Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 169 references

Dihadron Angular Correlations in the $e^+e^-$ Collision

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The authors obtain the full analytic O(alpha_s^2) partonic Wilson coefficients for the opening-angle distribution of two hadrons in e+e- -> H1 H2 + X, with pole cancellation in all channels validating collinear QCD factorization at…

desk verdict First NLO dihadron angular coefficient functions with strong internal cross-checks, but an obvious equation typo and hidden final expressions keep the central claim unverified. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.11463 v1 pith:ALWB3JJY submitted 2025-06-13 hep-ph

Wan-Li Ju , Zhe-Yan Shu , Tong-Zhi Yang , Zhen-Hua Zhang , Hua Xing Zhu This is my paper
classification hep-ph PACS 12.38.Bx13.66.Bc
keywords dihadronproductione+e-annihilationopeningangledistributionfragmentationfunctionsnext-to-leadingorderQCDcollinearfactorizationmasterintegralsdifferentialequations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to compute, for the first time, the complete next-to-leading-order (O($alpha_s^{2}$)) QCD correction to the angular separation distribution between two detected hadrons in e+e- annihilation, in the intermediate region where the hadrons are neither back-to-back nor collinear. The calculation produces analytic partonic coefficient functions C_{ij;q}(x1,x2,z) for the triply differential cross section, expressed in terms of ordinary logarithms and dilogarithms so they can be used in event generators. After combining double-real radiation, one-loop real-virtual corrections, and fragmentation-function counterterms, the 1/epsilon poles cancel exactly in every partonic channel, which the authors read as a nontrivial check that collinear factorization holds for this observable at NLO. If correct, this is the first NLO angular-dependent dihadron coefficient set and a necessary ingredient for precision comparisons with B-factory and future collider data.

What carries the argument

The engine is the evaluation of four-parton phase-space integrals by reverse unitarity, which re-expresses on-shell delta functions as differences of Feynman propagators; integration-by-parts (IBP) reduction then maps all double-real integrals to nine master integrals I1 through I9. The master integrals are solved through canonical differential equations in variables ($\alpha$, y, bar-y) satisfying y*bar-y = $m_X^{2}$; canonical forms with letter alphabets free of quadratic terms allow recursive solutions to weight five as Chen iterated integrals (Goncharov polylogarithms). Near $m_X^{2}$ -> 0, where IBP coefficients develop 1/$m_X^{2}$ singularities, the authors resum the higher-order epsilon terms for each master integral using the asymptotic form of the canonical equations, producing factors ($m_X^{2}$)^{-n_i*epsilon} that render the singular region well-defined; combined with star distributions [ln^k($m_X^{2}$)/$m_X^{2}$]_* for the convolution, this yields finite coefficient functions.

What would settle it

Take a physical point, for example (x1, x2, z) = (0.4, 0.3, 0.5) with Q much larger than Lambda_QCD, compute the O($alpha_s^{2}$) double-real, real-virtual, and counterterm contributions with an independent subtraction scheme, and compare the finite sum to the analytic C_{ij;q} from the ancillary files; any mismatch beyond numerical error, or any non-cancelling 1/epsilon pole, would disprove the claimed NLO coefficient functions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the NLO (O($alpha_s^{2}$)) Wilson coefficient functions entering the factorized dihadron cross section can be obtained in closed analytic form for the full kinematic range 0 < {x1,x2,z} < 1 with $m_X^{2}$ = 1 - x1 - x2 + x1*x2*z >= 0. The result is organized as a regular function R_{ij} plus, in the q-bar-q and q-g sectors, delta-function and star-distribution terms V_{ij}, U_{ij}^{[k]} that capture the ln($m_X^{2}$)/$m_X^{2}$ singular behavior as the invariant mass of the unseen partons vanishes. All other sectors, q-q-prime, q-prime-bar-q-prime, q-q, and g-g, are regular. The central technical claim is that after the real-virtual, double-real, and fragmentation-function-renormalization pieces are combined, the 1/epsilon poles cancel in every partonic channel, which the authors state provides a nontrivial validation of the collinear factorization formula at NLO.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes the collinear factorization ansatz of eq. (2.3), that the cross section is a convolution of two independent fragmentation functions with perturbative Wilson coefficients plus power-suppressed corrections, so if factorization fails or receives unsuppressed non-factorizing corrections, the physical meaning of the coefficient functions changes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The analytic NLO coefficients can be convoluted with any fitted fragmentation functions to produce NLO predictions for the dihadron opening-angle spectrum in e+e- annihilation, replacing the previous order-alpha_s-only description.
  • Because the poles cancel in every partonic sector, the result provides a nontrivial check that the product of two independent fragmentation functions captures the collinear physics of this observable at NLO.
  • The closed-form expressions in the ancillary files, built from logarithms and dilogarithms, are ready for implementation in Monte Carlo event generators without numerical loop integration.
  • The boundary analysis shows that within the physical domain the convolution integrals never hit x1,2 = 1, so no plus-distribution handling at that endpoint is needed at this order; this simplification is expected to persist at higher orders.
  • The table of leading asymptotic behaviors near x -> 0,1 and z -> 0,1 identifies which channels produce ln(m_X^2)/m_X^2, ln x / x, and similar enhanced terms, providing a map for future resummations in the collinear and back-to-back limits.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension, not claimed by the paper, is that the same IBP plus canonical-differential-equation machinery could be pushed to O(alpha_s^3), although the larger alphabet and the proliferation of overlapping limits make that a substantial project; the paper only says the weight-five solutions are preparation for future N^2LO analysis.
  • The singular-behavior map in the tables mirrors standard soft-gluon and collinear-splitting logarithms, so one could attempt to reproduce the leading terms from soft-collinear effective theory; the paper itself does not make that connection.
  • A quick numerical cross-check of the ancillary expressions against an independent NNLO subtraction code at a handful of phase-space points would settle the reliability of the analytic forms; the paper does not report such a direct numerical comparison of the final coefficient functions.
  • Near the back-to-back limit z -> 1, the fixed-order result develops ln(1-z)/(1-z) growth in several channels, so phenomenological use of these coefficients near that region will likely need a resummed companion calculation, a step the paper leaves implicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper computes the full analytic next-to-leading-order (O(alpha_s^2)) partonic Wilson coefficients C_ij;q(x1,x2,z) for the triply differential dihadron production cross section e+e- -> H1 H2 + X in the intermediate angular region, within the collinear factorization framework. The calculation combines double-real emission integrals (treated by reverse unitarity, IBP reduction, and differential equations in a canonical basis), real-virtual corrections (checked against ref. [115]), and fragmentation-function renormalization counterterms. The paper claims that all 1/epsilon poles cancel exactly in all partonic channels, thereby validating collinear factorization at NLO, and provides the finite coefficients in ancillary files.

