pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12535 · v1 · pith:AKJ3QS5Bnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.GA

Directional dark matter signatures of the Large Magellanic Cloud

Javier Reynoso-Cordova , Nassim Bozorgnia , Marie-C\'ecile Piro This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 09:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.GA
keywords dark matter detectiondirectional detectionLarge Magellanic CloudMilky Way haloanisotropyrecoil signalscosmological simulations
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Large Magellanic Cloud distorts directional dark matter recoil patterns by up to 80 percent and reduces the events needed to reject isotropy by a factor of five.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the effect of the Large Magellanic Cloud on the local dark matter velocity distribution and the resulting directional nuclear recoil signals. It uses cosmological simulations to show that the LMC produces a non-zero mean azimuthal velocity component, which breaks the symmetry of the standard halo model ring feature and creates preferred azimuthal directions in the recoil map. These changes reach 80 percent near the peak signal strength and make it easier for experiments to distinguish a dark matter signal from an isotropic background. The improvement is largest for heavy dark matter particles. The work shows why the LMC must be included when planning or interpreting data from directional detectors.

Core claim

Using Auriga simulations of a Milky Way analogue that hosts an LMC analogue, the authors compute the local dark matter velocity distribution and generate directional recoil maps. They find that the LMC induces strong anisotropies driven by the non-zero mean azimuthal velocity. The ring-like feature predicted by the Standard Halo Model for heavy dark matter and low recoil energies is replaced by an asymmetric pattern concentrated at preferred azimuthal angles. Differences between the simulated maps and the Standard Halo Model reach approximately 80 percent near the signal maximum. For a 100 GeV dark matter particle in a CYGNUS-like detector, the number of events required to reject isotropy dr

What carries the argument

The perturbed local dark matter velocity distribution taken from Auriga cosmological simulations of a Milky Way-Large Magellanic Cloud analogue, used to calculate directional nuclear recoil rates and maps.

If this is right

  • Recoil maps differ from the Standard Halo Model by up to 80 percent near the maximum.
  • The number of events needed to reject isotropy falls by a factor of five for 100 GeV dark matter in a CYGNUS-like setup.
  • The reduction is even larger for heavier dark matter particles.
  • Future directional searches must account for the LMC when interpreting signals or setting exposure goals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Analysis pipelines for directional detectors should include LMC-induced velocity components rather than assuming a standard halo model.
  • Experiment design could prioritize azimuthal coverage aligned with the expected LMC-induced preference.
  • Similar velocity perturbations from other massive satellites or subhalos could produce comparable effects in other galaxies.

Load-bearing premise

The Auriga simulations of a Milky Way analogue with an LMC analogue give an accurate enough picture of the perturbed local dark matter velocity distribution to apply directly to directional recoil calculations.

What would settle it

Directional detector data that show a symmetric ring feature in recoil directions for heavy dark matter particles, with no measurable azimuthal asymmetry beyond Standard Halo Model expectations, would falsify the claimed distortion.

read the original abstract

The Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), the most massive satellite of the Milky Way (MW), can significantly perturb the local dark matter (DM) distribution. We study its impact on directional DM detection using the Auriga cosmological simulations of a MW analogue hosting an LMC analogue. We find that the LMC induces strong anisotropies in directional recoil signals, driven primarily by the non-zero mean azimuthal velocity of the local DM distribution. The characteristic ring-like feature predicted in the Standard Halo Model (SHM) for heavy DM and low recoil energies is strongly distorted, producing an asymmetric recoil pattern concentrated at preferred azimuthal angles. Differences between recoil maps for the MW-LMC analogue and the SHM reach up to $\sim80\%$ near the signal maximum. These distortions significantly enhance directional discovery prospects, reducing the number of events required to reject isotropy by nearly a factor of five for a 100 GeV DM particle in a near-future CYGNUS-like experiment, and by even larger factors for heavier DM. Our results highlight the importance of the LMC for interpreting and optimizing future directional DM searches.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses Auriga cosmological zoom simulations of a Milky Way analogue hosting an LMC analogue to extract the local DM velocity distribution and compute directional nuclear recoil maps. It claims that the LMC induces strong anisotropies (driven by non-zero mean azimuthal velocity), distorts the SHM ring-like feature, produces recoil-map differences up to ∼80% near the signal maximum, and reduces the number of events needed to reject isotropy by nearly a factor of five (for 100 GeV DM in a CYGNUS-like detector) and by larger factors for heavier DM.

