Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 65 references

A geometric perspective on Algebraic Quantum Field Theory

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the wedge regions where quantum observables localize are governed by Euler elements—Lie algebra elements whose adjoint action has eigenvalues −1, 0, 1—and that the modular group and modular conjugation of a wedge…

desk verdict Useful survey of the Euler-wedge program, not a research paper; the unaddressed regularity/Poincaré tension should be fixed before it stands as a guide. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.20410 v2 pith:B2ARLVWP submitted 2024-12-29 math.OA math-phmath.MPmath.RT

Vincenzo Morinelli This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.OAmath-phmath.MPmath.RT MSC 46L1081T0522E4617B70
keywords algebraicquantumfieldtheoryEulerelementsstandardsubspacesBisognano–WichmannpropertymodularwedgeregionsLiegroupstypeIIIvonNeumannalgebras
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's aim is to establish that the geometry of Algebraic Quantum Field Theory—which regions count as wedges and how modular operators act on them—is governed by Euler elements of a Lie algebra. In the standard models (Minkowski space, de Sitter space, chiral circle), wedge regions correspond one-to-one to boost one-parameter groups whose generators have adjoint spectrum inside {−1, 0, 1}; the paper presents a framework that takes such generators, called Euler elements, as an abstract index set for nets of standard subspaces and von Neumann algebras, without referring to a spacetime manifold. The central Euler Element Theorem states that the Bisognano–Wichmann property together with a regularity condition force the generator of the modular group to be an Euler element, so geometric modular action is not an extra assumption but a consequence under those hypotheses. If the framework is right, local algebras in these models are type III_1 factors, and the classification of simple Lie algebras with Euler elements provides a catalogue of possible localization geometries.

What carries the argument

The central objects are Euler elements and Euler wedges. An Euler element h is a Lie algebra element whose adjoint action is diagonalizable over R with spectrum contained in {−1, 0, 1}, giving a 3-grading g = g_1 ⊕ g_0 ⊕ g_{−1}; an Euler wedge is the pair (h, τ_h) in the Z2-graded group $G^{{τ_h}}$, and its orbit under the twisted adjoint action forms the index set of the net. The technical engine is the one-to-one dictionary between standard subspaces V and pairs (J, Δ) with JΔJ = $Δ^{{−1}}$, via V = Fix($JΔ^{{1/2}}$); in the BGL construction these operators are supplied by the representation as J = U(τ_h) and Δ = $e^{{2π i ∂U(h)}}$. Inclusion of wedges is controlled by an invariant convex cone C, whose choice determines whether proper wedge inclusions exist; this distinction separates the de Sitter-type geometry (trivial cone, no inclusions) from the chiral-circle-type geometry (non-trivial cone, interval-like inclusions). The regularity property is what upgrades this dictionary from an abstract construction to a theorem: the cyclicity of the intersection V_N forces the generator of the modular group to be an Euler element.

