pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22288 · v1 · pith:B3DCOS74new · submitted 2026-05-21 · 💻 cs.IT · eess.SP· math.IT

Multi-Cell 6DMA: Cooperative Interference Management and Antenna Rotation Optimization

Qijun Jiang , Xiaodan Shao , Rui Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 04:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IT eess.SPmath.IT
keywords 6DMAmulti-cell networksinterference managementmovable antennasdistributed optimizationprecoding designtwo-timescale control
0
0 comments X

The pith

A distributed two-timescale design lets neighboring base stations coordinate movable-antenna rotations to manage inter-cell interference while approaching centralized performance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that in a multi-cell network where each base station uses six-dimensional movable antennas, the rotations that strengthen desired signals also change how much interference leaks to other cells. This coupling makes separate local optimization ineffective, so the authors develop a joint scheme that optimizes short-term precoders from instantaneous channels and long-term antenna rotations from statistical channels. The key enabler is an interference-power-constraint coordination step that exchanges only limited information between neighbors. Numerical tests indicate the resulting sum rates stay close to a centralized benchmark across varying interference levels and grow in scale with more cells. If the coordination step holds, operators could deploy dense movable-antenna systems without building high-capacity central controllers.

Core claim

By formulating an average weighted sum-rate maximization problem and solving it via a distributed two-timescale framework based on inter-cell interference power constraint coordination, each base station can locally optimize its downlink precoders with instantaneous CSI and update its 6DMA rotations with statistical CSI, using only edge-wise exchanges implemented through two-stage one-dimensional grid search and random maximal matching, thereby achieving sum-rate performance close to a centralized offline benchmark while preserving scalability as the number of cells increases.

What carries the argument

Edge-wise IPC coordination mechanism that uses two-stage one-dimensional grid search and random maximal matching to enforce interference power limits between neighboring base stations with limited information exchange.

If this is right

  • The distributed design maintains near-centralized weighted sum rates under different interference conditions.
  • Performance remains favorable as the number of cells grows, supporting larger networks.
  • Only limited inter-BS information exchange is required, avoiding the need for full central CSI collection.
  • Long-term antenna rotations can be updated separately from short-term precoding, matching practical hardware timescales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same coordination pattern could be tested in uplink scenarios where user equipment also carries movable antennas.
  • If the grid-search step is replaced by a learned policy, the scheme might adapt faster to changing user locations.
  • Operators might reduce backhaul capacity requirements by adopting this local coordination instead of full centralization.

Load-bearing premise

Neighboring base stations can reliably agree on interference power limits using only statistical channel information and a small number of local exchanges.

What would settle it

A simulation of a 20-cell network in which the distributed design's average weighted sum-rate drops more than 10 percent below the centralized benchmark under moderate-to-high interference.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22288 by Qijun Jiang, Rui Zhang, Xiaodan Shao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Illustration of the 6DMA-BS architecture. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Illustration of a multi-cell downlink network with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Accordingly, we parameterize the rotation vector of the b-th surface at the m-th 6DMA-BS by a two-dimensional vector zm,b ≜ [φm,b, θm,b] T ∈ R 2×1 , (1) where φm,b ∈ (0, 2π] denotes the azimuth angle of the surface normal’s projection on the x–y plane, and θm,b denotes its tilt angle (subject to a physical range). Stacking all surfaces, the rotation vector of the m-th 6DMA-BS can be written as zm ≜ [z T m,… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustration of the proposed two-timescale transmission protocol within one transmission frame. In each transmission block, pilot transmission is followed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Graph-based illustration of adjacent-cell sets and IPC. Each node [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Illustration of the proposed IPC coordination iteration. A random [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Weighted sum-rate versus the long-term iteration index under different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Illustration of two network geometries with different ICI levels. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Weighted sum-rate versus a fixed IPC threshold. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Scalability performance versus the number of cells. The weighted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper, we investigate a multi-cell six-dimensional movable antenna (6DMA) network for enhancing downlink communication performance under inter-cell interference (ICI). Each base station (BS) is equipped with multiple 6DMA surfaces, and the 6DMA rotations affect both the desired-signal enhancement for in-cell users and the interference leakage toward neighboring cells, which makes the antenna-rotation design and transmit precoding intrinsically coupled across BSs. To address this issue, we formulate an average weighted sum-rate maximization problem for the multi-cell system by jointly optimizing the short-term downlink precoders and long-term 6DMA rotations under practical antenna geometric constraints. To tackle the resulting nonconvex problem, we propose a distributed two-timescale design based on inter-cell interference power constraint (IPC) coordination among neighboring BSs, under which each BS performs local short-term precoder optimization based on instantaneous channel state information (CSI) and long-term 6DMA rotation update according to statistical CSI with limited inter-BS information exchange. In particular, an edge-wise IPC coordination mechanism based on two-stage one-dimensional grid search and random maximal matching is developed to enable scalable distributed implementation. A centralized offline benchmark is also provided for performance comparison. Numerical results show that the proposed distributed design achieves performance close to the centralized benchmark under different interference conditions, while maintaining favorable scalability as the network size increases.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper investigates multi-cell networks with six-dimensional movable antennas (6DMA) to maximize average weighted sum-rate under inter-cell interference. It formulates a joint optimization of short-term downlink precoders and long-term 6DMA rotations subject to geometric constraints, then proposes a distributed two-timescale algorithm based on inter-cell interference power constraint (IPC) coordination. The coordination uses a two-stage one-dimensional grid search combined with random maximal matching on the interference graph to limit information exchange. A centralized offline benchmark is derived for comparison. Numerical results are reported to show that the distributed scheme achieves rates close to the centralized benchmark across varying interference levels while scaling favorably with network size.

