REVIEW 1 cited by
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Small-scale double quasars discovered in the DECam Legacy Survey
read the original abstract
Dual quasars are precursors of binary supermassive black holes, which are important objects for gravitational wave study, galaxy evolution, and cosmology. I report four double quasars, one of which is newly discovered, with separations of 1$-$2 arcsec selected from the DECam Legacy Survey. The Gemini optical spectra confirm that both sources are quasars at the same redshifts. J0118$-$0104 and J0932+0722 are classified as dual quasars, whereas J0037+2058 could be either a dual quasar or a lensed quasar. I estimate the physical properties such as black hole masses and Eddington ratios for the four double quasars. The newly discovered system supplements the incomplete sample of dual quasars at $\sim$10 kpc at $z>0.5$. The results demonstrate that new high-quality imaging surveys with existing spectroscopic data could reveal additional small-scale double quasars. Combined with the dual quasars from the literature, I find a power-law index of 1.45$\pm$0.48 for the distribution of dual quasars as a function of separation between 5$-$20 kpc, steeper than that expected from dynamical friction, though it is likely due to the incomplete sample at $<$15 kpc. I also discuss the implications for future searches with new imaging surveys such as the Dark Energy Survey and the Legacy Survey of Space and Time.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Search for Quasar Pairs with ${\it Gaia}$ Astrometric Data. III. Discovery of 9 dual and projected quasars
Spectroscopic follow-up of 11 candidates from the MGQPC catalog confirms 6 dual quasars and 3 projected quasars, with discussion of prior survey misses and future strategies.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.