pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20020 · v1 · pith:B2DJLGLAnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · quant-ph

Effects of interaction range on the mean-field dynamics of Bose polarons

Piotr Wysocki , Ubaldo Cavazos Olivas , Marek Tylutki , Krzysztof Jachymski This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 15:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas quant-ph
keywords Bose polaronfinite-range interactionsmean-field dynamicsrelaxation oscillationseffective massion-atom interactionsmomentum transfer
0
0 comments X

The pith

The range of impurity-bath forces controls how quickly a Bose polaron relaxes through damped velocity oscillations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In the mean-field treatment of a three-dimensional Bose polaron, momentum transfer from the impurity to the host gas occurs through damped oscillations of the impurity velocity whose form depends simply on interaction strength. The equilibration process changes markedly with interaction type: long-range forces appropriate to ion-atom systems produce substantially longer timescales and more pronounced oscillations in the strong-coupling regime than short-range local potentials. Even when the number of atoms accumulated in the polaron cloud is similar in the two cases, the resulting effective masses differ by a large amount.

Core claim

Relaxation dynamics can occur via damped oscillations of the impurity velocity with simple dependence on the interaction strength. The equilibration process is sensitive to the type of the impurity-bath interaction. Specifically, interatomic forces describing ion-atom systems lead to much longer timescales and more pronounced oscillations in the strong coupling regime with respect to local interaction potentials. Effective masses can differ by a large amount between the two scenarios, even if the number of atoms in the polaron cloud remains similar for both cases.

What carries the argument

Mean-field evolution of impurity velocity and momentum transfer in the impurity rest frame for finite-range versus contact interactions.

If this is right

  • Damped oscillations of impurity velocity provide the relaxation channel, with a form that depends simply on interaction strength.
  • Ion-atom type interactions produce longer equilibration times and larger oscillation amplitudes than local potentials in strong coupling.
  • Effective masses of the polaron can differ substantially between the two interaction classes even when cloud atom numbers are comparable.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Oscillation periods observed in momentum-relaxation experiments could serve as a direct probe of the spatial range of the impurity-bath potential.
  • The large effective-mass contrast implies that transport coefficients such as mobility will also differ markedly between neutral and charged impurities despite similar cloud sizes.
  • The sensitivity to interaction range suggests that mean-field predictions for out-of-equilibrium dynamics in mixed atomic-ion systems require explicit inclusion of the potential shape rather than a single scattering-length parameter.

Load-bearing premise

The mean-field approximation remains quantitatively accurate for the out-of-equilibrium momentum transfer and relaxation dynamics across the interaction strengths and ranges considered.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures impurity velocity after sudden momentum kick in a Bose gas and finds either no damped oscillations or relaxation timescales that do not differ between ion-atom and contact interactions in the strong-coupling regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20020 by Krzysztof Jachymski, Marek Tylutki, Piotr Wysocki, Ubaldo Cavazos Olivas.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Ground state density profile for a BEC interacting with a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Scattering length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Polaron residue as a function of the interaction strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Tan contact as a function of the inverse scattering length for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Effective masses for the ion-atom (upper blue curve) vs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Upper: buildup of the central density for an initially non [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Characterization of damped oscillations of the impurity ve [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider the three-dimensional Bose polaron problem in the regime of finite range interactions and competing length scales. Working in the reference frame of the impurity, we study both static and out of equilibrium properties of the system, in particular the transfer of momentum between the impurity and the host gas. We find that relaxation dynamics can occur via damped oscillations of the impurity velocity with simple dependence on the interaction strength. Furthermore, the equilibration process is sensitive to the type of the impurity-bath interaction. Specifically, interatomic forces describing ion-atom systems lead to much longer timescales and more pronounced oscillations in the strong coupling regime with respect to local interaction potentials. We also find that the effective masses can differ by a large amount between the two scenarios, even if the number of atoms in the polaron cloud remains similar for both cases.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the three-dimensional Bose polaron problem with finite-range interactions and competing length scales. Working in the impurity reference frame, it analyzes both static properties and out-of-equilibrium momentum transfer between the impurity and the host gas. The central claims are that relaxation proceeds via damped oscillations of the impurity velocity with simple dependence on interaction strength; that ion-atom (long-range) interactions produce substantially longer equilibration timescales and more pronounced oscillations than local potentials in the strong-coupling regime; and that effective masses differ markedly between the two interaction types even when the number of atoms in the polaron cloud is comparable.