Significance. If the numerical claims hold under the stated coordination mechanism, the work offers a concrete path toward practical 6DMA deployment in multi-cell settings by trading modest performance loss for substantially reduced inter-BS signaling. The two-timescale separation and edge-wise IPC approach address a genuine scalability bottleneck in movable-antenna systems and could influence future standards work on dynamic antenna reconfiguration.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and distributed coordination mechanism section] The central performance claim—that the distributed design stays close to the centralized benchmark—depends on the edge-wise IPC coordination mechanism (described in the abstract and the method section on distributed implementation). The use of random maximal matching to select coordinated BS pairs can produce different feasible edge sets on each realization; the manuscript does not report variance across matching seeds, provide a sub-optimality bound, or test dense topologies where uncoordinated high-interference edges would directly degrade local precoder/rotation updates. This leaves the scalability statement (performance remains close as network size grows) insufficiently supported by the presented evidence.
  2. [IPC coordination and numerical results sections] The two-stage one-dimensional grid search for IPC threshold selection is presented as enabling scalable distributed implementation, yet no analysis quantifies how the discretization granularity or the random matching step affects the tightness of the IPC constraints relative to the centralized solution. Without such quantification (e.g., via a table of gap versus grid resolution or matching density), it is difficult to assess whether the observed closeness to the benchmark is robust or an artifact of the simulated regimes.
minor comments (2)
  1. [System model section] Notation for the long-term statistical CSI and short-term instantaneous CSI should be introduced with explicit time-scale indices to avoid ambiguity when the two-timescale updates are described.
  2. [Numerical results section] The abstract states that the design maintains 'favorable scalability'; a plot or table explicitly showing sum-rate versus number of cells (with error bars if matching is randomized) would strengthen this claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We provide point-by-point responses to the major comments and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and distributed coordination mechanism section] The central performance claim—that the distributed design stays close to the centralized benchmark—depends on the edge-wise IPC coordination mechanism (described in the abstract and the method section on distributed implementation). The use of random maximal matching to select coordinated BS pairs can produce different feasible edge sets on each realization; the manuscript does not report variance across matching seeds, provide a sub-optimality bound, or test dense topologies where uncoordinated high-interference edges would directly degrade local precoder/rotation updates. This leaves the scalability statement (performance remains close as network size grows) insufficiently supported by the presented evidence.

    Authors: We acknowledge that reporting variance across different random maximal matching seeds and testing denser topologies would provide stronger support for the scalability claims. In the revised manuscript, we will add numerical results showing the performance variance over multiple matching realizations and include simulations for higher-density network topologies. Regarding a sub-optimality bound, we note that the matching is a heuristic to enable scalability, and deriving a tight bound is non-trivial; we will instead provide additional empirical evidence. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [IPC coordination and numerical results sections] The two-stage one-dimensional grid search for IPC threshold selection is presented as enabling scalable distributed implementation, yet no analysis quantifies how the discretization granularity or the random matching step affects the tightness of the IPC constraints relative to the centralized solution. Without such quantification (e.g., via a table of gap versus grid resolution or matching density), it is difficult to assess whether the observed closeness to the benchmark is robust or an artifact of the simulated regimes.