Significance. If the results are correct, these are the first NLO angular-dependent dihadron coefficient functions, providing a new ingredient for phenomenological studies of angular correlations in e+e- annihilation. The paper has clear strengths: the real-virtual amplitude is cross-checked against ref. [115], the double-real squared amplitudes against ref. [133], and the master integrals are matched to about 90 significant digits against AMFlow and FiniteFlow. No parameters are fitted to data, and the boundary constants are fixed by external numerical benchmarks rather than by adjusting the final result. The claimed pole cancellation is a meaningful internal consistency check of the assumed factorized structure. However, the published master-integral relations contain an apparent internal inconsistency (I1=I7 vs I7=I2), and the final pole cancellation and coefficient functions are not displayed in the main text, so the central claim is not independently verifiable from the printed material.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.3 and Sec. 5] There is an internal inconsistency in the master-integral labeling. Eq. (3.38) defines I7 as equal to I2 via the k_c <-> k_d symmetry, with denominator (k_i+k_j+k_d)^2. Eq. (3.43), however, states I1 = I7. Since I1 (Eq. (3.32)) has no propagator denominator and I2 (Eq. (3.33)) has an additional propagator, the printed relations imply I1 = I2, which is contradicted by the explicit expressions in Eqs. (3.43) and (3.44). Moreover, the prefactor (Q2)^{(8-d)/2} in Eq. (3.38) appears to be the two-propagator prefactor; a single-propagator integral such as I7 should carry (Q2)^{(6-d)/2}. This must be corrected and clarified, because the claimed pole cancellation and the final coefficients depend on which master integrals are actually used in the IBP reduction.
  2. [Sec. 5] The central claim, that the 1/epsilon poles exactly cancel after combining double-real, real-virtual, and fragmentation-function counterterms, is only stated as 'we have checked' (Sec. 3.3, Sec. 5) and the final finite coefficient functions are relegated to ancillary files. Given the master-integral labeling issue above, this is not sufficient for the reader to verify the main result. Please provide an explicit demonstration for at least one representative partonic channel, e.g., the 1/epsilon coefficients before and after adding C^CT_ij;q, or a reproducible script that evaluates the cancellation from the ancillary expressions.
  3. [Sec. 2.1 and Sec. 5] The paper assumes the collinear factorization formula (2.3) and then interprets the observed pole cancellation as 'validation of collinear factorization.' The cancellation is a consistency check within the assumed factorized framework, not a proof that the factorized form is complete or that power-suppressed corrections are absent. Please rephrase the abstract and conclusion to say that the pole cancellation provides a non-trivial consistency check of collinear factorization, rather than a validation of the factorization itself.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (4.3)] The basis set l^(k) is listed as l^(0)=1, l^(1)=ln(2), l^(3)=ln(1-x1), ..., but l^(2) is missing. Please add the missing entry or renumber the list consistently.
  2. [Tables 1 and 2] The notation in Tables 1 and 2 is very dense (h^(l), s^(l), s-tilde, o^(l), o-tilde, etc.) and is not fully defined in the surrounding text. Please add explicit definitions or move the notation to an appendix.
  3. [Eq. (3.38)] In addition to the inconsistency raised in the major comments, the prefactor of I7 in Eq. (3.38) should be checked for dimensional consistency: with a single propagator denominator, the factor should be (Q2)^{(6-d)/2}, not (Q2)^{(8-d)/2}.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the NLO coefficient functions are computed from independent amplitudes and master integrals, benchmarked against external numerical integrators, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an analytic O(alpha_s^2) calculation of the partonic Wilson coefficients C_ij;q(x1,x2,z). The derivation chain is self-contained at the perturbative level: squared amplitudes are generated with FeynArts/FeynCalc, phase-space integrals are reduced by IBP with LiteRed, differential equations are solved with CANONICA in terms of GPLs, and the boundary constants of the master integrals are fixed by matching to high-precision numerical evaluations from AMFlow and FiniteFlow, followed by PSLQ identification with zeta values and powers of ln 2. This is an external numerical benchmark, not a fit to the quantity being predicted; the resulting analytic expressions are then checked against the same numerical integrators at random phase-space points to about 90 digits. No parameter is fitted to data and then called a prediction. The collinear factorization formula (2.3) is an input taken from the standard literature [1-5]; the paper does not derive factorization from its own calculation. The statement that the 1/epsilon poles cancel after adding the fragmentation-function counterterms is a consistency check of that assumed factorized structure, not a circular derivation of the coefficients: the counterterms are fixed by the standard FF renormalization and splitting functions, not by demanding cancellation. The self-citations in the paper, including [133] used to cross-check double-real squared amplitudes, are not load-bearing: the amplitudes are independently generated by computer algebra, and the cited agreement is a validation rather than the source of the result. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in via a self-citation. The internal inconsistency noted by the skeptic, involving I1=I7 versus I7=I2, is a correctness concern about the labeling of master integrals, not an example of circular reasoning, and it does not affect the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; constants in the master integral boundary conditions are fixed by matching to independent high-precision numerical values (AMFlow and FiniteFlow) and recognized via PSLQ. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Collinear factorization formula, eq. (2.3)
    The physical cross section is assumed to factorize into two independent fragmentation functions and a perturbative Wilson coefficient, with power-suppressed corrections in m12/Lambda_QCD.
  • standard math Dimensional regularization with MS renormalization
    Used throughout for UV and IR regularization; standard in perturbative QCD calculations.
  • standard math Reverse unitarity and IBP/DE reduction
    Phase-space integrals are converted into cut-propagator integrals and reduced via integration-by-parts; standard technique in multi-loop calculations.
  • domain assumption Physical domain constraints, eq. (2.8)
    The paper argues that within m_X^2 >= 0 the integration limits never hit x = 1, so denominators (1 - x) can be treated as regular functions without plus distributions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dihadron Angular Correlations in the $e^+e^-$ Collision." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ALWB3JJY

@misc{pith2026250611463,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dihadron Angular Correlations in the $e^+e^-$ Collision},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ALWB3JJY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11463}
}
abstract

The precision of fixed-order calculations on the dihadron production in electron-positron annihilation is paramount for probing QCD factorization and constraining non-perturbative inputs. This paper investigates the QCD corrections to the angular separation distribution $\theta_{12}$ between two observed hadrons, $H_1$ and $H_2$, in the process $e^+e^- \to H_1 H_2 + X$ up to $\mathcal{O}(\alpha_s^2)$, with particular emphasis on the intermediate region $\theta_{12} \in (0,\pi)$. The partonic processes at this accuracy consist of two sorts of contributions, the real-virtual and double-real corrections. Of them, the evaluation of four-body phase space integrals in the latter case is at the core of this study. To address them, we first employ the integration-by-parts (IBP) identities to reduce the number of independent integrals and then apply the differential equations (DE) method to recursively solve the resulting master integrals. In kinematic regions where the invariant mass of the unresolved partons vanishes, IBP coefficients can develop divergences. To this end, we resum higher-order terms in the dimensional regulator for each master integral based on the asymptotic behavior of the canonical DEs. After combining the real and virtual corrections with the counter terms from fragmentation function renormalization, we demonstrate that the pole terms in the final analytic expressions exactly cancel out in all partonic channels, thereby providing a non-trivial validation of collinear factorization at the next-to-leading order (NLO). Eventually, when presenting our analytic expressions of the finite partonic coefficients, we transform the transcendental functions resulting from the DE solutions into classical (poly)logarithmic functions, in order to facilitate the implementation in event generators.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

