Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 58 references

Charge transfer mediated anomalous photoluminescence enhancement in monolayer MoS2 graphene heterostructure via polystyrene assisted wet transfer

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Transferring n-type monolayer MoS2 onto graphene via a polystyrene-assisted wet transfer produces a 54-fold photoluminescence enhancement by driving electrons from MoS2 to graphene.

desk verdict Useful experimental claim about PS-assisted transfer as an interface-engineering tool, but the DFT support for the charge-transfer direction doesn't actually compute that direction. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.18733 v1 pith:B3NX5EAB submitted 2026-07-21 cond-mat.mes-hall

Anagha Gopinath , Arpan De , Dipak Maity , Jyoti Mohanty This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords photoluminescenceenhancementMoS2/grapheneheterostructureinterlayerchargetransfertrion-to-excitonconversionpolystyrene-assistedwetKelvinprobeforcemicroscopyhydroxyl/epoxyfunctionalizationsodiumdopantremoval
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that n-type monolayer MoS2 grown with sodium chloride assistance, when stacked onto monolayer graphene by polystyrene-assisted wet transfer, exhibits a 54-fold increase in A-exciton photoluminescence instead of the usual quenching. The enhanced emission is accompanied by conversion of negatively charged trions into neutral excitons, a signature of electron depletion from MoS2. The authors attribute this to electron transfer from MoS2 to graphene, amplified by hydroxyl and epoxy functionalization of the graphene interface and by removal of residual sodium ions during the water-assisted transfer. If correct, the work turns a routine transfer step into an interface-engineering strategy for brightening TMD/graphene heterostructures without external doping or gating.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is interfacial charge transfer from MoS2 to graphene, activated by two co-factors: hydroxyl (C–OH) and epoxy (C–O–C) groups on graphene that act as electron sinks, and the removal of residual Na+ ions from the MoS2 surface during water-assisted delamination. The polystyrene-assisted wet transfer is the enabling step because it both introduces the oxygen functionalization and washes out sodium. The quantitative tool is a charge-partitioning analysis of density functional theory on MoS2/graphene supercells with 4% and 8% hydroxyl coverage and 4% epoxy coverage, which shows the computed electron gain of MoS2 dropping from 0.232 e− to 0.112 e− and 0.087 e− per supercell as

What would settle it

Repeat the same polystyrene-assisted wet transfer onto graphene that has had its oxygen functional groups removed, for example by vacuum annealing, and measure the photoluminescence and work function; if the ~54-fold enhancement and ~600 meV work-function shift persist, interfacial functionalization is not the controlling factor, and if they vanish, the proposed mechanism is corroborated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Stacking n-type monolayer MoS2 onto p-type graphene by polystyrene-assisted wet transfer raises A-exciton photoluminescence ~54-fold and flips the trion-to-exciton ratio from 1.72 to 0.58. Kelvin probe force microscopy shows the MoS2 work function rising from 4.36 to 4.96 eV, and graphene's Raman modes redshift, both indicating electron transfer from MoS2 to graphene. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy reveals hydroxyl and epoxy groups at the interface and loss of the Na 1s signal, so the paper links the transfer to interfacial oxygen functionalization plus sodium removal. DFT charge-partitioning on functionalized MoS2/graphene supercells shows these groups act as electron sinks, cutting MoS2'

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the charge-partitioning results from undoped MoS2/graphene supercells—where functional groups only reduce the electron gain of MoS2 without ever making it lose electrons—can be extrapolated to the experimental n-type MoS2 on p-type graphene as evidence of net electron transfer from MoS2 to graphene; the paper itself acknowledges the pristine model does not replicate the doped heterostructure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The standard polystyrene-assisted wet transfer can brighten MoS2/graphene light emitters instead of quenching them, offering a scalable route to TMD/graphene optoelectronics.
  • Controlling the degree of graphene hydroxyl/epoxy functionalization and the residual sodium content provides a parameter for tuning trion versus exciton emission and photoluminescence intensity.
  • The ~600 meV increase in the MoS2 work function implies the heterostructure acts as though MoS2 is hole-depleted, which should affect the electrical response of transistors or photodetectors built from these stacks.
  • Because the enhancement is intrinsic to the transfer process, it requires no external biasing, post-processing, or electrostatic gating, making it compatible with large-area device fabrication.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: If the enhancement is as sensitive to interfacial water chemistry as proposed, varying the water quality, pH, or rinse time during transfer should tune the photoluminescence enhancement between the ~2-fold level (sodium removal alone) and the ~54-fold level (with functionalization).
  • Editorial inference: The same wet-transfer procedure may brighten other alkali-promoted n-type TMDs, such as WS2 or MoSe2, when stacked on graphene, which would generalize the strategy beyond MoS2.
  • Editorial inference: A direct first-principles calculation on n-doped MoS2/p-doped graphene with functionalized graphene—rather than the undoped supercells the paper models—would settle whether the net electron transfer direction matches the proposed mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reports that transferring n-type monolayer MoS2 (grown with NaCl-assisted CVD) onto p-type monolayer graphene via a polystyrene-assisted wet transfer yields a ~54-fold enhancement in A-exciton PL, a blueshift and trion-to-exciton conversion, a ~600 meV increase in MoS2 work function (KPFM), and redshifts of graphene G/2D Raman modes. The authors attribute the effect to electron transfer from MoS2 to graphene, mediated by interfacial hydroxyl/epoxy functionalization and removal of residual Na+ dopants during transfer. DFT Bader analysis on pristine and functionalized MoS2/graphene supercells is used to claim that hydroxyl/epoxy groups reduce the charge gain of MoS2 and thereby facilitate the transfer. The control transfer of MoS2 to SiO2 shows only a ~2-fold enhancement and also trion-to-exciton conversion.