What would settle it

Take a unitary representation of a connected Lie group and a standard subspace V satisfying U(exp th) = $Δ_V^{{−it/2π}}$ for a non-Euler element h, with ker(dU) ∩ [h,g] = {0}, and check whether V_N = ⋂_{g∈N} U(g)V is cyclic for some identity neighborhood N. The theorem predicts it can never be cyclic; an example where it is cyclic would refute the Euler Element Theorem. A natural place to look is a solvable semidirect product representation, the case the paper reports as unresolved.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that the wedge-localization structure of AQFT is determined by Euler elements of the symmetry group's Lie algebra. An Euler element h is a non-zero element for which ad h is diagonalizable over the reals with Spec(ad h) ⊆ {−1, 0, 1}; it induces the 3-grading g = g_1(h) ⊕ g_0(h) ⊕ g_{−1}(h) and the involutive automorphism τ_h = $e^{{π i ad h}}$. The Euler Element Theorem states that if a standard subspace V satisfies the Bisognano–Wichmann property U(exp th) = $Δ_V^{{−it/2π}}$ and the regularity property that V_N = ⋂_{g∈N} U(g)V is cyclic for some identity neighborhood N, with ker(dU) ∩ [h,g] = {0}, then h is an Euler element (or central), and the modular conjugation satisfies J_V U(exp x) J_V = U(exp τ_h(x)) for all x ∈ g. Consequently the modular group and modular conjugation of wedge algebras act geometrically, and the BGL construction—J = U(τ_h), Δ = $e^{{2π i ∂U(h)}}$—produces the corresponding standard subspaces. The paper further reports that von Neumann algebras obtained in this framework are factors of type III_1 when non-trivial.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the regularity property in Theorem 3.1(b): the intersection of all U(g)V for g in some identity neighborhood must still generate the whole Hilbert space; this finer-than-wedge localization is not automatic, and the paper states it remains unknown for general (anti-)unitary representations, especially for solvable groups.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Nets of standard subspaces on causal homogeneous spaces satisfying isotony, covariance, Reeh–Schlieder, and Bisognano–Wichmann automatically have Euler-element wedge generators, so their modular conjugations implement the corresponding Euler involution.
  • Any unitary representation satisfying the Bisognano–Wichmann and regularity hypotheses extends to an (anti-)unitary representation of the Z2-graded group G^{τ_h} on the same Hilbert space, making the modular conjugation part of the symmetry group.
  • The second-quantized von Neumann algebras in this abstract wedge setting are type III_1 factors whenever they are non-trivial, in line with the standard expectation for local algebras in physically relevant models.
  • Massless finite non-zero helicity representations of the Poincaré group cannot support nets of standard subspaces on spacelike-cone regions with the Bisognano–Wichmann property, because the required antiunitary extension does not exist.
  • Simple real Lie algebras with Euler elements are classified into restricted root systems A_n, B_n, C_n, D_n, E_6, E_7, so the framework generates new concrete models beyond the known Minkowski, de Sitter, and chiral-circle examples.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: If regularity is read as a definition of localizability at scales finer than wedges, the theorem makes the classification of 3-graded Lie algebras into a classification of possible localization geometries: a symmetry group can support wedge localization with geometric modular action only if its Lie algebra contains an Euler element in the relevant position.
  • Inference: The paper's report that solvable groups are unresolved suggests a direct testable route: compute V_N for positive-energy representations of solvable semidirect products with h not an Euler element; a cyclic V_N would be a counterexample to the theorem, while a non-cyclic one would identify exactly where regularity fails.
  • Inference: The theorem could be used as a geometric-modular-action detector: in candidate models without geometric modular action, the cyclicity of the intersection over an identity neighborhood should fail, so checking V_N gives an effectively Hilbert-space criterion for when wedge modular groups cannot be geometric.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper is a survey of the author's recent program with K.-H. Neeb, G. Ólafsson, and collaborators, which recasts AQFT wedge-localization geometry in Lie-theoretic terms. It introduces Euler elements and abstract Euler wedges for Z2-graded Lie groups, reviews the correspondence between wedge regions and one-parameter boost subgroups in Minkowski, de Sitter, and chiral circle examples, and describes wedge domains in causal homogeneous spaces. The central structural result, Theorem 3.1, is the Euler Element Theorem: a standard subspace satisfying the Bisognano–Wichmann property for a one-parameter subgroup, together with a cyclicity/regularity condition, forces the generator to be Euler (or central) and the modular conjugation to implement the Euler involution. The paper then surveys regularity and localizability results for semidirect products, the derivation of type III_1 wedge algebras, and the construction of non-modular covariant nets. It contains no proofs; the main results are imported from [MN21], [MN22], [MN24], and [FNÖ23].

