pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.11364 · v1 · pith:B2TXHZBCnew · submitted 2019-07-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM

Strontium Iodide Radiation Instrument (SIRI) -- Early On-Orbit Results

Lee J. Mitchell , Bernard F. Phlips , J. Eric Grove , Theodore Finne , Mary Johnson-Rambert , W. Neil Johnson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 15:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM
keywords SrI2:Euscintillatorgamma-ray spectrometerSiPMspace instrumenton-orbit performanceactivation productsenergy resolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

SIRI shows SrI2:Eu scintillator with SiPMs functions in space and reaches 4.3 percent energy resolution at 662 keV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports early results from the Strontium Iodide Radiation Instrument, a single-detector gamma-ray spectrometer launched into 600 km sun-synchronous orbit in December 2018. The instrument uses an 11.6 cm3 europium-doped strontium iodide crystal read out by silicon photomultipliers and covers 0.04 to 8 MeV. It measures 4.3 percent FWHM resolution at the cesium-137 line, a 50 percent photo fraction for parallel gamma rays at 662 keV, and background rates of 40 to 50 counts per second outside trapped-particle regions, with at least ten activation lines visible in the spectra. The results position SrI2:Eu as a workable replacement for sodium iodide or cesium iodide when a factor-of-two gain in resolution matters for scientific return, marking the first on-orbit use of this scintillator and readout combination.

Core claim

The Strontium Iodide Radiation Instrument has operated for over 1000 hours by April 2019 and records spectroscopic performance of 4.3 percent FWHM at 662 keV together with clear detection of multiple activation-product lines and a beta continuum, establishing that SrI2:Eu scintillator paired with SiPM readout delivers usable gamma-ray spectroscopy in the space radiation environment.

What carries the argument

Europium-doped strontium iodide crystal with silicon photomultiplier readout, which supplies the measured energy resolution and allows identification of activation features amid orbital background.

If this is right

  • Missions that benefit from twice the energy resolution of NaI or CsI can adopt SrI2:Eu without changing the basic instrument architecture.
  • The observed activation spectrum from SAA transits and cosmic-ray bombardment sets a baseline for background modeling in similar low-Earth-orbit detectors.
  • Rate maps from energy-selected data confirm expected contributions from trapped-particle regions, validating the instrument's response to orbital radiation.
  • Continued data collection through December 2019 will test whether performance holds for a full year in orbit.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Compact SiPM readout may allow smaller or lower-power spectrometers on future spacecraft that currently use photomultiplier tubes.
  • The activation lines identified in the SIRI spectra could guide material choices or shielding strategies for other scintillator instruments in low Earth orbit.
  • If long-term stability is confirmed, the same crystal and readout combination could be scaled for planetary or astrophysics payloads needing better line separation than conventional scintillators provide.

Load-bearing premise

The resolution, photo fraction, and background features recorded in the first months accurately represent the detector's intrinsic long-term performance without unaccounted degradation from launch or space environment effects.