Significance. If the extracted velocity distributions prove robust, the result would be significant for directional DM searches: it demonstrates that a realistic galactic environment can substantially alter discovery reach relative to the SHM and supplies a concrete, falsifiable prediction for how LMC-induced azimuthal structure affects recoil patterns in upcoming experiments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Simulation analysis and local velocity distribution extraction] The central quantitative claims (∼80% map differences and factor-of-five reduction in events) rest on the detailed shape of the local DM velocity distribution extracted from the Auriga MW-LMC analogue. The manuscript supplies no information on the number of DM particles inside the ∼1 kpc solar-neighborhood sphere, Poisson sampling noise in the high-velocity tails, or any resolution-convergence tests; this directly affects the reliability of the azimuthal moments and the reported anisotropies.
  2. [Results on recoil maps and discovery reach] No validation of the simulated local velocity distribution against observational constraints, no error propagation on the recoil maps, and no sensitivity study to simulation resolution are presented. These omissions are load-bearing for the discovery-prospect claims in the results section.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and main text refer to a 'CYGNUS-like experiment' without specifying the exact detector parameters (target, energy threshold, angular resolution) assumed in the event-count calculations.
  2. Notation for the recoil direction maps (e.g., definition of azimuthal angle zero point) should be stated explicitly when comparing MW-LMC and SHM cases.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review of our manuscript. We agree that additional details regarding the simulation analysis and validation of results are necessary to support the quantitative claims. We will revise the manuscript to address these points as detailed below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Simulation analysis and local velocity distribution extraction] The central quantitative claims (∼80% map differences and factor-of-five reduction in events) rest on the detailed shape of the local DM velocity distribution extracted from the Auriga MW-LMC analogue. The manuscript supplies no information on the number of DM particles inside the ∼1 kpc solar-neighborhood sphere, Poisson sampling noise in the high-velocity tails, or any resolution-convergence tests; this directly affects the reliability of the azimuthal moments and the reported anisotropies.

    Authors: We thank the referee for pointing out this important omission. We will add the number of DM particles inside the solar-neighborhood sphere to the methods section of the revised manuscript. We will also include an assessment of Poisson sampling noise by showing the impact on the azimuthal moments through resampling. For resolution convergence, we will add a discussion referencing the Auriga project's convergence tests, noting that the mean azimuthal velocity is robust. These changes will be made. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on recoil maps and discovery reach] No validation of the simulated local velocity distribution against observational constraints, no error propagation on the recoil maps, and no sensitivity study to simulation resolution are presented. These omissions are load-bearing for the discovery-prospect claims in the results section.

    Authors: We agree these elements would strengthen the paper. We will add a comparison of the local velocity distribution to observational constraints in a revised methods or results section. Error propagation will be added to the recoil maps using sampling methods. For sensitivity to resolution, we will include a qualitative discussion as a full study is limited by available simulations. We plan partial revisions here. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: simulation-derived velocity distribution yields independent recoil predictions

full rationale

The paper extracts the local DM velocity distribution directly from the Auriga MW-LMC analogue simulation and computes directional recoil maps and discovery metrics from it. No equations define a quantity in terms of itself, no fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, and no self-citation chain supplies the load-bearing anisotropy or event-reduction factors. The ~80% map differences and factor-of-five reduction are downstream calculations from the external simulation data, compared against the independent SHM baseline. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all modeling details are absent.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5737 in / 1037 out tokens · 16302 ms · 2026-06-27T09:04:06.483489+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 26 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Cirelli, A

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and J. Zupan,Dark Matter,2406.01705

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Bozorgnia, J

    N. Bozorgnia, J. Bramante, J.M. Cline, D. Curtin, D. McKeen, D.E. Morrissey et al.,Dark matter candidates and searches,Can. J. Phys.103(2025) 671 [2410.23454]

    arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Goodman and E

    M.W. Goodman and E. Witten,Detectability of Certain Dark Matter Candidates,Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 3059

    1985

  4. [4]

    Lewin and P.F

    J.D. Lewin and P.F. Smith,Review of mathematics, numerical factors, and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoil,Astropart. Phys.6(1996) 87

    1996

  5. [5]

