pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.30769 · v1 · pith:AKY77X27new · submitted 2026-06-29 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · cond-mat.dis-nn· quant-ph

Density Wave Ordering with Disordered Ultracold Fermions in Optical Cavities

\'Oscar Rios Alves , Filippo Ferrari , Lorenzo Fioroni , Alberto Mercurio , Vincenzo Savona This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 01:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.dis-nnquant-ph
keywords density wave orderingultracold fermionsoptical cavitiesspeckle disordersuperradiant thresholdlinear response
0
0 comments X

The pith

Disorder in atom-light coupling renormalizes and lowers the superradiant threshold for density-wave order in cavity-coupled fermions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies a trapped two-dimensional Fermi gas dispersively coupled to an optical cavity and transversely pumped, with an added speckle beam that spatially modulates the atom-light coupling via an AC-Stark shift. In momentum space this disorder replaces the usual discrete set of density-wave couplings with a continuum weighted by the speckle spectrum. Linear response theory then shows that the effective light-matter coupling is renormalized downward on average, so the critical pump strength for superradiance decreases. When the speckle correlation length is short, the threshold value itself becomes self-averaging across realizations. Mean-field numerics confirm the shifted photonic boundary and the appearance of extra Fourier components in the ordered density.

Core claim

The disordered interaction renormalizes the effective light-matter coupling, lowering the critical pump strength on average, with the threshold becoming self-averaging for short speckle correlation lengths. This follows from linear response theory applied to the continuum of fermionic density modes created by the speckle, and is corroborated by numerical mean-field calculations of the intracavity photon number and real-space fermion density.

What carries the argument

Speckle-induced conversion of discrete density-wave Fourier couplings into a continuum weighted by the speckle spectrum, which renormalizes the effective light-matter coupling.

If this is right

  • The critical pump strength for the superradiant transition decreases on average.
  • For short speckle correlation lengths the threshold value is self-averaging across realizations.
  • Above threshold the density-wave crystal is distorted by additional Fourier components beyond those of the clean cavity geometry.
  • Emitted cavity light and in-situ density images both serve as experimental probes of the engineered disorder.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar renormalization might appear in other cavity QED geometries once the coupling is made spatially disordered.
  • The self-averaging property could let engineered disorder stabilize ordered phases without precise tuning of the pump.
  • Whether the effect survives beyond mean-field when particle interactions are added remains open for numerical or experimental test.

Load-bearing premise

Linear response theory remains valid for the superradiant threshold after the speckle converts the coupling into a continuum of modes.

What would settle it

Measure the critical pump strength as a function of speckle correlation length and check whether the threshold decreases on average and becomes independent of specific disorder realizations at short lengths.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.30769 by Alberto Mercurio, Filippo Ferrari, Lorenzo Fioroni, \'Oscar Rios Alves, Vincenzo Savona.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Sketch of the cavity setup. (a) An ultracold gas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Phase diagrams of the cavity superradiance transition in the Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Superradiant threshold, computed from Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Formation of the DWO crystal in the fermion density across the transition. The density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Structure factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a-b) Cavity photon number as a function of Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Difference between the superradiant threshold of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the interplay between cavity-induced density-wave ordering and controllable disorder in a trapped two-dimensional gas of ultracold fermions. The atoms are dispersively coupled to an optical cavity and transversely driven by a pump beam, while an additional speckle beam spatially modulates the atom-light coupling through an AC-Stark shift of the atomic transition. In momentum space, this disorder converts the usual coupling between the cavity mode and a discrete set of density-wave Fourier components into a coupling to a continuum of fermionic density modes, weighted by the spectrum of the speckle pattern. Using linear response theory, we derive the superradiant threshold and show that the disordered interaction renormalizes the effective light-matter coupling, lowering the critical pump strength on average, with the threshold becoming self-averaging for short speckle correlation lengths. We complement this analysis with a numerical mean-field treatment that gives access to the intracavity photon number and to the real-space fermion density across the transition. These results confirm that the disorder shifts the photonic phase boundary and, above threshold, distorts the density-wave crystal by populating Fourier components beyond those selected by the clean cavity geometry. Our findings identify both the emitted cavity light and in situ density images as probes of engineered disorder in fermionic matter coupled to optical cavities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the effects of speckle-induced disorder on cavity-mediated density-wave ordering in a trapped 2D ultracold Fermi gas. The AC-Stark speckle converts the atom-cavity coupling from discrete Fourier components to a continuum weighted by the speckle power spectrum. Linear response theory is applied to the cavity field equation to obtain a renormalized effective coupling that lowers the superradiant threshold on average, with the threshold becoming self-averaging for short speckle correlation lengths. Mean-field numerics are used to compute the intracavity photon number and real-space density profiles, confirming the shift of the phase boundary and the population of additional Fourier components that distort the density-wave crystal above threshold.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work provides a concrete route to engineering and probing disorder effects in cavity QED systems with fermions, with cavity emission and in-situ imaging identified as experimental observables. The combination of an analytical linear-response threshold calculation with numerical mean-field treatment of the ordered phase is a strength, as is the identification of self-averaging behavior for short correlation lengths.

