REVIEW 1 cited by
An interior-point trust-region method for nonsmooth regularized bound-constrained optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We develop an interior-point method for nonsmooth regularized bound-constrained optimization problems. Our method consists of iteratively solving a sequence of unconstrained nonsmooth barrier subproblems. We use a variant of the proximal quasi-Newton trust-region algorithm TR of arXiv:2103.15993v3 to solve the barrier subproblems, with additional assumptions inspired from well-known smooth interior-point trust-region methods. We show global convergence of our algorithm with respect to the criticality measure of arXiv:2103.15993v3. Under an additional assumption linked to the convexity of the nonsmooth term in the objective, we present an alternative interior-point algorithm with a slightly modified criticality measure, which performs better in practice. Numerical experiments show that our algorithm performs better than the trust-region method TR, the trust-region method with diagonal hessian approximations TRDH of arXiv:2309.08433, and the quadratic regularization method R2 of arXiv:2103.15993v3 for two out of four tested bound-constrained problems. On those two problems, our algorithm obtains smaller objective values than the other solvers using fewer objective and gradient evaluations. On the two other problems, it performs similarly to TR, R2 and TRDH.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A simple and practical adaptive trust-region method
A trust-region variant with a modified acceptance ratio attains the optimal O(Δ_f L^{1/2} ε^{-3/2}) iteration bound up to log factors and is competitive on CUTEst.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.