Significance. If the surveyed results are accurate, the program offers a genuinely unifying geometric framework: Euler wedges become a natural abstract index set for nets of standard subspaces and von Neumann algebras, subsuming the Minkowski, de Sitter, and chiral circle models, and Theorem 3.1 upgrades the Bisognano–Wichmann property plus a localization hypothesis into a structural statement about the symmetry group. The survey is honest about several limitations: the regularity hypothesis is not automatic, the solvable-group case is explicitly left open, locality on causal manifolds is deferred, and second quantization with twisted central complements is not yet established. The paper is also fully traceable to a published literature, so a reader can verify the imported theorems. Its value, however, depends on the precision of the theorem summaries, and two places in the present text appear to be internally inconsistent or under-specified; these need correction before the survey can serve as a reliable guide.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.3.2 vs Section 3.2] Section 3.3.2, paragraph beginning "This theorem applies to ... the Poincaré group", asserts that every positive-energy (anti-)unitary representation of the Poincaré group is h-regular: condition (a) follows from the spectral condition, and condition (b) holds for every Lorentz-group representation by [MN24, Thm. 4.25]. But Section 3.2, paragraph beginning "Another remark, in view of [DM20]", cites [DM20] to the effect that no net of standard subspaces on spacelike cones satisfying the Bisognano–Wichmann property exists for irreducible massless finite nonzero helicity representations, because Theorem 3.1 would force an extension of the representation to P_+, which is impossible for such helicities. The paper does not explain how these two assertions are compatible. If h-regularity is not meant to imply the existence of a full spacelike-cone net with cyclicity, that limitation must be stated explicitly in both places; if h-regularity is meant to imply such a net, then the claimed regularity of all Lorentz restrictions is in direct tension with the cited [DM20] obstruction. This is load-bearing for the paper's central claim that Euler wedges provide the natural index set for nets on physical spacetimes, and it must be resolved by a precise statement of what Theorem 4.11 and Theorem 4.25 of [MN24] do and do not imply.
  2. [Definition 2.1 and Section 2.2] Axiom (HK4) of Definition 2.1 is not well-defined for non-symmetric Euler elements. Section 2.2 defines the partial order only on the positive orbit G.W0, and it explicitly notes that W'_0 need not lie in W+(W0), giving the translation-dilation group as an example. Yet (HK4) uses the condition W1 ≤ W2' with W1, W2 ∈ W+; if W2' is not in W+, then W2' is not in the domain on which the order is defined. The axioms therefore currently cover only the symmetric case without saying so, even though Theorem 2.2 states that the BGL net satisfies (HK1)–(HK8) for all Euler couples. The authors should either restrict the axioms and the theorem to symmetric Euler elements or extend the order and duality formalism to the full wedge space and state precisely how (HK4) is interpreted when the dual wedge is outside the positive orbit.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Definition 2.1] The notation N : W+ := W(W0) → Stand(H) conflicts with the notation in Section 2.2, where W+(W0) denotes the positive orbit G.W0 and W(W0) denotes the full orbit G^τ.W0; reusing W+ for the full orbit is confusing and should be repaired.
  2. [Section 2.2] The sentence "For sake of simplicity we here assume here that that G is center free" contains repeated words and should be edited.
  3. [Section 2.2, Table 1] The table of simple 3-graded Lie algebras is presented without definitions of the symbols M_{j,n-j}(R), Herm_n(H), Altn(R), and similar entries; a sentence pointing to the conventions in [MN21] or [Bo90a] would make the table usable without going to the source.
  4. [Section 3.3.2] The phrase "holds for every representation of the Lorentz group" should specify that the statement concerns unitary (or anti-unitary) representations and should quote the precise hypotheses of [MN24, Thm. 4.25], especially in light of the tension with [DM20] noted above.
  5. [Section 3.2] The sentence "The latter property is satisfied by the free one-particle nets on Minkowski space when C is a spacelike cone" relies on [BGL02, Sect. 4], but the reader is not told whether the cyclicity of H(C) for free nets is a theorem about all spacelike cones or only cones with a nonempty interior relative to the lightcone; a one-line clarification would help.
  6. [Section 3.4] The theorem statement in Section 3.4 uses the assumption "HG = CΩ ≠ H" to conclude that M is a factor of type III_1, but the preceding theorem statement also assumes HG = ker(∂U(h)) in part (c); the notation HG is used for two different objects and should be disambiguated.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 3.1's Euler conclusion is not contained in its Bisognano-Wichmann plus regularity assumptions, and the cited self-authored theorems are independent mathematical imports rather than definitions of the target result.