major comments (1)
  1. [Linear response derivation] Linear response derivation (the section deriving the superradiant threshold after introducing the speckle-weighted continuum): the replacement of the discrete coupling g(q) by a continuous distribution set by the speckle spectrum is used to obtain a renormalized threshold via a zero crossing of 1 - g_eff² Χ(q,ω). No explicit demonstration is given that the continuum does not introduce additional imaginary parts to the pole or shift the real part outside the regime where the linear-response expansion remains controlled; this assumption is load-bearing for the claim that disorder lowers the threshold.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that linear response yields a renormalized threshold but does not reference the explicit expression for the effective coupling or the disorder-averaged denominator; adding a brief equation or pointer to the main-text formula would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment of its significance. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the linear-response section as indicated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Linear response derivation] Linear response derivation (the section deriving the superradiant threshold after introducing the speckle-weighted continuum): the replacement of the discrete coupling g(q) by a continuous distribution set by the speckle spectrum is used to obtain a renormalized threshold via a zero crossing of 1 - g_eff² Χ(q,ω). No explicit demonstration is given that the continuum does not introduce additional imaginary parts to the pole or shift the real part outside the regime where the linear-response expansion remains controlled; this assumption is load-bearing for the claim that disorder lowers the threshold.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration strengthens the derivation. The cavity field is treated in the frequency domain with a static, real-valued speckle potential; the effective coupling is therefore obtained by a real-weighted integral over the speckle spectrum, and any imaginary component of the denominator originates exclusively from the fermionic susceptibility Χ(q,ω) evaluated at the relevant frequency (identical to the clean-system case). In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph that (i) writes the pole condition explicitly as Re[1 − g_eff² Χ] = 0 with Im[1 − g_eff² Χ] kept finite only by the cavity linewidth, (ii) shows by direct numerical quadrature that, for the short-correlation-length regime where self-averaging holds, the imaginary part remains ≪ cavity decay rate near threshold, and (iii) verifies that the real-part renormalization stays inside the regime where the linear expansion is controlled by comparing the disordered threshold to the clean limit and to the subsequent mean-field numerics. These additions will be placed immediately after the definition of g_eff. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: threshold derived from linear response on disorder spectrum

full rationale

The abstract states the superradiant threshold is derived via linear response after the speckle converts the coupling to a weighted integral over a continuum of density modes. The renormalization of effective coupling follows directly from that spectrum without any fitting step, self-definition, or reduction to prior self-citations. No load-bearing ansatz or uniqueness claim is quoted that collapses the result to its own inputs. The derivation chain remains independent of the target quantity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields insufficient detail to enumerate free parameters or invented entities; the derivation implicitly assumes linear response near threshold and a specific form for the speckle-induced modulation of the atom-light coupling.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Linear response theory applies to the disordered light-matter coupling near the superradiant transition
    Invoked to derive the threshold from the continuum of density modes

