REVIEW 1 cited by
On a Class of Bias-Amplifying Variables that Endanger Effect Estimates
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This note deals with a class of variables that, if conditioned on, tends to amplify confounding bias in the analysis of causal effects. This class, independently discovered by Bhattacharya and Vogt (2007) and Wooldridge (2009), includes instrumental variables and variables that have greater influence on treatment selection than on the outcome. We offer a simple derivation and an intuitive explanation of this phenomenon and then extend the analysis to non linear models. We show that: 1. the bias-amplifying potential of instrumental variables extends over to non-linear models, though not as sweepingly as in linear models; 2. in non-linear models, conditioning on instrumental variables may introduce new bias where none existed before; 3. in both linear and non-linear models, instrumental variables have no effect on selection-induced bias.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Optimizing Feature Selection in Causal Inference: A Three-Stage Computational Framework for Unbiased Estimation
An exposure-first, three-stage penalized feature selection framework claims to keep confounders and outcome predictors, drop treatment predictors and noise, and reduce bias and variance in ATT estimation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.