Significance. If the attribution is correct, the result is significant: it identifies a process-compatible wet-transfer route to turn the normally PL-quenching MoS2/graphene interface into a PL-enhancing one, with possible implications for TMD-based light emitters. The manuscript includes a reasonable set of complementary measurements (Raman, PL, KPFM, XPS) and a control experiment. It also explicitly acknowledges the limitation of the DFT model, which is useful. However, the central claim currently rests on a single spectrum for the headline 54-fold factor and on a DFT calculation that never computes the claimed charge-transfer direction; these are load-bearing gaps.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3, Fig. 3(a); Fig. S.4] The headline 54-fold enhancement and the 600 meV work-function shift are presented from single representative spectra/maps with no error bars or sample-to-sample statistics. The authors state that PL measurements were performed on multiple flakes and that 'dominant neutral exciton emission was consistently observed' (Fig. S.4), but the 54-fold factor is not quantified across samples. Because the control transfer to SiO2 already produces a 2-fold enhancement and trion-to-exciton conversion (Fig. 3(c)), the specific contribution of the graphene interface over and above transfer-induced Na+ removal needs to be demonstrated with statistical comparison (mean ± SD over at least three independently prepared samples). Without this, the magnitude and even the existence of the 'anomalous' enhancement is not robust.
  2. [Section 2.4 and Fig. 6] The DFT Bader analysis computes only the pristine, undoped MoS2/graphene supercell, in which net electron transfer is always from graphene to MoS2 (0.232 e−/supercell pristine, reduced to 0.112 e− at 4% OH and 0.087 e− at 4% epoxy). The paper states that 'the pristine, undoped system does not replicate the heterostructure formed from n-type MoS2 on p-type graphene' (Section 2.4). Therefore the calculation does not simulate the proposed MoS2→graphene transfer at all; it only shows that functionalization suppresses the opposite transfer. The conclusion in Section 3 that 'DFT calculations reveal that the presence of hydroxyl and epoxy groups amplifies this driving force' is a non-sequitur as written. To support the proposed mechanism microscopically, the calculation must include the experimental doping asymmetry (e.g., via a gate, dopant, or explicit charge state), or the DFT section must b
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, Fig. 4] The sentence 'KPFM profiles indicate a higher surface potential for MoS2 than for graphene (Figure 4(e)), hence a higher work function for graphene than for MoS2 (Figure 4(c))' is internally inconsistent with the work-function map and with the subsequent 4.96 eV value for MoS2. The authors likely mean that MoS2 has the higher work function in the heterostructure; please correct this typo, as it could confuse readers about the sign of the charge transfer.
  2. [Section 3, Raman analysis] The G and 2D mode redshifts are interpreted purely as doping effects based on the Δω2D/ΔωG ratio of ~0.46. However, strain also contributes to both modes, and the authors do not provide a quantitative strain/doping separation (e.g., using the 2D/G intensity ratio or a reference measurement). Since the wet transfer itself can introduce strain, the conclusion that the redshifts 'provide strong evidence of interlayer charge transfer' is somewhat overstated unless strain is controlled or measured.
  3. [Section 3, XPS (Fig. 5)] The C 1s deconvolution shows an increase in C-OH and the appearance of a C-O-C peak after heterostructure formation, but no quantitative comparison (e.g., atomic percentages with uncertainties) is given. Since the XPS evidence underpins the proposed functionalization-mediated mechanism, a quantitative analysis would strengthen the claim. Similarly, the absence of the Na 1s peak is used to support Na+ removal, but the detection limit is not discussed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: central PL enhancement and charge-transfer signatures are measured independently; the DFT extrapolation is a non-sequitur, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central experimental chain is self-contained: monolayer MoS2 is characterized (PL, Raman, XPS, KPFM), transferred to graphene, and the 54-fold PL enhancement, trion-to-exciton conversion, 600 meV work-function increase, graphene G/2D redshifts, and Na+ removal are all directly measured. The mechanistic attribution to MoS2-to-graphene charge transfer is an inference from these independent observables, not a quantity that was fitted from the same data. The DFT section is not used to predict the enhancement; it is a separate model on pristine undoped supercells, and the paper explicitly concedes that this system 'does not replicate the heterostructure formed from n-type MoS2 on p-type graphene.' The Bader numbers (0.232, 0.112, 0.087 e−/supercell) show only that functionalization reduces the graphene-to-MoS2 electron donation; extrapolating this to a doped system where MoS2 donates to graphene is a logical extrapolation that may be unsupported, but it is not circular. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input. The few self-citations (refs. [16], [29]) support standard KPFM mapping and the growth protocol; they are not load-bearing. Overall circularity score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on standard experimental/characterization assumptions (KPFM, Raman doping interpretation, XPS peak assignment) and one ad hoc computational extrapolation: applying pristine undoped DFT supercells to the heavily doped experimental system. No new physical entities are postulated; hydroxyl/epoxy groups are observed by XPS and are known chemical species.

