Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 117 references

JWST spectra show that polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons dominate the mid-IR emission in the inner CGM of NGC 891 out to 4 kpc.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

2026-06-29 17:19 UTC pith:ALJG72W4

load-bearing objection New JWST spectra show PAH features dominating mid-IR emission in NGC 891's inner CGM out to 4 kpc, but the PAHFIT decomposition lacks validation for low-density conditions. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2605.26864 v1 pith:ALJG72W4 submitted 2026-05-26 astro-ph.GA

Survival of very small carbonaceous dust grains in the inner-CGM of NGC 891 from JWST/MIRI MRS

J\'er\'emy Chastenet , Ilse De Looze , Karl D. Gordon , Suzanne C. Madden , Monica Rela\~no , Karin M. Sandstrom , Dries Van De Putte , Maarten Baes
show 21 more authors
Simone Bianchi Alberto D. Bolatto Viviana Casasola Daniel A. Dale Sara Duval Jacopo Fritz Fr\'ed\'eric Galliano Simon C. O. Glover Stavroula Katsioli Vasileios Katsis Florian Kirchschlager Ralf S. Klessen Rebecca C. Levy Sharon E. Meidt Aleksandr V. Mosenkov Kentaro Nagamine Lara Pantoni Helena M. Richie Stefanie Walch Thomas G. Williams Emanuele M. Xilouris
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords PAHscircumgalactic mediumNGC 891JWST MIRImid-infrared spectroscopydust survivalgalactic outflowsH2 emission
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents JWST/MIRI MRS spectroscopic observations at multiple positions in the inner circumgalactic medium of NGC 891, including along the minor axis at different heights and radii. Analysis with the PAHFIT model decomposes the spectra to show that previously detected mid-IR emission arises from PAH features rather than hot dust continuum. This supplies direct evidence that these small carbonaceous grains persist in the inner CGM. Band ratios indicate a preference for larger neutral PAHs, PAH strengths correlate tightly with H2, and a new feature appears at 16.72 μm. A reader would care because the result bears on whether dust can be transported or survive in galactic halos and outflows.

Core claim

The spectra reveal that the earlier reported mid-IR emission out to 4 kpc is dominated by the emission of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and not hot dust continuum, providing direct evidence of the survival of PAHs in the inner CGM of NGC 891. The 11.2 μm PAH feature dominates, implying more neutral large PAHs. PAH-to-continuum ratios show little variation with scale-height and radius, while feature strengths decrease with the [Ne III]/[Ne II] ratio. A tight correlation exists between H2 and PAH features, and a previously unidentified PAH feature is detected at 16.72 μm.

What carries the argument

The PAHFIT dust emission model applied to decompose 1D spectra and 3D cubes into PAH features versus continuum components across the observed positions.

Load-bearing premise

The PAHFIT model correctly assigns the observed spectral features to PAHs without substantial contamination from other sources or continuum in the low-density CGM.

What would settle it

Higher spatial or spectral resolution data or an alternative decomposition that attributes the same features primarily to hot dust continuum instead of PAHs would falsify the survival claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • PAH emission in the CGM originates from cool dense cloudlets entrained in outflows, as shown by the H2 correlation.
  • PAH processing increases with harder radiation fields, as indicated by the drop in feature strengths with the [Ne III]/[Ne II] ratio.
  • The dominance of the 11.2 μm feature over 7.7 μm points to a population of larger neutral PAHs distinct from those in star-forming regions like Orion or M51.
  • Minimal change in PAH-to-continuum ratios with height and radius implies limited additional processing during transport into the inner CGM.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If PAHs survive at these distances, similar small grains may remain intact in the halos of other edge-on galaxies and affect interpretations of diffuse mid-IR emission.
  • The co-location with H2 suggests that dense phases within outflows can shield PAHs, which may alter models of dust and molecule survival during galactic feedback.
  • The unidentified 16.72 μm feature could trace excitation conditions unique to the low-density CGM and warrants targeted searches in other outflow systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper presents new JWST/MIRI MRS spectroscopic observations of the inner CGM of NGC 891 at four positions (two near the bulge, two at r~1.5 and 4.7 kpc). Using the PAHFIT dust emission model on 1D spectra and 3D cubes, the authors conclude that the previously reported mid-IR emission out to 4 kpc is dominated by PAH features rather than hot dust continuum. This is taken as direct evidence for PAH survival in the inner CGM. Additional findings include dominance of the 11.2 μm PAH band over 7.7 μm (suggesting more neutral, large PAHs), little variation in PAH-to-continuum ratios with scale height or radius, a decrease in PAH strengths with [Ne III]/[Ne II], a tight H2-PAH correlation, and detection of a new feature at 16.72 μm.