Significance. If the mean-field results are quantitatively reliable, the work shows that interaction range is a controlling factor in polaron relaxation dynamics and effective-mass renormalization, offering a concrete distinction between local and ion-atom potentials that could inform experiments in ultracold ion-atom mixtures.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (and the mean-field treatment throughout): the reported damped-oscillation relaxation, interaction-type-dependent timescales, and effective-mass differences are obtained exclusively within a mean-field description. No benchmark against a controlled beyond-mean-field method, fluctuation correction, or expansion parameter is supplied to justify the approximation in the strong-coupling regime highlighted for ion-atom potentials, where correlations are known to renormalize momentum relaxation rates.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the detailed comment on our manuscript. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and the mean-field treatment throughout): the reported damped-oscillation relaxation, interaction-type-dependent timescales, and effective-mass differences are obtained exclusively within a mean-field description. No benchmark against a controlled beyond-mean-field method, fluctuation correction, or expansion parameter is supplied to justify the approximation in the strong-coupling regime highlighted for ion-atom potentials, where correlations are known to renormalize momentum relaxation rates.

    Authors: We agree that all quantitative results on the damped-oscillatory relaxation, the interaction-type dependence of the timescales, and the effective-mass differences are obtained strictly within the mean-field treatment. The manuscript is framed as a mean-field study whose purpose is to isolate the role of interaction range and competing length scales. No controlled benchmark against beyond-mean-field methods is provided. In the revised manuscript we will insert an explicit discussion of this limitation, noting that correlations are expected to renormalize relaxation rates in the strong-coupling regime and that the reported numbers should be viewed as qualitative indicators rather than quantitative predictions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; direct mean-field evolution of dynamics

full rationale

The paper computes static and dynamical properties via direct numerical integration of the mean-field equations for the impurity-bath system in the impurity rest frame, for two classes of interaction potentials. Reported features (damped velocity oscillations, interaction-range-dependent timescales, effective-mass differences) are outputs of that evolution rather than inputs. No parameter is fitted to a target observable and then relabeled as a prediction, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz, and the derivation chain does not reduce any claimed result to a tautological re-expression of its own definitions. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the mean-field treatment for both static and dynamical properties of the impurity-bath system; no free parameters are explicitly named in the abstract, but interaction strength and range are varied as control parameters.

free parameters (2)
  • interaction strength
    Key parameter controlling coupling regime and oscillation amplitude, varied across weak to strong coupling.
  • interaction range
    Finite range is the central variable distinguishing the two interaction scenarios studied.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Mean-field theory suffices to describe the impurity velocity relaxation and effective mass in the presence of finite-range interactions
    Title and abstract specify mean-field dynamics as the framework used.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5678 in / 1371 out tokens · 22141 ms · 2026-06-26T15:21:31.473039+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Landau and S

    L. Landau and S. Pekar, Effective mass of a polaron, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz18, 419 (1948)

    1948

  2. [2]

    Schirotzek, C.-H

    A. Schirotzek, C.-H. Wu, A. Sommer, and M. W. Zwierlein, Observation of fermi polarons in a tunable fermi liquid of ultra- cold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 230402 (2009)

    2009

  3. [3]

    Cetina, M

    M. Cetina, M. Jag, R. S. Lous, I. Fritsche, J. T. Walraven, R. Grimm, J. Levinsen, M. M. Parish, R. Schmidt, M. Knap, et al., Ultrafast many-body interferometry of impurities cou- pled to a fermi sea, Science354, 96 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    G. Ness, C. Shkedrov, Y . Florshaim, O. K. Diessel, J. von Mil- czewski, R. Schmidt, and Y . Sagi, Observation of a smooth polaron-molecule transition in a degenerate fermi gas, Phys. Rev. X10, 041019 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    M.-G. Hu, M. J. Van de Graaff, D. Kedar, J. P. Corson, E. A. Cornell, and D. S. Jin, Bose polarons in the strongly interacting regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 055301 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    Z. Z. Yan, Y . Ni, C. Robens, and M. W. Zwierlein, Bose po- larons near quantum criticality, Science368, 190 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Z. Z. Yan, Y . Ni, A. Chuang, P. E. Dolgirev, K. Seetharam, E. Demler, C. Robens, and M. Zwierlein, Collective flow of fermionic impurities immersed in a bose–einstein condensate, Nature Physics20, 1395 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    J. c. v. Etrych, G. Martirosyan, A. Cao, C. J. Ho, Z. Hadzibabic, and C. Eigen, Universal quantum dynamics of bose polarons, Phys. Rev. X15, 021070 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    L. B. Tan, O. K. Diessel, A. Popert, R. Schmidt, A. Imamoglu, and M. Kroner, Bose polaron interactions in a cavity-coupled monolayer semiconductor, Phys. Rev. X13, 031036 (2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    Grusdt, N