free parameters (3)
  • Voigt fit peak positions for A0 and A- in PL deconvolution = as-grown: 1.89 eV, 1.85 eV; heterostructure: 1.87 eV, 1.84 eV
    PL A-exciton deconvolution into neutral exciton and trion; the fitted positions/widths determine the trion-to-exciton ratio used as primary evidence for charge transfer.
  • Lorentzian fit G and 2D peak positions for graphene = bare graphene: 1604.08, 2697.26 cm^-1; heterostructure: 1591.21, 2691.31 cm^-1
    Raman shifts used to infer doping change (charge transfer).
  • Functionalization coverages in DFT (OH and epoxy groups) = 4% (2 OH), 8% (4 OH), 4% epoxy (2 C-O-C)
    Chosen by hand to model XPS-observed functional groups; not fitted to any target, but arbitrary within supercell construction.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption DFT with PBE-GGA + Grimme-D3 vdW correction reliably describes interlayer charge transfer in MoS2/graphene.
    Section 2.4; used for all Bader charge analysis.
  • standard math KPFM contact potential difference (V_CPD = phi_tip - phi_sample) directly maps local work function.
    Section 2.3 / Fig 4; the 600 meV work-function increase is derived from this relation.
  • domain assumption Raman G/2D peak shifts with delta(2D)/delta(G) ~ 0.46 are dominated by doping rather than strain.
    Section 3, Fig 2; uses Lee et al. criterion (ref 48) without quantitative strain separation.
  • domain assumption XPS C 1s C-OH/C-O-C peak assignments (285.9/286.7 eV) and the absence of Na 1s after transfer indicate interfacial chemical changes that mediate charge transfer.
    Section 3, Fig 5; functionalization is inferred from small spectral components.
  • ad hoc to paper The pristine undoped DFT supercell can be extrapolated to the experimental heavily doped MoS2/graphene system.
    Section 2.4/Fig 6; authors acknowledge the pristine system 'does not replicate' the doped heterostructure but still use it as qualitative evidence.
  • domain assumption Trion/exciton PL intensity ratio tracks electron density in MoS2.
    Section 3; used to infer electron depletion from reduced A-/A0 ratio.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Charge transfer mediated anomalous photoluminescence enhancement in monolayer MoS2 graphene heterostructure via polystyrene assisted wet transfer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B3NX5EAB

@misc{pith2026260718733,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Charge transfer mediated anomalous photoluminescence enhancement in monolayer MoS2 graphene heterostructure via polystyrene assisted wet transfer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B3NX5EAB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.18733}
}
read the original abstract

Van der Waals MoS2 graphene heterostructures are compelling candidates for high performance electronic and optoelectronic device applications. However, the interlayer charge transfer typically quenches the photoluminescence of monolayer MoS2, limiting the use of these heterostructures in light emitting applications. In this work, we report an anomalous photoluminescence enhancement in n-type monolayer MoS2 by integrating it with monolayer graphene via polystyrene assisted wet transfer process. Photoluminescence spectroscopy reveals a dominant trion to exciton conversion in the heterostructure. Kelvin probe force microscopy shows a 600 meV increase in the work function of MoS2 upon heterostructure formation. This work function shift, together with the higher work function of graphene, signifies electron transfer from MoS2 to graphene. Shifts in the graphene G and 2D Raman modes further corroborate the interlayer charge transfer. Hydroxyl and epoxy functionalization of graphene following heterostructure formation is evidenced by X ray photoelectron spectroscopy. DFT based Bader charge analysis quantifies the role of these functional groups in facilitating interlayer charge transfer. Collectively, our findings establish polystyrene assisted wet transfer as a practical interface engineering strategy for enhancing excitonic emission in MoS2 graphene heterostructures, thereby advancing their potential for scalable optoelectronic devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.18733 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Characterization of as-grown MoS2. (a) Optical microscopy image. (b) Atomic force mi￾croscopy image. Scale bar corresponds to 5µm. (c) Raman spectrum depicting characteristic E1 2g mode and A1g mode of MoS2 separated by 18.81 cm−1 . (d) Photoluminescence spectrum showing A and B excitonic features associated with the direct transitions at the K point. out of plane A1g vibrational modes, respectively. The frequency s… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Characterization of the MoS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Photoluminescence (PL) characterization of the MoS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: KPFM characterization. (a) Workfunction map of as-grown MoS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: XPS characterization. Core level XPS spectra of (a) Mo 3d, (b) S 2p, and (c) Na 1s of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Optimized atomic structures of (a) MoS2/Gr heterostructure, (b) MoS2/Gr with 4% hydroxyl coverage, (c) MoS2/Gr with 8% hydroxyl coverage, and (d) MoS2/Gr with 4% epoxy coverage. (e-h) Corresponding charge density difference plots. Yellow regions represent electron accu…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides.Na- ture nanotechnology, 7(11):699–712, 2012