full rationale

The paper is a review of previously published theorems rather than a new derivation, so there are no fitted parameters, predictions, or constructions that collapse into their own inputs. Theorem 3.1 is imported from [MN24, Thm. 3.1] and assumes (a) the Bisognano-Wichmann formula U(exp th) = Delta^{-it/2pi}_V and (b) cyclicity of the intersection V_N = intersection_{g in N} U(g)V; neither assumption contains the conclusion that h is Euler or that J_V implements tau_h. Regularity is an additional localization condition, equivalent to the existence of a cyclic subspace localized more finely than the wedge, and the cited theorem is a parameter-free mathematical statement whose assumptions do not include the target conclusion, so it counts as independent support. The same holds for the BGL net theorem and the classification of Euler elements attributed to [MN21]: the paper cites them as external results and does not redefine them through the claims being proved. Heavy self-citation is present, but it is not load-bearing circularity. One apparent tension exists between the [DM20] no-go for massless finite helicity nets on spacelike cones and the blanket regularity claim for all positive-energy Poincare representations attributed to [MN24, Thm. 4.11 and 4.25]; this is an internal-consistency or correctness risk, not a circular step, and the paper leaves it unresolved. Therefore no specific circular step can be quoted, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

This paper is a survey, so most load-bearing content is imported from cited papers. No numerical fitting appears. The main structural inputs beyond standard modular theory are the choice of an invariant convex cone C, the regularity hypothesis, and the abstract Euler wedge construction.

free parameters (1)
  • Invariant pointed convex cone C = Eq. (7) for the circle; trivial cone for de Sitter; chosen per Lie group in general
    The cone C defines the wedge inclusion geometry in Section 2.2. It is a structural choice made by hand, not derived from data.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Tomita-Takesaki modular theory and the standard subspace correspondence H = Fix(J Delta^{1/2})
    Used throughout Section 2.4 as the bridge between von Neumann algebras and real subspaces.
  • standard math Borchers theorem and its converse for standard subspaces
    Invoked in Section 2.4.2 to relate modular covariance, positivity, and inclusion properties of standard subspaces.
  • domain assumption Classification of simple real Lie algebras supporting Euler elements and the list of three-graded Lie algebras
    Imported from [MN21, Thm. 3.10] and reproduced in Tables 1 and 2 without proof in this paper.
  • domain assumption Regularity property as a hypothesis in the Euler Element Theorem
    Theorem 3.1 assumes V_N is cyclic for some identity neighborhood N. This is not automatic and is open for general representations of G^{tau_h}, as stated in Section 3.3.2.
  • domain assumption Causal symmetric space and wedge domain constructions
    Section 2.3 relies on imported results from [NO22], [MNO23a], and [MNO23b] on the existence, connectedness, and structure of wedge domains.
invented entities (2)
  • Abstract Euler wedge space GE(G^{tau})
    purpose: Provides an abstract index set for nets of standard subspaces and von Neumann algebras, generalizing wedge regions in Minkowski, de Sitter, and circle models.
    Defined in Section 2.2 as a mathematical construction. It is internally consistent but has no empirical falsifiable handle independent of the framework.
  • Euler couple (h, tau_h)
    purpose: Pairs an Euler element with its integrating involution to encode wedge symmetries in the abstract setting.
    Introduced in Section 2.2 as the basic object replacing concrete wedge regions. It is a mathematical definition, not a physical entity with external experimental evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A geometric perspective on Algebraic Quantum Field Theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B2ARLVWP