Significance. If the PAHFIT decomposition is reliable, the result would provide valuable direct spectroscopic evidence for the survival of very small carbonaceous grains in the CGM, with implications for dust processing in galactic outflows and the origin of CGM dust. The band-ratio comparisons to Orion and M51, the H2 correlation implying co-spatial emission from entrained cloudlets, and the new 16.72 μm feature are useful additions to the literature on PAH properties in varied environments. The work applies standard modeling tools to new JWST data in a novel setting.

major comments (2)
  1. [Spectral decomposition] Spectral decomposition (PAHFIT analysis): The manuscript applies the PAHFIT model, calibrated on denser star-forming regions, to the low-density CGM spectra without providing validation, sensitivity tests, or alternative continuum models to confirm that the decomposition correctly attributes flux to PAH bands rather than a smooth hot-dust continuum. This assumption is load-bearing for the central claim that PAHs dominate and survive in the inner CGM.
  2. [Results] Results section: No quantitative error bars, fit statistics (e.g., reduced χ²), or tabulated flux measurements for the individual PAH components and continuum are provided, preventing independent assessment of the robustness of the reported PAH dominance, band ratios, and the new 16.72 μm feature.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that 'it is obvious that the 11.2 μm PAH feature dominates' should be replaced by a quantitative comparison (e.g., measured 11.2/7.7 ratios with uncertainties) to other environments.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review. We address the two major comments below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional validation and quantitative details as requested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Spectral decomposition] Spectral decomposition (PAHFIT analysis): The manuscript applies the PAHFIT model, calibrated on denser star-forming regions, to the low-density CGM spectra without providing validation, sensitivity tests, or alternative continuum models to confirm that the decomposition correctly attributes flux to PAH bands rather than a smooth hot-dust continuum. This assumption is load-bearing for the central claim that PAHs dominate and survive in the inner CGM.

    Authors: We agree that the applicability of PAHFIT to the low-density CGM requires explicit validation. Although the model has been applied across a range of environments in the literature, the current manuscript does not include dedicated sensitivity tests or alternative continuum comparisons for these spectra. In the revised version we will add such tests (varying continuum parameters, comparing with polynomial continua, and assessing residual structures) together with a discussion of the model's suitability for CGM conditions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section: No quantitative error bars, fit statistics (e.g., reduced χ²), or tabulated flux measurements for the individual PAH components and continuum are provided, preventing independent assessment of the robustness of the reported PAH dominance, band ratios, and the new 16.72 μm feature.

    Authors: We accept that the absence of error bars, fit statistics, and tabulated fluxes limits independent evaluation. The revised manuscript will include reduced χ² values for all PAHFIT fits, uncertainties on individual PAH and continuum fluxes, and a supplementary table listing the measured fluxes with errors for the key features (including the 16.72 μm feature). revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in observational spectral analysis