    Qing Hua Wang, Kourosh Kalantar-Zadeh, Andras Kis, Jonathan N Coleman, and Michael S Strano. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides.Na- ture nanotechnology, 7(11):699–712, 2012

    2012

  2. [2]

    Atomically thin mos 2: a new direct-gap semiconductor.Physical review letters, 105(13):136805, 2010

    Kin Fai Mak, Changgu Lee, James Hone, Jie Shan, and Tony F Heinz. Atomically thin mos 2: a new direct-gap semiconductor.Physical review letters, 105(13):136805, 2010

    2010

  3. [3]

    Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic crystals

    Xiaoze Liu, Tal Galfsky, Zheng Sun, Fengnian Xia, Erh-chen Lin, Yi-Hsien Lee, Stéphane Kéna- Cohen, and Vinod M Menon. Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic crystals. Nature Photonics, 9(1):30–34, 2015. 12

    2015

  4. [4]

    Zhiyong Y Zhu, Yingchun C Cheng, and Udo Schwingenschlögl. Giant spin-orbit-induced spin splitting in two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenide semiconductors.Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 84(15):153402, 2011

    2011

  5. [5]

    Control of valley polarization in monolayer mos2 by optical helicity.Nature nanotechnology, 7(8):494–498, 2012

    Kin Fai Mak, Keliang He, Jie Shan, and Tony F Heinz. Control of valley polarization in monolayer mos2 by optical helicity.Nature nanotechnology, 7(8):494–498, 2012

    2012

  6. [6]

    Valley polarization in mos2 monolayers by optical pumping.Nature nanotechnology, 7(8):490–493, 2012

    Hualing Zeng, Junfeng Dai, Wang Yao, Di Xiao, and Xiaodong Cui. Valley polarization in mos2 monolayers by optical pumping.Nature nanotechnology, 7(8):490–493, 2012

    2012

  7. [7]

    Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer mos2.Nano letters, 10(4):1271–1275, 2010

    Andrea Splendiani, Liang Sun, Yuanbo Zhang, Tianshu Li, Jonghwan Kim, Chi-Yung Chim, Giulia Galli, and Feng Wang. Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer mos2.Nano letters, 10(4):1271–1275, 2010

    2010

  8. [8]

    Exciton binding energy and nonhy- drogenic rydberg series in monolayer ws 2.Physical review letters, 113(7):076802, 2014

    Alexey Chernikov, Timothy C Berkelbach, Heather M Hill, Albert Rigosi, Yilei Li, Burak Aslan, David R Reichman, Mark S Hybertsen, and Tony F Heinz. Exciton binding energy and nonhy- drogenic rydberg series in monolayer ws 2.Physical review letters, 113(7):076802, 2014

    2014

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Tightly bound trions in monolayer mos2.Nature materials, 12(3):207–211, 2013

    Kin Fai Mak, Keliang He, Changgu Lee, Gwan Hyoung Lee, James Hone, Tony F Heinz, and Jie Shan. Tightly bound trions in monolayer mos2.Nature materials, 12(3):207–211, 2013

    2013

  2. [10]

    Electrical control of neutral and charged excitons in a monolayer semiconductor.Nature communications, 4(1):1474, 2013

    Jason S Ross, Sanfeng Wu, Hongyi Yu, Nirmal J Ghimire, Aaron M Jones, Grant Aivazian, Jiaqiang Yan, David G Mandrus, Di Xiao, Wang Yao, et al. Electrical control of neutral and charged excitons in a monolayer semiconductor.Nature communications, 4(1):1474, 2013

    2013

  3. [11]

    Greatly enhanced resonant exciton-trion conversion in electrically modulated atomically thin ws2 at room temperature.Ad- vanced Materials, 35(33):2302248, 2023

    Zeng Wang, Matej Sebek, Xinan Liang, Ahmed Elbanna, Arash Nemati, Nan Zhang, Choon Hwa Ken Goh, Mengting Jiang, Jisheng Pan, Zexiang Shen, et al. Greatly enhanced resonant exciton-trion conversion in electrically modulated atomically thin ws2 at room temperature.Ad- vanced Mat...

