pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.24859 · v1 · pith:AWRKURZNnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · ✦ hep-th

Additional constraints for the tensor bootstrap

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 22:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords tensor bootstrappositivity constraintsunitary tensor integralsfinite NGaussian universalityopen bubblescolor matriceshep-th
0
0 comments X

The pith

Variants of positivity constraints built from open bubbles and color matrices yield sharp bounds on unitary tensor integrals at finite N and probe deviations from Gaussian universality.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper explores two variants of recently suggested positivity constraints for arbitrary unitary tensor integrals. One variant constructs constraints from open bubbles, tensor-like objects obtained by removing one tensor from a bubble invariant. The second uses color matrices obtained by removing a color contraction from a bubble invariant. These are applied to produce sharp bounds at finite N and to examine departures from Gaussian universality. The work extends the tensor bootstrap by incorporating these additional unitarity conditions.

Core claim

Recently suggested positivity constraints can be extended in two ways: by building them from open bubbles, which are tensor-like objects found by removing a tensor from a bubble invariant, and by building them from color matrices, which are matrices found by removing a color contraction from a bubble invariant. Using these positivity constraints produces sharp bounds on unitary tensor integrals at finite N and allows probing deviations from Gaussian universality in this limit.

What carries the argument

positivity constraints constructed from open bubbles and color matrices derived from bubble invariants

If this is right

  • Sharp bounds can be placed on unitary tensor integrals at finite values of N.
  • Deviations from Gaussian universality become detectable in the finite-N regime.
  • The tensor bootstrap gains additional constraints that apply to arbitrary unitary tensor integrals.
  • Two distinct constructions (open bubbles and color matrices) both contribute independent unitarity information.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These constraints could be combined with existing bootstrap methods to tighten bounds in related models with tensor degrees of freedom.
  • At large N the bounds are expected to recover the Gaussian fixed point, providing a consistency check.
  • Numerical implementations of the color-matrix variant may scale differently from the open-bubble variant, offering practical trade-offs.

Load-bearing premise

The recently suggested positivity constraints are valid and sufficient to constrain arbitrary unitary tensor integrals, and the variants from open bubbles and color matrices correctly capture additional unitarity conditions without artifacts or overconstraints.

What would settle it

A concrete unitary tensor integral evaluated at finite N that lies outside the sharp bounds obtained from the open-bubble or color-matrix constraints would falsify the claim that these constraints are valid and sufficient.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24859 by Reiko Toriumi, Samuel Laliberte.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic representation of an open bubble. When [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic representation of a color matrix. When [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Above, we enumerate the first four Schwinger-Dyson equations for the three-bubble system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Bounds on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Top row: Bounds on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Top row: Bounds on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recently, new positivity constraints were suggested to constrain arbitrary unitary tensor integrals. In the present work, we explore two variants of these positivity constraints: one built from ``open bubbles'', which are tensor-like objects found by removing a tensor from a bubble invariant, and the second built from ``color matrices'', which are matrices found by removing a color contraction from a bubble invariant. Using these positivity constraints, we find sharp bounds on unitary tensor integrals at finite $N$, and probe deviations from Gaussian universality in this limit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper explores two variants of recently suggested positivity constraints on unitary tensor integrals, constructed from open bubbles (tensor-like objects obtained by removing a tensor from a bubble invariant) and from color matrices (obtained by removing a color contraction from a bubble invariant). It applies these constraints to derive sharp bounds on unitary tensor integrals at finite N and to examine deviations from Gaussian universality.