169 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

  1. [115]

    Ellis, D.A

    R.K. Ellis, D.A. Ross and A.E. Terrano, The Perturbative Calculation of Jet Structure in e+ e- Annihilation , Nucl. Phys. B 178 (1981) 421

    1981

  2. [133]

    Dixon, M.-X

    L.J. Dixon, M.-X. Luo, V. Shtabovenko, T.-Z. Yang and H.X. Zhu, Analytical Computation of Energy-Energy Correlation at Next-to-Leading Order in QCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 102001 [ 1801.03219]

    arXiv 2018

  3. [1]

    Collins, D.E

    J.C. Collins, D.E. Soper and G.F. Sterman, Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD , Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 5 (1989) 1 [ hep-ph/0409313]

    arXiv 1989

  4. [2]

    Collins and G.F

    J.C. Collins and G.F. Sterman, Soft Partons in QCD , Nucl. Phys. B 185 (1981) 172

    1981

  5. [3]

    Amati, R

    D. Amati, R. Petronzio and G. Veneziano, Relating Hard QCD Processes Through Universality of Mass Singularities. 2. , Nucl. Phys. B 146 (1978) 29

    1978

  6. [4]

    Ellis, H

    R.K. Ellis, H. Georgi, M. Machacek, H.D. Politzer and G.G. Ross, Perturbation Theory and the Parton Model in QCD , Nucl. Phys. B 152 (1979) 285

    1979

  7. [5]

    Libby and G.F

    S.B. Libby and G.F. Sterman, Jet and Lepton Pair Production in High-Energy Lepton-Hadron and Hadron-Hadron Scattering, Phys. Rev. D 18 (1978) 3252

    1978

  8. [6]

    Almasy, S

    A.A. Almasy, S. Moch and A. Vogt, On the Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Evolution of Flavour-Singlet Fragmentation Functions, Nucl. Phys. B 854 (2012) 133 [ 1107.2263]

    arXiv 2012

Show all 169 references
  1. [7]

    Rijken and W.L

    P.J. Rijken and W.L. van Neerven, O (alpha-s**2) contributions to the longitudinal fragmentation function in e+ e- annihilation , Phys. Lett. B 386 (1996) 422 [hep-ph/9604436]

    1996 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Rijken and W.L

    P.J. Rijken and W.L. van Neerven, O (alpha-s**2) contributions to the asymmetric fragmentation function in e+ e- annihilation , Phys. Lett. B 392 (1997) 207 [hep-ph/9609379]

    1997 arXiv

  3. [9]

    Rijken and W.L

    P.J. Rijken and W.L. van Neerven, Higher order QCD corrections to the transverse and longitudinal fragmentation functions in electron - positron annihilation , Nucl. Phys. B 487 (1997) 233 [ hep-ph/9609377]

    1997 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Mitov and S.-O

    A. Mitov and S.-O. Moch, QCD Corrections to Semi-Inclusive Hadron Production in Electron-Positron Annihilation at Two Loops , Nucl. Phys. B 751 (2006) 18 [hep-ph/0604160]

    2006 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Xu and H.X

    Z. Xu and H.X. Zhu, Threshold Resummation for Semi-Inclusive Single-Hadron Production with Effective Field Theory , 2411.11595

    arXiv

  6. [12]

    C.-Q. He, H. Xing, T.-Z. Yang and H.X. Zhu, Single-inclusive hadron production in electron-positron annihilation at next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD , 2503.20441. – 41 –

    arXiv

  7. [13]

    Goyal, S.-O

    S. Goyal, S.-O. Moch, V. Pathak, N. Rana and V. Ravindran, Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order QCD Corrections to Semi-Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 251902 [ 2312.17711]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Bonino, T

    L. Bonino, T. Gehrmann and G. Stagnitto, Semi-Inclusive Deep-Inelastic Scattering at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order in QCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) 251901 [ 2401.16281]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [15]

    C. Liu, X. Shen, B. Zhou and J. Gao, Automated calculation of jet fragmentation at NLO in QCD, JHEP 09 (2023) 108 [ 2305.14620]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Zhou and J

    B. Zhou and J. Gao, The impact of data from future lepton colliders on light hadrons fragmentation functions, JHEP 02 (2025) 003 [ 2407.10059]

    2025 arXiv

  11. [17]

    NNPDF collaboration, A determination of the fragmentation functions of pions, kaons, and protons with faithful uncertainties , Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 516 [ 1706.07049]

    2017 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Soleymaninia, M

    M. Soleymaninia, M. Goharipour and H. Khanpour, First QCD analysis of charged hadron fragmentation functions and their uncertainties at next-to-next-to-leading order , Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 074002 [ 1805.04847]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Borsa, R

    I. Borsa, R. Sassot, D. de Florian, M. Stratmann and W. Vogelsang, Towards a Global QCD Analysis of Fragmentation Functions at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Accuracy , Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 012002 [ 2202.05060]

    2022 arXiv

  14. [20]

    MAP (Multi-dimensional Analyses of Partonic distributions)collaboration, Pion and kaon fragmentation functions at next-to-next-to-leading order , Phys. Lett. B 834 (2022) 137456 [2204.10331]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [21]

    J. Gao, X. Shen, H. Xing, Y. Zhao and B. Zhou, Fragmentation functions of charged hadrons at next-to-next-to-leading order and constraints on proton PDFs , 2502.17837

    arXiv

  16. [22]

    J. Gao, C. Liu, M. Li, X. Shen, H. Xing, Y. Zhao et al., Global analysis of fragmentation functions to light neutral hadrons , 2503.21311

  17. [23]

    Collins and D.E

    J.C. Collins and D.E. Soper, Transverse Momentum in e+e− → a + B + X , Acta Phys. Polon. B 16 (1985) 1047

    1985

  18. [24]

    Collins and D.E

    J.C. Collins and D.E. Soper, Back-To-Back Jets in QCD , Nucl. Phys. B 193 (1981) 381

    1981

  19. [25]

    Collins and D.E

    J.C. Collins and D.E. Soper, Back-To-Back Jets: Fourier Transform from B to K-Transverse, Nucl. Phys. B 197 (1982) 446

    1982

  20. [26]

    Collins, D.E

    J.C. Collins, D.E. Soper and G.F. Sterman, Transverse Momentum Distribution in Drell-Yan Pair and W and Z Boson Production , Nucl. Phys. B 250 (1985) 199

