Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

What Are the Odds? Language Models Are Capable of Probabilistic Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.12830 v3 pith:AZ6SPJIV submitted 2024-06-18 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords distributionsreasoningcontextmodelsreal-worldassumptionscapabledistribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Language models (LM) are capable of remarkably complex linguistic tasks; however, numerical reasoning is an area in which they frequently struggle. An important but rarely evaluated form of reasoning is understanding probability distributions. In this paper, we focus on evaluating the probabilistic reasoning capabilities of LMs using idealized and real-world statistical distributions. We perform a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art LMs on three tasks: estimating percentiles, drawing samples, and calculating probabilities. We evaluate three ways to provide context to LMs 1) anchoring examples from within a distribution or family of distributions, 2) real-world context, 3) summary statistics on which to base a Normal approximation. Models can make inferences about distributions, and can be further aided by the incorporation of real-world context, example shots and simplified assumptions, even if these assumptions are incorrect or misspecified. To conduct this work, we developed a comprehensive benchmark distribution dataset with associated question-answer pairs that we have released publicly.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. High-Stakes Decisions with Language Models: Insights from Emergency Triage

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Re-analyzing a consumer triage system's failures, the paper shows much of the under-triage comes from an implicit resource-conserving decision policy, and that utility prompts can steer capable models along the safety...

  2. Exposure is not manifestation: measurement target and output resolution jointly determine which behavioural-faithfulness evaluator wins

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Small hyperbolic models (146M–3B) report 100% creative-seed preference, 90.7% compliance-gap detection, and a selective-gating skeleton–wallpaper memory pilot as a companion-AI stack.

Pith tools