    Drukier, K

    A.K. Drukier, K. Freese and D.N. Spergel,Detecting cold dark-matter candidates,Phys. Rev. D 33(1986) 3495

    1986

  6. [6]

    Spergel,The Motion of the Earth and the Detection of Wimps,Phys

    D.N. Spergel,The Motion of the Earth and the Detection of Wimps,Phys. Rev. D37(1988) 1353

    1988

  7. [7]

    Alenazi and P

    M.S. Alenazi and P. Gondolo,Directional recoil rates for WIMP direct detection,Phys. Rev. D 77(2008) 043532 [0712.0053]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    Ahlen et al.,The case for a directional dark matter detector and the status of current experimental efforts,Int

    S. Ahlen et al.,The case for a directional dark matter detector and the status of current experimental efforts,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A25(2010) 1 [0911.0323]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  9. [9]

    Green and B

    A.M. Green and B. Morgan,The median recoil direction as a WIMP directional detection signal,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 061301 [1002.2717]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    Mayet et al.,A review of the discovery reach of directional Dark Matter detection,Phys

    F. Mayet et al.,A review of the discovery reach of directional Dark Matter detection,Phys. Rept.627(2016) 1 [1602.03781]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    Vahsen, C.A.J

    S.E. Vahsen, C.A.J. O’Hare and D. Loomba,Directional Recoil Detection,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.71(2021) 189 [2102.04596]

    arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Baracchini,Directional dark matter searches,SciPost Phys

    E. Baracchini,Directional dark matter searches,SciPost Phys. Proc.12(2023) 002

    2023

  13. [13]

    Bozorgnia, G.B

    N. Bozorgnia, G.B. Gelmini and P. Gondolo,Ring-like features in directional dark matter detection,JCAP06(2012) 037 [1111.6361]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  14. [14]

    Bozorgnia, G.B

    N. Bozorgnia, G.B. Gelmini and P. Gondolo,Aberration features in directional dark matter detection,JCAP08(2012) 011 [1205.2333]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  15. [15]

    Bozorgnia, G.B

    N. Bozorgnia, G.B. Gelmini and P. Gondolo,Inverted dipole feature in directional detection of exothermic dark matter,JCAP01(2017) 052 [1611.01750]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    O’Hare,New Definition of the Neutrino Floor for Direct Dark Matter Searches,Phys

    C.A.J. O’Hare,New Definition of the Neutrino Floor for Direct Dark Matter Searches,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 251802 [2109.03116]

    arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Snowden-Ifft, C.J

    D.P. Snowden-Ifft, C.J. Martoff and J.M. Burwell,Low pressure negative ion drift chamber for dark matter search,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 101301 [astro-ph/9904064]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  18. [18]

    Burgos et al.,First results from the DRIFT-IIa dark matter detector,Astropart

    S. Burgos et al.,First results from the DRIFT-IIa dark matter detector,Astropart. Phys.28 (2007) 409 [0707.1488]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  19. [19]

    Billard, F

    J. Billard, F. Mayet and D. Santos,Directional detection of dark matter with mimac,Journal of Physics: Conference Series375(2012) 012008

    2012

  20. [20]

    Santos,Dark matter directional detection with mimac,Journal of Physics: Conference Series1029(2018) 012005

    D. Santos,Dark matter directional detection with mimac,Journal of Physics: Conference Series1029(2018) 012005

    2018

  21. [21]

    Ahlen et al.,First Dark Matter Search Results from a Surface Run of the 10-L DMTPC Directional Dark Matter Detector,Phys

    S. Ahlen et al.,First Dark Matter Search Results from a Surface Run of the 10-L DMTPC Directional Dark Matter Detector,Phys. Lett. B695(2011) 124 [1006.2928]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    Miuchi et al.,First underground results with NEWAGE-0.3a direction-sensitive dark matter detector,Phys

    K. Miuchi et al.,First underground results with NEWAGE-0.3a direction-sensitive dark matter detector,Phys. Lett. B686(2010) 11 [1002.1794]. – 20 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  23. [23]

    Nakamura et al.,Direction-sensitive dark matter search with gaseous tracking detector NEWAGE-0.3b’,PTEP2015(2015) 043F01

    K. Nakamura et al.,Direction-sensitive dark matter search with gaseous tracking detector NEWAGE-0.3b’,PTEP2015(2015) 043F01

    2015

  24. [24]