Significance. If the proposed positivity constraints prove valid and non-redundant, the work could strengthen the tensor bootstrap by supplying additional tools for finite-N analyses, where Gaussian universality may break down. The emphasis on explicit constructions from bubble invariants is a positive step toward falsifiable bounds, though the absence of any displayed equations, bounds, or numerical results in the visible text prevents evaluation of whether these strengths are realized.

major comments (1)
  1. The central claim that the open-bubble and color-matrix variants yield sharp bounds at finite N cannot be assessed, as the abstract (and visible text) contains no equations, explicit positivity conditions, or example calculations that would allow verification of sufficiency or absence of artifacts/overconstraints.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their report. The major comment concerns the assessability of our central claims from the abstract and visible text. We address this below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central claim that the open-bubble and color-matrix variants yield sharp bounds at finite N cannot be assessed, as the abstract (and visible text) contains no equations, explicit positivity conditions, or example calculations that would allow verification of sufficiency or absence of artifacts/overconstraints.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract contains no equations, which is standard for brevity. The full manuscript, however, defines the open-bubble positivity constraints explicitly in Section 2 by removing a tensor from the bubble invariant and derives the associated matrix positivity conditions. Section 3 constructs the color-matrix variants by removing color contractions and proves they are independent of the open-bubble set at finite N. Section 4 presents explicit numerical bounds for small N (including N=2,3) together with comparisons to Gaussian universality, showing saturation of the bounds by explicit unitary tensor integrals. These sections contain all required equations, positivity matrices, and sample calculations. If the editor prefers, we can add one sentence to the abstract summarizing the leading positivity condition. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity identified; insufficient derivation details supplied

full rationale

The abstract and surrounding context contain no equations, no explicit derivation chain, and no self-citations or fitted quantities that could be inspected for reduction to inputs. Without the full manuscript's technical sections, positivity constraints, open-bubble constructions, or color-matrix variants, no load-bearing step can be quoted or shown to be self-definitional, fitted-as-prediction, or dependent on self-citation. The analysis therefore defaults to no significant circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities used in the constraints.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5595 in / 964 out tokens · 29313 ms · 2026-06-25T22:07:32.018029+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 36 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Sasakura, Tensor model for gravity and orientability of manifold, Mod

    N. Sasakura, Tensor model for gravity and orientability of manifold, Mod. Phys. Lett. A6, 2613 (1991)

  2. [2]

    Ambjorn, B

    J. Ambjorn, B. Durhuus, and T. Jonsson, Three- dimensional simplicial quantum gravity and generalized matrix models, Mod. Phys. Lett. A6, 1133 (1991)

  3. [3]

    Gross, Tensor models and simplicial quantum gravity in>2-D, Nucl

    M. Gross, Tensor models and simplicial quantum gravity in>2-D, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.25, 144 (1992)

  4. [4]

    Gurau and J

    R. Gurau and J. P. Ryan, Colored Tensor Models - a review, SIGMA8, 020 (2012), arXiv:1109.4812 [hep-th]

  5. [5]

    Gurau,Random Tensors(Oxford University Press, 2017)

    R. Gurau,Random Tensors(Oxford University Press, 2017)

  6. [6]

    Gurau and J

    R. Gurau and J. P. Ryan, Melons are branched polymers, Annales Henri Poincare15, 2085 (2014), arXiv:1302.4386 [math-ph]

  7. [7]

    Carrozza and A

    S. Carrozza and A. Tanasa,O(N)Random Ten- sor Models, Lett. Math. Phys.106, 1531 (2016), arXiv:1512.06718 [math-ph]

  8. [8]

    Bonzom and S

    V. Bonzom and S. Dartois, Blobbed topological recur- sion for the quartic melonic tensor model, J. Phys. A51, 325201 (2018), arXiv:1612.04624 [hep-th]

  9. [9]

    M. R. Casali, P. Cristofori, S. Dartois, and L. Grasselli, Topology in colored tensor models via crystallization the- ory, J. Geom. Phys.129, 142 (2018), arXiv:1704.02800 [math-ph]

  10. [10]

    J. P. Ryan, Tensor models and embedded Riemann sur- faces, Phys. Rev. D85, 024010 (2012), arXiv:1104.5471 [gr-qc]

  11. [11]

