Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Ensemble of Example-Dependent Cost-Sensitive Decision Trees

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1505.04637 v1 pith:ASTWRF7T submitted 2015-05-18 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords cost-sensitiveexample-dependentdecisiondifferentcostsproposedtreesaccount
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Several real-world classification problems are example-dependent cost-sensitive in nature, where the costs due to misclassification vary between examples and not only within classes. However, standard classification methods do not take these costs into account, and assume a constant cost of misclassification errors. In previous works, some methods that take into account the financial costs into the training of different algorithms have been proposed, with the example-dependent cost-sensitive decision tree algorithm being the one that gives the highest savings. In this paper we propose a new framework of ensembles of example-dependent cost-sensitive decision-trees. The framework consists in creating different example-dependent cost-sensitive decision trees on random subsamples of the training set, and then combining them using three different combination approaches. Moreover, we propose two new cost-sensitive combination approaches; cost-sensitive weighted voting and cost-sensitive stacking, the latter being based on the cost-sensitive logistic regression method. Finally, using five different databases, from four real-world applications: credit card fraud detection, churn modeling, credit scoring and direct marketing, we evaluate the proposed method against state-of-the-art example-dependent cost-sensitive techniques, namely, cost-proportionate sampling, Bayes minimum risk and cost-sensitive decision trees. The results show that the proposed algorithms have better results for all databases, in the sense of higher savings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 25 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating the stability of model explanations in instance-dependent cost-sensitive credit scoring

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Cost-sensitive credit models improve cost efficiency but produce less stable SHAP and LIME explanations, especially when the training data are imbalanced.

Pith tools