@misc{pith2026241220410,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A geometric perspective on Algebraic Quantum Field Theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B2ARLVWP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.20410}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper we give a streamlined overview of some of the recent constructions provided with K.-H. Neeb, G. \'Olafsson and collaborators for a new geometric approach to Algebraic Quantum Field Theory (AQFT). Motivations, fundamental concepts and some of the relevant results about the abstract structure of these models are here presented.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Araki, H., A lattice of von Neumann algebras associated with the quantum theory of a free Bose field , J. Math. Phys. 4 (1963), 1343--1362

    work page 1963

  2. [2]

    RIMS, Kyoto Univ

    Araki, H., Relative entropy of states of von Neumann algebras , Publ. RIMS, Kyoto Univ. 11 (1976), 809--833

    work page 1976

  3. [3]

    J., Wichmann E

    Bisognano J. J., Wichmann E. H. , On the Duality condition for Hermitian scalar field , J. Math. Phys. 16 (1975), 985--1007

    work page 1975

  4. [4]

    Buchholz, Global properties of vacuum states in de Sitter space , Ann

    Borchers, H.-J., and D. Buchholz, Global properties of vacuum states in de Sitter space , Ann. Inst. H. Poincar\'e Phys. Th\'eor. 70 (1999), 23--40

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    Neeb, Projective completions of Jordan pairs, Part I

    Bertram, W., and K.-H. Neeb, Projective completions of Jordan pairs, Part I. The generalized projective geometry of a Lie algebra , J. Algebra 277:2 (2004), 474--519

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    Bratteli, O., and D. W. Robinson, ``Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics. Vol. 2'' 2nd ed., Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1997

    work page 1997

  7. [7]

    Longo, Modular localization and Wigner particles , Rev

    Brunetti, R., Guido, D., and R. Longo, Modular localization and Wigner particles , Rev. Math. Phys. 14 (2002), 759--785

    work page 2002

  8. [8]

    Buchholz, D., D'Antoni, C., Fredenhagen, K., The Universal Structure of Local Algebras, Commun. Math. Phys. Ill, 123-135 (1987)

    work page 1987

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Longo, Modular structure and duality in conformal quantum field theory , Comm

    Brunetti, R., Guido, D., and R. Longo, Modular structure and duality in conformal quantum field theory , Comm. Math. Phys. 156 (1993), 210--219

    1993

  2. [10]

    Summers, Transplantation of local nets and geometric modular action on Robertson-Walker Space-Times , Fields Inst

    Buchholz, D., Mund, J., and S.J. Summers, Transplantation of local nets and geometric modular action on Robertson-Walker Space-Times , Fields Inst. Commun. 30 (2001), 65--81

    2001

  3. [11]

    Chandrasekaran V., Longo R., Penington G., Witten E., An Algebra of Observables for de Sitter Space, JHEP, 2023, 82, (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Commun., Conference on Math

    Borchers, H.J., Yngvason, J., On the PCT theorem in the theory of local observables, Fields Inst. Commun., Conference on Math. Phys. in Math. and Phys. , 30, 39--64 (2001)

    2001

  5. [13]

    Ruzzi, Relative entropy and curved spacetimes , J

    Ciolli, F., Longo, R., Ranallo, A., and G. Ruzzi, Relative entropy and curved spacetimes , J. Geom. Phys. 172 (2022), Paper No. 104416, 16 pp

    2022

  6. [14]

    Longo, and G

    Ciolli, F., R. Longo, and G. Ruzzi, The information in a wave , Comm. Math. Phys. 379:3 (2020), 979--1000; arXiv:1703.10656

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    4i\'eme s\'erie 6:2 (1973), 133--252

    Connes, A., Une classification des facteurs de type III , Annales scientifiques de l’\'E.N.S. 4i\'eme s\'erie 6:2 (1973), 133--252

    1973

  8. [16]

    Rovelli, von Neumann algebra automorphisms and time-thermodynamics relation in generally covariant quantum theories , Classical Quantum Gravity 11:12 (1994), 2899--2917

