Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Privacy Preserving Prompt Engineering: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.06001 v2 pith:AXXZTJW6 submitted 2024-04-09 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelsprivacygenerallanguagepromptingframeworksmethodsplms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Pre-trained language models (PLMs) have demonstrated significant proficiency in solving a wide range of general natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Researchers have observed a direct correlation between the performance of these models and their sizes. As a result, the sizes of these models have notably expanded in recent years, persuading researchers to adopt the term large language models (LLMs) to characterize the larger-sized PLMs. The size expansion comes with a distinct capability called in-context learning (ICL), which represents a special form of prompting and allows the models to be utilized through the presentation of demonstration examples without modifications to the model parameters. Although interesting, privacy concerns have become a major obstacle in its widespread usage. Multiple studies have examined the privacy risks linked to ICL and prompting in general, and have devised techniques to alleviate these risks. Thus, there is a necessity to organize these mitigation techniques for the benefit of the community. This survey provides a systematic overview of the privacy protection methods employed during ICL and prompting in general. We review, analyze, and compare different methods under this paradigm. Furthermore, we provide a summary of the resources accessible for the development of these frameworks. Finally, we discuss the limitations of these frameworks and offer a detailed examination of the promising areas that necessitate further exploration.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AgentSentinel: An End-to-End and Real-Time Security Defense Framework for Computer-Use Agents

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AgentSentinel combines system-level tracing with LLM-based auditing to block 79.6% of attacks in the authors' 60-scenario computer-use agent benchmark.

  2. What Makes a Good Natural Language Prompt?

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A meta-analysis and experiments propose 21 prompt properties across six dimensions, finding that boosting a single property often beats combining several, and that instruction-tuning with polite prompts can help.

  3. LLM Access Shield: Domain-Specific LLM Framework for Privacy Policy Compliance

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An enterprise proxy that detects sensitive data in LLM prompts with a fine-tuned small model and replaces it with format-preserving encryption.

  4. SoK: The Privacy Paradox of Large Language Models: Advancements, Privacy Risks, and Mitigation

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A systematization-of-knowledge survey that categorizes LLM privacy risks into training data, prompts, outputs, and agents, and reviews limitations of current mitigations.

Pith tools