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5776 in / 1240 out tokens · 34034 ms · 2026-07-01T01:49:42.724246+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (6) from the cavity-QED Hamiltonian in Eq

    Derivation of the DWO threshold In this section we detail the derivation of the phase-boundary condition in Eq. (6) from the cavity-QED Hamiltonian in Eq. (1). First, we write the interaction Hamiltonian in Eq. (2) in terms of single-particle momentum eigenstates, with annihilation (creation) operators ˆck (ˆc† k). Using ˆΨ(r) = R dk 2π eik·rˆck we obtain...

  2. [2]

    (7) and characterizing how the mean and variance of the critical point depend on the speckle correlation length

    Disorder average and variance of the phase boundary We now study the statistics of the threshold over disorder realizations, with the goal of deriving Eq. (7) and characterizing how the mean and variance of the critical point depend on the speckle correlation length. We first decompose the disorder contribution as D(k) =F µ+ 1 1 +I(r)/⟨I(r)⟩ −µ (k) = 2πµδ...

  3. [3]

    T rap averaging To determine the critical threshold, we need the static (ω= 0) density-density response function. For free spin- 1/2 fermions in two dimensions, the static Lindhard func- tion is χfree(q) =− mat πℏ2  1−Θ(q−2k F ) s 1− 2kF q 2   , (A27) wherem at is the atomic mass (throughout the article, we assume 6Li atoms) andk F the Fermi wave vect...

  4. [4]

    To generate such a pattern numerically we follow the proce- dure outlined in Ref

    Numerical construction of the speckle pattern A speckle pattern can be represented as a superpo- sition of plane waves with random relative phases. To generate such a pattern numerically we follow the proce- dure outlined in Ref. [54]. Considering aN x ×N y two- dimensional grid representing a real-space region of size Lx ×L y, the corresponding Fourier g...

    2000

  5. [5]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

    2008

  6. [6]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Science357, 995 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    Esslinger, Fermi-Hubbard Physics with Atoms in an Optical Lattice, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics1, 129 (2010)

    T. Esslinger, Fermi-Hubbard Physics with Atoms in an Optical Lattice, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics1, 129 (2010)

    2010

  8. [8]

    R. A. Hart, P. M. Duarte, T.-L. Yang, X. Liu, T. Paiva, E. Khatami, R. T. Scalettar, N. Trivedi, D. A. Huse, and R. G. Hulet, Observation of antiferromagnetic cor- relations in the Hubbard model with ultracold atoms, Nature519, 211 (2015)

    2015

  9. [9]

    Mazurenko, C

    A. Mazurenko, C. S. Chiu, G. Ji, M. F. Parsons, M. Kan´ asz-Nagy, R. Schmidt, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, D. Greif, and M. Greiner, A cold-atom Fermi–Hubbard antiferromagnet, Nature545, 462 (2017)

    2017

  10. [10]

    Polkovnikov, K

    A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalat- tore,Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 863 (2011)

    2011

  11. [11]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimb` ene, Quantum sim- ulations with ultracold quantum gases, Nat. Phys.8, 267 (2012)

    2012

  12. [12]

    Ritsch, P

    H. Ritsch, P. Domokos, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Cold atoms in cavity-generated dynamical optical poten- tials, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 553 (2013)

    2013

  13. [13]

    Mivehvar, F

    F. Mivehvar, F. Piazza, T. Donner, and H. Ritsch, Cavity QED with quantum gases: new paradigms in many-body physics, Adv. Phys.70, 1 (2021)

    2021

  14. [14]

    Domokos and H

    P. Domokos and H. Ritsch, Collective Cooling and Self- Organization of Atoms in a Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 253003 (2002)

    2002

  15. [15]