    Connes, A., and C. Rovelli, von Neumann algebra automorphisms and time-thermodynamics relation in generally covariant quantum theories , Classical Quantum Gravity 11:12 (1994), 2899--2917

    1994

  9. [17]

    Correa da Silva, R., Lechner,G., Modular structure and inclusions of twisted Araki-Woods algebras , Comm. Math. Phys. 402:3 (2023), 2339--2386; arXiv:2212.02298

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Morinelli, Bisognano--Wichmann property for asymptotically complete massless QFT, Comm

    Dybalski, W., and V. Morinelli, Bisognano--Wichmann property for asymptotically complete massless QFT, Comm. Math. Phys. 380(3) (2020), 1267--1294

    2020

  11. [19]

    ``On the Type of Local Algebras in Quantum Field Theory", Commun

    Driessler, W. ``On the Type of Local Algebras in Quantum Field Theory", Commun. Math. Phys. 53,295497 (1977)

    1977

  12. [20]

    Fewster, C.J., Janssen, D.W., Loveridge, L.D., Rejzner, K., Waldron, J., Quantum Reference Frames, Measurement Schemes and the Type of Local Algebras in Quantum Field Theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 406, 19 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    Neeb, and G

    Frahm, J., K.-H. Neeb, and G. \'Olafsson, Nets of standard subspaces on non-compactly causal symmetric spaces , to appear in ``Toshiyuki Kobayashi Festschrift'', Progress in Mathematics, Springer-Nature, https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10065

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Fredenhagen, K., ``On the modular structure of local algebras of observables", Communications in Mathematical Physics volume 97, pages79–89 (1985)

    1985

  15. [23]

    and Guido D

    Figliolini F. and Guido D. , On the type of second quantization factors , J. Operator Theory , 31 , (1994), 229--252

    1994

  16. [24]

    Longo, An algebraic spin and statistics theorem , Comm

    Guido, D., and R. Longo, An algebraic spin and statistics theorem , Comm. Math. Phys. 172:3 (1995), 517--533

    1995

  17. [25]

    Gaier J., Yngvason J., Geometric Modular Action, Wedge Duality and Lorentz Covariance are Equivalent for Generalized Free Fields, J. Math. Phys. 41, (2000)

    2000

  18. [26]

    Longo, and H.-W

    Guido, D., R. Longo, and H.-W. Wiesbrock, Extensions of conformal nets and superselection structures, Comm. Math. Phys. 192:1 (1998), 217--244

    1998

  19. [27]

    Fields, Particles, Algebras,'' Second edition, Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996

    Haag, R., ``Local Quantum Physics. Fields, Particles, Algebras,'' Second edition, Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996

    1996

  20. [28]

    \'O lafsson, ``Causal Symmetric Spaces, Geometry and Harmonic Analysis,'' Perspectives in Mathematics 18 , Academic Press, 1996

    Hilgert, J., and G. \'O lafsson, ``Causal Symmetric Spaces, Geometry and Harmonic Analysis,'' Perspectives in Mathematics 18 , Academic Press, 1996

    1996

  21. [29]

    Neeb, ``Structure and Geometry of Lie Groups,'' Springer, 2012

    Hilgert, J., and K.-H. Neeb, ``Structure and Geometry of Lie Groups,'' Springer, 2012

    2012

  22. [30]

    Faraut et al eds., Progress in Math

    Kaneyuki, S., Graded Lie algebras and pseudo-hermitian symmetric space , in ``Analysis and Geometry on Complex Homogeneous Domains,'' J. Faraut et al eds., Progress in Math. 185 , Birkh\"auser, Boston, 2000

    2000

  23. [31]

    Roberts, and D

    Leyland, P., J. Roberts, and D. Testard, Duality for quantum free fields , Unpublished manuscript, Marseille(1978)

    1978

  24. [32]

    551–566, Proc

    Longo, R., Algebraic and modular structure of von Neumann algebras of physics , Operator algebras and applications, Part 2 (Kingston, Ont., 1980), pp. 551–566, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., 38 American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1982