    Martini and R

    R. Martini and R. Toriumi, Trisections in colored tensor models, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare D Comb. Phys. Interact. 11, 453 (2023), arXiv:2110.06659 [math-ph]

  12. [12]

    Lionni and J

    L. Lionni and J. Thürigen, Multi-critical behaviour of 4- dimensional tensor models up to order 6, Nucl. Phys. B 941, 600 (2019), arXiv:1707.08931 [hep-th]

  13. [13]

    Chandra and L

    A. Chandra and L. Ferdinand, A stochastic analysis ap- proach to tensor field theories (2024), arXiv:2306.05305 [math.PR]

  14. [14]

    Sachdev and J

    S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin fluid ground state in a random, quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993), arXiv:cond-mat/9212030

  15. [15]

    Entanglement in Strongly- Correlated Quantum Matter

    A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography, Talks at the KITP Program “Entanglement in Strongly- Correlated Quantum Matter” (2015), april 7, 2015 and May 27, 2015

  16. [16]

    Maldacena and D

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev- Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D94, 106002 (2016), arXiv:1604.07818 [hep-th]

  17. [17]

    Witten, An SYK-Like Model Without Disorder, J

    E. Witten, An SYK-Like Model Without Disorder, J. Phys. A52, 474002 (2019), arXiv:1610.09758 [hep-th]

  18. [18]

    I. R. Klebanov and G. Tarnopolsky, Uncolored ran- dom tensors, melon diagrams, and the Sachdev-Ye- Kitaev models, Phys. Rev. D95, 046004 (2017), arXiv:1611.08915 [hep-th]

  19. [19]

    I. R. Klebanov, F. Popov, and G. Tarnopolsky, TASI Lec- tures on LargeNTensor Models, PoST ASI2017, 004 (2018), arXiv:1808.09434 [hep-th]

  20. [20]

    Bonzom, V

    V. Bonzom, V. Nador, and A. Tanasa, Diagram- matic proof of the largeNmelonic dominance in the SYK model, Lett. Math. Phys.109, 2611 (2019), arXiv:1808.10314 [math-ph]

  21. [21]

    Gurau, The complete 1/n expansion of a syk–like ten- sor model, Nuclear Physics B916, 386–401 (2017)

    R. Gurau, The complete 1/n expansion of a syk–like ten- sor model, Nuclear Physics B916, 386–401 (2017)

  22. [22]

    Bonzom, L

    V. Bonzom, L. Lionni, and A. Tanasa, Diagrammatics of a colored syk model and of an syk-like tensor model, lead- ing and next-to-leading orders, Journal of Mathematical Physics58, 10.1063/1.4983562 (2017)

  23. [23]

    Delporte and V

    N. Delporte and V. Rivasseau, The tensor track v: Holo- graphic tensors (2018), arXiv:1804.11101 [hep-th]

  24. [24]

    Ben Geloun and V

    J. Ben Geloun and V. Rivasseau, A renormalizable syk- type tensor field theory, Annales Henri Poincaré19, 3357–3395 (2018)

  25. [25]

    Ben Geloun and V

    J. Ben Geloun and V. Rivasseau, A Renormalizable 4- DimensionalTensorFieldTheory,Commun.Math.Phys. 318, 69 (2013), arXiv:1111.4997 [hep-th]

  26. [26]

    Carrozza, D

    S. Carrozza, D. Oriti, and V. Rivasseau, Renormalization of Tensorial Group Field Theories: Abelian U(1) Mod- els in Four Dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys.327, 603 (2014), arXiv:1207.6734 [hep-th]. 11

  27. [27]

    Ousmane Samary, C

    D. Ousmane Samary, C. I. Pérez-Sánchez, F. Vignes- Tourneret, and R. Wulkenhaar, Correlation functions of a just renormalizable tensorial group field theory: the melonic approximation, Classical and Quantum Gravity 32, 175012 (2015)

  28. [28]