    2023

  4. [12]

    Bright and efficient light-emitting devices based on 2d transition metal dichalcogenides.Advanced Materials, 35(31):2208054, 2023

    Tanveer Ahmed, Jiajia Zha, Kris KH Lin, Hao-Chung Kuo, Chaoliang Tan, and Der-Hsien Lien. Bright and efficient light-emitting devices based on 2d transition metal dichalcogenides.Advanced Materials, 35(31):2208054, 2023

    2023

  5. [13]

    Enhanced performance of a cvd mos2 photodetector by chemical in situ n-type doping.ACS applied materials & interfaces, 11(12):11636–11644, 2019

    Songyu Li, Xiaoqing Chen, Famin Liu, Yongfeng Chen, Beiyun Liu, Wenjie Deng, Boxing An, Fei- hong Chu, Guoqing Zhang, Shanlin Li, et al. Enhanced performance of a cvd mos2 photodetector by chemical in situ n-type doping.ACS applied materials & interfaces, 11(12):11636–11644, 2019

    2019

  6. [14]

    Stabilizing the heavily-doped and metallic phase of mos2 monolayers with surface functionalization.2D Materials, 9(1):015033, 2022

    Hanyu Zhang, Tamara D Koledin, Xiang Wang, Ji Hao, Sanjini U Nanayakkara, Nuwan H At- tanayake, Zhaodong Li, Michael V Mirkin, and Elisa M Miller. Stabilizing the heavily-doped and metallic phase of mos2 monolayers with surface functionalization.2D Materials, 9(1):015033, 2022

    2022

  7. [15]

    Tunable photoluminescence of mono- layer mos2 via chemical doping.Nano letters, 13(12):5944–5948, 2013

    Shinichiro Mouri, Yuhei Miyauchi, and Kazunari Matsuda. Tunable photoluminescence of mono- layer mos2 via chemical doping.Nano letters, 13(12):5944–5948, 2013

    2013

  8. [16]

    Optically active de- fect states and valley depolarization in monolayer mos 2 induced by high-energy electron-beam irradiation.Nanoscale, 18(14):7727–7740, 2026

    Anagha Gopinath, Faiha Mujeeb, Subhabrata Dhar, and Jyoti Mohanty. Optically active de- fect states and valley depolarization in monolayer mos 2 induced by high-energy electron-beam irradiation.Nanoscale, 18(14):7727–7740, 2026

    2026

  9. [17]

    Stable few-layer mos2 rectifying diodes formed by plasma-assisted doping.Applied Physics Letters, 103(14), 2013

    Mikai Chen, Hongsuk Nam, Sungjin Wi, Lian Ji, Xin Ren, Lifeng Bian, Shulong Lu, and Xiaogan Liang. Stable few-layer mos2 rectifying diodes formed by plasma-assisted doping.Applied Physics Letters, 103(14), 2013. 13

    2013

  10. [18]

    Charge transfer dynamics in mose2/hbn/wse2 heterostructures.Nano Letters, 22(24):10140–10146, 2022

    Yoseob Yoon, Zuocheng Zhang, Ruishi Qi, Andrew Y Joe, Renee Sailus, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Sefaattin Tongay, and Feng Wang. Charge transfer dynamics in mose2/hbn/wse2 heterostructures.Nano Letters, 22(24):10140–10146, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Ultrafast charge transfer in atomically thin mos2/ws2 heterostructures.Nature nanotechnology, 9(9):682–686, 2014

    Xiaoping Hong, Jonghwan Kim, Su-Fei Shi, Yu Zhang, Chenhao Jin, Yinghui Sun, Sefaattin Tongay, Junqiao Wu, Yanfeng Zhang, and Feng Wang. Ultrafast charge transfer in atomically thin mos2/ws2 heterostructures.Nature nanotechnology, 9(9):682–686, 2014

    2014

  12. [20]

    Twist-angle-dependent ultrafast charge transfer in mos2-graphene van der waals heterostructures.Nano Letters, 21(19):8051–8057, 2021

    Duan Luo, Jian Tang, Xiaozhe Shen, Fuhao Ji, Jie Yang, Stephen Weathersby, Michael E Kozina, Zhijiang Chen, Jun Xiao, Yusen Ye, et al. Twist-angle-dependent ultrafast charge transfer in mos2-graphene van der waals heterostructures.Nano Letters, 21(19):8051–8057, 2021

    2021

  13. [21]

    Ultrafast dynamics of charge transfer in cvd grown mos2–graphene heterostructure.Applied Physics Letters, 119(9), 2021

    Zhen Xu, Zhe Liu, Dehui Zhang, Zhaohui Zhong, and Theodore B Norris. Ultrafast dynamics of charge transfer in cvd grown mos2–graphene heterostructure.Applied Physics Letters, 119(9), 2021

    2021

  14. [22]

    Sub-bandgap activated charges transfer in a graphene-mos2-graphene heterostructure.Nano Select, 2(10):2019–2028, 2021

    Sunil Kumar, Arvind Singh, Anand Nivedan, Sandeep Kumar, Seok Joon Yun, Young Hee Lee, Marc Tondusson, Jérôme Degert, Jean Oberle, and Eric Freysz. Sub-bandgap activated charges transfer in a graphene-mos2-graphene heterostructure.Nano Select, 2(10):2019–2028, 2021

    2019

  15. [23]

    Optical identification of interlayer coupling of graphene/mos2 van der waals heterostructures.Nano Research, 14(7):2241–2246, 2021

