Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 114 references

A search for long-lived charginos and tau-sleptons in 137 fb^-1 of 13 TeV proton-proton collisions finds no significant excess and sets new 95% CL mass limits, excluding higgsino-like charginos up to 225 GeV at lifetimes below 0.03 ns.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 02:31 UTC pith:AUVZX7YG

load-bearing objection Solid, incremental ATLAS search with genuinely useful new techniques and one extrapolation concern worth asking about. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2603.08315 v1 pith:AUVZX7YG submitted 2026-03-09 hep-ex

Search for long-lived charginos and τ-sleptons using final states with a disappearing track in pp collisions at sqrt{s} = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration This is my paper
classification hep-ex
keywords disappearing tracktrackletcharginotau-sleptonlong-lived particlessupersymmetrymissing transverse momentumLHC
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper is trying to establish whether supersymmetric partner particles — charginos and tau-sleptons — that travel a few centimetres before decaying show up as short 'disappearing tracks' in the ATLAS detector. Using the full Run 2 dataset of 137 fb^-1, it finds no significant excess over Standard Model backgrounds and converts that null result into 95% confidence level lower bounds on particle masses in several benchmark models. The key advance is reconstructing tracks with only three pixel hits and using a machine-learned tagger for the very soft pion from chargino decay, which extends sensitivity to the short lifetimes expected for higgsino-like dark-matter candidates. If correct, the result tightens the exclusion of light higgsino and wino supersymmetric scenarios and of long-lived tau-sleptons in CMSSM- and GMSB-inspired models.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central result is the absence of an excess and the setting of 95% CL exclusion limits in the 0.01–10 ns lifetime window. Observed (expected) limits reach 225 GeV (250 GeV) for pure-higgsino charginos at lifetimes below 0.03 ns, 720 GeV (840 GeV) for the same particles at around 1 ns, 880 GeV (1020 GeV) for wino-like charginos near 1 ns, and 320/300 GeV (390/380 GeV) for tau-sleptons in CMSSM/GMSB-inspired scenarios. The largest local excess, in the high missing-energy four-hit region, has a significance of 1.9σ, which the paper treats as consistent with background.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the disappearing-track signature: a short charged track left by a heavy charged particle, such as a chargino (the charged supersymmetric partner of the electroweak and Higgs states) or a tau-slepton (the partner of the tau lepton), that decays after crossing three or four of ATLAS's innermost pixel layers, leaving no hits in the outer silicon tracker. A dedicated tracklet reconstruction allows tracks as short as three pixel hits, and for three-hit tracklets a boosted decision tree identifies the low-energy charged pion from chargino decay. Backgrounds are estimated data-drivenly from template regions, transfer factors, and control regions; the fake-tracklet componen

Load-bearing premise

The estimate of the dominant fake-tracklet background assumes that the tracklet transverse-momentum shape and the ratio of 'pure' to 'hybrid' fakes measured in low missing-transverse-momentum regions and simulated V+jets events correctly describe the high missing-transverse-momentum signal regions.

What would settle it

Take the three observed SR4High events (tracklet pT near 139, 142, and 152 GeV, expected background 0.68 ± 0.14) and re-analyze the next ~140 fb^-1 of Run-3 data with the same selection: if the yield grows to several events while the scaled background stays near one, the null result is contradicted; if the events disappear or match the scaled background, the central limit claim survives.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Wino-like charginos with masses up to 880 GeV and lifetimes around 1 ns are excluded at 95% CL.
  • Higgsino-like charginos below 225 GeV are excluded for lifetimes below 0.03 ns, covering the loop-induced mass-splitting region.
  • Long-lived tau-sleptons with lifetimes around 1 ns are excluded up to about 320 GeV (CMSSM) and 300 GeV (GMSB).
  • No signal region shows more than a 1.9σ local excess, so the Standard Model background prediction is consistent with data in these final states.
  • The improved tracklet and pion reconstruction extends the expected mass reach by about 100 GeV compared with the earlier Run-2 analysis.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One thing the paper leaves open is the fate of the 1.9σ excess in SR4High: if the three events around 140–150 GeV tracklet pT persist in more data, they could become a real signal or expose an underestimated fake background.
  • The same three-hit tracklet plus pion-tagging technique could be applied to Run-3 data at 13.6 TeV, where the larger dataset should push the higgsino limit to higher masses.
  • Because the signal regions are defined model-independently around tracklet kinematics, other new physics with a decaying charged track and missing energy could be reinterpreted with the same results.
  • The reliance on V+jets simulation for the pure-to-hybrid fake ratio suggests that a dedicated high missing-energy fake-enriched control sample would directly test the extrapolation that carries the main background uncertainty.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a search for long-lived charginos and tau-sleptons using the disappearing-track signature in 137 fb^-1 of 13 TeV pp collisions recorded by ATLAS. Four signal regions are defined: two requiring four-pixel-layer tracklets and two requiring three-pixel-layer tracklets, with the latter further split by a BDT-based low-energy pion tag. The background is estimated with a data-driven strategy using template regions, transfer factors, and control-region normalizations; the dominant fake-tracklet component is modeled from a low-EmissT, high-|z0 sin theta| template with MC-derived transfer factors. No significant excess is found (largest local significance 1.9 sigma in SR4High), and 95% CL exclusion limits are set on wino and higgsino charginos and on tau-sleptons in CMSSM- and GMSB-inspired scenarios. The observed (expected) limits reach 880 GeV (1020 GeV) for wino production and 720 GeV (840 GeV) for higgsino production at ~1 ns lifetime, and 320 GeV (390 GeV) for CMSSM staus.

Significance. If the background estimate is unbiased, the paper presents a solid experimental result with improved sensitivity over the previous ATLAS disappearing-track search, particularly for short lifetimes due to the use of three-pixel-layer tracklets and the dedicated pion tag. The paper is unusually transparent: detailed selection tables, control and validation regions, post-fit distributions, and an explicit discussion of the local excess are provided. The systematic treatment is thorough for the electron, muon, and hadron backgrounds, with data-driven tag-and-probe methods where possible. However, the central exclusion limits rely sensitively on the fake-tracklet background in the four-layer regions, and the manuscript itself states that no dedicated uncertainty is associated with the overall background estimation methodology. Because the validation regions do not cover the high-pT, high-EmissT, calo-veto phase space of SR4High, this omission is load-bearing for the central claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6, Eq. (1) and Table 1] The fake-tracklet pT template N_TR^fake(pT) is explicitly taken from tracklets with hits in three layers ('All three TRs select tracklets reconstructed from hits in three layers to ensure a high-statistics pT template'), while SR4High and SR4Mid require four-layer tracklets. No transfer factor or shape correction is applied for the layer multiplicity. The four-layer SRs dominate the sensitivity and drive the strongest limits. The validation regions do not test the extrapolation: VR4Mid has pT<60 GeV, and VR4MidS requires E_clus>5 GeV (hadron-dominated), so neither probes the high-pT, calo-veto, high-EmissT region relevant to SR4High. If the 3-hit and 4-hit fake tracklet pT spectra differ at pT>60 GeV, the SR4High background of 0.68 +/- 0.14 and the resulting mass limits would be biased. Please either introduce a layer-count transfer factor, validate the 4-layer fake shape in a dedicated
  2. [Section 7] The manuscript states: 'No dedicated uncertainty is associated with the overall background estimation methodology as, within other sources of uncertainties including the statistics of the data, the predicted post-fit tracklet pT distributions in the VRs are consistent with the data.' This is not sufficient because the MC-derived terms in the fake background, TF^fake_hybrid(pT) and SF^fake_EmissT, are based on V+jets simulation and a fitted exponential-plus-constant function, and the validation regions (VR4Mid, VR4MidS, VR3Mid1pi, VR3High0pi) do not cover the SR4High phase space. The quoted background uncertainties in SR4High and the derived limits therefore may undercover the extrapolation uncertainty. A quantitative methodology uncertainty, or an additional validation specifically in the high-pT, low-E_clus, high-EmissT region, should be provided.
  3. [Section 6, CR4Low/CR4High (Table 2)] The scale factor SF^fake_EmissT is derived from the ratio of events in CR4Low (EmissT<150 GeV) to CR4High (EmissT>300 GeV). Both regions require the EmissT trigger to pass. The text justifies the low-Emiss TR by saying the trigger efficiency 'does not need to be well understood' because the TR is not used for the overall yield, but the CR ratio is used for the normalization and is therefore directly affected by any trigger inefficiency in CR4Low. Since CR4Low is below the 230 GeV online trigger threshold quoted in Section 3, the trigger efficiency is not on the plateau. Please demonstrate that the trigger efficiency cancels in the ratio or apply a correction; otherwise the SF is biased.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3] Typo: 'in both the CSSM and GMSB models' should be 'CMSSM'.
  2. [Section 9] Typo: 'The data obervations' should be 'observations'.
  3. [Section 8] The text says 'the previous analyses used five-layer tracking', but Section 2 describes four pixel layers and Ref. [43] is described as requiring at least four pixel hits. Please clarify what 'five-layer tracking' refers to (perhaps it includes SCT hits).
  4. [General] The reproduction of the text contains numerous formatting artifacts (missing spaces, stray characters such as 'Tτ-sleptons' in the contents). These should be corrected in the final published version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the exclusion limits come from a direct experimental search with data-driven backgrounds derived from control regions orthogonal to the signal regions; the 3-layer-to-4-layer tracklet template extrapolation is a modelling assumption, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental null result: observed yields in four signal regions are compared with background estimates and signal Monte Carlo, leading to 95% CL exclusion limits. Walking the derivation chain, the background is genuinely predicted rather than fitted from the SRs: fake-tracklet templates are taken from template regions with `E_missT < 150 GeV` and `|z0 sinθ| > 2.5 mm`, electron/muon templates from single-lepton-enriched regions, and hadron templates from TRT/SCT/calorimeter-matched samples; the transfer and scale factors are derived from MC or from control regions, and the fit uses "only the CRs, and not the SRs, ... to constrain the SM background" (Section 8). No SR bin itself enters the background construction, so the observed `p0 = 0.033 (1.9σ)` in SR4High and the consequent limits (e.g., 880 GeV wino, 720 GeV higgsino) are not forced by construction. The skeptic's 3-layer-versus-4-layer template issue is a legitimate extrapolation assumption -- the text states "All three TRs select tracklets reconstructed from hits in three layers to ensure a high-statistics pT template" while SR4High/SR4Mid require four layers -- but it is a potential mis-modelling (a correctness/systematics concern, especially given the paper's own admission that "No dedicated uncertainty is associated with the overall background estimation methodology"), not a circular reduction: the prediction is not equal to its input by definition. Self-references (Refs. [43-45]) are prior ATLAS disappearing-track analyses used for comparison and as the source of Figure 3; they are not load-bearing for the null result or the limits. No uniqueness theorem, no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and no ansatz smuggled via self-citation were found.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles are introduced; all signal models are from prior SUSY literature. The analysis relies on established theory inputs and MC simulation. The listed free parameters are optimization choices, not fitted to the observed data, and do not introduce circularity. The central limit-setting claim is a direct experimental measurement.

free parameters (3)
  • Tracklet pT threshold = 60 GeV
    Optimized for background rejection; not fitted to observed data.
  • BDT score threshold for pion tag = 0.8
    Chosen to balance signal acceptance vs misidentification; hyperparameter selected on MC.
  • EmissT thresholds in SRs = >300, 150-300, >240, >280 GeV
    SR definitions optimized for sensitivity; not derived from a theory fit.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Signal models (wino, higgsino, CMSSM stau, GMSB stau with gravitino LSP) are valid simplified SUSY scenarios with the stated decay chains and cross-sections.
    Used throughout Section 3 and interpretation (Section 8); these are standard simplified models from prior literature, not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption The mass-splitting calculations for winos/higgsinos from Refs. [14,15,21,22] correctly predict the chargino lifetime as a function of mass.
    Used to convert lifetime limits to mass-splitting limits (Section 8, Figures 12-14). These are external theory inputs.
  • domain assumption MC simulation (Geant4, Pythia) accurately models tracklet reconstruction efficiency and the detector response for the signal and background templates.
    Tracklet efficiencies and transfer factors rely on MC; validated partially by data-driven tag-and-probe for electron/muon backgrounds, but the fake/hadron transfer factors come from V+jets MC (Section 6).
  • domain assumption Data-driven background estimation assumes that the template regions and transfer factors/scale factors correctly extrapolate to the signal regions, with closure tested in validation regions.
    The entire background prediction (Section 6) rests on this extrapolation; the paper explicitly notes no dedicated methodology uncertainty is assigned (Section 7).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 63488 in / 9586 out tokens · 96905 ms · 2026-08-03T02:31:34.085859+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper reports a search for decays of long-lived charginos or $\tau$-sleptons to final states containing a short disappearing track, a single high-energy jet, and missing transverse momentum. The search uses 137 fb$^{-1}$ of data from 13 TeV proton-proton collisions recorded by the ATLAS detector during Run 2 of the LHC. Multiple search regions are defined, all requiring the presence of a track reconstructed from either three or four measurements in the innermost layers of the ATLAS detector. Regions with tracks having only three measurements are further characterised by the absence or presence of a low-energy charged pion reconstructed using a dedicated algorithm, leveraging machine learning. Data-driven methods are used to estimate the background contributions in the search regions. No significant excesses are found and 95% CL lower limits are placed on the masses of charginos and $\tau$-sleptons in the lifetime range $0.01{-}10$ ns. Observed (expected) mass limits of up to 225 GeV (250 GeV) are set for pure-higgsino charginos in scenarios with lifetimes below 0.03 ns, where the electroweakino mass splitting is entirely due to loop corrections involving the Standard Model bosons, and up to 720 GeV (840 GeV) for charginos with a lifetime of around 1 ns. For wino production, charginos with masses up to 880 GeV (1020 GeV) are excluded for lifetimes of around 1 ns. For $\tau$-sleptons with lifetimes of around 1 ns, masses are excluded up to 320 GeV (390 GeV) in Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model scenarios and 300 GeV (380 GeV) in Gauge-Mediated Supersymmetry-Breaking scenarios.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.08315 by ATLAS Collaboration.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Representative signal diagrams for (a) the electroweak production of 𝜒˜ ± 1 𝜒˜ 0 1 , and 𝜏-slepton pair production in (b) CMSSM-inspired or (c) GMSB-inspired SUSY models. The signal signature consists of a long-lived 𝜒˜ ± 1 or 𝜏-slepton, missing transverse momentum, and quarks or gluons, which are observed as jets (𝑗). When considering the electroweakino scenarios, the production of 𝜒˜ + 1 𝜒˜ − 1 is also c… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Representative distributions related to the reconstruction of tracklets and charged pions: (a) event yields and reconstruction efficiencies for three- and four-layer tracklet reconstruction as a function of 𝜒˜ ± 1 decay radius; (b) BDT output score used to judge if an event contains a low-energy pion, showing the training dataset (solid histogram) and the test dataset (points); (c) event yields and reconst… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic diagram illustrating how the signal scenarios are detected and how the background processes may enter the SR selections. The detector layers are not shown to scale. Taken from Ref. [43]. 6 Background estimation Data-driven methods are used to estimate all backgrounds in the analysis and a similar approach is used for all backgrounds sources. Template regions (TRs) are used to calculate an initial… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Individual components used in the estimation of the fake background: (a) shows the original template, 𝑁 TRfake (𝑝T), as a solid line. The templates after the application of the transfer factors are shown as dashed lines; (b) shows the |𝑑0|/𝜎(𝑑0) dependence introduced when extrapolating over |𝑧0 sin 𝜃| and the binwise, with respect to |𝑑0|/𝜎(𝑑0), transfer factors TFfake 𝑑0-correction (𝑑0) used to remove the… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Individual contributions used in the estimation of the electron background: (a) presents the original electron 𝑝T template, 𝑁 TRe (𝑝T), as a solid line, with the templates also shown after the application of each transfer/smearing factor as dashed lines; (b) shows the transfer factor, TF𝑒 tracklet, used to correct for the likelihood of reconstructing an electron track as a tracklet; (c) shows the transfer … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Schematic diagram for the background estimation strategy, describing the usage of template regions (TRs), and relaxed selections to calculate transfer factors (TFs) before performing the fit using control regions (CRs). The kinematic regions are orthogonal due to selections on 𝐸 miss T , tracklet 𝑝T, and tracklet 𝐸 clus T , with high calorimeter energies (‘calo-side’) dominated by the hadron background, an… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: A summary of the systematic uncertainties affecting the background estimates in the SRs after the likelihood fit to data in the CRs is performed (‘Post-fit’). The total uncertainty is indicated by a solid black line. The individual uncertainties may not sum in quadrature to the total uncertainty, due to correlations between the different components. The uncertainties arising from the estimation of the fake… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The post-fit yields in the CRs. All statistical and systematic uncertainties are considered in the error bands. Three representative pre-fit signal yields are indicated with dashed lines. agreement is seen in the VRs. Small excesses are seen in SR4High and SR3High1𝜋 , corresponding to local significances of 1.9𝜎 and 1.0𝜎 respectively. These discrepancies and how the events compare with the previous analysi… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The post-fit tracklet 𝑝T distributions in (a) VR4MidS , (b) VR3High0𝜋 , and (c) VR3Mid1𝜋 . The dashed vertical line denotes the boundary between the CR and VR selections. The pre-fit signal distributions are indicated with dashed lines. The lower pad shows the ratio of the observed yields to the post-fit predicted background yields. The last bin includes overflow events. All statistical and systematic unce… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The observed and expected event yields in the VRs and SRs. The lower pads show the ratio of the observed yields to the post-fit predicted background yields and the statistical significance [112] of the observed data. A red arrow is used to indicate that a ratio value is outside the displayed interval. The background estimates are calculated from the background-only fit. All statistical and systematic unce… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The post-fit tracklet 𝑝T distributions in (a) SR4High , (b) SR4Mid , (c) SR3High0𝜋 , and (d) SR3High1𝜋 . The dashed vertical line denotes the boundary between the CR/VR and SR selections. The lower pad shows the ratio of the observed data yields to the post-fit predicted background estimates. A red arrow is used to indicate that a ratio value is outside the displayed interval. The last bin includes overfl… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The expected (dashed line) and observed (solid line) 95% CL exclusion contours for wino production as a function of the chargino mass and (a) lifetime, or (b) mass splitting of the electroweakinos. The dotted lines indicates the ±𝜎theory from signal cross-section uncertainties, while the solid band indicates the ±𝜎exp from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yie… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The expected (dashed line) and observed (solid line) 95% CL exclusion contours for higgsino production as a function of the chargino mass and (a) lifetime, or (b) mass splitting of the electroweakinos. The dotted lines indicates the ±𝜎theory from signal cross-section uncertainties, while the solid band indicates the ±𝜎exp from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The expected (dashed line) and observed (solid line) 95% CL exclusion contours for 𝜏-slepton production in (a) CMSSM-inspired scenarios and (b) GMSB-inspired scenario. The dotted lines indicates the ±𝜎theory from signal cross-section uncertainties, while the solid band indicates the ±𝜎exp from experimental systematic uncertainties and statistical uncertainties on the data yields. 27 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figu… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 82 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Gol’fand and E

    Y. Gol’fand and E. Likhtman, Extension of the Algebra of Poincare Group Generators and Violation of P Invariance, JETP Lett.13(1971) 323, [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.13(1971) 452]

    1971

  2. [2]

    D. V. Volkov and V. P. Akulov,Is the neutrino a goldstone particle?, Phys. Lett. B46(1973) 109

    1973

  3. [3]

    Wess and B

    J. Wess and B. Zumino,Supergauge transformations in four dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B70(1974) 39

    1974

  4. [4]

    Wess and B

    J. Wess and B. Zumino,Supergauge invariant extension of quantum electrodynamics, Nucl. Phys. B78(1974) 1

    1974

  5. [5]

    Ferrara and B

    S. Ferrara and B. Zumino,Supergauge invariant Yang-Mills theories, Nucl. Phys. B79(1974) 413

    1974

  6. [6]

    Salam and J

    A. Salam and J. Strathdee,Super-symmetry and non-Abelian gauges, Phys. Lett. B51(1974) 353

    1974

  7. [7]

    Sakai,Naturalness in supersymmetric GUTS, Z

    N. Sakai,Naturalness in supersymmetric GUTS, Z. Phys. C11(1981) 153

    1981

  8. [8]

    Dimopoulos, S

    S. Dimopoulos, S. Raby and F. Wilczek,Supersymmetry and the scale of unification, Phys. Rev. D24(1981) 1681

    1981

  9. [9]

    L. E. Ibáñez and G. G. Ross,Low-energy predictions in supersymmetric grand unified theories, Phys. Lett. B105(1981) 439

    1981

  10. [10]

    Dimopoulos and H

    S. Dimopoulos and H. Georgi,Softly broken supersymmetry and SU(5), Nucl. Phys. B193(1981) 150

    1981

  11. [11]

    G. R. Farrar and P. Fayet,Phenomenology of the production, decay, and detection of new hadronic states associated with supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B76(1978) 575

    1978

  12. [12]

    Goldberg,Constraint on the Photino Mass from Cosmology, Phys

    H. Goldberg,Constraint on the Photino Mass from Cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett.50(1983) 1419, Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.103(2009) 099905

    1983

  13. [13]

    Ellis, J

    J. Ellis, J. Hagelin, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. A. Olive and M. Srednicki, Supersymmetric relics from the big bang, Nucl. Phys. B238(1984) 453

    1984

  14. [14]

    M. Ibe, S. Matsumoto and R. Sato, Mass Splitting between Charged and Neutral Winos at Two-Loop Level, Phys. Lett. B721(2013) 252, arXiv:1212.5989 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  15. [15]

    Fukuda, N

    H. Fukuda, N. Nagata, H. Otono and S. Shirai,Higgsino Dark Matter or Not: Role of Disappearing Track Searches at the LHC and Future Colliders, Phys. Lett. B781(2018) 306, arXiv:1703.09675 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    G. F. Giudice, M. A. Luty, H. Murayama and R. Rattazzi,Gaugino mass without singlets, JHEP12(1998) 027, arXiv:hep-ph/9810442

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  17. [17]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,Out of this world supersymmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B557(1999) 79, arXiv:hep-th/9810155

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  18. [18]

    Papucci, J

    M. Papucci, J. T. Ruderman and A. Weiler,Natural SUSY Endures, JHEP09(2012) 035, arXiv:1110.6926 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  19. [19]

    Barbieri and G

    R. Barbieri and G. F. Giudice,Upper bounds on supersymmetric particle masses, Nucl. Phys. B306(1988) 63

    1988

  20. [20]

    de Carlos and J

    B. de Carlos and J. A. Casas,One-loop analysis of the electroweak breaking in supersymmetric models and the fine-tuning problem, Phys. Lett. B309(1993) 320, arXiv:hep-ph/9303291. 30

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  21. [21]

    S. D. Thomas and J. D. Wells,Phenomenology of Massive Vectorlike Doublet Leptons, Phys. Rev. Lett.81(1998) 34, arXiv:hep-ph/9804359

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  22. [22]

    Nagata and S

    N. Nagata and S. Shirai,Higgsino Dark Matter in High-Scale Supersymmetry, JHEP01(2015) 029, arXiv:1410.4549 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  23. [23]

    Albornoz Vásquez, G

    D. Albornoz Vásquez, G. Bélanger and C. Bœhm, Revisiting light neutralino scenarios in the MSSM, Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 095015, arXiv:1108.1338 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  24. [24]

    Belanger, F

    G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Cottrant, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov,WMAP constraints on SUGRA models with non-universal gaugino masses and prospects for direct detection, Nucl. Phys. B706(2005) 411, arXiv:hep-ph/0407218

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  25. [25]

    S. King, J. Roberts and D. Roy, Natural dark matter in SUSY GUTs with non-universal gaugino masses, JHEP10(2007) 106, arXiv:0705.4219 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  26. [26]

    J. R. Ellis, T. Falk and K. A. Olive,Neutralino - Stau coannihilation and the cosmological upper limit on the mass of the lightest supersymmetric particle, Phys. Lett. B444(1998) 367, arXiv:hep-ph/9810360

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  27. [27]

    Jittoh, J

    T. Jittoh, J. Sato, T. Shimomura and M. Yamanaka, Long life stau in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 055009, [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 019901], arXiv:hep-ph/0512197

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  28. [28]

    Kaneko, J

    S. Kaneko, J. Sato, T. Shimomura, O. Vives and M. Yamanaka, Measuring lepton flavor violation at LHC with a long-lived slepton in the coannihilation region, Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 116013, [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 039904], arXiv:0811.0703 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  29. [29]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler,A phenomenological model of particle physics based on supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B110(1982) 227

    1982

  30. [30]

    Alvarez-Gaumé, M

    L. Alvarez-Gaumé, M. Claudson and M. B. Wise,Low-energy supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B207(1982) 96

    1982

  31. [31]

    C. R. Nappi and B. A. Ovrut,Supersymmetric extension of the SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) model, Phys. Lett. B113(1982) 175

    1982

  32. [32]

    A. H. Chamseddine, R. L. Arnowitt and P. Nath,Locally Supersymmetric Grand Unification, Phys. Rev. Lett.49(1982) 970

    1982

  33. [33]

    Barbieri, S

    R. Barbieri, S. Ferrara and C. A. Savoy, Gauge Models with Spontaneously Broken Local Supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B119(1982) 343

    1982

  34. [34]

    G. L. Kane, C. F. Kolda, L. Roszkowski and J. D. Wells, Study of constrained minimal supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 6173, arXiv:hep-ph/9312272

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  35. [35]

    Cirelli, N

    M. Cirelli, N. Fornengo and A. Strumia,Minimal dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B753(2006) 178, arXiv:hep-ph/0512090

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  36. [36]

    Cid Vidal et al., Report from Working Group 3: Beyond the Standard Model physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep

    X. Cid Vidal et al., Report from Working Group 3: Beyond the Standard Model physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr.7(2019) 585, ed. by A. Dainese et al., arXiv:1812.07831 [hep-ph]. 31

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Saito, R

    M. Saito, R. Sawada, K. Terashi and S. Asai,Discovery reach for wino and higgsino dark matter with a disappearing track signature at a 100 TeV𝑝𝑝collider, Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 469, arXiv:1901.02987 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    Capdevilla, F

    R. Capdevilla, F. Meloni, R. Simoniello and J. Zurita, Hunting wino and higgsino dark matter at the muon collider with disappearing tracks, JHEP06(2021) 133, arXiv:2102.11292 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Capdevilla, F

    R. Capdevilla, F. Meloni and J. Zurita, Discovering Electroweak Interacting Dark Matter at Muon Colliders Using Soft Tracks, Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 181802, arXiv:2405.08858 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Alwall, M.-P

    J. Alwall, M.-P. Le, M. Lisanti and J. G. Wacker, Searching for directly decaying gluinos at the Tevatron, Phys. Lett. B666(2008) 34, arXiv:0803.0019 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  41. [41]

    Alwall, P

    J. Alwall, P. C. Schuster and N. Toro, Simplified models for a first characterization of new physics at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 075020, arXiv:0810.3921 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  42. [42]

    Alves et al.,Simplified models for LHC new physics searches, J

    D. Alves et al.,Simplified models for LHC new physics searches, J. Phys. G39(2012) 105005, arXiv:1105.2838 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  43. [43]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for long-lived charginos based on a disappearing-track signature using136fb −1 of𝑝𝑝collisions at √𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 606, arXiv:2201.02472 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for long-lived charginos based on a disappearing-track signature in 𝑝𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP06(2018) 022, arXiv:1712.02118 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for direct pair production of higgsinos by reinterpretation of the disappearing track analysis with36.1fb−1 of√𝑠=13TeV data collected with the ATLAS experiment, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2017-019, 2017,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2297480

    arXiv 2017

  46. [46]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for charginos nearly mass degenerate with the lightest neutralino based on a disappearing-track signature in𝑝𝑝collisions at√𝑠=8TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 112006, arXiv:1310.3675 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [47]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for disappearing tracks in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Phys. Lett. B806(2020) 135502, arXiv:2004.05153 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for long-lived charged particles using large specific ionisation loss and time of flight in140fb−1 of𝑝𝑝collisions at √𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP07(2025) 140, arXiv:2502.06694 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for heavy long-lived charged particles with large ionization energy loss in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, JHEP04(2024) 109, arXiv:2410.09164 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3(2008) S08003. 32

    2008

  51. [51]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Insertable B-Layer: Technical Design Report, ATLAS-TDR-19; CERN-LHCC-2010-013, 2010, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1291633, Addendum: ATLAS-TDR-19-ADD-1; CERN-LHCC-2012-009, 2012,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1451888

    arXiv 2010

  52. [52]

    Abbott et al.,Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer, JINST13(2018) T05008, arXiv:1803.00844 [physics.ins-det]

    B. Abbott et al.,Production and integration of the ATLAS Insertable B-Layer, JINST13(2018) T05008, arXiv:1803.00844 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [53]

    Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13(2018) P07017

    G. Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13(2018) P07017

    2018

  54. [54]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  55. [55]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 234, arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 907

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS data quality operations and performance for 2015–2018 data-taking, JINST15(2020) P04003, arXiv:1911.04632 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  57. [57]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Luminosity determination in𝑝𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 982, arXiv:2212.09379 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    ATLAS Collaboration,2015 start-up trigger menu and initial performance assessment of the ATLAS trigger using Run-2 data, ATL-DAQ-PUB-2016-001, 2016, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2136007

    arXiv 2015

  59. [59]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the missing transverse momentum triggers for the ATLAS detector during Run-2 data taking, JHEP08(2020) 080, arXiv:2005.09554 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS muon triggers in Run 2, JINST15(2020) P09015, arXiv:2004.13447 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  61. [61]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 47, arXiv:1909.00761 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 823, arXiv:1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  63. [63]

    Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl

    S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506(2003) 250

    2003

  64. [64]

    Sjöstrand, S

    T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P. Skands,A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178(2008) 852, arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  65. [65]

    NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions with LHC data, Nucl. Phys. B867(2013) 244, arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  66. [66]

    ATLAS Collaboration,The Pythia 8 A3 tune description of ATLAS minimum bias and inelastic measurements incorporating the Donnachie–Landshoff diffractive model, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-017, 2016,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2206965

    arXiv 2016

  67. [67]

    J. Alwall et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07(2014) 079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]. 33

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  68. [68]

    Sjöstrand et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput

    T. Sjöstrand et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159, arXiv:1410.3012 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  69. [69]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Pythia 8 tunes to7TeV data, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021, 2014, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1966419

    arXiv 2014

  70. [70]

    Lönnblad and S

    L. Lönnblad and S. Prestel,Merging Multi-leg NLO Matrix Elements with Parton Showers, JHEP03(2013) 166, arXiv:1211.7278 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  71. [71]

    NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions for the LHC run II, JHEP04(2015) 040, arXiv:1410.8849 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  72. [72]

    Beenakker et al.,Production of Charginos, Neutralinos, and Sleptons at Hadron Colliders, Phys

    W. Beenakker et al.,Production of Charginos, Neutralinos, and Sleptons at Hadron Colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 3780, arXiv:hep-ph/9906298, Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 029901

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  73. [73]

    Debove, B

    J. Debove, B. Fuks and M. Klasen, Threshold resummation for gaugino pair production at hadron colliders, Nucl. Phys. B842(2011) 51, arXiv:1005.2909 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  74. [74]

    B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea and M. Rothering, Gaugino production in proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of8TeV, JHEP10(2012) 081, arXiv:1207.2159 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  75. [75]

    B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea and M. Rothering, Precisionpredictionsforelectroweaksuperpartnerproductionathadroncolliderswithresummino, Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2480, arXiv:1304.0790 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  76. [76]

    Fiaschi and M

    J. Fiaschi and M. Klasen,Neutralino-chargino pair production at NLO+NLL with resummation-improved parton density functions for LHC Run II, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 055014, arXiv:1805.11322 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  77. [77]

    Bozzi, B

    G. Bozzi, B. Fuks and M. Klasen, Threshold resummation for slepton-pair production at hadron colliders, Nucl. Phys. B777(2007) 157, arXiv:hep-ph/0701202

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  78. [78]

    B. Fuks, M. Klasen, D. R. Lamprea and M. Rothering, Revisiting slepton pair production at the Large Hadron Collider, JHEP01(2014) 168, arXiv:1310.2621 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  79. [79]

    Fiaschi and M

    J. Fiaschi and M. Klasen, Slepton pair production at the LHC in NLO+NLL with resummation-improved parton densities, JHEP03(2018) 094, arXiv:1801.10357 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  80. [80]

    Fiaschi, B

    J. Fiaschi, B. Fuks, M. Klasen and A. Neuwirth, Electroweak superpartner production at 13.6 Tev with Resummino, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 707, arXiv:2304.11915 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.