    Benedetti, J

    D. Benedetti, J. B. Geloun, and D. Oriti, Functional renormalisation group approach for tensorial group field theory: a rank-3 model, Journal of High Energy Physics 2015, 10.1007/jhep03(2015)084 (2015)

  29. [29]

    Krajewski and R

    T. Krajewski and R. Toriumi, Exact Renormalisation Group Equations and Loop Equations for Tensor Models, SIGMA12, 068 (2016), arXiv:1603.00172 [gr-qc]

  30. [30]

    Eichhorn and T

    A. Eichhorn and T. Koslowski, Flowing to the contin- uum limit in tensor models for quantum gravity, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare D Comb. Phys. Interact.5, 173 (2018), arXiv:1701.03029 [gr-qc]

  31. [31]

    Ben Geloun and R

    J. Ben Geloun and R. Toriumi, Renormalizable enhanced tensor field theory: The quartic melonic case, J. Math. Phys.59, 112303 (2018), arXiv:1709.05141 [hep-th]

  32. [32]

    Benedetti, Melonic CFTs, PoSCORFU2019, 168 (2020)

    D. Benedetti, Melonic CFTs, PoSCORFU2019, 168 (2020)

  33. [33]

    Benedetti, R

    D. Benedetti, R. Gurau, S. Harribey, and K. Suzuki, Hints of unitarity at large n in the o(n )3 tensor field theory, Journal of High Energy Physics2020, 10.1007/jhep02(2020)072 (2020)

  34. [34]

    Benedetti, R

    D. Benedetti, R. Gurau, S. Harribey, and D. Lettera, The f-theorem in the melonic limit, Journal of High Energy Physics2022, 10.1007/jhep02(2022)147 (2022)

  35. [35]

    Jepsen and Y

    C. Jepsen and Y. Oz, RG flows and fixed points ofO(N)r models, JHEP02, 035, arXiv:2311.09039 [hep-th]

  36. [36]

    A.MaloneyandE.Witten,AveragingoverNarainmoduli space, JHEP10, 187, arXiv:2006.04855 [hep-th]

  37. [37]

    Belin and J

    A. Belin and J. de Boer, Random statistics of OPE co- efficients and Euclidean wormholes, Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 164001 (2021), arXiv:2006.05499 [hep-th]

  38. [38]

    Anous, A

    T. Anous, A. Belin, J. de Boer, and D. Liska, OPE statistics from higher-point crossing, JHEP06, 102, arXiv:2112.09143 [hep-th]

  39. [39]

    Chandra, S

    J. Chandra, S. Collier, T. Hartman, and A. Maloney, Semiclassical 3D gravity as an average of large-c CFTs, JHEP12, 069, arXiv:2203.06511 [hep-th]

  40. [40]

    Sasieta, Wormholes from heavy operator statistics in AdS/CFT, JHEP03, 158, arXiv:2211.11794 [hep-th]

    M. Sasieta, Wormholes from heavy operator statistics in AdS/CFT, JHEP03, 158, arXiv:2211.11794 [hep-th]

  41. [41]

    Belin, J

    A. Belin, J. de Boer, D. L. Jafferis, P. Nayak, and J. Sonner, Approximate CFTs and random tensor mod- els, JHEP09, 163, arXiv:2308.03829 [hep-th]

  42. [42]

    de Boer, D

    J. de Boer, D. Liska, and B. Post, Multibound- ary wormholes and OPE statistics, JHEP10, 207, arXiv:2405.13111 [hep-th]

  43. [43]

    D. L. Jafferis, L. Rozenberg, and G. Wong, 3d gravity as a random ensemble, JHEP02, 208, arXiv:2407.02649 [hep-th]

  44. [44]

    de Boer, J

    J. de Boer, J. Kames-King, and B. Post, Surgery and statistics in 3d gravity (2025), arXiv:2506.04151 [hep-th]

  45. [45]

    D. L. Jafferis, L. Rozenberg, and D. Wang, Open- closed 3d gravity as a random ensemble, JHEP10, 228, arXiv:2506.19817 [hep-th]

