REVIEW 1 cited by
Impact of different approaches for computing rotating stellar models I. The solar metallicity case
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Impact of different approaches for computing rotating stellar models I. The solar metallicity case
read the original abstract
The physics of stellar rotation plays a crucial role in the evolution of stars, their final fate and the properties of compact remnants. Diverse approaches have been adopted to incorporate the effects of rotation in stellar evolution models. This study seeks to explore the consequences of these various prescriptions for rotation on essential outputs of massive star models. We compute a grid of 15 and 60 M$_{\odot}$ stellar evolution models with the Geneva Stellar Evolution Code (GENEC), accounting for both hydrodynamical and magnetic instabilities induced by rotation. In both the 15 and 60 M$_{\odot}$ models, the choice of the vertical and horizontal diffusion coefficients for the non magnetic models strongly impacts the evolution of the chemical structure, but has a weak impact on the angular momentum transport and the rotational velocity of the core. In the 15 M$_{\odot}$ models, the choice of diffusion coefficient impacts the convective core size during the core H-burning phase, whether the model begins core He-burning as a blue or red supergiant and the core mass at the end of He-burning. In the 60 M$_{\odot}$ models, the evolution is dominated by mass loss and is less affected by the choice of diffusion coefficient. In the magnetic models, magnetic instability dominates the angular momentum transport and such models are found to be less mixed when compared to their rotating non-magnetic counterparts. Stellar models with the same initial mass, chemical composition, and rotation may exhibit diverse characteristics depending on the physics applied. By conducting thorough comparisons with observational features, we can ascertain which method(s) produce the most accurate results in different cases.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The IACOB project XIX. Revisiting massive-star evolution with empirical TAMS constraints: updated models, overshoot calibration, and the population of blue supergiants
Massive-star models require mass-dependent core overshoot (α_ov ≈ 0.18–0.45) to match the empirical TAMS, but still fail to explain the velocity dependence of the TAMS and the observed blue supergiant population.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.