    Authors: We agree that a more detailed quantification would be beneficial. We will include in the revised version a table or figure that shows the performance gap to the centralized benchmark as a function of the grid resolution used in the two-stage search, as well as the impact of matching density. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Providing a theoretical sub-optimality bound for the random maximal matching heuristic used in IPC coordination.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in optimization formulation or numerical validation

full rationale

The paper formulates a joint optimization problem for precoders and 6DMA rotations, then develops a distributed IPC coordination scheme using two-stage grid search and random maximal matching to enable scalable implementation with limited information exchange. Performance is validated numerically against an independent centralized benchmark under varying interference conditions and network sizes. No derivation step reduces a claimed prediction or result to a fitted parameter or self-referential definition by construction; the design choices and comparisons remain externally grounded rather than tautological.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

With only the abstract available, the ledger is limited to domain assumptions stated in the problem formulation; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the provided text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption 6DMA rotations simultaneously affect desired-signal enhancement and interference leakage toward neighboring cells, creating intrinsic coupling across BSs.
    Directly stated in the abstract as the reason the antenna-rotation design and transmit precoding are coupled.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5775 in / 1295 out tokens · 43669 ms · 2026-05-22T04:04:45.494519+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    A tutorial on extremely large-scale MIMO for 6G: Fundamentals, signal processing, and applications,

    Z. Wang, J. Zhang, H. Duet al., “A tutorial on extremely large-scale MIMO for 6G: Fundamentals, signal processing, and applications,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1560–1605, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    On the road to 6G: Visions, requirements, key technologies, and testbeds,

    C.-X. Wanget al., “On the road to 6G: Visions, requirements, key technologies, and testbeds,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 905–974, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Robust and secure wireless communications via intelligent reflecting surfaces,

    X. Yu, D. Xu, Y . Sun, D. W. K. Ng, and R. Schober, “Robust and secure wireless communications via intelligent reflecting surfaces,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2637–2652, Nov. 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Intelligent surfaces empowered wireless network: Recent advances and the road to 6G,

    Q. Wuet al., “Intelligent surfaces empowered wireless network: Recent advances and the road to 6G,”Proc. IEEE, vol. 112, no. 7, pp. 724–763, Jul. 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Atomic norm minimization-based DoA estimation for IRS-assisted sensing systems,

    R. Li, S. Sun, and M. Tao, “Atomic norm minimization-based DoA estimation for IRS-assisted sensing systems,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 2672–2676, Oct. 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Beam scanning for integrated sensing and communication in IRS-aided mmwave systems,

    R. Liet al., “Beam scanning for integrated sensing and communication in IRS-aided mmwave systems,” inIEEE Int. Workshop Signal Process. Adv. Wireless Commun. (SPAWC), Sep. 2023, pp. 196–200. 14

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Coordinated multipoint transmission/reception techniques for LTE-advanced [coordinated and distributed MIMO],

    M. Sawahashi, Y . Kishiyama, A. Morimoto, D. Nishikawa, and M. Tanno, “Coordinated multipoint transmission/reception techniques for LTE-advanced [coordinated and distributed MIMO],”IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 26–34, Jun. 2010

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Scalable cell-free massive MIMO systems,

    E. Bj ¨ornson and L. Sanguinetti, “Scalable cell-free massive MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 4247–4261, Jul. 2020

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Fluid antenna systems,

    K.-K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Fluid antenna systems,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950–1962, 2021

    work page 1950

  10. [10]

    Performance analysis and optimization for movable antenna aided wideband communications,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, Z. Xiao, and R. Zhang, “Performance analysis and optimization for movable antenna aided wideband communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 18 653–18 668, Dec. 2024

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    A tutorial on movable antennas for wireless networks,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, W. Meiet al., “A tutorial on movable antennas for wireless networks,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 28, pp. 3002– 3054, 2026

    work page 2026

  12. [12]

    6D movable antenna based on user distribution: Modeling and optimization,

    X. Shao, Q. Jiang, and R. Zhang, “6D movable antenna based on user distribution: Modeling and optimization,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 355–370, Jan. 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    6D movable antenna enhanced wireless network via discrete position and rotation optimiza- tion,

