Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MONSTER: Monash Scalable Time Series Evaluation Repository

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.15122 v1 pith:B4V7XGAE submitted 2025-02-21 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords seriestimeclassificationdatasetsbenchmarksfieldevaluationlarger
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce MONSTER-the MONash Scalable Time Series Evaluation Repository-a collection of large datasets for time series classification. The field of time series classification has benefitted from common benchmarks set by the UCR and UEA time series classification repositories. However, the datasets in these benchmarks are small, with median sizes of 217 and 255 examples, respectively. In consequence they favour a narrow subspace of models that are optimised to achieve low classification error on a wide variety of smaller datasets, that is, models that minimise variance, and give little weight to computational issues such as scalability. Our hope is to diversify the field by introducing benchmarks using larger datasets. We believe that there is enormous potential for new progress in the field by engaging with the theoretical and practical challenges of learning effectively from larger quantities of data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Standardized Benchmark for Skeleton-Based Rehabilitation Assessment Using Deep Learning

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rehab-Pile, a standardized archive of 60 rehabilitation skeleton datasets with reproducible baselines, reports that the authors' lightweight LITEMV model wins on efficiency and usually on accuracy.

Pith tools