    1980

  25. [33]

    Longo, R., Real Hilbert subspaces, modular theory, SL(2, R) and CFT in ``Von Neumann Algebras in Sibiu'', 33-91, Theta Ser. Adv. Math. 10 , Theta, Bucharest

  26. [34]

    Longo, R., ``Lectures on Conformal Nets. Part II. Nets of von Neumann Algebras,'' unpublished notes, 2008

    2008

  27. [35]

    Longo, R., Entropy distribution of localised states , Comm. Math. Phys. 373:2 (2020), 473--505; arXiv:1809.03358

    2020 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Feng, Relative entropy in CFT , Adv

    Longo, R., and X. Feng, Relative entropy in CFT , Adv. Math. 337 (2018), 139--170; arXiv:1712.07283

    2018 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Longo R., Morinelli V., An entropy bound due to symmetries, Rev. Math. Phys. , Online ready (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Morinelli, and K.-H

    Longo, R., V. Morinelli, and K.-H. Rehren, Where infinite spin particles are localizable , Comm. Math. Phys. 345:2 (2016), 587--614

    2016

  31. [39]

    Morsella, The Massless Modular Hamiltonian , Comm

    Longo, R., and G. Morsella, The Massless Modular Hamiltonian , Comm. Math. Phys. 400 (2023), 1181--1201

    2023

  32. [40]

    de Riese, Simple space-time symmetries: generalizing conformal field theory , J

    Mack, G., and M. de Riese, Simple space-time symmetries: generalizing conformal field theory , J. Math. Phys. 48:5 (2007), 052304, 21 pp

    2007

  33. [41]

    Henri Poincar\'e 19:3 (2018), 937--958

    Morinelli, V., The Bisognano--Wichmann property on nets of standard subspaces, some sufficient conditions , Ann. Henri Poincar\'e 19:3 (2018), 937--958

    2018

  34. [42]

    Neeb, Covariant homogeneous nets of standard subspaces , Comm

    Morinelli, V., and K.-H. Neeb, Covariant homogeneous nets of standard subspaces , Comm. Math. Phys. 386 (2021), 305--358; arXiv:math-ph.2010.07128

    2021 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Neeb, ``A family of non-modular covariant AQFTs",\\ Anal

    Morinelli, V., K.-H. Neeb, ``A family of non-modular covariant AQFTs",\\ Anal. Math. Phys. 12, 124 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Morinelli V., Neeb K.-H., From local nets to Euler elements , Advances in Mathematics, Volume 458, Part A, (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Neeb, and G.\ \'Olafsson, From Euler elements and 3 -gradings to non-compactly causal symmetric spaces , Journal of Lie Theory 23:1 (2023), 377--432; arXiv:2207.1403

    Morinelli, V., K.-H. Neeb, and G.\ \'Olafsson, From Euler elements and 3 -gradings to non-compactly causal symmetric spaces , Journal of Lie Theory 23:1 (2023), 377--432; arXiv:2207.1403

    2023

  38. [46]

    Neeb, and G.\ \'Olafsson, Modular geodesics and wedge domains in non-compactly causal symmetric spaces , Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry, Volume 65, article number 9, (2024)

    Morinelli, V., K.-H. Neeb, and G.\ \'Olafsson, Modular geodesics and wedge domains in non-compactly causal symmetric spaces , Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry, Volume 65, article number 9, (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    Neeb, and G.\ \'Olafsson, Orthogonal pairs of Euler elements , in preparation

    Morinelli, V., K.-H. Neeb, and G.\ \'Olafsson, Orthogonal pairs of Euler elements , in preparation

  40. [48]

    Neeb, Conformally invariant nets on Jordan spacetimes, in preparation

    Morinelli, V., K.-H. Neeb, Conformally invariant nets on Jordan spacetimes, in preparation

  41. [49]

    Tanimoto, Scale and M\"obius covariance in two-dimensional Haag-Kastler net , Commun

