Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself
read the original abstract
Quantum theory provides an extremely accurate description of fundamental processes in physics. It thus seems likely that the theory is applicable beyond the, mostly microscopic, domain in which it has been tested experimentally. Here we propose a Gedankenexperiment to investigate the question whether quantum theory can, in principle, have universal validity. The idea is that, if the answer was yes, it must be possible to employ quantum theory to model complex systems that include agents who are themselves using quantum theory. Analysing the experiment under this presumption, we find that one agent, upon observing a particular measurement outcome, must conclude that another agent has predicted the opposite outcome with certainty. The agents' conclusions, although all derived within quantum theory, are thus inconsistent. This indicates that quantum theory cannot be extrapolated to complex systems, at least not in a straightforward manner.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
On QBism and Assumption (Q)
Corrects historical and conceptual misapprehensions about QBism and Assumption (Q) in recent discussions of Wigner's Friend thought-experiments.
-
The limits of quantum superposition: Should "Schr\"{o}dinger's cat" and "Wigner's friend" be considered "miracle" narratives?
By adding an observer-independent irreversibility principle for detections, the paper concludes that quantum superposition cannot extend to visible objects with observer-dependent outcomes.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.