Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Foundation Models for Biomedical Image Segmentation: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.07654 v1 pith:ANV6YEN5 submitted 2024-01-15 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords imagingmedicalimagesegmentationadaptationsanalysisapplicationapplying
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advancements in biomedical image analysis have been significantly driven by the Segment Anything Model (SAM). This transformative technology, originally developed for general-purpose computer vision, has found rapid application in medical image processing. Within the last year, marked by over 100 publications, SAM has demonstrated its prowess in zero-shot learning adaptations for medical imaging. The fundamental premise of SAM lies in its capability to segment or identify objects in images without prior knowledge of the object type or imaging modality. This approach aligns well with tasks achievable by the human visual system, though its application in non-biological vision contexts remains more theoretically challenging. A notable feature of SAM is its ability to adjust segmentation according to a specified resolution scale or area of interest, akin to semantic priming. This adaptability has spurred a wave of creativity and innovation in applying SAM to medical imaging. Our review focuses on the period from April 1, 2023, to September 30, 2023, a critical first six months post-initial publication. We examine the adaptations and integrations of SAM necessary to address longstanding clinical challenges, particularly in the context of 33 open datasets covered in our analysis. While SAM approaches or achieves state-of-the-art performance in numerous applications, it falls short in certain areas, such as segmentation of the carotid artery, adrenal glands, optic nerve, and mandible bone. Our survey delves into the innovative techniques where SAM's foundational approach excels and explores the core concepts in translating and applying these models effectively in diverse medical imaging scenarios.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Edge2Prompt: Modality-Agnostic Model for Out-of-Distribution Liver Segmentation

    eess.IV 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Edge2Prompt uses edge maps converted by a U-Net into prompts for SAM-2, achieving 86.4% mean Dice on cross-modality liver segmentation.

  2. F3-Net: Foundation Model for Full Abnormality Segmentation of Medical Images with Flexible Input Modality Requirement

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    F3-Net combines multi-encoder nnU-Net with zero-filled missing modalities to segment glioma, metastasis, stroke, and white matter lesions, but the missing-modality claim is untested and comparisons are incomplete.

Pith tools