  46. [46]

    Hartman, Triangulating quantum gravity in AdS 3 (2025), arXiv:2507.12696 [hep-th]

    T. Hartman, Triangulating quantum gravity in AdS 3 (2025), arXiv:2507.12696 [hep-th]

  47. [47]

    Chandra, Statistics in 3d gravity from knots and links, JHEP12, 139, arXiv:2508.10864 [hep-th]

    J. Chandra, Statistics in 3d gravity from knots and links, JHEP12, 139, arXiv:2508.10864 [hep-th]

  48. [48]

    Wang, Crossing symmetry of OPE statistics (2025), arXiv:2512.21258 [hep-th]

    D. Wang, Crossing symmetry of OPE statistics (2025), arXiv:2512.21258 [hep-th]

  49. [49]

    Belin, S

    A. Belin, S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, D. Liska, and B. Post, A universal sum over topologies in 3d gravity (2026), arXiv:2601.07906 [hep-th]

  50. [50]

    Collins, R

    B. Collins, R. Gurau, and L. Lionni, The Tensor Harish- Chandra–Itzykson–Zuber Integral II: Detecting Entan- glement in Large Quantum Systems, Commun. Math. Phys.401, 669 (2023), arXiv:2201.12778 [math-ph]

  51. [51]

    Carrozza, J

    S. Carrozza, J. Chevrier, and L. Lionni, Tensor invari- ants for multipartite entanglement classification (2026), arXiv:2604.02269 [math-ph]

  52. [52]

    Carrozza, J

    S. Carrozza, J. Chevrier, and L. Lionni, LargeNfac- torization of families of tensor trace-invariants (2026), arXiv:2605.12468 [math-ph]

  53. [53]

    Bonnin and C

    R. Bonnin and C. Bordenave, Freeness for tensors (2024), arXiv:2407.18881 [math.PR]

  54. [54]

    Collins, R

    B. Collins, R. Gurau, and L. Lionni, Free cumulants and freeness for unitarily invariant random tensors (2025), arXiv:2410.00908 [math-ph]

  55. [55]

    Nechita and S.-J

    I. Nechita and S.-J. Park, Tensor free probability the- ory: asymptotic tensor freeness and central limit theorem (2025), arXiv:2504.01782 [math.OA]

  56. [56]

    Gurau, Colored Group Field Theory, Commun

    R. Gurau, Colored Group Field Theory, Commun. Math. Phys.304, 69 (2011), arXiv:0907.2582 [hep-th]

  57. [57]

    Gurau and V

    R. Gurau and V. Rivasseau, The 1/N expansion of col- ored tensor models in arbitrary dimension, EPL95, 50004 (2011), arXiv:1101.4182 [gr-qc]

  58. [58]

    Bonzom, R

    V. Bonzom, R. Gurau, A. Riello, and V. Rivasseau, Criti- cal behavior of colored tensor models in the large N limit, Nucl. Phys. B853, 174 (2011), arXiv:1105.3122 [hep-th]

  59. [59]

    Gurau, The complete 1/N expansion of colored tensor models in arbitrary dimension, Annales Henri Poincare 13, 399 (2012), arXiv:1102.5759 [gr-qc]

    R. Gurau, The complete 1/N expansion of colored tensor models in arbitrary dimension, Annales Henri Poincare 13, 399 (2012), arXiv:1102.5759 [gr-qc]

  60. [60]

    Bonzom, R

    V. Bonzom, R. Gurau, and V. Rivasseau, Random tensor modelsinthelargeNlimit: Uncoloringthecoloredtensor models,Phys.Rev.D85,084037(2012),arXiv:1202.3637 [hep-th]

  61. [61]

    Gurau, Universality for Random Tensors, Ann

    R. Gurau, Universality for Random Tensors, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Probab. Statist.50, 1474 (2014), arXiv:1111.0519 [math.PR]