    A. T. Black, H. W. Chan, and V. Vuleti´ c, Observa- tion of Collective Friction Forces due to Spatial Self- Organization of Atoms: From Rayleigh to Bragg Scat- tering, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 203001 (2003)

    2003

  16. [16]

    Baumann, C

    K. Baumann, C. Guerlin, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity, Nature464, 1301 (2010)

    2010

  17. [17]

    D. Nagy, G. K´ onya, G. Szirmai, and P. Domokos, Dicke- Model Phase Transition in the Quantum Motion of a Bose-Einstein Condensate in an Optical Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 130401 (2010)

    2010

  18. [18]

    L´ eonard, A

    J. L´ eonard, A. Morales, P. Zupancic, T. Esslinger, and T. Donner, Supersolid formation in a quantum gas break- ing a continuous translational symmetry, Nature543, 87 (2017)

    2017

  19. [19]

    A. J. Koll´ ar, A. T. Papageorge, V. D. Vaidya, Y. Guo, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev, Supermode-density-wave- polariton condensation with a Bose–Einstein condensate in a multimode cavity, Nat. Commun.8, 14386 (2017)

    2017

  20. [20]

    R. M. Kroeze, Y. Guo, V. D. Vaidya, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev, Spinor Self-Ordering of a Quantum Gas in a Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 163601 (2018)

    2018

  21. [21]

    Keeling, M

    J. Keeling, M. Bhaseen, and B. Simons, Fermionic Su- perradiance in a Transversely Pumped Optical Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 143002 (2014)

    2014

  22. [22]

    Piazza and P

    F. Piazza and P. Strack, Umklapp Superradiance with a Collisionless Quantum Degenerate Fermi Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 143003 (2014)

    2014

  23. [23]

    Y. Chen, Z. Yu, and H. Zhai, Superradiance of Degener- ate Fermi Gases in a Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 143004 (2014)

    2014

  24. [24]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Chen, Z. Wu, J. Wang, J. Fan, S. Deng, and H. Wu, Observation of a superradiant quantum phase transition in an intracavity degenerate Fermi gas, Science 373, 1359 (2021)

    2021

  25. [25]

    Helson, T

    V. Helson, T. Zwettler, F. Mivehvar, E. Colella, K. Roux, H. Konishi, H. Ritsch, and J.-P. Brantut, Density-wave ordering in a unitary Fermi gas with photon-mediated interactions, Nature618, 716 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    Zwettler, F

    T. Zwettler, F. Marijanovic, T. B¨ uhler, S. Chattopad- hyay, G. Del Pace, L. Skolc, V. Helson, S. Uchino, E. Demler, and J.-P. Brantut, Cavity-mediated charge and pair-density waves in a unitary Fermi gas, Nat. Com- mun.17, 496 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    B¨ uhler, A

    T. B¨ uhler, A. Fabre, G. Bolognini, Z. Xue, T. Zwettler, G. Del Pace, and J.-P. Brantut, Microscopy of Cavity- Induced Density-Wave Ordering in Ultracold Gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 143401 (2026)

    2026

  28. [28]

    F. Orsi, E. Fedotova, R. P. Bhatt, M. Eichenberger, L. Dubois, and J.-P. Brantut, Fermi-pressure-assisted cavity superradiance in a mesoscopic fermi gas (2026), arXiv:2603.08691 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    Cl´ ement, A

    D. Cl´ ement, A. F. Var´ on, M. Hugbart, J. A. Retter, P. Bouyer, L. Sanchez-Palencia, D. M. Gangardt, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and A. Aspect, Suppression of Transport of an Interacting Elongated Bose-Einstein Condensate in a Random Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 170409 (2005)

    2005

  30. [30]

    Billy, V

    J. Billy, V. Josse, Z. Zuo, A. Bernard, B. Hambrecht, P. Lugan, D. Cl´ ement, L. Sanchez-Palencia, P. Bouyer, and A. Aspect, Direct observation of Anderson localiza- tion of matter waves in a controlled disorder, Nature453, 891 (2008)