full rationale

The paper is a purely observational study that acquires new JWST/MIRI MRS spectra at multiple positions in the inner CGM of NGC 891 and applies the established external PAHFIT decomposition tool to separate PAH features from continuum. The headline conclusion that PAHs dominate (and therefore survive) follows directly from the fitted band strengths in the observed data, with supporting empirical comparisons to Orion and M51 and noted correlations with [Ne III]/[Ne II] and H2. No equations, predictions, or uniqueness arguments are present that reduce any result to its own inputs by construction, and no load-bearing self-citation chain is invoked. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an observational paper using the standard PAHFIT spectral decomposition model; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced beyond those already present in the cited dust emission modeling literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6046 in / 1219 out tokens · 40781 ms · 2026-06-29T17:19:35.761329+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present new spectroscopic observations of the inner circumgalactic medium (CGM) of NGC 891 taken with the Mid-Infrared Imager/Medium Resolution Spectroscopy instrument onboard JWST, in four positions: two near the bulge and two at galactocentric radii (r) of ~ 1.5, 4.7 kpc. Each pair of pointings has one position along the minor axis (h) at ~ 0.5 kpc and one at ~ 1 kpc away from the mid-plane. We analyse both 1D spectra and 3D cubes using the dust emission model PAHFIT to extract properties of typical mid-IR features. These spectra reveal that the earlier reported mid-IR emission out to 4 kpc is dominated by the emission of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and not hot dust continuum, providing direct evidence of the survival of PAHs in the inner CGM of NGC 891. Comparing PAH band ratios with other environments (Orion, M51), it is obvious that the 11.2 $\mu$m PAH feature -- and not the usual 7.7 ${\mu}$m -- dominates in NGC 891, which seems to imply the presence of more neutral, large PAHs in the CGM. Overall, PAH-to-continuum ratios show little variations with scale-height and radius in NGC 891, which suggests little PAH processing. However, we do see a decrease in the PAH feature strengths with the [Ne III]/[Ne II] ratio, pointing at elevated dust processing with increased radiation field hardness. We also confirm a tight correlation between H2 and PAH features, suggesting that both tracers must be co-spatial and, hence, implying that PAH emission predominantly arises from cool dense parts of cloudlets entrained in galactic outflows. Finally, we report the clear detection of a previously unidentified PAH feature at 16.72 $\mu$m.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26864 by Alberto D. Bolatto, Aleksandr V. Mosenkov, Daniel A. Dale, Dries Van De Putte, Emanuele M. Xilouris, Florian Kirchschlager, Fr\'ed\'eric Galliano, Helena M. Richie, Ilse De Looze, Jacopo Fritz, J\'er\'emy Chastenet, Karin M. Sandstrom, Karl D. Gordon, Kentaro Nagamine, Lara Pantoni, Maarten Baes, Monica Rela\~no, Ralf S. Klessen, Rebecca C. Levy, Sara Duval, Sharon E. Meidt, Simon C. O. Glover, Simone Bianchi, Stavroula Katsioli, Stefanie Walch, Suzanne C. Madden, Thomas G. Williams, Vasileios Katsis, Viviana Casasola.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: 2MASS J-band image of NGC 891 with the four MIRI/MRS positions presented in this paper: Obsr1.5,h0.5 and Obsr1.5,h1.0 lie near the bulge, and Obsr4.7,h0.5 and Obsr4.7,h1.0 at r ∼ 4.7 kpc, where each pair has pointings at h ∼ 0.5 kpc and h ∼ 1.0 kpc. Additional footprints of available JWST data are shown: MIRI imaging is shown in dark red/brown, with the strip available in F770W (see Chastenet et al. 2024).… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Average spectra for the four observations, with 50 MJy/sr offsets for (the bottom of the shaded area shows the 0-point in each case). We label mid-IR features and emission lines of interest. Obsr1.5,h0.5 and Obsr4.7,h0.5 show the cleanest features and highest intensities for the identified lines. While showing a lower S/N, Obsr1.5,h1.0 and Obsr4.7,h1.0 still exhibit some features and the brightest emission… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: All spectra, continuum-subtracted using the best-fit stellar and hot dust components from 1D PAHFIT results. While Obsr4.7,h0.5 (green) shows notably higher flux densities, the shapes of the mid-IR features are in good agreement with Obsr1.5,h0.5 (brown). Obsr1.5,h1.0 (orange) and Obsr4.7,h1.0 (blue) show a clear decrease in mid-IR emission, but the brightest features persist (e.g. 7.7, 11.2, 17 µm). The s… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Portions of mid-IR spectra focused on a few typical PAH features. We show an average of the observations Obsr1.5,h0.5 and Obsr4.7,h0.5 spectra for NGC 891 in olive-green colour, the ‘atomic’ and ‘DF3’ templates from the PDRs4All program in solid and dash-dot blue lines, and an average of the three pointings in M51 in dash black. We add the average spectrum of the east pointing from Rand et al. (2008) in th… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Best fits for each 1D spectrum with our spectral model described in Section 3.3 using PAHFIT (with emission lines removed for better comparison of dust features). Overall, the model based on an average of Obsr1.5,h0.5 and Obsr4.7,h0.5 fits well all observations, and adjusts to the low-emission spectra Obsr1.5,h1.0 and Obsr4.7,h1.0. Note the difference in continuum between Obsr1.5,h0.5 and Obsr4.7,h0.5, nea… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: GO 2433’s F770W map of NGC 891, with the H2 S (1) maps for the four MRS pointings in our study, in colour. The contours in the background and inset images are F770W surface brightnesses. The white cross marks the centre of the galaxy. Right: Total intensity maps for a few key dust features in all observations. The maps are obtained by fitting a 1D model to each pixel independently, and summing the in… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Examples of correlation between the 16.72 µm feature and the 8.6 and 17 µm features, normalised by the 11.2 µm emission, showing the highest ρ values in Obsr1.5,h0.5 and Obsr4.7,h0.5. The labels indicate the Pearson coefficient, ρ, and p-value. in all features. Most observations show similar behaviours to one another for all features. At 7.7 µm, Obsr4.7,h0.5 shows a ∼ 30% difference with the others but doe… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: shows some of the common mid-IR band ratios accessible with our data. These ratios are computed using the same approach as in Draine et al. (2021): we use the same clip￾ping points, remove a simple continuum between these points (that line is calculated on a smoothed spectrum, to avoid the clip points falling on spurious values, leading to too many neg￾ative values after subtraction), and integrate the flu… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Top: Total intensity in the H2 S (1) + S (2) lines from Gaussian fitting as a function of the total intensity in the mid-IR features from PAHFIT, for Obsr1.5,h0.5 in brown and Obsr4.7,h0.5 in green. The slopes are indicated in the legend. Bottom: Total intensity in the mid-IR features normalised to the best-fit dust continuum from PAHFIT, as a function of the [Ne iii]/[Ne ii] ratio in all four observation… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Contribution of the stellar and the hot dust continua in a few MIRI filters. For each 1D MRS spectrum we use the PAHFIT best-fit of the stellar and hot dust components and integrate these continua in the F770W, F1130W, F1280W, F1500W, and F1800W transmission curves (black curves; arbitrary normalisation). Points are shown with horizon￾tal offsets for clarity. uum is likely increased in F1280W because this… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: H2 S (1) emission to total intensity in PAH features as a function of H2 S (1) emission. We also point out the clear discrepancy in the top panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J., Hudgins, D