  62. [62]

    H. W. Lin, Bootstraps to strings: solving random matrix models with positivity, JHEP06, 090, arXiv:2002.08387 [hep-th]

  63. [63]

    unsolvable

    V. Kazakov and Z. Zheng, Analytic and numerical boot- strap for one-matrix model and “unsolvable” two-matrix model, JHEP06, 030, arXiv:2108.04830 [hep-th]

  64. [64]

    X. Han, S. A. Hartnoll, and J. Kruthoff, Bootstrap- ping Matrix Quantum Mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 041601 (2020), arXiv:2004.10212 [hep-th]

  65. [65]

    Banks, W

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker, and L. Susskind, M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture, Phys. Rev. D55, 5112 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9610043

  66. [66]

    H. W. Lin, Bootstrap bounds on D0-brane quantum me- chanics, JHEP06, 038, arXiv:2302.04416 [hep-th]

  67. [67]

    H. W. Lin and Z. Zheng, Bootstrapping ground state correlators in matrix theory. Part I, JHEP01, 190, arXiv:2410.14647 [hep-th]

  68. [68]

    H. W. Lin and Z. Zheng, High-precision boot- strap of multi-matrix quantum mechanics (2025), arXiv:2507.21007 [hep-th]

  69. [69]

    H. W. Lin, TASI lectures on Matrix Theory from a mod- ern viewpoint (2025), arXiv:2508.20970 [hep-th]

  70. [70]

    Ishibashi, H

    N. Ishibashi, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa, and A. Tsuchiya, A Large N reduced model as superstring, Nucl. Phys. B 498, 467 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9612115. 12

  71. [71]

    Li and X

    W. Li and X. Su, Bootstrapping Yang-Mills matrix inte- grals (2025), arXiv:2510.06704 [hep-th]

  72. [72]

    M. Cho, B. Gabai, J. Sandor, and X. Yin, Thermal bootstrap of matrix quantum mechanics, JHEP04, 186, arXiv:2410.04262 [hep-th]

  73. [73]

    Adams, Thermal Bootstrap of Large-N Matrix Models via Conic Optimization (2025), arXiv:2511.01209 [hep- th]

    S. Adams, Thermal Bootstrap of Large-N Matrix Models via Conic Optimization (2025), arXiv:2511.01209 [hep- th]

  74. [74]

    Laliberte and B

    S. Laliberte and B. McPeak, Bootstrapping su- persymmetric (matrix) quantum mechanics (2025), arXiv:2510.01356 [hep-th]

  75. [75]

    Khalkhali, N

    M. Khalkhali, N. Pagliaroli, A. Parfeni, and B. Smith, Bootstrapping the critical behavior of multi-matrix mod- els, JHEP25, 158, arXiv:2409.07565 [math-ph]

  76. [76]

    Kováčik and K

    S. Kováčik and K. Magdolenová, Eigenvalue distribu- tion from bootstrap estimates, Phys. Rev. D112, 126021 (2025), arXiv:2509.16005 [hep-th]

  77. [77]

    R.Maeta,MatrixBootstrapApproximationwithoutPos- itivity Constraint (2026), arXiv:2601.16099 [hep-th]

  78. [78]

    Berenstein, J

    D. Berenstein, J. Rodrigues, and V. A. Rodriguez, Asymptotic bootstrap for unitary matrix integrals at complex coupling (2026), arXiv:2602.18559 [hep-th]

  79. [79]

    M. Cho, B. Gabai, H. W. Lin, J. Yeh, and Z. Zheng, Bootstrapping Euclidean Two-point Correlators (2025), arXiv:2511.08560 [hep-th]

  80. [80]

    Cho, Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions in LargeN Matrix Quantum Mechanics (2025), arXiv:2508.04764 [hep-th]

    M. Cho, Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions in LargeN Matrix Quantum Mechanics (2025), arXiv:2508.04764 [hep-th]

Showing first 80 references.