    1985

  21. [27]

    Catani, D

    S. Catani, D. de Florian and M. Grazzini, Universality of nonleading logarithmic contributions in transverse momentum distributions , Nucl. Phys. B 596 (2001) 299 [hep-ph/0008184]

    2001 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Bozzi, S

    G. Bozzi, S. Catani, D. de Florian and M. Grazzini, Transverse-momentum resummation and the spectrum of the Higgs boson at the LHC , Nucl. Phys. B 737 (2006) 73 [hep-ph/0508068]

    2006 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Bozzi, S

    G. Bozzi, S. Catani, D. de Florian and M. Grazzini, Higgs boson production at the LHC: Transverse-momentum resummation and rapidity dependence, Nucl. Phys. B 791 (2008) 1 [0705.3887]

    2008 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Collins, Foundations of Perturbative QCD , vol

    J. Collins, Foundations of Perturbative QCD , vol. 32, Cambridge University Press (2011), 10.1017/9781009401845. – 42 –

    2011 doi

  25. [31]

    Ebert and F.J

    M.A. Ebert and F.J. Tackmann, Resummation of Transverse Momentum Distributions in Distribution Space, JHEP 02 (2017) 110 [ 1611.08610]

    2017 arXiv

  26. [32]

    Monni, E

    P.F. Monni, E. Re and P. Torrielli, Higgs Transverse-Momentum Resummation in Direct Space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 242001 [ 1604.02191]

    2016 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Bizon, P.F

    W. Bizon, P.F. Monni, E. Re, L. Rottoli and P. Torrielli, Momentum-space resummation for transverse observables and the Higgs p ⊥ at N 3LL+NNLO, JHEP 02 (2018) 108 [1705.09127]

    2018 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Bizon, A

    W. Bizon, A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, N. Glover, A. Huss, P.F. Monni et al., The transverse momentum spectrum of weak gauge bosons at N 3 LL + NNLO , Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 868 [ 1905.05171]

    2019 arXiv

  29. [35]

    Bizo´ n, X

    W. Bizo´ n, X. Chen, A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, N. Glover, A. Huss et al., Fiducial distributions in Higgs and Drell-Yan production at N 3LL+NNLO, JHEP 12 (2018) 132 [1805.05916]

    2018 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Becher and M

    T. Becher and M. Neubert, Drell-Yan Production at Small qT , Transverse Parton Distributions and the Collinear Anomaly , Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1665 [ 1007.4005]

    2011 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Echevarria, A

    M.G. Echevarria, A. Idilbi and I. Scimemi, Factorization Theorem For Drell-Yan At Low qT And Transverse Momentum Distributions On-The-Light-Cone , JHEP 07 (2012) 002 [1111.4996]

    2012 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Becher and G

    T. Becher and G. Bell, Analytic Regularization in Soft-Collinear Effective Theory , Phys. Lett. B 713 (2012) 41 [ 1112.3907]

    2012 arXiv

  33. [39]

    J.-y. Chiu, A. Jain, D. Neill and I.Z. Rothstein, The Rapidity Renormalization Group , Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 151601 [ 1104.0881]

    2012 arXiv

  34. [40]

    J.-Y. Chiu, A. Jain, D. Neill and I.Z. Rothstein, A Formalism for the Systematic Treatment of Rapidity Logarithms in Quantum Field Theory , JHEP 05 (2012) 084 [ 1202.0814]

    2012 arXiv

  35. [41]

    Y. Li, D. Neill and H.X. Zhu, An exponential regulator for rapidity divergences , Nucl. Phys. B 960 (2020) 115193 [ 1604.00392]

    2020 arXiv

  36. [42]

    Li and H.X

    Y. Li and H.X. Zhu, Bootstrapping Rapidity Anomalous Dimensions for Transverse-Momentum Resummation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 022004 [ 1604.01404]

    2017 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Moult and H.X

    I. Moult and H.X. Zhu, Simplicity from Recoil: The Three-Loop Soft Function and Factorization for the Energy-Energy Correlation , JHEP 08 (2018) 160 [ 1801.02627]

    2018 arXiv

  38. [44]

    Moffat, T.C

    E. Moffat, T.C. Rogers, N. Sato and A. Signori, Collinear factorization in wide-angle hadron pair production in e+e− annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 094014 [ 1909.02951]

    2019 arXiv

  39. [45]

    Hautmann, M

    F. Hautmann, M. Hentschinski, L. Keersmaekers, A. Kusina, K. Kutak and A. Lelek, A parton branching with transverse momentum dependent splitting functions , Phys. Lett. B 833 (2022) 137276 [ 2205.15873]

    2022 arXiv

  40. [46]

    Gao, H.T

    A. Gao, H.T. Li, I. Moult and H.X. Zhu, The transverse energy-energy correlator at next-to-next-to-next-to-leading logarithm, JHEP 09 (2024) 072 [ 2312.16408]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [47]

    Boussarie et al., TMD Handbook, 2304.03302

    R. Boussarie et al., TMD Handbook, 2304.03302

    arXiv

  42. [48]

    Ji, J.-p

    X.-d. Ji, J.-p. Ma and F. Yuan, QCD factorization for semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering at low transverse momentum , Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 034005 [ hep-ph/0404183]. – 43 –

    2005 arXiv

  43. [49]

    Ji, J.-P

    X.-d. Ji, J.-P. Ma and F. Yuan, QCD factorization for spin-dependent cross sections in DIS and Drell-Yan processes at low transverse momentum , Phys. Lett. B 597 (2004) 299 [hep-ph/0405085]

    2004 arXiv

  44. [50]

    Bacchetta, M

    A. Bacchetta, M. Diehl, K. Goeke, A. Metz, P.J. Mulders and M. Schlegel, Semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering at small transverse momentum , JHEP 02 (2007) 093 [hep-ph/0611265]

    2007 arXiv

  45. [51]

    Bacchetta, F

    A. Bacchetta, F. Delcarro, C. Pisano, M. Radici and A. Signori, Extraction of partonic transverse momentum distributions from semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering, Drell-Yan and Z-boson production, JHEP 06 (2017) 081 [ 1703.10157]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [52]

    Z.-B. Kang, A. Prokudin, P. Sun and F. Yuan, Extraction of Quark Transversity Distribution and Collins Fragmentation Functions with QCD Evolution , Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 014009 [ 1505.05589]

    2016 arXiv

  47. [53]

    Bastami et al., Semi-Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering in Wandzura-Wilczek-type approximation, JHEP 06 (2019) 007 [ 1807.10606]

    S. Bastami et al., Semi-Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering in Wandzura-Wilczek-type approximation, JHEP 06 (2019) 007 [ 1807.10606]

    2019 arXiv

  48. [54]