    Allamandola, L. J., Hudgins, D. M., & Sandford, S. A. 1999, ApJ, 511, L115

    1999

  2. [2]

    J., Tielens, A

    Allamandola, L. J., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Barker, J. R. 1989, ApJS, 71, 733

    1989

  3. [3]

    T., Hunt, L

    Aniano, G., Draine, B. T., Hunt, L. K., et al. 2020, ApJ, 889, 150 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33

    2020

  4. [4]

    M., Rosolowsky, E., et al

    Baron, D., Sandstrom, K. M., Rosolowsky, E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 24

    2024

  5. [5]

    W., Peeters, E., & Allamandola, L

    Bauschlicher, Jr., C. W., Peeters, E., & Allamandola, L. J. 2008, ApJ, 678, 316

    2008

  6. [6]

    W., Peeters, E., & Allamandola, L

    Bauschlicher, Jr., C. W., Peeters, E., & Allamandola, L. J. 2009, ApJ, 697, 311

    2009

  7. [7]

    Bernard-Salas, J., Spoon, H. W. W., Charmandaris, V ., et al. 2009, ApJS, 184, 230

    2009

  8. [8]

    & Xilouris, E

    Bianchi, S. & Xilouris, E. M. 2011, A&A, 531, L11

    2011

  9. [9]

    K., & Schneider, R

    Bocchio, M., Bianchi, S., Hunt, L. K., & Schneider, R. 2016, A&A, 586, A8

    2016

  10. [10]

    R., Gautier, A.-L., & Jones, A

    Bocchio, M., Micelotta, E. R., Gautier, A.-L., & Jones, A. P. 2012, A&A, 545, A124

    2012

  11. [11]

    M., Neves, R., Pilling, S., Lago, A

    Boechat-Roberty, H. M., Neves, R., Pilling, S., Lago, A. F., & de Souza, G. G. B. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 810

    2009

  12. [12]

    W., Allamandola, L

    Boersma, C., Bauschlicher, C. W., Allamandola, L. J., et al. 2010, A&A, 511, A32

    2010

  13. [13]

    Boersma, C., Bregman, J., & Allamandola, L. J. 2014, ApJ, 795, 110

    2014

  14. [14]

    D., Levy, R

    Bolatto, A. D., Levy, R. C., Tarantino, E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 63

    2024

  15. [15]

    Witteborn, F. C. 1989, ApJ, 344, 791

    1989

  16. [16]

    N., Miller, E

    Bregman, J. N., Miller, E. D., Seitzer, P., Cowley, C. R., & Miller, M. J. 2013, ApJ, 766, 57 Article number, page 17 of 21 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aa58757-25

    2013

  17. [17]

    2020, A&A, 633, A100

    Casasola, V ., Bianchi, S., De Vis, P., et al. 2020, A&A, 633, A100

    2020

  18. [18]

    2022, A&A, 668, A130

    Casasola, V ., Bianchi, S., Magrini, L., et al. 2022, A&A, 668, A130

    2022

  19. [19]

    2024, A&A, 690, A348

    Chastenet, J., De Looze, I., Relaño, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A348

    2024

  20. [20]

    2019, ApJ, 876, 62

    Chastenet, J., Sandstrom, K., Chiang, I.-D., et al. 2019, ApJ, 876, 62

    2019

  21. [21]

    K., et al

    Chastenet, J., Sandstrom, K., Leroy, A. K., et al. 2025, ApJS, 276, 2

    2025

  22. [22]

    2021, MNRAS, 500, 1261

    Chown, R., Li, C., Parker, L., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 1261

    2021

  23. [23]

    2024, A&A, 685, A75

    Chown, R., Sidhu, A., Peeters, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A75

    2024

  24. [24]

    2012, A&A, 540, A52

    Cortese, L., Ciesla, L., Boselli, A., et al. 2012, A&A, 540, A52

    2012

  25. [25]

    2019, MNRAS, 482, 1618

    Cortzen, I., Garrett, J., Magdis, G., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 1618

    2019

  26. [26]

    I., Baes, M., Bianchi, S., et al

    Davies, J. I., Baes, M., Bianchi, S., et al. 2017, PASP, 129, 044102 De Looze, I., Lamperti, I., Saintonge, A., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 3668

    2017

  27. [27]

    P., Lai, T

    Donnelly, G. P., Lai, T. S. Y ., Armus, L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 983, 79

    2025

  28. [28]

    T., Dale, D

    Draine, B. T., Dale, D. A., Bendo, G., et al. 2007, ApJ, 663, 866

    2007

  29. [29]

    Draine, B. T. & Li, A. 2007, ApJ, 657, 810

    2007

  30. [30]