What would settle it

A measurable increase in the FWHM beyond 4.3 percent at 662 keV or the appearance of unidentified background features after several additional months of operation would indicate the early data do not represent stable long-term behavior.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.11364 by Bernard F. Phlips, J. Eric Grove, Lee J. Mitchell, Mary Johnson-Rambert, Theodore Finne, W. Neil Johnson.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: CAD rendering of SIRI showing the overall instrument design and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: SIRI detector housed in an aluminum hermetically sealed container with a quarts optical window on one end. Not shown is the SensL J-series 2x2 6mm SiPM array bonded to the optical window and used as the readout [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: SIRI on-orbit parameters over a ~24hr period. Shown are values for temperature, latitude, longitude and altitude as measured by onboard sensors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Centroid of the 511 keV line as a function of temperature. Plot shows [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Map of the 511 keV centroid channel with respect to geol [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows the differential fluxes for both trapped electrons and protons as predicted by the AE9 and AP9 near￾Earth radiation models [16] for the ephemeris of STPSat-5 for April 2019. The fluxes represent an average for that month, and are plotted over the range of 0.25 to 10 MeV and 0.1 to 1200 MeV for trapped electrons and protons, respectively. Changes in the trapped particle fluxes along the orbital path l… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Gross gamma-ray count rate showing the elevated backg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Summed spectra generated from zones indicated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Rate plots in counts per second generated from the 30 second spectra over a typical orbit. The gross rate(a) and rates corresponding to spectral energy cuts of 30-70 keV (b), 70-400 keV(c) and >800 keV(d) are plotted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Intensity rate map of the overflow bin showing det [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Intensity plot of the 511 keV line as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Strontium Iodide Radiation Instrument (SIRI) is a single detector, gamma-ray spectrometer designed to space-qualify the new scintillation detector material europium-doped strontium iodide (SrI2:Eu) and new silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) technology. SIRI covers the energy range from 0.04-8 MeV and was launched into 600 km sun-synchronous orbit on Dec 3, 2018 onboard STPSat5 with a one-year mission to investigate the detector's response to on-orbit background radiation. The detector has an active volume of 11.6 cm3 and a photo fraction efficiency of 50% at 662 keV for gamma-rays parallel to the long axis of the crystal. Its spectroscopic resolution of 4.3% was measured by the FWHM of the characteristic Cs-137 gamma-ray line at 662 keV. Measured background rates external to the trapped particle regions are 40-50 counts per second for energies greater than 40 keV and are largely the result of short- and long-term activation products generated by transits of the SAA and the continual cosmic-ray bombardment. Rate maps determined from energy cuts of the collected spectral data show the expected contributions from the various trapped particle regions. Early spectra acquired by the instrument show the presence of at least 10 characteristic gamma-ray lines and a beta continuum generated by activation products within the detector and surrounding materials. As of April 2019, the instrument has acquired over 1000 hours of data and is expected to continue operations until the space vehicle is decommissioned in Dec. 2019. Results indicate SrI2:Eu provides a feasible alternative to traditional sodium iodide and cesium iodide scintillators, especially for missions where a factor-of-two improvement in energy resolution would represent a significant difference in scientific return. To the best of our knowledge, SIRI is the first on-orbit use of SrI2:Eu scintillator with SiPM readouts.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper reports early on-orbit performance of the SIRI gamma-ray spectrometer, which uses a SrI2:Eu scintillator read out by SiPMs and was launched in December 2018 into 600 km orbit. It presents measured values including 4.3% FWHM energy resolution at 662 keV, 50% photofraction at that energy, background rates of 40-50 cps outside trapped-particle regions, and detection of at least 10 activation-product gamma lines plus a beta continuum. The work concludes that SrI2:Eu with SiPM readout is a feasible alternative to NaI and CsI scintillators for space applications where improved resolution matters, and states that SIRI is the first on-orbit demonstration of this combination.

Significance. If the reported early performance holds, the result provides the first space-qualified demonstration of SrI2:Eu + SiPM technology, directly quantifying a factor-of-two resolution improvement over conventional scintillators together with in-orbit background and activation data. This supplies concrete, falsifiable metrics (resolution, photofraction, count rates, line identifications) that instrument designers can use when trading energy resolution against other mission constraints.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / early spectra discussion] Abstract and results discussion: the feasibility conclusion that SrI2:Eu 'provides a feasible alternative' rests on spectra acquired in the first ~4 months (through April 2019). No comparison of FWHM, peak centroids, continuum shape, or background rate between early and later data segments is shown, nor is any pre-launch versus post-launch calibration cross-check presented. This leaves the assumption that launch vibration, SAA passages, and cosmic-ray dose have not introduced unaccounted degradation or time-evolving activation untested within the reported data set.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and for recognizing the significance of the first on-orbit demonstration of SrI2:Eu with SiPM readout. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / early spectra discussion] Abstract and results discussion: the feasibility conclusion that SrI2:Eu 'provides a feasible alternative' rests on spectra acquired in the first ~4 months (through April 2019). No comparison of FWHM, peak centroids, continuum shape, or background rate between early and later data segments is shown, nor is any pre-launch versus post-launch calibration cross-check presented. This leaves the assumption that launch vibration, SAA passages, and cosmic-ray dose have not introduced unaccounted degradation or time-evolving activation untested within the reported data set.