    Morinelli, V., and Y. Tanimoto, Scale and M\"obius covariance in two-dimensional Haag-Kastler net , Commun. Math. Phys. 371:2 (2019), 619--650

    2019

  42. [50]

    Tanimoto, and B

    Morinelli, V., Y. Tanimoto, and B. Wegener, Modular operator for null plane algebras in free fields , Comm. Math. Phys. 395 (2022), 331--363

    2022

  43. [51]

    Henri Poincar\'e 2 (2001), 907--926

    Mund, J., A Bisognano--Wichmann Theorem for massive theories , Ann. Henri Poincar\'e 2 (2001), 907--926

    2001

  44. [52]

    The CPT and Bisognano-Wichmann Theorems for Anyons and Plektons in d = 2 + 1

    Mund, J. The CPT and Bisognano-Wichmann Theorems for Anyons and Plektons in d = 2 + 1. Commun. Math. Phys. 294, 505–538 (2010)

    2010

  45. [53]

    Journal 62:3 (2022), 577--613; arXiv:OA:1912.13367

    Neeb, K.-H., Semigroups in 3-graded Lie groups and endomorphisms of standard subspaces , Kyoto Math. Journal 62:3 (2022), 577--613; arXiv:OA:1912.13367

    2022 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Neeb, K.-H., and G.\, \'Olafsson, (anti-)unitary representations and modular theory , in ``50th Sophus Lie Seminar'', Eds. K. Grabowska et al, J. Grabowski, A. Fialowski and K.-H. Neeb; Banach Center Publications 113 (2017), 291--362; arXiv:math-RT:1704.01336

    2017 arXiv

  47. [55]

    384 (2021), 107715, arXiv:2006.09832

    Neeb, K.-H., and G.\, \'Olafsson, Nets of standard subspaces on Lie groups , Advances in Math. 384 (2021), 107715, arXiv:2006.09832

    2021 arXiv

  48. [56]

    30; arXiv:2205.07685

    Neeb, K.-H., and G.\, \'Olafsson, Wedge domains in non-compactly causal symmetric spaces , Geometriae Dedicata 217:2 (2023), Paper No. 30; arXiv:2205.07685

    2023 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Neeb, K.-H., and G.\, \'Olafsson, Wedge domains in compactly causal symmetric spaces , Int. Math. Res. Notices 2023:12 (2023), 10209–-10312; arXiv:math-RT:2107.13288

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    rsted, Standard subspaces of Hilbert spaces of holomorphic functions on tube domains , Communications in Math

    Neeb, K.-H., G.\, \'Olafsson, and B. rsted, Standard subspaces of Hilbert spaces of holomorphic functions on tube domains , Communications in Math. Phys. 386 (2021), 1437--1487; arXiv:2007.14797

    2021 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Henri Poincar\`e, 1, 607--623 (2000)

    Rehren K.-H., Algebraic Holography, Ann. Henri Poincar\`e, 1, 607--623 (2000)

    2000

  52. [60]

    Strich, R., Passive states for essential observers , J. Math. Phys. 49:2 (2008), 022301, 16 pp

    2008

  53. [61]

    Sunder, V.S., ``An Invitation to von Neumann Algebras,'' Springer, Universitext, 1987

    1987

  54. [62]

    I,'' Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences 124 , Operator Algebras and Non-commutative Geometry 5 , Springer, Berlin, 2002

    Takesaki, M., ``Theory of Operator Algebras. I,'' Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences 124 , Operator Algebras and Non-commutative Geometry 5 , Springer, Berlin, 2002

    2002

  55. [63]

    J.\! Yngvason , A note on essential duality , Lett. Math. Phys. , 31 , (1994), 2 , 127--141

    1994

  56. [64]

    Varadarajan

    V.S. Varadarajan. Geometry of quantum theory . Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition edition, 1985

    1985

  57. [65]

    Witten, E., APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research: Invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory, Reviews of Modern Physics, 90, (4) (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.