    T., Li, A., Hensley, B

    Draine, B. T., Li, A., Hensley, B. S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 917, 3

    2021

  31. [31]

    V ., Kreckel, K., Sandstrom, K

    Egorov, O. V ., Kreckel, K., Sandstrom, K. M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, L16

    2023

  32. [32]

    L., & Mac Low, M.-M

    Emerick, A., Bryan, G. L., & Mac Low, M.-M. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 1304

    2019

  33. [33]

    W., Gordon, K

    Engelbracht, C. W., Gordon, K. D., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2005, ApJ, 628, L29

    2005

  34. [34]

    Field, G. B. 1975, in The Dusty Universe, ed. G. B. Field & A. G. W. Cameron, 89–112

    1975

  35. [35]

    B., Bolatto, A

    Fisher, D. B., Bolatto, A. D., Chisholm, J., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 538, 3068

    2025

  36. [36]

    2011, A&A, 531, A64

    Fraternali, F., Sancisi, R., & Kamphuis, P. 2011, A&A, 531, A64

    2011

  37. [37]

    2008, ApJ, 672, 214

    Galliano, F., Dwek, E., & Chanial, P. 2008, ApJ, 672, 214

    2008

  38. [38]

    2021, A&A, 649, A18

    Galliano, F., Nersesian, A., Bianchi, S., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A18

    2021

  39. [39]

    2016, MNRAS, 456, 3432

    Girichidis, P., Walch, S., Naab, T., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 3432

    2016

  40. [40]

    D., Engelbracht, C

    Gordon, K. D., Engelbracht, C. W., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2008, ApJ, 682, 336

    2008

  41. [41]

    2011, ApJS, 197, 27

    Haan, S., Armus, L., Laine, S., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 27

    2011

  42. [42]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357

    2020

  43. [43]

    Heckman, T. M. 2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Se- ries, V ol. 254, Extragalactic Gas at Low Redshift, ed. J. S. Mulchaey & J. T. Stocke, 292

    2002

  44. [44]

    Hensley, B. S. & Draine, B. T. 2023, ApJ, 948, 55

    2023

  45. [45]

    S., Murray, C

    Hensley, B. S., Murray, C. E., & Dodici, M. 2022, ApJ, 929, 23

    2022

  46. [46]

    2001, A&A, 370, 1030

    Hony, S., Van Kerckhoven, C., Peeters, E., et al. 2001, A&A, 370, 1030

    2001

  47. [47]

    C., Lin, L., Lin, J

    Hsieh, B. C., Lin, L., Lin, J. H., et al. 2017, ApJ, 851, L24

    2017

  48. [48]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  49. [49]

    A., Kennedy, H., Parkin, T., & Madden, S

    Irwin, J. A., Kennedy, H., Parkin, T., & Madden, S. 2007, A&A, 474, 461

    2007

  50. [50]

    Irwin, J. A. & Madden, S. C. 2006, A&A, 445, 123

    2006

  51. [51]

    Joblin, C., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Allamandola, L. J., & Geballe, T. R. 1996, ApJ, 458, 610

    1996

  52. [52]

    P., Köhler, M., Ysard, N., Bocchio, M., & Verstraete, L

    Jones, A. P., Köhler, M., Ysard, N., Bocchio, M., & Verstraete, L. 2017, A&A, 602, A46

    2017

  53. [53]

    Kaufman, M. J. & Neufeld, D. A. 1996, ApJ, 456, 611

    1996

  54. [54]

    J., & Tielens, A

    Kemper, F., Vriend, W. J., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2004, ApJ, 609, 826

    2004

  55. [55]

    Kennicutt, R. C. & Evans, N. J. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 531

    2012

  56. [56]

    2022, MNRAS, 513, 3663

    Kerkeni, B., García-Bernete, I., Rigopoulou, D., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 3663

    2022

  57. [57]