    Authors: The manuscript is explicitly titled and scoped as 'Early On-Orbit Results,' with the abstract stating that spectra and metrics (4.3% FWHM at 662 keV, 40-50 cps background, activation lines) derive from data through April 2019. The feasibility conclusion is therefore limited to performance achieved in this initial period. No time-segment comparisons or pre-/post-launch cross-checks are included because the paper's purpose is to report the first on-orbit demonstration rather than long-term stability; such analyses would require additional data reduction beyond the reported 1000 hours and lie outside the early-results scope. The text already notes that operations are expected to continue through December 2019, leaving open the possibility of future degradation studies. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational instrument report

full rationale

The paper is an experimental report on early on-orbit measurements of the SIRI detector. It presents direct observations of resolution (4.3% FWHM at 662 keV), photofraction (50%), background rates (40-50 cps), activation lines, and rate maps from collected spectral data. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-referential definitions appear in the provided text. All claims rest on measured spectra and rates without reduction to prior inputs by construction. The feasibility conclusion follows from the reported data rather than any circular step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions about scintillation detection physics and space radiation environments with no free parameters fitted to data or new entities postulated in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The FWHM of the 662 keV Cs-137 line accurately measures the detector energy resolution
    Standard definition used in gamma-ray spectroscopy
  • domain assumption Observed spectral features are dominated by activation products from SAA transits and cosmic rays
    Based on expected low-Earth orbit radiation environment

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5923 in / 1429 out tokens · 37662 ms · 2026-05-24T15:32:57.147472+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Advanced Scintillators and Readout Devices for High-Energy Astronomy,

    P. F. Bloser, M. L. Cherry, G. L. Case, J. Greiner, G. Kanbach, R. M. Kippen, M. L. McConnel, R. S. Miller, J. M. Ryan, K. Shah, C. J. Stapels, E. V. Loef and M. Wallace, "Advanced Scintillators and Readout Devices for High-Energy Astronomy," National Academies, Washington, 2009

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    Applications for New Scintillator Technologies in Gamma Ray Astronomy,

    M. McConnell, P. Bloser, L. J. and J. Ryan, "Applications for New Scintillator Technologies in Gamma Ray Astronomy," Journal of Physics, vol. 763, no. 1, 2016

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    New scintillators for focal plane detectors in gamma-ray missions,

    E.-J. Buis, M. Beijersbergen, S. Kraft, A. Owens, F. Quarati, S. Brandenburg and R. Ostendorf, "New scintillators for focal plane detectors in gamma-ray missions," Experimental Astronomy, vol. 20, pp. 333- 339, 2005

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    Scintillation properties of SrI2(Eu2+) for high energy astrophysical detectors: Nonproportionality as a function of temperature and at high gamma-ray energies,

    R. S. Perea, A. M. Parsons, M. Groza, T. E. Peterson, D. Caudel, K. G. Stassun, S. Nowickib and A. Burger, "Scintillation properties of SrI2(Eu2+) for high energy astrophysical detectors: Nonproportionality as a function of temperature and at high gamma-ray energies," arXiv, Ithica, 2014

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Characterization of silicon photomultipliers for new high-energy space telescopes,

    K. Lacombe, B. Houret, J. Knödlseder, J. Gimenez, J.- F. Olive and P. Ramon, "Characterization of silicon photomultipliers for new high-energy space telescopes," Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A, vol. 912, pp. 144-148, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    SiPM Development for Astroparticle Physics Applications

    M. Teshima, B. Dolgoshei n, R. Mirzoyan, E. Popova and J. Nincovic, "SiPM Development for Astroparticle Physics Applications," arXiv:0709.1808 [astro-ph], Ithica, 2007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  7. [7]

    The Next Generation of Photo-Detector for Particle Astrophysics,

    R. Wagner, K. Byrum, M. S anchez, A. V. Vaniachine, O. Siegmund, N. Otte, E. Ramberg, J. Hall and J. Buckley, "The Next Generation of Photo-Detector for Particle Astrophysics," U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, 2009

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    New Sierra Nevada Corporation Satellite to Launch,

    Sierra Nevada Corporation, "New Sierra Nevada Corporation Satellite to Launch," SNC, 17 Nov. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.sncorp.com/press- releases/snc-stpsat-5-set-to-launch/. [Accessed 31 Mar. 2019]