    2008

  31. [31]

    Roati, C

    G. Roati, C. D’Errico, L. Fallani, M. Fattori, C. Fort, M. Zaccanti, G. Modugno, M. Modugno, and M. In- guscio, Anderson localization of a non-interacting Bose–Einstein condensate, Nature453, 895 (2008)

    2008

  32. [32]

    S. S. Kondov, W. R. McGehee, J. J. Zirbel, and B. De- Marco, Three-Dimensional Anderson Localization of Ul- tracold Matter, Science334, 66 (2011)

    2011

  33. [33]

    Jendrzejewski, A

    F. Jendrzejewski, A. Bernard, K. M¨ uller, P. Cheinet, V. Josse, M. Piraud, L. Pezz´ e, L. Sanchez-Palencia, 14 A. Aspect, and P. Bouyer, Three-dimensional localiza- tion of ultracold atoms in an optical disordered potential, Nat. Phys.8, 398 (2012)

    2012

  34. [34]

    Schreiber, S

    M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, P. Bordia, H. P. L¨ uschen, M. H. Fischer, R. Vosk, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of many-body localization of inter- acting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice, Science 349, 842 (2015)

    2015

  35. [35]

    J.-y. Choi, S. Hild, J. Zeiher, P. Schauß, A. Rubio- Abadal, T. Yefsah, V. Khemani, D. A. Huse, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Exploring the many-body localization transition in two dimensions, Science352, 1547 (2016)

    2016

  36. [36]

    H. P. L¨ uschen, P. Bordia, S. Scherg, F. Alet, E. Alt- man, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of Slow Dynamics near the Many-Body Localization Transition in One-Dimensional Quasiperiodic Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 260401 (2017)

    2017

  37. [37]

    Lukin, M

    A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, M. E. Tai, A. M. Kauf- man, S. Choi, V. Khemani, J. L´ eonard, and M. Greiner, Probing entanglement in a many-body–localized system, Science364, 256 (2019)

    2019

  38. [38]

    Gopalakrishnan, B

    S. Gopalakrishnan, B. L. Lev, and P. M. Goldbart, Frustration and Glassiness in Spin Models with Cavity- Mediated Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 277201 (2011)

    2011

  39. [39]

    B. P. Marsh, Y. Guo, R. M. Kroeze, S. Gopalakrish- nan, S. Ganguli, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev, Enhancing Associative Memory Recall and Storage Capacity Using Confocal Cavity QED, Phys. Rev. X11, 021048 (2021)

    2021

  40. [40]

    B. P. Marsh, R. M. Kroeze, S. Ganguli, S. Gopalakrish- nan, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev, Entanglement and Replica Symmetry Breaking in a Driven-Dissipative Quantum Spin Glass, Phys. Rev. X14, 011026 (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    R. M. Kroeze, B. P. Marsh, D. Atri Schuller, H. S. Hunt, A. N. Bourzutschky, M. Winer, S. Gopalakrishnan, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev, Directly observing replica sym- metry breaking in a vector quantum-optical spin glass, Science389, 1122 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    B. P. Marsh, D. A. Schuller, Y. Ji, H. S. Hunt, G. Z. Socolof, D. P. Bowman, J. Keeling, and B. L. Lev, Mul- timode Cavity QED Ising Spin Glass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 160403 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Lippe, T

    C. Lippe, T. Klas, J. Bender, P. Mischke, T. Niederpr¨ um, and H. Ott, Experimental realization of a 3D random hopping model, Nat. Commun.12, 6976 (2021)

    2021

  44. [44]

    Periwal, E

    A. Periwal, E. S. Cooper, P. Kunkel, J. F. Wienand, E. J. Davis, and M. Schleier-Smith, Programmable in- teractions and emergent geometry in an array of atom clouds, Nature600, 630 (2021)

    2021

  45. [45]

