [62]DEScollaboration,The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: Cosmological Analysis and Systematic Uncertainties,Astrophys. J.975(2024) 86 [2401.02945]. [63]Planckcoll...

work page arXiv 2023
[58]

Constraining Cosmological Parameters Based on Relative Galaxy Ages

R. Jimenez and A. Loeb,Constraining cosmological parameters based on relative galaxy ages, Astrophys. J.573(2002) 37 [astro-ph/0106145]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[59]

Moresco et al

M. Moresco et al.,Unveiling the Universe with emerging cosmological probes,Living Rev. Rel. 25(2022) 6 [2201.07241]. – 29 –

work page arXiv 2022
[60]

Kumar, D

D. Kumar, D. Jain, S. Mahajan, A. Mukherjee and A. Rana,Constraints on the transition redshift using Hubble phase space portrait,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D32(2023) 2350039 [2205.13247]

work page arXiv 2023
[61]

J. Niu, P. He and T.-J. Zhang,Constraining the Hubble Constant with a Simulated Full Covariance Matrix Using Neural Networks,2502.11443

work page arXiv
[62]

Tomasetti, M

E. Tomasetti, M. Moresco, N. Borghi, K. Jiao, A. Cimatti, L. Pozzetti et al.,A new measurement of the expansion history of the Universe at z = 1.26 with cosmic chronometers in VANDELS,Astron. Astrophys.679(2023) A96 [2305.16387]

work page arXiv 2023
[63]

Borghi, M

N. Borghi, M. Moresco and A. Cimatti,Toward a Better Understanding of Cosmic Chronometers: A New Measurement of H(z) at z∼0.7,Astrophys. J. Lett.928(2022) L4 [2110.04304]

work page arXiv 2022
[64]

K. Jiao, N. Borghi, M. Moresco and T.-J. Zhang,New Observational H(z) Data from Full-spectrum Fitting of Cosmic Chronometers in the LEGA-C Survey,Astrophys. J. Suppl. 265(2023) 48 [2205.05701]

work page arXiv 2023
[65]

The Large Early Galaxy Astrophysics Census (LEGA-C) Data Release II: dynamical and stellar population properties of z ~< 1 galaxies in the COSMOS field

C.M.S. Straatman, A. van der Wel, R. Bezanson, C. Pacifici, A. Gallazzi, P.-F. Wu et al.,The Large Early Galaxy Astrophysics Census (LEGA-C) Data Release 2: Dynamical and Stellar Population Properties of z≲1 Galaxies in the COSMOS Field,"The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series"239(2018) 27 [1809.08236]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[66]

Constraints on the equation of state of dark energy and the Hubble constant from stellar ages and the CMB

R. Jimenez, L. Verde, T. Treu and D. Stern,Constraints on the equation of state of dark energy and the Hubble constant from stellar ages and the CMB,Astrophys. J.593(2003) 622 [astro-ph/0302560]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[67]

Moresco, R

M. Moresco, R. Jimenez, L. Verde, A. Cimatti and L. Pozzetti,Setting the Stage for Cosmic Chronometers. II. Impact of Stellar Population Synthesis Models Systematics and Full Covariance Matrix,Astrophys. J.898(2020) 82 [2003.07362]

work page arXiv 2020
[68]

Muccino, O

M. Muccino, O. Luongo and D. Jain,Constraints on the transition redshift from the calibrated gamma-ray burst Ep–Eiso correlation,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.523(2023) 4938 [2208.13700]

work page arXiv 2023
[69]

Intrinsic spectra and energetics of BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray Bursts with known redshifts

L. Amati et al.,Intrinsic spectra and energetics of BeppoSAX gamma-ray bursts with known redshifts,Astron. Astrophys.390(2002) 81 [astro-ph/0205230]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[70]

L. Izzo, M. Muccino, E. Zaninoni, L. Amati and M. Della Valle,New measurements ofΩm from gamma-ray bursts,Astron. Astrophys.582(2015) A115 [1508.05898]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[71]

Measuring the cosmological parameters with the Ep,i-Eiso correlation of Gamma-Ray Bursts

L. Amati, C. Guidorzi, F. Frontera, M. Della Valle, F. Finelli, R. Landi et al.,Measuring the cosmological parameters with the Ep,i-Eiso correlation of Gamma-Ray Bursts,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.391(2008) 577 [0805.0377]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[72]

Gamma-ray bursts as cosmological probes: LambdaCDM vs. conformal gravity

A. Diaferio, L. Ostorero and V.F. Cardone,Gamma-ray bursts as cosmological probes: LambdaCDM vs. conformal gravity,JCAP10(2011) 008 [1103.5501]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[73]

Cosmology with gamma-ray bursts: I. The Hubble diagram through the calibrated $E_{\rm p,i}$ - $E_{\rm iso}$ correlation

M. Demianski, E. Piedipalumbo, D. Sawant and L. Amati,Cosmology with gamma-ray bursts: I. The Hubble diagram through the calibratedEp,i -E iso correlation,Astron. Astrophys.598 (2017) A112 [1610.00854]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[74]

G.-J. Wang, H. Yu, Z.-X. Li, J.-Q. Xia and Z.-H. Zhu,Evolutions and Calibrations of Long Gamma-Ray-burst Luminosity Correlations Revisited,Astrophys. J.836(2017) 103 [1701.06102]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[75]

Khadka, O

N. Khadka, O. Luongo, M. Muccino and B. Ratra,Do gamma-ray burst measurements provide a useful test of cosmological models?,JCAP09(2021) 042 [2105.12692]

work page arXiv 2021
[76]

A Cosmology-Independent Calibration of Gamma-Ray Burst Luminosity Relations and the Hubble Diagram

N. Liang, W.K. Xiao, Y. Liu and S.N. Zhang,A Cosmology Independent Calibration of Gamma-Ray Burst Luminosity Relations and the Hubble Diagram,Astrophys. J.685(2008) 354 [0802.4262]. – 30 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[77]

A cosmological independent calibration of the Ep,i-Eiso correlation for Gamma Ray Bursts

S. Capozziello and L. Izzo,A cosmological independent calibration of the Ep,i-Eiso correlation for Gamma Ray Bursts,Astron. Astrophys.519(2010) A73 [1003.5319]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[78]

H. Gao, N. Liang and Z.-H. Zhu,Calibration of GRB Luminosity Relations with Cosmography,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D21(2012) 1250016 [1003.5755]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[79]

Cosmology with gamma-ray bursts: II Cosmography challenges and cosmological scenarios for the accelerated Universe

M. Demianski, E. Piedipalumbo, D. Sawant and L. Amati,Cosmology with gamma-ray bursts: II Cosmography challenges and cosmological scenarios for the accelerated Universe,Astron. Astrophys.598(2017) A113 [1609.09631]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[80]

Cosmological Models and Gamma-Ray Bursts Calibrated by Using Pade Method

J. Liu and H. Wei,Cosmological models and gamma-ray bursts calibrated by using Padé method,Gen. Rel. Grav.47(2015) 141 [1410.3960]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

Showing first 80 references.