Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Fractional differential problems with numerical anti-reflective boundary conditions: a computational/precision analysis and numerical results

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.16485 v2 pith:AUKFZLES submitted 2023-12-27 math.NA cs.NA

Fractional differential problems with numerical anti-reflective boundary conditions: a computational/precision analysis and numerical results

classification math.NA cs.NA
keywords numericalanti-reflectiveboundarycomputationaldifferentialfractionalproblemsaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Twenty years ago the anti-reflective numerical boundary conditions (BCs) were introduced in a context of signal processing and imaging, for increasing the quality of the reconstruction of a blurred signal/image contaminated by noise and for reducing the overall complexity to that of few fast sine transforms i.e. to $O(N\log N)$ real arithmetic operations, where $N$ is the number of pixels. Here for quality of reconstruction we mean a better accuracy and the elimination of boundary artifacts, called ringing effects. Now we propose numerical anti-reflective BCs in the context of nonlocal problems of fractional differential type: the goals are the same i.e. a smaller approximation error and the reduction of boundary artifacts. In the latter setting, we compare various types of numerical BCs, including the anti-symmetric ones considered in the case of fractional differential problems for modeling reasons. More in detail, given important similarities between anti-symmetric and anti-reflective BCs, we compare them from the perspective of computational efficiency, by considering nontruncated and truncated versions and also other standard numerical BCs such as reflective/Neumann. Several numerical tests, tables, and visualizations are provided and critically discussed. The conclusion is that the truncated numerical anti-reflective BCs perform better, both in terms of accuracy and low computational cost.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.