Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

BoostClean: Automated Error Detection and Repair for Machine Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1711.01299 v1 pith:B4QJRCTN submitted 2017-11-03 cs.DB

BoostClean: Automated Error Detection and Repair for Machine Learning

classification cs.DB
keywords datadetectionboostcleanerrorinconsistencieslearningmachinemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Predictive models based on machine learning can be highly sensitive to data error. Training data are often combined with a variety of different sources, each susceptible to different types of inconsistencies, and new data streams during prediction time, the model may encounter previously unseen inconsistencies. An important class of such inconsistencies is domain value violations that occur when an attribute value is outside of an allowed domain. We explore automatically detecting and repairing such violations by leveraging the often available clean test labels to determine whether a given detection and repair combination will improve model accuracy. We present BoostClean which automatically selects an ensemble of error detection and repair combinations using statistical boosting. BoostClean selects this ensemble from an extensible library that is pre-populated general detection functions, including a novel detector based on the Word2Vec deep learning model, which detects errors across a diverse set of domains. Our evaluation on a collection of 12 datasets from Kaggle, the UCI repository, real-world data analyses, and production datasets that show that Boost- Clean can increase absolute prediction accuracy by up to 9% over the best non-ensembled alternatives. Our optimizations including parallelism, materialization, and indexing techniques show a 22.2x end-to-end speedup on a 16-core machine.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Auto-Fill: Learning to Predict Missing Values Accurately with Specialist Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    An ensemble of three post-trained small specialist language models (knowledge, reasoning, coding) with calibrated confidence and abstention outperforms frontier reasoning models on high-precision missing-value predict...

  2. Collaborative Large and Small Language Models for Accurate and Scalable Data Repair

    cs.DB 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LasRepair++ pairs an LLM instructor with an SLM corrector, refines context via EM, and down-weights uncertain repairs using column-calibrated confidence, reporting 18.1% average F1 gain over baselines on data repair tasks.