REVIEW 2 cited by
Searching for Decaying and Annihilating Dark Matter with Line Intensity Mapping
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The purpose of line-intensity mapping (IM), an emerging tool for extragalactic astronomy and cosmology, is to measure the integrated emission along the line of sight from spectral lines emitted from galaxies and the intergalactic medium. The observed frequency of the line then provides a distance determination allowing the three-dimensional distribution of the emitters to be mapped. Here we discuss the possibility to use these measurements to seek radiative decays or annihilations from dark-matter particles. The photons from monoenergetic decays will be correlated with the mass distribution, which can be determined from galaxy surveys, weak-lensing surveys, or the IM mapping experiments themselves. We discuss how to seek this cross-correlation and then estimate the sensitivity of various IM experiments in the dark-matter mass-lifetime parameter space. We find prospects for improvements of ten orders of magnitude in sensitivity to decaying/annihilating dark matter in the frequency bands targeted for IM experiments.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Searching for axion-like particles with SPHEREx
SPHEREx should improve current limits on the axion-photon coupling for 0.5-3 eV ALP dark matter by observing the Milky Way halo in its deep field, the LMC, and dwarf spheroidals.
-
Bounds on decaying sterile neutrinos via magnetic dipole moment from COB intensity
The paper derives a range of sterile neutrino masses and transition magnetic moments that would reproduce the LORRI cosmic optical background excess, but the excess is only a 1.5-sigma signal.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.