    Shimada et al.,Direction-sensitive dark matter search with 3D-vector-type tracking in NEWAGE,PTEP2023(2023) 103F01 [2301.04779]

    T. Shimada et al.,Direction-sensitive dark matter search with 3D-vector-type tracking in NEWAGE,PTEP2023(2023) 103F01 [2301.04779]. [25]NEWS-Gcollaboration,The NEWS-G detector at SNOLAB,JINST18(2023) T02005 [2205.15433]

    arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Coquillat,Light WIMP search with the NEWS-G experiment,PoSICRC2025(2025) 477

    J.-M. Coquillat,Light WIMP search with the NEWS-G experiment,PoSICRC2025(2025) 477. [27]NEWSdmcollaboration,Directional Detection of Dark Matter With a Nuclear Emulsion Based Detector, in18th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics, pp. 314–317, 2019, DOI. [28]NEWSdmcollaboration,Directional Dark Matter Search with the NEWSdm experiment,J. Phy...

    2025

  26. [26]

    Shimizu, M

    Y. Shimizu, M. Minowa, H. Sekiya and Y. Inoue,Directional scintillation detector for the detection of the wind of wimps,Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment496(2003) 347

    2003

  27. [27]

    Schuster,Investigating the Anisotropic Scintillation Response in Organic Crystal Scintillator Detectors, Ph.D

    P.F. Schuster,Investigating the Anisotropic Scintillation Response in Organic Crystal Scintillator Detectors, Ph.D. thesis, UC, Berkeley (main), 2016

    2016

  28. [28]

    Nygren,Columnar recombination: a tool for nuclear recoil directional sensitivity in a xenon-based direct detection WIMP search,J

    D.R. Nygren,Columnar recombination: a tool for nuclear recoil directional sensitivity in a xenon-based direct detection WIMP search,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.460(2013) 012006

    2013

  29. [29]

    Mohlabeng, K

    G. Mohlabeng, K. Kong, J. Li, A. Para and J. Yoo,Dark Matter Directionality Revisited with a High Pressure Xenon Gas Detector,JHEP07(2015) 092 [1503.03937]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    Baracchini et al.,CYGNO: a gaseous TPC with optical readout for dark matter directional search,JINST15(2020) C07036 [2007.12627]

    E. Baracchini et al.,CYGNO: a gaseous TPC with optical readout for dark matter directional search,JINST15(2020) C07036 [2007.12627]

    arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Vahsen et al.,CYGNUS: Feasibility of a nuclear recoil observatory with directional sensitivity to dark matter and neutrinos,2008.12587

    S.E. Vahsen et al.,CYGNUS: Feasibility of a nuclear recoil observatory with directional sensitivity to dark matter and neutrinos,2008.12587

    arXiv 2008

  32. [32]

    Lisotti et al.,CYGνS: detecting solar neutrinos with directional gas time projection chambers,Eur

    C. Lisotti et al.,CYGνS: detecting solar neutrinos with directional gas time projection chambers,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 1021 [2404.03690]

    arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Amaro et al.,The CYGNO Experiment,Instruments6(2022) 6 [2202.05480]

    F.D. Amaro et al.,The CYGNO Experiment,Instruments6(2022) 6 [2202.05480]

    arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Bozorgnia, F

    N. Bozorgnia, F. Calore, M. Schaller, M. Lovell, G. Bertone, C.S. Frenk et al.,Simulated Milky Way analogues: implications for dark matter direct searches,JCAP1605(2016) 024 [1601.04707]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  35. [35]

    Kelso, C

    C. Kelso, C. Savage, M. Valluri, K. Freese, G.S. Stinson and J. Bailin,The impact of baryons on the direct detection of dark matter,JCAP1608(2016) 071 [1601.04725]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [36]

    Sloane, M.R

    J.D. Sloane, M.R. Buckley, A.M. Brooks and F. Governato,Assessing Astrophysical Uncertainties in Direct Detection with Galaxy Simulations,Astrophys. J.831(2016) 93 [1601.05402]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  37. [37]

    Bozorgnia and G

    N. Bozorgnia and G. Bertone,Implications of hydrodynamical simulations for the interpretation of direct dark matter searches,Int. J. Mod. Phys.A32(2017) 1730016 [1705.05853]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    Bozorgnia, A