    Sauerwein, F

    N. Sauerwein, F. Orsi, P. Uhrich, S. Bandyopadhyay, F. Mattiotti, T. Cantat-Moltrecht, G. Pupillo, P. Hauke, and J.-P. Brantut, Engineering random spin models with atoms in a high-finesse cavity, Nat. Phys.19, 1128 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    F. Orsi, N. Sauerwein, R. P. Bhatt, J. Faltinath, E. Fe- dotova, N. Reiter, T. Cantat-Moltrecht, and J.-P. Bran- tut, Cavity Microscope for Micrometer-Scale Control of Atom-Photon Interactions, PRX Quantum5, 040333 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    Uhrich, S

    P. Uhrich, S. Bandyopadhyay, N. Sauerwein, J. Sonner, J.-P. Brantut, and P. Hauke, A cavity quantum elec- trodynamics implementation of the sachdev–ye–kitaev model (2023), arXiv:2303.11343 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Baumgartner, P

    R. Baumgartner, P. Pelliconi, S. Bandyopadhyay, F. Orsi, N. Sauerwein, P. Hauke, J.-P. Brantut, and J. Sonner, Quantum simulation of the sachdev-ye-kitaev model us- ing time-dependent disorder in optical cavities (2024), arXiv:2411.17802 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    R. L. Baumgartner, P. Pelliconi, S. Bandyopadhyay, F. Orsi, P. Hauke, J.-P. Brantut, and J. Sonner, Quan- tum simulation using trotterized disorder hamiltonians in a single-mode optical cavity (2025), arXiv:2512.13774 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    D. P. Solis, A. Windey, S. Bandyopadhyay, A. Legra- mandi, and P. Hauke, From single-particle to many-body chaos in the Yukawa-Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model: Theory and a cavity-QED proposal, Phys. Rev. B113, 184121 (2026)

    2026

  51. [51]

    Marijanovi´ c, S

    F. Marijanovi´ c, S. Chattopadhyay, L. Skolc, T. Zwettler, C.-M. Halati, S. B. J¨ ager, T. Giamarchi, J.-P. Brantut, and E. Demler, Quench Instabilities of a Strongly Inter- acting Quantum Gas in an Optical Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 193401 (2026)

    2026

  52. [52]

    Giuliani and G

    G. Giuliani and G. Vignale,Quantum Theory of the Elec- tron Liquid, 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2005)

    2005

  53. [53]

    Helson, T

    V. Helson, T. Zwettler, K. Roux, H. Konishi, S. Uchino, and J.-P. Brantut, Optomechanical response of a strongly interacting Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033199 (2022)

    2022

  54. [54]

    Z. Wu, J. Fan, X. Zhang, J. Qi, and H. Wu, Signatures of Prethermalization in a Quenched Cavity-Mediated Long- Range Interacting Fermi Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 243401 (2023)

    2023

  55. [55]

    Zwettler, G

    T. Zwettler, G. Del Pace, F. Marijanovic, S. Chattopad- hyay, T. B¨ uhler, C.-M. Halati, L. Skolc, L. Tolle, V. Hel- son, G. Bolognini, A. Fabre, S. Uchino, T. Giamarchi, E. Demler, and J.-P. Brantut, Nonequilibrium Dynamics of Long-Range Interacting Fermions, Phys. Rev. X15, 021089 (2025)

    2025

  56. [56]

    Giorgini, L

    S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Theory of ultracold atomic Fermi gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1215 (2008)

    2008

  57. [57]

    Zwerger, ed.,The BCS-BEC Crossover and the Uni- tary Fermi Gas, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol

    W. Zwerger, ed.,The BCS-BEC Crossover and the Uni- tary Fermi Gas, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 836 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012)

    2012

  58. [58]

    D. D. Duncan and S. J. Kirkpatrick, Algorithms for sim- ulation of speckle (laser and otherwise), inComplex Dy- namics and Fluctuations in Biomedical Photonics V, Vol. 6855, edited by V. V. Tuchin and L. V. Wang, Interna- tional Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE, 2008) p. 685505

    2008