    X. Shao, R. Zhang, Q. Jiang, and R. Schober, “6D movable antenna enhanced wireless network via discrete position and rotation optimiza- tion,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 674–687, Mar. 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Statistical channel-based low- complexity rotation and position optimization for 6D movable antennas enabled wireless communication,

    Q. Jiang, X. Shao, and R. Zhang, “Statistical channel-based low- complexity rotation and position optimization for 6D movable antennas enabled wireless communication,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 8874–8889, Jan. 2026

    work page 2026

  15. [15]

    6DMA enhanced wireless network with flexible antenna position and rotation: Opportunities and challenges,

    X. Shao and R. Zhang, “6DMA enhanced wireless network with flexible antenna position and rotation: Opportunities and challenges,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 121–128, Apr. 2025

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Low-complexity 6DMA rotation and position optimization based on statistical channel information,

    Q. Jiang, X. Shao, and R. Zhang, “Low-complexity 6DMA rotation and position optimization based on statistical channel information,” in IEEE/CIC Int. Conf. Commun. China Workshops (ICCC Workshops), Aug. 2025, pp. 1–6

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Distributed channel estimation and optimization for 6D movable antenna: Unveiling directional sparsity,

    X. Shao, R. Zhang, Q. Jiang, J. Park, T. Q. S. Quek, and R. Schober, “Distributed channel estimation and optimization for 6D movable antenna: Unveiling directional sparsity,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 349–365, Mar. 2025

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Intelligent reflecting surface-aided wireless communication with movable elements,

    G. Hu, Q. Wu, D. Xuet al., “Intelligent reflecting surface-aided wireless communication with movable elements,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1173–1177, Apr. 2024

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    6D movable antenna for internet of vehicles: CSI-free dynamic antenna configuration,

    M. Ji, Q. Wu, P. Fan, K. Wang, W. Chen, and K. B. Letaief, “6D movable antenna for internet of vehicles: CSI-free dynamic antenna configuration,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.23991, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    Single-Step Six-Dimensional Movable Antenna Reconfiguration for High-Mobility IoV: Modeling, Analysis, and Optimization

    M. Ji, Q. Wu, P. Fan, K. Wang, W. Chen, C. Zhang, and K. B. Letaief, “Single-step six-dimensional movable antenna reconfiguration for high- mobility iov: Modeling, analysis, and optimization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.03321, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Six- dimensional movable antenna enabled wideband THz communications,

    W. Yan, W. Hao, Y . Fan, Y . Guo, Q. Wu, and X. Li, “Six- dimensional movable antenna enabled wideband THz communications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.25088, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Polarforming antenna enhanced sensing and communication: Modeling and optimization,

    X. Shao, R. Zhang, H. Zhou, Q. Jiang, C. Zhou, W. Zhuang, and X. Shen, “Polarforming antenna enhanced sensing and communication: Modeling and optimization,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 44, pp. 416–431, 2026

    work page 2026

  23. [23]

    6D movable holographic surface assisted integrated data and energy transfer: A sensing enhanced approach,

    Z. Wang, Y . Zhao, G. Hu, Y . Zheng, and K. Yang, “6D movable holographic surface assisted integrated data and energy transfer: A sensing enhanced approach,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.21137, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    A tutorial on six-dimensional mov- able antenna for 6G networks: Synergizing positionable and rotatable antennas,

    X. Shao, W. Mei, C. Youet al., “A tutorial on six-dimensional mov- able antenna for 6G networks: Synergizing positionable and rotatable antennas,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., 2025, early access

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Flexible-sector 6dma base station: Modeling and design,

    Y . Liet al., “Flexible-sector 6dma base station: Modeling and design,”

    work page

  26. [26]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26086

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26086

    work page arXiv

  27. [27]

    Hybrid near-far field 6D movable antenna design exploiting directional sparsity and deep learning,

    X. Shaoet al., “Hybrid near-far field 6D movable antenna design exploiting directional sparsity and deep learning,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 3736–3749, 2026

    work page 2026

  28. [28]

    Channel knowledge map-enabled 6D movable antenna systems with kinematic constraints: A manifold optimization approach,

    N. Chenget al., “Channel knowledge map-enabled 6D movable antenna systems with kinematic constraints: A manifold optimization approach,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 8968–8981, 2026, early access

    work page 2026

  29. [29]

    UA V-enabled passive 6D movable antennas: Joint deployment and beamforming optimization,