    2025, A&A, 699, A133

    Khan, B., Abbott, B., Peeters, E., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A133

    2025

  58. [58]

    S.-Y ., Duval, S., Smith, J

    Lai, T. S.-Y ., Duval, S., Smith, J. D. T., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, L56

    2025

  59. [59]

    N., Gottesman, S

    Laine, S., Appleton, P. N., Gottesman, S. T., Ashby, M. L. N., & Garland, C. A. 2010, AJ, 140, 753

    2010

  60. [60]

    W., Irwin, J

    Lee, S. W., Irwin, J. A., Dettmar, R. J., et al. 2001, A&A, 377, 759

    2001

  61. [61]

    K., Sandstrom, K., Rosolowsky, E., et al

    Leroy, A. K., Sandstrom, K., Rosolowsky, E., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, L9

    2023

  62. [62]

    K., Walter, F., Brinks, E., et al

    Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., Brinks, E., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 2782

    2008

  63. [63]

    C., Bolatto, A

    Levy, R. C., Bolatto, A. D., Sánchez, S. F., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 84

    2019

  64. [64]

    C., Bolatto, A

    Levy, R. C., Bolatto, A. D., Teuben, P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 860, 92

    2018

  65. [65]

    L., et al

    Lin, L., Pan, H.-A., Ellison, S. L., et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, L33

    2019

  66. [66]

    K., et al

    Lopez, S., Ring, C., Leroy, A. K., et al. 2026, ApJ, 999, L7

    2026

  67. [67]

    J., et al

    Lu, L.-Y ., Li, J.-T., Vargas, C. J., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A217

    2024

  68. [68]

    Madden, S. C. 2005, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, V ol. 761, The Spectral Energy Distributions of Gas-Rich Galaxies: Confronting Models with Data, ed. C. C. Popescu & R. J. Tuffs, 223–230

    2005

  69. [69]

    C., Galliano, F., Jones, A

    Madden, S. C., Galliano, F., Jones, A. P., & Sauvage, M. 2006, A&A, 446, 877

    2006

  70. [70]

    & Mannucci, F

    Maiolino, R. & Mannucci, F. 2019, A&A Rev., 27, 3

    2019

  71. [71]

    2010, MN- RAS, 408, 2115

    Mannucci, F., Cresci, G., Maiolino, R., Marconi, A., & Gnerucci, A. 2010, MN- RAS, 408, 2115

    2010

  72. [72]

    D., & Allamandola, L

    Maragkoudakis, A., Boersma, C., Temi, P., Bregman, J. D., & Allamandola, L. J. 2022, ApJ, 931, 38

    2022

  73. [73]

    2025, ApJ, 979, 90

    Maragkoudakis, A., Boersma, C., Temi, P., et al. 2025, ApJ, 979, 90

    2025

  74. [74]

    2020, MNRAS, 494, 642

    Maragkoudakis, A., Peeters, E., & Ricca, A. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 642

    2020

  75. [75]

    2023, MNRAS, 520, 5354

    Maragkoudakis, A., Peeters, E., & Ricca, A. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 5354

    2023

  76. [76]

    S., Mezger, P

    Mathis, J. S., Mezger, P. G., & Panagia, N. 1983, A&A, 128, 212

    1983

  77. [77]

    2026, A&A, 705, A75

    Matsumoto, K., Sommovigo, L., Gebek, A., et al. 2026, A&A, 705, A75

    2026

  78. [78]

    2024, MNRAS, 530, 2548

    McCallum, L., Wood, K., Benjamin, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 2548

    2024

  79. [79]

    E., Huff, E

    McCleary, J. E., Huff, E. M., Bartlett, J. G., & Hensley, B. S. 2026, ApJ, 1000, 313 Ménard, B., Scranton, R., Fukugita, M., & Richards, G. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 1025

    2026

  80. [80]

    Min, M., Waters, L. B. F. M., de Koter, A., et al. 2008, A&A, 486, 779

    2008

Showing first 80 references.