Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CauESC: A Causal Aware Model for Emotional Support Conversation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.17755 v1 pith:ANGG5CKL submitted 2024-01-31 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords emotionemotionalcausesdistresscauescconversationseekerstrategy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Emotional Support Conversation aims at reducing the seeker's emotional distress through supportive response. Existing approaches have two limitations: (1) They ignore the emotion causes of the distress, which is important for fine-grained emotion understanding; (2) They focus on the seeker's own mental state rather than the emotional dynamics during interaction between speakers. To address these issues, we propose a novel framework CauESC, which firstly recognizes the emotion causes of the distress, as well as the emotion effects triggered by the causes, and then understands each strategy of verbal grooming independently and integrates them skillfully. Experimental results on the benchmark dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach and show the benefits of emotion understanding from cause to effect and independent-integrated strategy modeling.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. IntentionESC: An Intention-Centered Framework for Enhancing Emotional Support in Dialogue Systems

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adds explicit supporter intention inference to emotional support dialogue generation; claims improved response quality, but the evaluation is small-scale, partially confounded, and the full chain does not always help.

Pith tools