Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Exploring the Role of Logically Related Non-Question Phrases for Answering Why-Questions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1303.7310 v1 pith:APLV4MP5 submitted 2013-03-29 cs.CL cs.IR

classification cs.CLcs.IR
keywords phrasesquestionansweringwordsanswerscandidatedocumentgiven
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we show that certain phrases although not present in a given question/query, play a very important role in answering the question. Exploring the role of such phrases in answering questions not only reduces the dependency on matching question phrases for extracting answers, but also improves the quality of the extracted answers. Here matching question phrases means phrases which co-occur in given question and candidate answers. To achieve the above discussed goal, we introduce a bigram-based word graph model populated with semantic and topical relatedness of terms in the given document. Next, we apply an improved version of ranking with a prior-based approach, which ranks all words in the candidate document with respect to a set of root words (i.e. non-stopwords present in the question and in the candidate document). As a result, terms logically related to the root words are scored higher than terms that are not related to the root words. Experimental results show that our devised system performs better than state-of-the-art for the task of answering Why-questions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools