Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 8 minor 43 references

Half state at $\nu_{tot}$ = -1/2 and its transition in Decoupled Twisted Double Bilayer Graphene

T0 review · 3 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-07-08 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Displacement field drives Abelian-to-non-Abelian transition at half filling

desk verdict New platform for 2C-to-1C transition at half-filling in TDBG, but the non-Abelian identification is an inference, not evidence read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06547 v1 pith:AVBIWW2L submitted 2026-07-07 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el

Ning Ma , Kenji Watanabe , Takashi Taniguchi , Mitali Banerjee This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el PACS 73.43.-f73.22.Pr
keywords statedoublebilayerhallquantumdecoupledfieldgraphene
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports magnetotransport measurements in a large-angle (8°) twisted double bilayer graphene device, where two Bernal-stacked bilayer graphene sheets are rotated relative to each other so that interlayer tunneling is negligible while the physical separation remains sub-nanometer. This creates a strongly coupled double quantum Hall system with independent gate control of each layer. At total filling factor ν_tot = -1/2 and zero displacement field, the authors observe a half-filling state whose symmetry properties and strong sensitivity to charge imbalance between layers are consistent with the two-component Abelian Halperin (331) state, an interlayer-coherent state where each layer hosts charge carriers at fractional filling. When a finite displacement field is applied, charges polarize toward one layer, the interlayer coherence breaks down, and the state transitions to a layer-polarized, one-component configuration. The authors identify this finite-field state as a non-Abelian Pfaffian (Moore-Read) state by analogy to prior theoretical and experimental results showing that ν = -1/2 in single bilayer graphene hosts non-Abelian order. The paper also catalogs multiple odd- and even-denominator fractional quantum Hall states at fillings near -2 and -3, including Jain-sequence states following both 2-flux and 4-flux composite-fermion series, and a -5/2 state that emerges only above a displacement-field threshold. Temperature-dependent measurements yield activation gaps for several of these states and reveal that the zero-field and finite-field half-filling states have different thermal behavior, supporting the claim that they have distinct topological origins.

What carries the argument

The central object is the 8° twisted double bilayer graphene heterostructure: two Bernal-stacked bilayer graphene sheets twisted by a large angle so that interlayer tunneling is suppressed while the physical layer separation remains sub-nanometer, enabling strong interlayer Coulomb coupling. The control knob is the displacement field D, which tunes the charge distribution between the top and bottom bilayer graphene layers. At D = 0, balanced charge distribution favors interlayer-coherent two-component states (Halperin 331). At finite D, charge polarization toward one layer breaks interlayer coherence and drives the system toward one-component states (Pfaffian). The filling factor ν_tot = -1/

What would settle it

A direct experimental test of non-Abelian statistics — such as a Fabry-Pérot interferometry measurement showing anyonic braiding phase shifts inconsistent with Abelian quasiparticles, or a shot-noise measurement revealing charge e/4 quasiparticles characteristic of the Moore-Read state — would falsify or confirm the non-Abelian identification. Short of that, measuring the topological degeneracy of the ground state on a torus (genus-1) geometry would distinguish Abelian from non-Abelian order. Additionally, if numerical exact diagonalization or density-matrix renormalization group calculations

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central finding is a displacement-field-driven transition at ν_tot = -1/2 in decoupled twisted double bilayer graphene: at zero displacement field the half-filling state behaves as a two-component Abelian Halperin (331) state with strong sensitivity to layer-charge imbalance, while at finite displacement field it becomes a robust one-component state that the authors identify as a non-Abelian Pfaffian state. The paper establishes that this transition is driven purely by electrostatic control of the interlayer charge distribution, without requiring changes to magnetic field, sample geometry, or tunneling strength. The device platform — large-angle twisted double bilayer graphene — is the载体

Load-bearing premise

The identification of the finite-displacement-field state as non-Abelian rests on an inference: because ν = -1/2 in single bilayer graphene is known to host non-Abelian states, the layer-polarized state observed here at finite displacement field is assumed to be non-Abelian as well. The paper does not directly measure quasiparticle exchange statistics or perform topological-order-sensitive probes such as interferometry; the non-Abelian identification is based on analogy and间接

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the transition is genuinely from Abelian to non-Abelian topological order, this platform could serve as a tunable route to creating and manipulating non-Abelian quasiparticles using only electrostatic gates, which would be relevant for topological quantum computation architectures.
  • The displacement-field knob provides a continuous parameter to study the quantum phase transition between competing topological orders at half filling, potentially allowing mapping of the critical behavior and universality class of the Abelian-to-non-Abelian transition.
  • The observation of both 2-flux and 4-flux Jain sequences, plus even-denominator states at -1/2 and -5/2, in a single device demonstrates that twisted double bilayer graphene can realize a broad family of fractional quantum Hall states, making it a versatile platform for systematic studies of competing topological orders.
  • The thermal activation gaps reported (44–80 mK at 10 T) are modest; if device quality improves, larger gaps could stabilize the non-Abelian state at higher temperatures, making it more accessible for interferometric or tunneling experiments that directly probe exchange statistics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 8 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports magnetotransport measurements in large-angle (8°) twisted double bilayer graphene (TDBG), operated as a decoupled double quantum Hall system. The authors observe fractional quantum Hall states at both odd and even denominators on the hole-doped side, including Jain-sequence states near ν_tot = -2 and -3 and a half-filling state at ν_tot = -1/2. The central claim is that the ν_tot = -1/2 state undergoes a displacement-field-driven transition from a two-component Abelian Halperin (331) state at D = 0 to a one-component non-Abelian (Pfaffian) state at finite D. The (331) identification at D = 0 is argued on the basis of the state's sensitivity to displacement field (consistent with interlayer coherence), while the non-Abelian identification at finite D is argued by analogy to prior bilayer graphene results.

Significance. The observation of a displacement-field-tunable half-filling state in a decoupled TDBG platform is a genuine experimental contribution, and the device quality is demonstrated by the observation of multiple fractional states including 2-flux and 4-flux Jain sequences. The identification of the D = 0 state as a two-component (331) state is supported by the displacement-field sensitivity data shown in Fig. 5, which is a reasonable diagnostic. The paper provides a clear experimental pathway for tuning between two-component and one-component regimes in a system with sub-nanometer interlayer separation, which is a physically interesting regime. However, the central claim of a transition specifically to a non-Abelian state is not supported by the data presented in this manuscript, as discussed below.

major comments (3)
  1. Section IV, final paragraph: The claim that the finite-D state is non-Abelian rests entirely on the sentence: 'Since ν = -1/2 state in bilayer graphene hosts the non-Abelian state, based on previous theoretical and experimental results, we claim that a transition from two-component Abelian state to one-component non-Abelian state is observed.' This is an inference from analogy, not a direct measurement. The experimental observations at finite D — layer polarization, weak D-dependence of R_xx, and survival to higher temperature — establish that the state is one-component and incompressible, but they do not distinguish between non-Abelian (Pfaffian/anti-Pfaffian) and Abelian one-component candidates. The cited prior experiments in BLG (refs 24–26) established non-Abelian order through specific signatures such as daughter-state hierarchies or gap scaling, not merely by observing a one-comer
  2. Section IV, Fig. 5: The temperature dependence data are presented as evidence that the half-filling states at zero and nonzero D have different origins. However, the argument is qualitative: the D = 0 state undergoes a transition to an insulating state at 1 K, while the finite-D state survives to higher temperature. No activation gap is extracted for the ν_tot = -1/2 state at either zero or finite D, in contrast to the gaps reported for the -8/3, -7/3, and -5/2 states in Section III. Without a quantitative gap comparison, the claim that the two regimes host fundamentally different topological orders is suggestive but not definitive.
  3. Section III, Fig. 2(b): The activation gaps for the -8/3, -7/3, and -5/2 states are reported as 80 mK, 64 mK, and 44 mK respectively. These values are extremely small (sub-Kelvin) for a 10 T magnetic field, and no error bars or discussion of uncertainty are provided. The claim of particle-hole symmetry around -5/2 based on 'identical gaps' of -8/3 and -7/3 is not convincing given that the gaps differ by 25% and neither has a stated uncertainty. This weakens the quantitative claims in the paper.
minor comments (8)
  1. Abstract and throughout: 'Pffafian' should be 'Pfaffian'.
  2. Abstract and Section IV: 'tunning' should be 'tuning'.
  3. Section I: 'seperation' should be 'separation'; 'tuability' should be 'tunability'.
  4. Section III: 'unzero' should be 'nonzero'.
  5. Section II: The global gate voltage of -77 V is mentioned without explanation of why it is necessary or what it compensates for. This should be clarified.
  6. Section IV: The phrase 'the half state at non-zero D field can survive at higher temperature, consistent with previously calculated large energy gaps [41]' is ambiguous — ref 41 refers to BLG, not TDBG. The connection should be stated more precisely.
  7. Figures: It would help to show line cuts of R_xx vs D at ν_tot = -1/2 at a fixed temperature, rather than only the 2D color map, to make the contrast between the D-sensitive and D-insensitive regimes clearer.
  8. Reference [26] is cited as supporting the non-Abelian identification in BLG, but the authors should clarify which specific signatures from that work are being invoked, since the present experiment does not reproduce those signatures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive report. The referee correctly identifies that the experimental observation of a displacement-field-tunable half-filling state in decoupled TDBG is a genuine contribution, and we agree that the identification of the finite-D state as specifically non-Abelian is not directly established by our data. We address each comment below and describe revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The claim that the finite-D state is non-Abelian rests entirely on inference from analogy to bilayer graphene, not direct measurement. The experimental observations establish one-component incompressible behavior but do not distinguish non-Abelian from Abelian one-component candidates.

    Authors: The referee is correct. Our data at finite D establish that the ν_tot = -1/2 state becomes layer-polarized (one-component) and incompressible, with weak D-dependence and survival to higher temperature. These observations are consistent with a one-component state but do not by themselves distinguish between a non-Abelian Pfaffian/anti-Pfaffian state and an Abelian one-component candidate (e.g., a particle-hole-symmetric Pfaffian or a 113-type state). The identification as non-Abelian was based on analogy to prior bilayer graphene experiments (refs 24–26), where the non-Abelian order was established through additional signatures such as daughter-state hierarchies and gap scaling — signatures we do not present here. We will revise the manuscript to soften this claim. Specifically, we will reframe the finite-D state as a one-component state that is consistent with a non-Abelian Pfaffian origin by analogy to BLG, while explicitly stating that our data do not rule out Abelian one-component alternatives. The abstract and conclusion will be revised accordingly to replace 'non-Abelian state' with 'one-component state' in the experimental claims, with the non-Abelian interpretation discussed as a motivated but not definitive assignment. revision: yes

  2. Referee: No activation gap is extracted for the ν_tot = -1/2 state at either zero or finite D, in contrast to gaps reported for -8/3, -7/3, and -5/2. Without quantitative gap comparison, the claim of different topological orders is suggestive but not definitive.

    Authors: This is a fair point. The temperature dependence data in Fig. 5 are presented qualitatively: the D = 0 state transitions to an insulating behavior by 1 K, while the finite-D state survives to higher temperature. We did not extract activation gaps for the ν_tot = -1/2 state because the resistance minima are shallow and the accessible temperature window (230 mK to ~1 K) is limited, making a reliable Arrhenius fit difficult — particularly at D = 0, where the state appears to compete with an insulating background. We acknowledge that without quantitative gaps, the argument for fundamentally different topological orders at zero and finite D remains suggestive. In the revised manuscript, we will add the Arrhenius analysis where feasible and explicitly state the limitations where a reliable gap cannot be extracted. We will also temper the language from 'different origins' to 'consistent with different origins' to accurately reflect what the data support. revision: partial

  3. Referee: The activation gaps for -8/3, -7/3, and -5/2 (80, 64, 44 mK) are extremely small for 10 T, no error bars or uncertainty discussion, and the claim of 'identical gaps' for -8/3 and -7/3 is unconvincing given 25% difference.

    Authors: The referee raises a valid concern. The gaps are indeed small, which reflects the relatively limited temperature range available in our dilution refrigerator setup and the fact that disorder broadening is non-negligible in this device. We agree that the claim of 'identical gaps' for -8/3 and -7/3 is not justified given the 25% difference and the absence of stated uncertainties. In the revised manuscript, we will: (1) add error bars from the Arrhenius fits, estimated from the scatter of the data points and the fit residuals; (2) remove the claim of 'identical gaps' and instead state that the gaps are 'comparable within experimental uncertainty,' if the error bars support this, or simply report the values without the particle-hole symmetry claim if they do not; and (3) add a brief discussion of possible reasons for the small gap values, including disorder and LL mixing effects. We will not claim particle-hole symmetry unless the data with uncertainties support it. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity: the non-Abelian identification is an externally-sourced inference from prior literature, not a self-citation chain or definitional reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim — a transition from a two-component Abelian (331) state to a one-component non-Abelian (Pfaffian) state at ν_tot = -1/2 — is supported by experimental transport data (displacement-field and temperature-dependent R_xx measurements) that are independently measured and not defined in terms of the conclusion. The identification of the finite-D state as non-Abelian rests on a single inferential sentence (Section IV): 'Since ν = -1/2 state in bilayer graphene hosts the non-Abelian state, based on previous theoretical [22, 23] and experimental results [24–26], we claim that a transition from two-component Abelian state to one-component non-Abelian state is observed.' This is an analogy-based inference from externally published literature (refs 22–26, 41), not a self-citation chain: none of the cited works share authors with the present paper. The inference may be scientifically weak — the data establish layer polarization and incompressibility but do not directly measure topological order — but this is a correctness concern, not circularity. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then 'predicted' on related data. No ansatz is smuggled through a self-citation. No result is defined in terms of itself. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks, and the non-Abelian claim, while under-supported, is not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper does not invent new entities. It uses standard concepts (331 state, Pfaffian, composite fermions) and applies them to a new platform.

free parameters (3)
  • Displacement field offset D_0
    Used to calibrate the displacement field axis; standard but fitted to the device.
  • Carrier density offset n_0
    Used to calibrate the density axis; standard but fitted to the device.
  • Global gate voltage (-77 V) = -77 V
    Applied to observe well-quantized states; chosen empirically.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The ν = -1/2 state in bilayer graphene hosts a non-Abelian state.
    Section IV: The authors assume that because the state is in BLG and layer-polarized, it is non-Abelian, based on prior theoretical and experimental results.
  • domain assumption The large twist angle (8°) guarantees negligible interlayer tunneling.
    Introduction: Stated as justification for treating the system as decoupled.
  • domain assumption The layer-dependent filling factor combinations can be extracted from the integer index.
    Section III: Used to decompose fractional states into layer components.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Half state at $\nu_{tot}$ = -1/2 and its transition in Decoupled Twisted Double Bilayer Graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AVBIWW2L

@misc{pith2026260706547,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Half state at $\nu_tot$ = -1/2 and its transition in Decoupled Twisted Double Bilayer Graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AVBIWW2L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06547}
}
abstract

The origin of the fractional state at $\nu$ = 1/2 observed in double-layer quantum Hall systems has been under debate for decades. Because of the variation of bilayer charge distribution and interlayer tunneling strength, the half-filling state can be attributed to a two-component(2C) or a one-component(1C) origin, which corresponds to Halperin state and Pffafian state, respectively. Here we report the magnetotransport measurement in decoupled twisted double bilayer graphene(TDBG), which has been proved to be a promising platform for double quantum Hall system. Fractional quantum hall states in both odd and even denominator fillings are observed. We also found that the half-filling state occurs at zero displacement field at $\nu_{tot}$ = -1/2, which is theoretically consistent with two-component Halperin-Laughlin ({\Psi}331) state. Moreover, we report the transition from two-component state at zero D field to one-component non-Abelian state by tunning displacement field. Our observation of the half filling state and its transition from 2C to 1C state provides the tunability of decoupled twisted double bilayer graphene and shed light on the understanding of the ground states at half-filling factor in the double quantum Hall system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06547 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Electrical measurement of 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Jain sequences of both the 2-flux and 4-flux com [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Sequences of fractional states near total filling factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Excitonic states of fractional fillings near [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Displacement field and temperature dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    1/3 and 2/3 states can be observed on both side ofν tot = -1, as indicated by the red dashed lines in Fig.4(a)

    (a) The longitudinal resistance of TDBG as a function of both total filling factors and displacement field at 230 mK and 10.5 T. 1/3 and 2/3 states can be observed on both side ofν tot = -1, as indicated by the red dashed lines in Fig.4(a). Besides, the -1/2 state is found to coexist with the Jain states even at zero displacement field. Interestingly, the...

    work page

  2. [2]

    V. W. Scarola and J. K. Jain, Phase diagram of bilayer composite fermion states, Physical Review B64, 085313 (2001)

    work page 2001

  3. [3]

    magnetic

    X.-G. Wen and A. Zee, Neutral superfluid modes and “magnetic” monopoles in multilayered quantum Hall sys- tems, Physical Review Letters69, 1811 (1992)

    work page 1992

  4. [4]

    Alicea, O

    J. Alicea, O. I. Motrunich, G. Refael, and M. P. A. Fisher, Interlayer Coherent Composite Fermi Liquid Phase in Quantum Hall Bilayers, Physical Review Letters103, 256403 (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    Barkeshli and X.-G

    M. Barkeshli and X.-G. Wen, Non-Abelian two- component fractional quantum Hall states, Physical Re- view B82, 233301 (2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    Geraedts, M

    S. Geraedts, M. P. Zaletel, Z. Papi´ c, and R. S. K. Mong, Competing Abelian and non-Abelian topological orders inν= 1/3 + 1/3 quantum Hall bilayers, Physical Review B91, 205139 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    X.-J. Hou, L. Wang, and Y.-H. Wu, Non-Abelian in- terlayer coherent fractional quantum Hall states (2025), arXiv:2501.06041 [cond-mat]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    W. Zhu, Z. Liu, F. D. M. Haldane, and D. N. Sheng, Frac- tional quantum Hall bilayers at half filling: Tunneling- driven non-Abelian phase, Physical Review B94, 245147 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    B. I. Halperin, Theory of the quantized hall conductance, Helv Phys Acta56, 75 (1983)

    1983

  2. [10]

    Y. W. Suen, L. W. Engel, M. B. Santos, M. Shayegan, and D. C. Tsui, Observation of aν= 1/2 fractional quan- tum Hall state in a double-layer electron system, Physical Review Letters68, 1379 (1992)

    1992

  3. [11]

    J. P. Eisenstein, G. S. Boebinger, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, and S. He, New fractional quantum Hall state in double-layer two-dimensional electron systems, Physical Review Letters68, 1383 (1992)

    1992

  4. [12]

    Y. W. Suen, H. C. Manoharan, X. Ying, M. B. Santos, and M. Shayegan, Origin of theν= 1/2 fractional quan- tum Hall state in wide single quantum wells, Physical Review Letters72, 3405 (1994)

    1994

  5. [13]

    Y. Liu, A. Graninger, S. Hasdemir, M. Shayegan, L. Pfeiffer, K. West, K. Baldwin, and R. Winkler, Frac- tional Quantum Hall Effect atν= 1/2 in Hole Systems Confined to GaAs Quantum Wells, Physical Review Let- ters112, 046804 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    J. I. A. Li, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Hone, and C. R. Dean, Excitonic superfluid phase in double bilayer graphene, Nature Physics13, 751 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    X. Liu, Z. Hao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. I. Halperin, and P. Kim, Interlayer fractional quantum Hall effect in a coupled graphene double layer, Nature Physics 15, 893 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    J. I. A. Li, Q. Shi, Y. Zeng, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, and C. R. Dean, Pairing states of composite fermions in double-layer graphene, Nature Physics15, 898 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    N. J. Zhang, R. Q. Nguyen, N. Batra, X. Liu, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, D. E. Feldman, and J. I. A. Li, Exci- tons in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Nature637, 327 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    R. Q. Nguyen, N. J. Zhang, N. Khurana-Batra, X. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. E. Feldman, and J. I. A. Li, Bilayer Excitons in the Laughlin Fractional Quantum Hall State (2025), arXiv:2410.24208 [cond-mat]

    2025

  11. [19]

    Z. Han, T. Wang, Z. Dong, M. P. Zaletel, and A. Vish- wanath, Anyon superfluidity of excitons in quantum Hall bilayers (2025), arXiv:2508.14894 [cond-mat]

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Rickhaus, F

    P. Rickhaus, F. K. de Vries, J. Zhu, E. Portoles, G. Zheng, M. Masseroni, A. Kurzmann, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. H. MacDonald, T. Ihn, and K. Ensslin, 6 Correlated electron-hole state in twisted double-bilayer graphene, Science373, 1257 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Q. Li, Y. Chen, L. Wei, H. Chen, Y. Huang, Y. Zhu, W. Zhu, D. An, J. Song, Q. Gan, Q. Zhang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, X. Shi, K. S. Novoselov, R. Wang, G. Yu, and L. Wang, Strongly coupled magneto- exciton condensates in large-angle twisted double bilayer graphene, Nature ...

    2024

  14. [22]

    D. Kim, S. Jin, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. H. Smet, G. Y. Cho, and Y. Kim, Observation of 1/3 fractional quantum Hall physics in balanced large angle twisted bi- layer graphene, Nature Communications16, 179 (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    V. M. Apalkov and T. Chakraborty, Stable Pfaffian State in Bilayer Graphene, Physical Review Letters107, 186803 (2011)

    2011

  16. [24]

    Papi´ c and D

    Z. Papi´ c and D. A. Abanin, Topological Phases in the Ze- roth Landau Level of Bilayer Graphene, Physical Review Letters112, 046602 (2014)

    2014

  17. [25]

    D.-K. Ki, V. I. Fal’ko, D. A. Abanin, and A. F. Morpurgo, Observation of even denominator fractional quantum hall effect in suspended bilayer graphene, Nano Letters14, 2135 (2014)

    2014

  18. [26]

    J. I. A. Li, C. Tan, S. Chen, Y. Zeng, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Hone, and C. R. Dean, Even- denominator fractional quantum Hall states in bilayer graphene, Science358, 648 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Kumar, A

    R. Kumar, A. Haug, J. Kim, M. Yutushui, K. Khudi- akov, V. Bhardwaj, A. Ilin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. F. Mross, and Y. Ronen, Quarter- and half-filled quan- tum Hall states and their topological orders revealed by daughter states in bilayer graphene, Nature Communica- ti...