    F. Grusdt, N. Mostaan, E. Demler, and L. A. P. Ardila, Impuri- ties and polarons in bosonic quantum gases: a review on recent 7 progress (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    Massignan, R

    P. Massignan, R. Schmidt, G. E. Astrakharchik, A. ˙Imamoglu, M. Zwierlein, J. J. Arlt, and G. M. Bruun, Polarons in atomic gases and two-dimensional semiconductors (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    R. S. Christensen, J. Levinsen, and G. M. Bruun, Quasiparticle properties of a mobile impurity in a bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 160401 (2015)

    2015

  13. [13]

    Y . E. Shchadilova, R. Schmidt, F. Grusdt, and E. Demler, Quan- tum dynamics of ultracold bose polarons, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 113002 (2016)

    2016

  14. [14]

    Christianen, J

    A. Christianen, J. I. Cirac, and R. Schmidt, Phase diagram for strong-coupling bose polarons, SciPost Physics16, 067 (2024)

    2024

  15. [15]

    L. A. P. Ardila and S. Giorgini, Impurity in a bose-einstein condensate: Study of the attractive and repulsive branch using quantum monte carlo methods, Phys. Rev. A92, 033612 (2015)

    2015

  16. [16]

    S. I. Mistakidis, F. Grusdt, G. M. Koutentakis, and P. Schmelcher, Dissipative correlated dynamics of a moving im- purity immersed in a bose–einstein condensate, New Journal of Physics21, 103026 (2019)

    2019

  17. [17]

    M. G. Skou, T. G. Skov, N. B. Jørgensen, K. K. Nielsen, A. Camacho-Guardian, T. Pohl, G. M. Bruun, and J. J. Arlt, Non-equilibrium quantum dynamics and formation of the bose polaron, Nature Physics17, 731 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    Pavloff, Breakdown of superfluidity of an atom laser past an obstacle, Phys

    N. Pavloff, Breakdown of superfluidity of an atom laser past an obstacle, Phys. Rev. A66, 013610 (2002)

    2002

  19. [19]

    Ianeselli, C

    S. Ianeselli, C. Menotti, and A. Smerzi, Beyond the landau cri- terion for superfluidity, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecu- lar and Optical Physics39, S135 (2006)

    2006

  20. [20]

    Carusotto, S

    I. Carusotto, S. X. Hu, L. A. Collins, and A. Smerzi, Bogoliubov- ˇCerenkov radiation in a bose-einstein condensate flowing against an obstacle, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 260403 (2006)

    2006

  21. [21]

    Seetharam, Y

    K. Seetharam, Y . Shchadilova, F. Grusdt, M. B. Zvonarev, and E. Demler, Dynamical quantum cherenkov transition of fast impurities in quantum liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 185302 (2021)

    2021

  22. [22]

    Seetharam, Y

    K. Seetharam, Y . Shchadilova, F. Grusdt, M. Zvonarev, and E. Demler, Quantum cherenkov transition of finite-momentum bose polarons, Phys. Rev. A110, 063306 (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    Tomza, K

    M. Tomza, K. Jachymski, R. Gerritsma, A. Negretti, T. Calarco, Z. Idziaszek, and P. S. Julienne, Cold hybrid ion-atom systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 035001 (2019)

    2019

  24. [24]

    R. S. Lous and R. Gerritsma, Ultracold ion-atom experiments: cooling, chemistry, and quantum effects, Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics71, 65 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    Massignan, C

    P. Massignan, C. J. Pethick, and H. Smith, Static properties of positive ions in atomic bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 71, 023606 (2005)

    2005

  26. [26]

    E. R. Christensen, A. Camacho-Guardian, and G. M. Bruun, Charged polarons and molecules in a bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 243001 (2021)

    2021

  27. [27]

    G. E. Astrakharchik, L. A. P. Ardila, R. Schmidt, K. Jachymski, and A. Negretti, Ionic polaron in a bose-einstein condensate, Communications Physics4, 94 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    Cavazos Olivas, L

    U. Cavazos Olivas, L. A. Peña Ardila, and K. Jachymski, Mod- ified mean-field ansatz for charged polarons in a bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A110, L011301 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    T. A. Yo ˘gurt and M. T. Eiles, Quasiparticle properties of long- range impurities in a bose condensate, Phys. Rev. A112, 063313 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    G. A. Sánchez and A. C. Guardian, Charged bose polarons at finite momentum, arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.31255 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Gross, Motion of foreign bodies in boson systems, Annals of Physics19, 234 (1962)

    E. Gross, Motion of foreign bodies in boson systems, Annals of Physics19, 234 (1962)

    1962

  32. [32]

    Drescher, M

    M. Drescher, M. Salmhofer, and T. Enss, Theory of a resonantly interacting impurity in a bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 032011 (2020)