    C. Liu, W. Mei, P. Wang, Y . Meng, Z. Chen, and B. Ning, “UA V-enabled passive 6D movable antennas: Joint deployment and beamforming optimization,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 9765–9781, 2026

    work page 2026

  30. [30]

    Coupler position optimiza- tion and channel estimation for flexible coupler antenna aided multiuser communication,

    X. Shao, C. Shan, W. Zhuang, and X. Shen, “Coupler position optimiza- tion and channel estimation for flexible coupler antenna aided multiuser communication,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2026, early access

    work page 2026

  31. [31]

    Flexible coupler antenna for wireless networks: Oppor- tunities and challenges,

    X. Shaoet al., “Flexible coupler antenna for wireless networks: Oppor- tunities and challenges,”IEEE Commun. Mag., 2026, early access

    work page 2026

  32. [32]

    Flexible coupler antenna enhanced low-altitude wireless communication,

    X. Shao, Y . Duet al., “Flexible coupler antenna enhanced low-altitude wireless communication,”IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process., 2026, early access

    work page 2026

  33. [33]

    Flexible coupler antenna enhanced wireless communication: Modeling and cou- pler position optimization,

    X. Shao, C. Shan, Y . Du, J. Li, R. Zhang, and C.-X. Wang, “Flexible coupler antenna enhanced wireless communication: Modeling and cou- pler position optimization,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 2026, early access

    work page 2026

  34. [34]

    Rotatable coupler antenna enhanced wireless network: Modeling and coupler rotation optimiza- tion,

    X. Shao, C. Shan, W. Zhuang, and X. Shen, “Rotatable coupler antenna enhanced wireless network: Modeling and coupler rotation optimiza- tion,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 2026

    work page 2026

  35. [35]

    AI signal processing paradigm for movable antenna: From spatial position optimization to electromagnetic reconfigurability,

    Y . Liet al., “AI signal processing paradigm for movable antenna: From spatial position optimization to electromagnetic reconfigurability,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.19209, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Coordinated beamforming for the multicell multi-antenna wireless system,

    H. Dahrouj and W. Yu, “Coordinated beamforming for the multicell multi-antenna wireless system,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1748–1759, May 2010

    work page 2010

  37. [37]

    Downlink optimization with interference pricing and statistical CSI,

    T. A. Le and M. R. Nakhai, “Downlink optimization with interference pricing and statistical CSI,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 2339–2349, Jun. 2013

    work page 2013

  38. [38]

    Cooperative multicell precoding: Rate region characterization and distributed strate- gies with instantaneous and statistical CSI,

    E. Bj ¨ornson, R. Zakhour, D. Gesbert, and B. Ottersten, “Cooperative multicell precoding: Rate region characterization and distributed strate- gies with instantaneous and statistical CSI,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 4298–4310, Aug. 2010

    work page 2010

  39. [39]

    6DMA-aided cell-free massive MIMO communication,

    X. Shiet al., “6DMA-aided cell-free massive MIMO communication,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1361–1365, May 2025

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Representing attitude: Euler angles, unit quaternions, and rotation vectors,

    J. Diebel, “Representing attitude: Euler angles, unit quaternions, and rotation vectors,”Matrix, vol. 58, no. 15–16, pp. 1–35, 2006

    work page 2006

  41. [41]

    Weighted sum-rate maximization using weighted MMSE for MIMO-BC beam- forming design,

    S. S. Christensen, R. Agarwal, E. Carvalho, and J. M. Cioffi, “Weighted sum-rate maximization using weighted MMSE for MIMO-BC beam- forming design,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 4792–4799, 2008

    work page 2008

  42. [42]

    An iteratively weighted MMSE approach to distributed sum-utility maximization for a MIMO interfering broadcast channel,

    Q. Shi, M. Razaviyayn, Z.-Q. Luo, and C. He, “An iteratively weighted MMSE approach to distributed sum-utility maximization for a MIMO interfering broadcast channel,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 4331–4340, Sep. 2011

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    Particle swarm optimization,

    J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, “Particle swarm optimization,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Neural Netw. (ICNN), vol. 4, 1995, pp. 1942–1948

    work page 1995

  44. [44]

    G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan,Matrix Computations, 4th ed. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013

    work page 2013

  45. [45]

    Boyd and L

    S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe,Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, 2004

    work page 2004

  46. [46]

    Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Study on 3D Channel Model for LTE,

    3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Study on 3D Channel Model for LTE,” 3GPP, Tech. Rep. TR 36.873, 2017

    work page 2017