    2025

  20. [28]

    Saito, J

    Y. Saito, J. Ge, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and A. F. Young, Independent superconductors and correlated in- sulators in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Physics16, 926 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    S. Kim, D. Kim, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. H. Smet, and Y. Kim, Orbitally Controlled Quantum Hall States in Decoupled Two-Bilayer Graphene Sheets, Advanced Science10, 2300574 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    Rickhaus, G

    P. Rickhaus, G. Zheng, J. L. Lado, Y. Lee, A. Kurz- mann, M. Eich, R. Pisoni, C. Tong, R. Garreis, C. Gold, M. Masseroni, T. Taniguchi, K. Wantanabe, T. Ihn, and K. Ensslin, Gap Opening in Twisted Double Bi- layer Graphene by Crystal Fields, Nano Letters19, 8821 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    A. A. Zibrov, C. Kometter, H. Zhou, E. M. Spanton, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. P. Zaletel, and A. F. Young, Tunable interacting composite fermion phases in a half-filled bilayer-graphene Landau level, Nature549, 360 (2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    W. N. Faugno, A. C. Balram, A. W´ ojs, and J. K. Jain, Theoretical phase diagram of two-component compos- ite fermions in double-layer graphene, Physical Review B101, 085412 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    S. C. Davenport and S. H. Simon, Spinful composite fermions in a negative effective field, Physical Review B 85, 245303 (2012)

    2012

  26. [34]

    Read and E

    N. Read and E. Rezayi, Beyond paired quantum Hall states: Parafermions and incompressible states in the first excited Landau level, Physical Review B59, 8084 (1999)

    1999

  27. [35]

    Rezayi, X.-G

    E. Rezayi, X.-G. Wen, and N. Read, Condensation of fractional excitons, non-Abelian states in double-layer quantum Hall systems andZ 4 parafermions (2010), arXiv:1007.2022 [cond-mat]

    2010 arXiv

  28. [36]

    K. Yang, K. Moon, L. Zheng, A. H. MacDonald, S. M. Girvin, D. Yoshioka, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum ferro- magnetism and phase transitions in double-layer quan- tum Hall systems, Physical Review Letters72, 732 (1994)

    1994

  29. [37]

    K. Moon, H. Mori, K. Yang, S. M. Girvin, A. H. Mac- Donald, L. Zheng, D. Yoshioka, and S.-C. Zhang, Sponta- neous interlayer coherence in double-layer quantum Hall systems: Charged vortices and Kosterlitz-Thouless phase transitions, Physical Review B51, 5138 (1995)

    1995

  30. [38]

    Moore and N

    G. Moore and N. Read, Nonabelions in the fractional quantum hall effect, Nuclear Physics B360, 362 (1991)

    1991

  31. [39]

    Greiter, X

    M. Greiter, X. G. Wen, and F. Wilczek, Paired Hall states in double-layer electron systems, Physical Review B46, 9586 (1992)

    1992

  32. [40]

    S. K. Singh, C. Wang, A. Gupta, K. W. Baldwin, L. N. Pfeiffer, and M. Shayegan, Fractional Quantum Hall State atν= 1/2 with Energy Gap Up to 6 K and Possi- ble Transition from the One- to Two-Component State, Physical Review Letters135, 246603 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    D. Kim, G. Lee, N. Leconte, S. Jin, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Jung, G. Y. Cho, and Y. Kim, Cor- related Interlayer Quantum Hall State in Large-Angle Twisted Trilayer Graphene, Nano Letters26, 231 (2026)

    2026

  34. [42]

    Assouline, T

    A. Assouline, T. Wang, H. Zhou, L. A. Cohen, F. Yang, R. Zhang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, R. S. Mong, M. P. Zaletel, and A. F. Young, Energy Gap of the Even- Denominator Fractional Quantum Hall State in Bilayer Graphene, Physical Review Letters132, 046603 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    T. S. Lay, T. Jungwirth, L. Smrˇ cka, and M. Shayegan, One-component to two-component transition of theν= 2/3 fractional quantum Hall effect in a wide quantum well induced by an in-plane magnetic field, Physical Review B56, R7092 (1997). Acknowledgements We thank Gil Young Cho...

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed July 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.