Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Improving Chess Commentaries by Combining Language Models with Symbolic Reasoning Engines

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.08195 v1 pith:AT4K5K6X submitted 2022-12-15 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords languagereasoningchesscommentariesmodelssymboliccomplexdemonstrate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite many recent advancements in language modeling, state-of-the-art language models lack grounding in the real world and struggle with tasks involving complex reasoning. Meanwhile, advances in the symbolic reasoning capabilities of AI have led to systems that outperform humans in games like chess and Go (Silver et al., 2018). Chess commentary provides an interesting domain for bridging these two fields of research, as it requires reasoning over a complex board state and providing analyses in natural language. In this work we demonstrate how to combine symbolic reasoning engines with controllable language models to generate chess commentaries. We conduct experiments to demonstrate that our approach generates commentaries that are preferred by human judges over previous baselines.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Communicating Chess Strategies in Natural Language

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Natural-language verbalizations of pruned engine strategy trees improve human and LLM puzzle play, while pure concept lists and main-line-only evaluation understate strategy quality.

  2. From Multimodal Perception to Strategic Reasoning: A Survey on AI-Generated Game Commentary

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes AI-generated game commentary research into a taxonomy of three commentator capabilities and three commentary types, with a review of methods, datasets, and metrics.

Pith tools