    N. Bozorgnia, A. Fattahi, C.S. Frenk, A. Cheek, D.G. Cerdeno, F.A. G´ omez et al.,The dark matter component of the Gaia radially anisotropic substructure,JCAP07(2020) 036 [1910.07536]

    arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    Poole-McKenzie, A.S

    R. Poole-McKenzie, A.S. Font, B. Boxer, I.G. McCarthy, S. Burdin, S.G. Stafford et al., Informing dark matter direct detection limits with the ARTEMIS simulations,JCAP11(2020) 016 [2006.15159]. – 21 –

    arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    Lawrence, A.R

    G.E. Lawrence, A.R. Duffy, C.A. Blake and P.F. Hopkins,Gusts in the Headwind: Uncertainties in Direct Dark Matter Detection,2207.07644

    arXiv

  41. [41]

    Kuhlen, A

    M. Kuhlen, A. Pillepich, J. Guedes and P. Madau,The Distribution of Dark Matter in the Milky Way’s Disk,Astrophys. J.784(2014) 161 [1308.1703]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  42. [42]

    Lacroix, A

    T. Lacroix, A. N´ u˜ nez Casti˜ neyra, M. Stref, J. Lavalle and E. Nezri,Predicting the dark matter velocity distribution in galactic structures: tests against hydrodynamic cosmological simulations, JCAP10(2020) 031 [2005.03955]

    arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Santos-Santos, N

    I. Santos-Santos, N. Bozorgnia, A. Fattahi and J.F. Navarro,Are there any extragalactic high speed dark matter particles in the Solar neighborhood?,JCAP03(2024) 046 [2308.15388]

    arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Garavito-Camargo, G

    N. Garavito-Camargo, G. Besla, C.F.P. Laporte, K.V. Johnston, F.A. G´ omez and L.L. Watkins,Hunting for the Dark Matter Wake Induced by the Large Magellanic Cloud, Astrophys. J.884(2019) 51 [1902.05089]

    arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Garavito-Camargo, G

    N. Garavito-Camargo, G. Besla, C.F.P. Laporte, A.M. Price-Whelan, E.C. Cunningham, K.V. Johnston et al.,Quantifying the Impact of the Large Magellanic Cloud on the Structure of the Milky Way’s Dark Matter Halo Using Basis Function Expansions,Astrophys. J.919(2021) 109 [2010.00816]

    arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Conroy, R.P

    C. Conroy, R.P. Naidu, N. Garavito-Camargo, G. Besla, D. Zaritsky, A. Bonaca et al.,All-sky dynamical response of the galactic halo to the large magellanic cloud,Nature592(2021) 534

    2021

  47. [47]

    Petersen and J

    M.S. Petersen and J. Pe˜ narrubia,Detection of the milky way reflex motion due to the large magellanic cloud infall,Nature Astronomy5(2020) 251

    2020

  48. [48]

    Petersen and J

    M.S. Petersen and J. Pe˜ narrubia,Reflex motion in the Milky Way stellar halo resulting from the Large Magellanic Cloud infall,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.494(2020) L11 [2001.09142]

    arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    Cunningham, N

    E.C. Cunningham, N. Garavito-Camargo, A.J. Deason, K.V. Johnston, D. Erkal, C.F.P. Laporte et al.,Quantifying the Stellar Halo’s Response to the LMC’s Infall with Spherical Harmonics,Astrophys. J.898(2020) 4 [2006.08621]

    arXiv 2020

  50. [50]

    Cavieres, J

    M. Cavieres, J. Chanam´ e, C. Navarrete, Y. Ordenes-Brice˜ no, N. Garavito-Camargo, G. Besla et al.,The Distant Milky Way Halo from the Southern Hemisphere: Characterization of the LMC-induced Dynamical Friction Wake, ApJ983(2025) 83 [2410.00114]

    arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Besla, A

    G. Besla, A. Peter and N. Garavito-Camargo,The highest-speed local dark matter particles come from the Large Magellanic Cloud,JCAP1911(2019) 013 [1909.04140]

    arXiv 2019

  52. [52]

    Donaldson, M.S

    K. Donaldson, M.S. Petersen and J. Pe˜ narrubia,Effects on the local dark matter distribution due to the Large Magellanic Cloud,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.L513(2022) 46 [2111.15440]

    arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Smith-Orlik et al.,The impact of the Large Magellanic Cloud on dark matter direct detection signals,JCAP10(2023) 070 [2302.04281]