    2020

  33. [33]

    Schmidt and T

    R. Schmidt and T. Enss, Self-stabilized bose polarons, SciPost Physics13, 054 (2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    Yegovtsev, G

    N. Yegovtsev, G. E. Astrakharchik, P. Massignan, and V . Gu- rarie, Exact results for heavy unitary bose polarons, Phys. Rev. A110, 023310 (2024)

    2024

  35. [35]

    Majumdar and A

    S. Majumdar and A. Petkovi´c, Relaxation dynamics of a mobile impurity injected into a one-dimensional bose gas, Phys. Rev. A112, 053326 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    Majumdar and A

    S. Majumdar and A. Petkovi ´c, Dynamically entangled oscillat- ing state in a bose gas with an attractive polaron, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.08443 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    Wysocki, M

    P. Wysocki, M. Tylutki, and K. Jachymski, Dynamics of a mo- bile ion in a bose–einstein condensate, New Journal of Physics 28, 013201 (2026)

    2026

  38. [38]

    C. J. M. Mathy, M. B. Zvonarev, and E. Demler, Quantum flut- ter of supersonic particles in one-dimensional quantum liquids, Nature Physics8, 881 (2012)

    2012

  39. [39]

    M. Knap, C. J. M. Mathy, M. Ganahl, M. B. Zvonarev, and E. Demler, Quantum flutter: Signatures and robustness, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 015302 (2014)

    2014

  40. [40]

    Burovski, V

    E. Burovski, V . Cheianov, O. Gamayun, and O. Lychkovskiy, Momentum relaxation of a mobile impurity in a one- dimensional quantum gas, Phys. Rev. A89, 041601 (2014)

    2014

  41. [41]

    Zhang, Y

    Z.-H. Zhang, Y . Jiang, H.-Q. Lin, and X.-W. Guan, Microscopic origin of the quantum supersonic phenomenon in one dimen- sion, Phys. Rev. A110, 023329 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    Collin, P

    A. Collin, P. Massignan, and C. J. Pethick, Energy-dependent effective interactions for dilute many-body systems, Phys. Rev. A75, 013615 (2007)

    2007

  43. [43]

    Krych and Z

    M. Krych and Z. Idziaszek, Description of ion motion in a paul trap immersed in a cold atomic gas, Phys. Rev. A91, 023430 (2015)

    2015

  44. [44]

    T. D. Lee, F. E. Low, and D. Pines, The motion of slow electrons in a polar crystal, Phys. Rev.90, 297 (1953)

    1953

  45. [45]

    Girardeau, Motion of an impurity particle in a boson super- fluid, The Physics of Fluids4, 279 (1961)

    M. Girardeau, Motion of an impurity particle in a boson super- fluid, The Physics of Fluids4, 279 (1961)

    1961

  46. [46]

    Jager, R

    J. Jager, R. Barnett, M. Will, and M. Fleischhauer, Strong- coupling bose polarons in one dimension: Condensate defor- mation and modified bogoliubov phonons, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033142 (2020)

    2020

  47. [47]

    D. Breu, E. Vidal Marcos, M. Will, and M. Fleischhauer, Impu- rities in a trapped one-dimensional bose gas of arbitrary inter- action strength: Localization-delocalization transition and ab- sence of self-localization, Phys. Rev. A111, 023326 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    R. Kubo, M. Toda, and N. Hashitsume,Statistical physics II: nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, V ol. 31 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  49. [49]

    A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, Influence of dissipation on quantum tunneling in macroscopic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.46, 211 (1981)

    1981

  50. [50]

    Tan, Energetics of a strongly correlated fermi gas, Annals of Physics323, 2952 (2008)

    S. Tan, Energetics of a strongly correlated fermi gas, Annals of Physics323, 2952 (2008)

    2008

  51. [51]

    Tan, Large momentum part of a strongly correlated fermi gas, Annals of Physics323, 2971 (2008)

    S. Tan, Large momentum part of a strongly correlated fermi gas, Annals of Physics323, 2971 (2008)

    2008

  52. [52]

    Guenther, R

    N.-E. Guenther, R. Schmidt, G. M. Bruun, V . Gurarie, and P. Massignan, Mobile impurity in a bose-einstein condensate and the orthogonality catastrophe, Phys. Rev. A103, 013317 (2021)

    2021

  53. [53]

    Dieterle, M

    T. Dieterle, M. Berngruber, C. Hölzl, R. Löw, K. Jachymski, T. Pfau, and F. Meinert, Transport of a single cold ion immersed in a bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 033401 8 (2021). [54] R. Grimm, (2025), conference presentation

    2021