    Mingming Yang, Longlong Wang, Guofeng Hu, Xue Chen, Peng Lai Gong, Xin Cong, Yi Liu, Yuanbo Yang, Xiaoli Li, Xiaohui Zhao, et al. Optical identification of interlayer coupling of graphene/mos2 van der waals heterostructures.Nano Research, 14(7):2241–2246, 2021

    2021

  16. [24]

    Tuning the excitonic states in mos2/graphene van der waals heterostructures via electrochemical gating.Advanced functional materials, 26(2):293–302, 2016

    Yang Li, Cheng-Yan Xu, Jing-Kai Qin, Wei Feng, Jia-Ying Wang, Siqi Zhang, Lai-Peng Ma, Jian Cao, Ping An Hu, Wencai Ren, et al. Tuning the excitonic states in mos2/graphene van der waals heterostructures via electrochemical gating.Advanced functional materials, 26(2):293–302, 2016

    2016

  17. [25]

    Tunable exciton modulation and efficient charge transfer in mos2/graphene van der waals heterostructures

    Omid Ghaebi, Tarlan Hamzayev, Till Weickhardt, Muhammad Sufyan Ramzan, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Caterina Cocchi, Domenico De Fazio, and Giancarlo Soavi. Tunable exciton modulation and efficient charge transfer in mos2/graphene van der waals heterostructures. ACS nano...

    2025

  18. [26]

    Zhenping Wang, Qing Cao, Kai Sotthewes, Yalei Hu, Hyeon S Shin, and Siegfried Eigler. Interlayer electron modulation in van der waals heterostructures assembled by stacking monolayer mos 2 onto monolayer graphene with different electron transfer ability.Nanoscale, 13(36):15464...

    2021

  19. [27]

    Controllable graphene/mos2 heterointerfaces by perpendicular surface functionalization.Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 63(51):e202415922, 2024

    Qing Cao, Jiajun Dai, Zhuting Hao, Beate Paulus, Siegfried Eigler, and Xin Chen. Controllable graphene/mos2 heterointerfaces by perpendicular surface functionalization.Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 63(51):e202415922, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Pho- toluminescence modulation of graphene/mos2 heterostructures separated by laser-induced func- tionalization.Chemistry of Materials, 36(7):3267–3276, 2024

    Qing Cao, Mira Kreßler, Marleen Hußmann, Yalei Hu, Patryk Kusch, and Siegfried Eigler. Pho- toluminescence modulation of graphene/mos2 heterostructures separated by laser-induced func- tionalization.Chemistry of Materials, 36(7):3267–3276, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Nanoscale mapping of stacking-dependent work function and local photoresponse in cvd-grown mos2 bilayers by kpfm

    Anagha Gopinath, Faiha Mujeeb, Subhabrata Dhar, and Jyoti Mohanty. Nanoscale mapping of stacking-dependent work function and local photoresponse in cvd-grown mos2 bilayers by kpfm. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.11099, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Surface-energy-assisted perfect transfer of centimeter-scale monolayer and few-layer mos2 films onto arbitrary substrates.ACS nano, 8(11):11522–11528, 2014

    Alper Gurarslan, Yifei Yu, Liqin Su, Yiling Yu, Francisco Suarez, Shanshan Yao, Yong Zhu, Mehmet Ozturk, Yong Zhang, and Linyou Cao. Surface-energy-assisted perfect transfer of centimeter-scale monolayer and few-layer mos2 films onto arbitrary substrates.ACS nano, 8(11):11522–...

    2014

  23. [31]

    The comparative defect study on the polymeric transfer of mos2 monolayers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.06996, 2021

    C Abinash Bhuyan, Kishore K Madapu, and Sandip Dhara. The comparative defect study on the polymeric transfer of mos2 monolayers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.06996, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Enhancement of valley polarization in cvd grown monolayer mos2 films.Applied Physics Letters, 121(7), 2022

    Poulab Chakrabarti, Faiha Mujeeb, and Subhabrata Dhar. Enhancement of valley polarization in cvd grown monolayer mos2 films.Applied Physics Letters, 121(7), 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials.Journal of physics: Condensed matter, 21(39):395502, 2009

    Paolo Giannozzi, Stefano Baroni, Nicola Bonini, Matteo Calandra, Roberto Car, Carlo Cavazzoni, Davide Ceresoli, Guido L Chiarotti, Matteo Cococcioni, Ismaila Dabo, et al. Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials.Journal ...

    2009

  26. [34]

    Ad- vanced capabilities for materials modelling with quantum espresso.Journal of physics: Condensed matter, 29(46):465901, 2017

    Paolo Giannozzi, Oliviero Andreussi, Thomas Brumme, Oana Bunau, M Buongiorno Nardelli, Matteo Calandra, Roberto Car, Carlo Cavazzoni, Davide Ceresoli, Matteo Cococcioni, et al. Ad- vanced capabilities for materials modelling with quantum espresso.Journal of physics: Condensed ...