    A. Smith-Orlik et al.,The impact of the Large Magellanic Cloud on dark matter direct detection signals,JCAP10(2023) 070 [2302.04281]

    arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    Reynoso-Cordova, N

    J. Reynoso-Cordova, N. Bozorgnia and M.-C. Piro,The Large Magellanic Cloud: expanding the low-mass parameter space of dark matter direct detection,JCAP12(2024) 037

    2024

  55. [55]

    Bozorgnia, J

    N. Bozorgnia, J. Bramante and A. Buchanan,High mass dark matter searches with the high speed flux from the Large Magellanic Cloud,JCAP04(2026) 065 [2511.21841]

    arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Grand, F.A

    R.J.J. Grand, F.A. G´ omez, F. Marinacci, R. Pakmor, V. Springel, D.J.R. Campbell et al.,The Auriga Project: the properties and formation mechanisms of disc galaxies across cosmic time, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.467(2017) 179 [1610.01159]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Grand, F

    R.J.J. Grand, F. Fragkoudi, F.A. G´ omez, A. Jenkins, F. Marinacci, R. Pakmor et al.,Overview and public data release of the Auriga Project: cosmological simulations of dwarf and Milky Way-mass galaxies,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2401.08750 [2401.08750]

    arXiv 2024

  58. [58]

    Schaye et al.,The EAGLE project: Simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments,Mon

    J. Schaye et al.,The EAGLE project: Simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.446(2015) 521 [1407.7040]. – 22 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  59. [59]

    Crain et al.,The EAGLE simulations of galaxy formation: calibration of subgrid physics and model variations,Mon

    R.A. Crain et al.,The EAGLE simulations of galaxy formation: calibration of subgrid physics and model variations,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.450(2015) 1937 [1501.01311]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  60. [60]

    Springel,E pur si muove: Galiliean-invariant cosmological hydrodynamical simulations on a moving mesh,Mon

    V. Springel,E pur si muove: Galiliean-invariant cosmological hydrodynamical simulations on a moving mesh,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.401(2010) 791 [0901.4107]. [64]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 594(2016) A13 [1502.01589]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  61. [61]

    Power, J.F

    C. Power, J.F. Navarro, A. Jenkins, C.S. Frenk, S.D.M. White, V. Springel et al.,The Inner structure of Lambda CDM halos. 1. A Numerical convergence study,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.338(2003) 14 [astro-ph/0201544]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  62. [62]

    Jenkins,A new way of setting the phases for cosmological multiscale Gaussian initial conditions,MNRAS434(2013) 2094 [1306.5968]

    A. Jenkins,A new way of setting the phases for cosmological multiscale Gaussian initial conditions,MNRAS434(2013) 2094 [1306.5968]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  63. [63]

    Gondolo,Recoil momentum spectrum in directional dark matter detectors,Phys

    P. Gondolo,Recoil momentum spectrum in directional dark matter detectors,Phys. Rev. D66 (2002) 103513 [hep-ph/0209110]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  64. [64]

    Helm,Inelastic and elastic scattering of 187-mev electrons from selected even-even nuclei, Phys

    R.H. Helm,Inelastic and elastic scattering of 187-mev electrons from selected even-even nuclei, Phys. Rev.104(1956) 1466

    1956

  65. [65]

    G´ orski, E

    K.M. G´ orski, E. Hivon, A.J. Banday, B.D. Wandelt, F.K. Hansen, M. Reinecke et al., HEALPix - A Framework for high resolution discretization, and fast analysis of data distributed on the sphere,Astrophys. J.622(2005) 759 [astro-ph/0409513]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  66. [66]

    Baracchini et al.,Technical Design Report — TDR CYGNO-04/INITIUM, Tech

    E. Baracchini et al.,Technical Design Report — TDR CYGNO-04/INITIUM, Tech. Rep. INFN-23-06-LNF, INFN (2023)

    2023

  67. [67]

    Baxter et al.,Recommended conventions for reporting results from direct dark matter searches,Eur

    D. Baxter et al.,Recommended conventions for reporting results from direct dark matter searches,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 907 [2105.00599]. [72]LZcollaboration,Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 011802 [2410.17036]. – 23 –

    arXiv 2021