    D. Boer, L. Gamberg, B. Musch and A. Prokudin, Bessel-Weighted Asymmetries in Semi Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering , JHEP 10 (2011) 021 [ 1107.5294]

    2011 arXiv

  49. [55]

    Collins and A

    J.C. Collins and A. Metz, Universality of soft and collinear factors in hard-scattering factorization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 252001 [ hep-ph/0408249]

    2004 arXiv

  50. [56]

    S.-C. Xue, X. Wang, D.-M. Li and Z. Lu, The Collins asymmetry in electroproduction of Kaon at the electron ion colliders within TMD factorization , Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 685 [2003.05679]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [57]

    P. Sun, J. Isaacson, C.P. Yuan and F. Yuan, Nonperturbative functions for SIDIS and Drell–Yan processes, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33 (2018) 1841006 [ 1406.3073]

    2018 arXiv

  52. [58]

    H.T. Li, I. Vitev and Y.J. Zhu, Transverse-Energy-Energy Correlations in Deep Inelastic Scattering, JHEP 11 (2020) 051 [ 2006.02437]

    2020 arXiv

  53. [59]

    Caucal, F

    P. Caucal, F. Salazar, B. Schenke, T. Stebel and R. Venugopalan, Back-to-back inclusive dijets in DIS at small x: gluon Weizs¨ acker-Williams distribution at NLO , JHEP 08 (2023) 062 [2304.03304]

    2023 arXiv

  54. [60]

    Scimemi and A

    I. Scimemi and A. Vladimirov, Non-perturbative structure of semi-inclusive deep-inelastic and Drell-Yan scattering at small transverse momentum , JHEP 06 (2020) 137 [1912.06532]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [61]

    M. Bury, A. Prokudin and A. Vladimirov, Extraction of the Sivers function from SIDIS, Drell-Yan, and W ±/Z boson production data with TMD evolution , JHEP 05 (2021) 151 [2103.03270]

    2021 arXiv

  56. [62]

    H.T. Li, Y. Makris and I. Vitev, Energy-energy correlators in Deep Inelastic Scattering , Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 094005 [ 2102.05669]

    2021 arXiv

  57. [63]

    Bhattacharya, Z.-B

    S. Bhattacharya, Z.-B. Kang, D. Padilla and J. Penttala, Probing the Sivers Asymmetry with Transverse Energy-Energy Correlators in the Small- x Regime, 2504.10475

    arXiv

  58. [64]

    Bozzi, S

    G. Bozzi, S. Catani, G. Ferrera, D. de Florian and M. Grazzini, Production of Drell-Yan lepton pairs in hadron collisions: Transverse-momentum resummation at next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy, Phys. Lett. B 696 (2011) 207 [ 1007.2351]. – 44 –

    2011 arXiv

  59. [65]

    Becher, M

    T. Becher, M. Neubert and D. Wilhelm, Electroweak Gauge-Boson Production at Small qT : Infrared Safety from the Collinear Anomaly , JHEP 02 (2012) 124 [ 1109.6027]

    2012 arXiv

  60. [66]

    Banfi, M

    A. Banfi, M. Dasgupta and S. Marzani, QCD predictions for new variables to study dilepton transverse momenta at hadron colliders , Phys. Lett. B 701 (2011) 75 [ 1102.3594]

    2011 arXiv

  61. [67]

    Banfi, M

    A. Banfi, M. Dasgupta, S. Marzani and L. Tomlinson, Probing the low transverse momentum domain of Z production with novel variables , JHEP 01 (2012) 044 [ 1110.4009]

    2012 arXiv

  62. [68]

    Banfi, M

    A. Banfi, M. Dasgupta, S. Marzani and L. Tomlinson, Predictions for Drell-Yan ϕ∗ and QT observables at the LHC , Phys. Lett. B 715 (2012) 152 [ 1205.4760]

    2012 arXiv

  63. [69]

    Catani, D

    S. Catani, D. de Florian, G. Ferrera and M. Grazzini, Vector boson production at hadron colliders: transverse-momentum resummation and leptonic decay , JHEP 12 (2015) 047 [1507.06937]

    2015 arXiv

  64. [70]

    Scimemi and A

    I. Scimemi and A. Vladimirov, Analysis of vector boson production within TMD factorization, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 89 [ 1706.01473]

    2018 arXiv

  65. [71]

    Bacchetta, V

    A. Bacchetta, V. Bertone, C. Bissolotti, G. Bozzi, F. Delcarro, F. Piacenza et al., Transverse-momentum-dependent parton distributions up to N 3LL from Drell-Yan data , JHEP 07 (2020) 117 [ 1912.07550]

    2020 arXiv

  66. [72]

    Becher and T

    T. Becher and T. Neumann, Fiducial qT resummation of color-singlet processes at N3LL+NNLO, JHEP 03 (2021) 199 [ 2009.11437]

    2021 arXiv

  67. [73]

    Ebert, J.K.L

    M.A. Ebert, J.K.L. Michel, I.W. Stewart and F.J. Tackmann, Drell-Yan qT resummation of fiducial power corrections at N 3LL, JHEP 04 (2021) 102 [ 2006.11382]

    2021 arXiv

  68. [74]

    E. Re, L. Rottoli and P. Torrielli, Fiducial Higgs and Drell-Yan distributions at N3LL′+NNLO with RadISH , 2104.07509

    arXiv

  69. [75]

    Camarda, L

    S. Camarda, L. Cieri and G. Ferrera, Drell–Yan lepton-pair production: qT resummation at N3LL accuracy and fiducial cross sections at N3LO , Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) L111503 [2103.04974]

    2021 arXiv

  70. [76]

    Ju and M

    W.-L. Ju and M. Sch¨ onherr,The q T and ∆ϕ spectra in W and Z production at the LHC at N3LL’+N2LO, JHEP 10 (2021) 088 [ 2106.11260]

    2021 arXiv

  71. [77]

    Camarda, L

    S. Camarda, L. Cieri and G. Ferrera, Drell–Yan lepton-pair production: qT resummation at N4LL accuracy, Phys. Lett. B 845 (2023) 138125 [ 2303.12781]

    2023 arXiv

  72. [78]

    Neumann and J

    T. Neumann and J. Campbell, Fiducial Drell-Yan production at the LHC improved by transverse-momentum resummation at N4LLp+N3LO , Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) L011506 [2207.07056]

    2023 arXiv

  73. [79]

    V. Moos, I. Scimemi, A. Vladimirov and P. Zurita, Extraction of unpolarized transverse momentum distributions from the fit of Drell-Yan data at N 4LL, JHEP 05 (2024) 036 [2305.07473]

    2024 arXiv

  74. [80]

    Bubanja et al., The small kTregion in Drell–Yan production at next-to-leading order with the parton branching method , Eur

    I. Bubanja et al., The small kTregion in Drell–Yan production at next-to-leading order with the parton branching method , Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 154 [ 2312.08655]

