REVIEW 2 cited by
CHATS: Combining Human-Aligned Optimization and Test-Time Sampling for Text-to-Image Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Diffusion models have emerged as a dominant approach for text-to-image generation. Key components such as the human preference alignment and classifier-free guidance play a crucial role in ensuring generation quality. However, their independent application in current text-to-image models continues to face significant challenges in achieving strong text-image alignment, high generation quality, and consistency with human aesthetic standards. In this work, we for the first time, explore facilitating the collaboration of human performance alignment and test-time sampling to unlock the potential of text-to-image models. Consequently, we introduce CHATS (Combining Human-Aligned optimization and Test-time Sampling), a novel generative framework that separately models the preferred and dispreferred distributions and employs a proxy-prompt-based sampling strategy to utilize the useful information contained in both distributions. We observe that CHATS exhibits exceptional data efficiency, achieving strong performance with only a small, high-quality funetuning dataset. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CHATS surpasses traditional preference alignment methods, setting new state-of-the-art across various standard benchmarks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
TeEFusion: Blending Text Embeddings to Distill Classifier-Free Guidance
TeEFusion distills classifier-free guidance into text embeddings via linear fusion, enabling a student model to generate images in one forward pass instead of two.
-
Reinforcement Learning for Flow-Matching Policies
Reward-weighted flow matching and GRPO with a learned reward surrogate both improve flow-matching policies beyond a suboptimal demonstrator on simulated unicycle tasks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.