    2017

  27. [35]

    Generalized gradient approximation made simple.Physical review letters, 77(18):3865, 1996

    John P Perdew, Kieron Burke, and Matthias Ernzerhof. Generalized gradient approximation made simple.Physical review letters, 77(18):3865, 1996

    1996

  28. [36]

    From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented- wave method.Physical review b, 59(3):1758, 1999

    Georg Kresse and Daniel Joubert. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented- wave method.Physical review b, 59(3):1758, 1999

    1999

  29. [37]

    A broyden—fletcher—goldfarb—shanno optimization proce- dure for molecular geometries.Chemical physics letters, 122(3):264–270, 1985

    John D Head and Michael C Zerner. A broyden—fletcher—goldfarb—shanno optimization proce- dure for molecular geometries.Chemical physics letters, 122(3):264–270, 1985

    1985

  30. [38]

    A fast and robust algorithm for bader decomposition of charge density.Computational Materials Science, 36(3):354–360, 2006

    Graeme Henkelman, Andri Arnaldsson, and Hannes Jónsson. A fast and robust algorithm for bader decomposition of charge density.Computational Materials Science, 36(3):354–360, 2006

    2006

  31. [39]

    Anharmonicity in raman- active phonon modes in atomically thin mos 2.Physical Review B, 101(20):205302, 2020

    Suman Sarkar, Indrajit Maity, HL Pradeepa, Goutham Nayak, Laetitia Marty, Julien Renard, Johann Coraux, Nedjma Bendiab, Vincent Bouchiat, Sarthak Das, et al. Anharmonicity in raman- active phonon modes in atomically thin mos 2.Physical Review B, 101(20):205302, 2020

    2020

  32. [40]

    Oxide scale sublimation chemical vapor deposition for controllable growth of monolayer mos2 crystals.Small Methods, 6(2):2101107, 2022

    Xu Yang, Shisheng Li, Naoki Ikeda, and Yoshiki Sakuma. Oxide scale sublimation chemical vapor deposition for controllable growth of monolayer mos2 crystals.Small Methods, 6(2):2101107, 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    Spontaneous n-doping in growing monolayer mos2 by alkali metal compound- promoted cvd.ACS applied materials & interfaces, 13(48):58144–58151, 2021

    Peng Wang, Jiafan Qu, Yadong Wei, Hongyan Shi, Jian Wang, Xiudong Sun, Weiqi Li, Wenjun Liu, and Bo Gao. Spontaneous n-doping in growing monolayer mos2 by alkali metal compound- promoted cvd.ACS applied materials & interfaces, 13(48):58144–58151, 2021

    2021

  34. [42]

    Dielectric screening of excitons and trions in single-layer mos2

    Yuxuan Lin, Xi Ling, Lili Yu, Shengxi Huang, Allen L Hsu, Yi-Hsien Lee, Jing Kong, Mildred S Dresselhaus, and Tomás Palacios. Dielectric screening of excitons and trions in single-layer mos2. Nano letters, 14(10):5569–5576, 2014

    2014

  35. [43]

    Modulation doping of transition metal dichalco- genide/oxide heterostructures.Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 5(2):376–381, 2017

    Kang Xu, Yi Wang, Yuda Zhao, and Yang Chai. Modulation doping of transition metal dichalco- genide/oxide heterostructures.Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 5(2):376–381, 2017

    2017

  36. [44]

    Enhanced trion emission in monolayer mose2 by constructing a type-i van der waals heterostructure.Advanced Functional Materials, 31(40):2104960, 2021

    Juanmei Duan, Phanish Chava, Mahdi Ghorbani-Asl, Denise Erb, Liang Hu, Arkady V Krashenin- nikov, Harald Schneider, Lars Rebohle, Artur Erbe, Manfred Helm, et al. Enhanced trion emission in monolayer mose2 by constructing a type-i van der waals heterostructure.Advanced Functio...

    2021

  37. [45]

    Wet chemical synthesis of graphene.Advanced materials, 25(26):3583–3587, 2013

    Siegfried Eigler, Michael Enzelberger-Heim, Stefan Grimm, Philipp Hofmann, Wolfgang Kroener, Andreas Geworski, Christoph Dotzer, Michael Röckert, Jie Xiao, Christian Papp, et al. Wet chemical synthesis of graphene.Advanced materials, 25(26):3583–3587, 2013. 15

    2013

  38. [46]

    Probing electronic doping in cvd graphene crystals treated by hno3 vapors.ACS omega, 9(49):48246–48255, 2024

    Nikos Delikoukos, Stavros Katsiaounis, John Parthenios, Labrini Sygellou, Dimitrios Tasis, and Konstantinos Papagelis. Probing electronic doping in cvd graphene crystals treated by hno3 vapors.ACS omega, 9(49):48246–48255, 2024

    2024

  39. [47]

    Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers.Physical review letters, 97(18):187401, 2006

    Andrea C Ferrari, Jannik C Meyer, Vittorio Scardaci, Cinzia Casiraghi, Michele Lazzeri, Francesco Mauri, Stefano Piscanec, Dingde Jiang, Konstantin Sergeevich Novoselov, Siegmar Roth, et al. Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers.Physical review letters, 97(18):187401, 2006