    2024 arXiv

  75. [81]

    Billis, J.K.L

    G. Billis, J.K.L. Michel and F.J. Tackmann, Drell-Yan transverse-momentum spectra at N3LL′ and approximate N 4LL with SCETlib , JHEP 02 (2025) 170 [ 2411.16004]

    2025 arXiv

  76. [82]

    Hautmann, L

    F. Hautmann, L. Keersmaekers, A. Lelek, S.S. Barzani and S. Taheri Monfared, Collinear and TMD distributions with dynamical soft-gluon resolution scale , 2502.19380. – 45 –

    arXiv

  77. [83]

    Belle collaboration, Measurement of azimuthal asymmetries in inclusive production of hadron pairs in e+ e- annihilation at Belle , Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 232002 [hep-ex/0507063]

    2006 arXiv

  78. [84]

    Belle collaboration, Measurement of Azimuthal Asymmetries in Inclusive Production of Hadron Pairs in e+e- Annihilation at s**(1/2) = 10.58-GeV , Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 032011 [0805.2975]

    2008 arXiv

  79. [85]

    Belle collaboration, Azimuthal asymmetries of back-to-back π± − (π0, η, π±) pairs in e+e− annihilation, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 092008 [ 1909.01857]

    2019 arXiv

  80. [86]

    BaBar collaboration, Measurement of Collins asymmetries in inclusive production of charged pion pairs in e+e− annihilation at BABAR , Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 052003 [1309.5278]

    2014 arXiv

  81. [87]

    BESIII collaboration, Measurement of azimuthal asymmetries in inclusive charged dipion production in e+e− annihilations at √s = 3.65 GeV , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 042001 [1507.06824]

    2016 arXiv

  82. [88]

    Boer, Angular dependences in inclusive two-hadron production at BELLE , Nucl

    D. Boer, Angular dependences in inclusive two-hadron production at BELLE , Nucl. Phys. B 806 (2009) 23 [ 0804.2408]

    2009 arXiv

  83. [89]

    Metz and A

    A. Metz and A. Vossen, Parton Fragmentation Functions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 91 (2016) 136 [ 1607.02521]

    2016 arXiv

  84. [90]

    Collins, S.F

    J.C. Collins, S.F. Heppelmann and G.A. Ladinsky, Measuring transversity densities in singly polarized hadron hadron and lepton - hadron collisions , Nucl. Phys. B 420 (1994) 565 [hep-ph/9305309]

    1994 arXiv

  85. [91]

    Bianconi, S

    A. Bianconi, S. Boffi, R. Jakob and M. Radici, Two hadron interference fragmentation functions. Part 1. General framework , Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 034008 [ hep-ph/9907475]

    2000 arXiv

  86. [92]

    Collins, Fragmentation of transversely polarized quarks probed in transverse momentum distributions, Nucl

    J.C. Collins, Fragmentation of transversely polarized quarks probed in transverse momentum distributions, Nucl. Phys. B 396 (1993) 161 [ hep-ph/9208213]

    1993 arXiv

  87. [93]

    Ju and M

    W.-L. Ju and M. Sch¨ onherr,Projected transverse momentum resummation in top-antitop pair production at LHC , JHEP 02 (2023) 075 [ 2210.09272]

    2023 arXiv

  88. [94]

    Catani, M

    S. Catani, M. Grazzini and H. Sargsyan, Azimuthal asymmetries in QCD hard scattering: infrared safe but divergent , JHEP 06 (2017) 017 [ 1703.08468]

    2017 arXiv

  89. [95]

    Konishi, A

    K. Konishi, A. Ukawa and G. Veneziano, Jet Calculus: A Simple Algorithm for Resolving QCD Jets , Nucl. Phys. B 157 (1979) 45

    1979

  90. [96]

    Sukhatme and K.E

    U.P. Sukhatme and K.E. Lassila, Q2 Evolution of Multi - Hadron Fragmentation Functions , Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 1184

    1980

  91. [97]

    de Florian and L

    D. de Florian and L. Vanni, Two hadron production in e+ e- annihilation to next-to-leading order accuracy, Phys. Lett. B 578 (2004) 139 [ hep-ph/0310196]

    2004 arXiv

  92. [98]

    H. Chen, M. Jaarsma, Y. Li, I. Moult, W.J. Waalewijn and H.X. Zhu, Multi-collinear splitting kernels for track function evolution , JHEP 07 (2023) 185 [ 2210.10058]

    2023 arXiv

  93. [99]

    H. Chen, M. Jaarsma, Y. Li, I. Moult, W.J. Waalewijn and H.X. Zhu, Collinear parton dynamics beyond Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi framework , Phys. Rev. D 111 (2025) 076021 [ 2210.10061]

    2025 arXiv

  94. [100]

    Majumder and X.-N

    A. Majumder and X.-N. Wang, The Dihadron fragmentation function and its evolution , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 014007 [ hep-ph/0402245]. – 46 –

    2004 arXiv

  95. [101]

    Majumder and X.-N

    A. Majumder and X.-N. Wang, Evolution of the parton dihadron fragmentation functions , Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 034007 [ hep-ph/0411174]

    2005 arXiv

  96. [102]

    Ceccopieri, M

    F.A. Ceccopieri, M. Radici and A. Bacchetta, Evolution equations for extended dihadron fragmentation functions, Phys. Lett. B 650 (2007) 81 [ hep-ph/0703265]

    2007 arXiv

  97. [103]

    Bacchetta, F.A

    A. Bacchetta, F.A. Ceccopieri, A. Mukherjee and M. Radici, Asymmetries involving dihadron fragmentation functions: from DIS to e+e- annihilation , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 034029 [0812.0611]

    2009 arXiv

  98. [104]

    Bacchetta, A

    A. Bacchetta, A. Courtoy and M. Radici, First glances at the transversity parton distribution through dihadron fragmentation functions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 012001 [1104.3855]

    2011 arXiv

  99. [105]

    Courtoy, A

    A. Courtoy, A. Bacchetta, M. Radici and A. Bianconi, First extraction of Interference Fragmentation Functions from e+e− data, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 114023 [ 1202.0323]

    2012 arXiv

  100. [106]

    Bacchetta, A

    A. Bacchetta, A. Courtoy and M. Radici, First extraction of valence transversities in a collinear framework, JHEP 03 (2013) 119 [ 1212.3568]

    2013 arXiv

  101. [107]

    Radici, A

    M. Radici, A. Courtoy, A. Bacchetta and M. Guagnelli, Improved extraction of valence transversity distributions from inclusive dihadron production , JHEP 05 (2015) 123 [1503.03495]

    2015 arXiv

  102. [108]

    Jefferson Lab Angular Momentum (JAM)collaboration, First simultaneous global QCD analysis of dihadron fragmentation functions and transversity parton distribution functions, Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) 034024 [ 2308.14857]