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    SpaceX launche s swarm of satellites, flies rocket for third time,

    S. Clark, "SpaceX launche s swarm of satellites, flies rocket for third time," 3 December 2018. [Online]. Available: https://spaceflightnow.com/2018/12/03/spacex- launches-swarm-of-satellites-re-flies-rocket-for-third- time/

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Instroduc ting SSO-A: The SmallSat Express,

    SpaceFlight, "Instroduc ting SSO-A: The SmallSat Express," SpaceFligh, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://spaceflight.com/sso-a/. [Accessed 2019 February 2019]

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Strontium Iodide Radiation Instrumentation (SIRI),

    L. J. Mitchell, B. F. Phlips, R. S. Woolf, F. T. Theodore, N. J. Johnson and E. G. Jackson, "Strontium Iodide Radiation Instrumentation (SIRI)," in Proceedings of SPIE, San Diego, 2017

    work page 2017

  12. [12]

    Gamma Sci ntillator Properties SrI2,

    RMD Inc., "Gamma Sci ntillator Properties SrI2," [Online]. Available: https://cdn.dynasil.com//assets/Strontium-Iodide-SrI2- Gamma-Scintillator-Properties.pdf. [Accessed 31 03 2019]

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    NaI(Tl) and Polyscin® NaI(Tl) Sodium Iodide,

    Saint Gobain, "NaI(Tl) and Polyscin® NaI(Tl) Sodium Iodide," [Online]. Available: https://www.crystals.saint- gobain.com/sites/imdf.crystals.com/files/documents/so dium-iodide-material-data-sheet_0.pdf. [Accessed 31 03 2019]

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Obse rvation of high intensity radiation by satellites 1958 alpha and gamma.,

    J. A. van Allen, "Obse rvation of high intensity radiation by satellites 1958 alpha and gamma.," Journal of Jet Propulsion, vol. 28, no. 9, p. 588–592, 1958

    work page 1958

  15. [15]

    Background for a gamma-ray satellite on a low-Earth orbit

    P. Cumani, M. Hernanz, J. Kiener, V. Tatischeff and A. Zoglauer, "Background for a gamma-ray satellite on a low-Earth," 19 Feb. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.06944. [Accessed 31 Mar. 2019]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    AE9, AP9 and SPM: New Models for Specifying the Trapped Energetic Particle and Space Plasma Environment,

    G. P. Ginet, S. L. Huston, T. P. O'Brien and W. R. Johnston, "AE9, AP9 and SPM: New Models for Specifying the Trapped Energetic Particle and Space Plasma Environment," Space Science Review, vol. 179, pp. 579-615, 2013

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    Relationship of the Van Allen radiation belts to solar wind drivers,

    M. K. Hudson, B. T. Kr ess, H.-R. Mueller, J. A. Zastrow and J. B. Blake, "Relationship of the Van Allen radiation belts to solar wind drivers," Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 708-729, 2008

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    The South Atlantic Anomaly throughout the solar cycle,

    J. Domingos, D. Jault, M. A. Pais and M. Mandea, "The South Atlantic Anomaly throughout the solar cycle," Earth and Planetary Science Letters, vol. 473, pp. 154-163, 1 Sep. 2017

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    J. F. Ziegler, J. P. Bie rsack and M. D. Ziegler, SRIM - The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter, Lulu, 2015

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    Magnetospheric Cosmic-ray Cutoff and Their Variations,

    D. J. HOfmann and H. H. Sauer, "Magnetospheric Cosmic-ray Cutoff and Their Variations," Space Science Reviews, vol. 8, no. 5-6, pp. 750-803, 1968

    work page 1968

  21. [21]

    The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor,

    C. Meegan, G. Lichti, P . N. Bhat, M. S. Briggs, V. Connaughton and et al., "The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor," The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 702, pp. 791-804, 2009

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    Calculation of radioactivity induced in gamma- ray spectrometers during spaceflight,

    C. S. Dyer, J. I. Trom bka, S. M. Seltzer and L. G. Evans, "Calculation of radioactivity induced in gamma- ray spectrometers during spaceflight," Nuclear Instruments and Methods, vol. 173, no. 3, pp. 585-601, 1980

    work page 1980