    2006

  40. [48]

    Optical separation of mechanical strain from charge doping in graphene.Nature communications, 3(1):1024, 2012

    Ji Eun Lee, Gwanghyun Ahn, Jihye Shim, Young Sik Lee, and Sunmin Ryu. Optical separation of mechanical strain from charge doping in graphene.Nature communications, 3(1):1024, 2012

    2012

  41. [49]

    Monitoring dopants by raman scattering in an electrochemically top-gated graphene transistor.Nature nanotechnology, 3(4):210–215, 2008

    Anindya Das, Simone Pisana, Biswanath Chakraborty, Stefano Piscanec, Srijan K Saha, Umesh V Waghmare, Konstantin S Novoselov, Hulikal R Krishnamurthy, Andre K Geim, Andrea C Fer- rari, et al. Monitoring dopants by raman scattering in an electrochemically top-gated graphene tra...

    2008

  42. [50]

    Layer number dependence of the work function and optical properties of single and few layers mos2: effect of substrate.Nanotechnology, 30(24):245708, 2019

    Magdalena Tamulewicz, Joanna Kutrowska-Girzycka, Krzysztof Gajewski, Jarosław Serafińczuk, Andrzej Sierakowski, Joanna Jadczak, Leszek Bryja, and Teodor P Gotszalk. Layer number dependence of the work function and optical properties of single and few layers mos2: effect of sub...

    2019

  43. [51]

    Layer dependence and light tuning surface potential of 2d mos2 on various substrates

    Feng Li, Junjie Qi, Minxuan Xu, Jiankun Xiao, Yuliang Xu, Xiankun Zhang, Shuo Liu, and Yue Zhang. Layer dependence and light tuning surface potential of 2d mos2 on various substrates. Small, 13(14):1603103, 2017

    2017

  44. [52]

    Influence of stoichiometry on the optical and electrical properties of chemical vapor deposition derived mos2

    In Soo Kim, Vinod K Sangwan, Deep Jariwala, Joshua D Wood, Spencer Park, Kan-Sheng Chen, Fengyuan Shi, Francisco Ruiz-Zepeda, Arturo Ponce, Miguel Jose-Yacaman, et al. Influence of stoichiometry on the optical and electrical properties of chemical vapor deposition derived mos2...

    2014

  45. [53]

    Nacl-assisted temperature- dependent controllable growth of large-area mos2 crystals using confined-space cvd.ACS omega, 7(34):30074–30086, 2022

    Muhammad Suleman, Sohee Lee, Minwook Kim, Van Huy Nguyen, Muhammad Riaz, Naila Nasir, Sunil Kumar, Hyun Min Park, Jongwan Jung, and Yongho Seo. Nacl-assisted temperature- dependent controllable growth of large-area mos2 crystals using confined-space cvd.ACS omega, 7(34):30074–...

    2022

  46. [54]

    Nacl-assisted substrate dependent 2d planar nucleated growth of mos2.Applied Surface Science, 538:148201, 2021

    Aditya Singh, Monika Moun, Madan Sharma, Arabinda Barman, Ashok Kumar Kapoor, and Rajendra Singh. Nacl-assisted substrate dependent 2d planar nucleated growth of mos2.Applied Surface Science, 538:148201, 2021

    2021

  47. [55]

    Large-area transfer of 2d tmdcs assisted by a water-soluble layer for potential device applications.ACS omega, 7(14):11731– 11741, 2022

    Madan Sharma, Aditya Singh, Pallavi Aggarwal, and Rajendra Singh. Large-area transfer of 2d tmdcs assisted by a water-soluble layer for potential device applications.ACS omega, 7(14):11731– 11741, 2022

    2022

  48. [56]

    Probing the thermal deoxygenation of graphene oxide using high-resolution in situ x-ray-based spectroscopies

    Abhijit Ganguly, Surbhi Sharma, Pagona Papakonstantinou, and Jeremy Hamilton. Probing the thermal deoxygenation of graphene oxide using high-resolution in situ x-ray-based spectroscopies. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 115(34):17009–17019, 2011

    2011

  49. [57]

    Exploring of the quantum capacitance of mos2/graphene heterostructures for supercapacitor electrodes.FlatChem, 38:100471, 2023

    Qingxiao Zhou, Li Wang, Weiwei Ju, Yongliang Yong, Zhaohui Dong, Shengqi Chi, and Jianan Yao. Exploring of the quantum capacitance of mos2/graphene heterostructures for supercapacitor electrodes.FlatChem, 38:100471, 2023. 16

    2023

  50. [58]

    Graphene oxide as a promising hole injection layer for mos2-based electronic devices.ACS nano, 8(11):11432–11439, 2014

    Tiziana Musso, Priyank V Kumar, Adam S Foster, and Jeffrey C Grossman. Graphene oxide as a promising hole injection layer for mos2-based electronic devices.ACS nano, 8(11):11432–11439, 2014. 17

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.