    2024 arXiv

  103. [109]

    Belle collaboration, Invariant-mass and fractional-energy dependence of inclusive production of di-hadrons in e+e− annihilation at √s = 10.58 GeV , Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 032005 [1706.08348]

    2017 arXiv

  104. [110]

    Wang, J.O

    B. Wang, J.O. Gonzalez-Hernandez, T.C. Rogers and N. Sato, Large Transverse Momentum in Semi-Inclusive Deeply Inelastic Scattering Beyond Lowest Order , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 094029 [1903.01529]

    2019 arXiv

  105. [111]

    Daleo, D

    A. Daleo, D. de Florian and R. Sassot, O(alpha**2(s)) QCD corrections to the electroproduction of hadrons with high transverse momentum , Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 034013 [hep-ph/0411212]

    2005 arXiv

  106. [112]

    Gonsalves, J

    R.J. Gonsalves, J. Pawlowski and C.-F. Wai, QCD Radiative Corrections to Electroweak Boson Production at Large Transverse Momentum in Hadron Collisions , Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 2245

    1989

  107. [113]

    Ellis, G

    R.K. Ellis, G. Martinelli and R. Petronzio, Second Order Corrections to the Drell-Yan Process at Large Transverse Momentum, Phys. Lett. B 104 (1981) 45

    1981

  108. [114]

    Ellis, G

    R.K. Ellis, G. Martinelli and R. Petronzio, Lepton Pair Production at Large Transverse Momentum in Second Order QCD , Nucl. Phys. B 211 (1983) 106

    1983

  109. [116]

    Kublbeck, M

    J. Kublbeck, M. Bohm and A. Denner, Feyn Arts: Computer Algebraic Generation of Feynman Graphs and Amplitudes , Comput. Phys. Commun. 60 (1990) 165

    1990

  110. [117]

    Shtabovenko, R

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig and F. Orellana, FeynCalc 10: Do multiloop integrals dream of computer codes?, Comput. Phys. Commun. 306 (2025) 109357 [ 2312.14089]. – 47 –

    2025 arXiv

  111. [118]

    Shtabovenko, R

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig and F. Orellana, FeynCalc 9.3: New features and improvements , Comput. Phys. Commun. 256 (2020) 107478 [ 2001.04407]

    2020 arXiv

  112. [119]

    Shtabovenko, R

    V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig and F. Orellana, New Developments in FeynCalc 9.0 , Comput. Phys. Commun. 207 (2016) 432 [ 1601.01167]

    2016 arXiv

  113. [120]

    Mertig, M

    R. Mertig, M. Bohm and A. Denner, FEYN CALC: Computer algebraic calculation of Feynman amplitudes, Comput. Phys. Commun. 64 (1991) 345

    1991

  114. [121]

    Shtabovenko, FeynHelpers: Connecting FeynCalc to FIRE and Package-X , Comput

    V. Shtabovenko, FeynHelpers: Connecting FeynCalc to FIRE and Package-X , Comput. Phys. Commun. 218 (2017) 48 [ 1611.06793]

    2017 arXiv

  115. [122]

    Tkachov, A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions, Phys

    F.V. Tkachov, A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions, Phys. Lett. B 100 (1981) 65

    1981

  116. [123]

    Chetyrkin and F.V

    K.G. Chetyrkin and F.V. Tkachov, Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops , Nucl. Phys. B 192 (1981) 159

    1981

  117. [124]

    Laporta, High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations, Int

    S. Laporta, High-precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15 (2000) 5087 [ hep-ph/0102033]

    2000 arXiv

  118. [125]

    Kotikov, Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation, Phys

    A.V. Kotikov, Differential equations method: New technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation, Phys. Lett. B 254 (1991) 158

    1991

  119. [126]

    Remiddi, Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes , Nuovo Cim

    E. Remiddi, Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes , Nuovo Cim. A 110 (1997) 1435 [ hep-th/9711188]

    1997 arXiv

  120. [127]

    Gehrmann and E

    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi, Differential equations for two-loop four-point functions , Nucl. Phys. B 580 (2000) 485 [ hep-ph/9912329]

    2000 arXiv

  121. [128]

    Argeri and P

    M. Argeri and P. Mastrolia, Feynman Diagrams and Differential Equations , Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 22 (2007) 4375 [ 0707.4037]

    2007 arXiv

  122. [129]

    Henn, Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple , Phys

    J.M. Henn, Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple , Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 251601 [ 1304.1806]

    2013 arXiv

  123. [130]

    Collins, INTRINSIC TRANSVERSE MOMENTUM

    J.C. Collins, INTRINSIC TRANSVERSE MOMENTUM. 1. NONGAUGE THEORIES , Phys. Rev. D 21 (1980) 2962

    1980

  124. [131]

    Collins, D.E

    J.C. Collins, D.E. Soper and G.F. Sterman, Factorization for Short Distance Hadron - Hadron Scattering, Nucl. Phys. B 261 (1985) 104

    1985

  125. [132]

    Bodwin, Factorization of the Drell-Yan Cross-Section in Perturbation Theory , Phys

    G.T. Bodwin, Factorization of the Drell-Yan Cross-Section in Perturbation Theory , Phys. Rev. D 31 (1985) 2616

    1985

  126. [134]

    Anastasiou and K

    C. Anastasiou and K. Melnikov, Higgs boson production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD , Nucl. Phys. B 646 (2002) 220 [ hep-ph/0207004]

    2002 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Anastasiou, L.J

    C. Anastasiou, L.J. Dixon, K. Melnikov and F. Petriello, Dilepton rapidity distribution in the Drell-Yan process at NNLO in QCD , Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 182002 [hep-ph/0306192]

    2003 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Feng, Apart: A Generalized Mathematica Apart Function , Comput

    F. Feng, Apart: A Generalized Mathematica Apart Function , Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 2158 [ 1204.2314]

    2012 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Lee, Presenting LiteRed: a tool for the Loop InTEgrals REDuction , 1212.2685

    R.N. Lee, Presenting LiteRed: a tool for the Loop InTEgrals REDuction , 1212.2685. – 48 –

    arXiv

  130. [138]

    Lee, LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for reduction of multiloop integrals , J

    R.N. Lee, LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for reduction of multiloop integrals , J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 523 (2014) 012059 [ 1310.1145]

    2014 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Chavez and C

    F. Chavez and C. Duhr, Three-mass triangle integrals and single-valued polylogarithms , JHEP 11 (2012) 114 [ 1209.2722]

    2012 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Gehrmann, A

    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel, L. Tancredi and E. Weihs, The two-loop master integrals for qq → V V, JHEP 06 (2014) 032 [ 1404.4853]

    2014 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Caola, J.M

    F. Caola, J.M. Henn, K. Melnikov and V.A. Smirnov, Non-planar master integrals for the production of two off-shell vector bosons in collisions of massless partons , JHEP 09 (2014) 043 [1404.5590]

    2014 arXiv

  134. [142]

    J.M. Henn, K. Melnikov and V.A. Smirnov, Two-loop planar master integrals for the production of off-shell vector bosons in hadron collisions , JHEP 05 (2014) 090 [ 1402.7078]

    2014 arXiv

  135. [143]

    Gehrmann, A

    T. Gehrmann, A. von Manteuffel and L. Tancredi, The two-loop helicity amplitudes for qq′ → V1V2 → 4 leptons, JHEP 09 (2015) 128 [ 1503.04812]

    2015 arXiv

  136. [144]

    van Neerven, Dimensional Regularization of Mass and Infrared Singularities in Two Loop On-shell Vertex Functions , Nucl

    W.L. van Neerven, Dimensional Regularization of Mass and Infrared Singularities in Two Loop On-shell Vertex Functions , Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 453

    1986

  137. [145]

    Beenakker, H

    W. Beenakker, H. Kuijf, W.L. van Neerven and J. Smith, QCD Corrections to Heavy Quark Production in p anti-p Collisions , Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 54

    1989

  138. [146]

    Somogyi, Angular integrals in d dimensions , J

    G. Somogyi, Angular integrals in d dimensions , J. Math. Phys. 52 (2011) 083501 [1101.3557]

    2011 arXiv

  139. [147]

    Devoto, D.W

    A. Devoto, D.W. Duke, J.D. Kimel and G.A. Sowell, Analytic Calculation of the Fourth Order Quantum Chromodynamic Contribution to the Nonsinglet Quark Longitudinal Structure Function, Phys. Rev. D 30 (1984) 541

    1984

  140. [148]

    Meyer, Transforming differential equations of multi-loop Feynman integrals into canonical form, JHEP 04 (2017) 006 [ 1611.01087]

    C. Meyer, Transforming differential equations of multi-loop Feynman integrals into canonical form, JHEP 04 (2017) 006 [ 1611.01087]

    2017 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Meyer, Algorithmic transformation of multi-loop master integrals to a canonical basis with CANONICA , Comput

    C. Meyer, Algorithmic transformation of multi-loop master integrals to a canonical basis with CANONICA , Comput. Phys. Commun. 222 (2018) 295 [ 1705.06252]

    2018 arXiv

  142. [150]

    Papadopoulos, D

    C.G. Papadopoulos, D. Tommasini and C. Wever, The Pentabox Master Integrals with the Simplified Differential Equations approach , JHEP 04 (2016) 078 [ 1511.09404]

    2016 arXiv

  143. [151]

    Canko and N

    D.D. Canko and N. Syrrakos, Resummation methods for Master Integrals , JHEP 02 (2021) 080 [2010.06947]

    2021 arXiv

  144. [152]

    Chen, Iterated path integrals, Bull

    K.-T. Chen, Iterated path integrals, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 83 (1977) 831

    1977

  145. [153]

    Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes , Math

    A.B. Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes , Math. Res. Lett. 5 (1998) 497 [ 1105.2076]

    1998 arXiv

  146. [154]

    Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms and mixed Tate motives , math/0103059

    A.B. Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms and mixed Tate motives , math/0103059

    arXiv

  147. [155]

    Duhr and F

    C. Duhr and F. Dulat, PolyLogTools — polylogs for the masses , JHEP 08 (2019) 135 [1904.07279]

    2019 arXiv

  148. [156]

    Bauer, A

    C.W. Bauer, A. Frink and R. Kreckel, Introduction to the GiNaC framework for symbolic computation within the C++ programming language , J. Symb. Comput. 33 (2002) 1 [cs/0004015]

    2002 arXiv

  149. [157]

    Liu and Y.-Q

    X. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma, AMFlow: A Mathematica package for Feynman integrals computation via auxiliary mass flow , Comput. Phys. Commun. 283 (2023) 108565 [ 2201.11669]. – 49 –

    2023 arXiv

  150. [158]

    Liu, Y.-Q

    X. Liu, Y.-Q. Ma and C.-Y. Wang, A Systematic and Efficient Method to Compute Multi-loop Master Integrals, Phys. Lett. B 779 (2018) 353 [ 1711.09572]

    2018 arXiv

  151. [159]

    Peraro, FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs, JHEP 07 (2019) 031 [ 1905.08019]

    T. Peraro, FiniteFlow: multivariate functional reconstruction using finite fields and dataflow graphs, JHEP 07 (2019) 031 [ 1905.08019]

    2019 arXiv

  152. [160]

    Ferguson and D.H

    H.R.P. Ferguson and D.H. Bailey, A Polynomial Time, Numerically Stable Integer Relation Algorithm, RNR Technical Report RNR-91-032 (1992)

    1992

  153. [161]

    PSLQ Integer Relation Algorithm Implementation

    P. Bertok, “ PSLQ Integer Relation Algorithm Implementation .” http://library.wolfram.com/infocenter/MathSource/4263/, 2004

    2004

  154. [162]

    De Fazio and M

    F. De Fazio and M. Neubert, B — > X(u) lepton anti-neutrino lepton decay distributions to order alpha(s), JHEP 06 (1999) 017 [ hep-ph/9905351]

    1999 arXiv

  155. [163]

    Bosch, B.O

    S.W. Bosch, B.O. Lange, M. Neubert and G. Paz, Factorization and shape function effects in inclusive B meson decays , Nucl. Phys. B 699 (2004) 335 [ hep-ph/0402094]

    2004 arXiv

  156. [164]

    Passarino and M.J.G

    G. Passarino and M.J.G. Veltman, One Loop Corrections for e+ e- Annihilation Into mu+ mu- in the Weinberg Model , Nucl. Phys. B 160 (1979) 151

    1979

  157. [165]

    Patel, Package-X: A Mathematica package for the analytic calculation of one-loop integrals, Comput

    H.H. Patel, Package-X: A Mathematica package for the analytic calculation of one-loop integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 197 (2015) 276 [ 1503.01469]

    2015 arXiv

  158. [166]

    Bardeen, A.J

    W.A. Bardeen, A.J. Buras, D.W. Duke and T. Muta, Deep Inelastic Scattering Beyond the Leading Order in Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories , Phys. Rev. D 18 (1978) 3998

    1978

  159. [167]

    Altarelli and G

    G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language , Nucl. Phys. B 126 (1977) 298

    1977

  160. [168]

    Heller and A

    M. Heller and A. von Manteuffel, MultivariateApart: Generalized partial fractions , Comput. Phys. Commun. 271 (2022) 108174 [ 2101.08283]

    2022 arXiv

  161. [169]

    Boehm, M

    J. Boehm, M. Wittmann, Z. Wu, Y. Xu and Y. Zhang, IBP reduction coefficients made simple, JHEP 12 (2020) 054 [ 2008.13194]. – 50 –

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.