Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 52 references

Thermoelastic Harvesting Outperforming Thermoelectric Generators Below 100 {\deg}C

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A thermoelastic harvester built from NiTi shape-memory-alloy wires reaches 366 mW/cm³ of directly measured mechanical power, and on this measure outperforms reported thermoelectric generators below 100°C.

desk verdict Solid measured power density for a thermoelastic harvester, but the 'outperforms thermoelectrics' headline only holds if you compare raw mechanical power to electrical output. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12092 v1 pith:B6VCHC3U submitted 2026-08-12 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.app-ph

Bruno Neumann , Andreas Henschke , Morik Nikolic , Sebastian Fähler This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph
keywords thermoelasticharvestingshapememoryalloysNiTilow-gradewasteheatenergypowerdensitythermoelectricgeneratorssolid-stateconversion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Low-grade waste heat below 100°C is abundant but has no economically viable solid-state converter. This paper reports that thermoelastic harvesting—using NiTi shape-memory-alloy wires that switch between a stiff high-temperature phase and an easily deformed low-temperature phase—can fill that gap. With a protagonist–antagonist seesaw, a tunable prestrain, and transversal water flow, the device produces a directly measured mechanical power density of 366 mW/cm³ of active material, about 1.7 times the best prior thermoelastic harvester and ahead of reported thermomagnetic and pyroelectric generators. On power per material cost (4.9 W/€) it also beats the thermoelectric generators benchmarked in this temperature range, making thermoelastic harvesting a credible competitor for recovering sub-100°C waste heat.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the protagonist–antagonist thermoelastic harvester: a seesaw connecting two sets of NiTi wires that are alternately heated and cooled, so the contracting hot side does the prestrain work on the cold side. The prestrain at the central bearing sets the operating point on the SMA's stress–strain response, and the enclosed loop on that diagram is the mechanical work delivered per cycle. Transversal water flow decouples the cycle frequency from wire length, and the direct measurement chain—forces from load cells, displacement from a laser, power $\bar{P} = \langle F_1 \dot{x} + F_2 \dot{x}\rangle$—is what lets the paper map device performance without material-property estimates.

What would settle it

Run the same harvester with the cold side at 20°C instead of 7.5°C and convert the hydraulic output with a real electrical generator; if the resulting electrical power density falls below the 205 mW/cm³ of the best benchmarked thermoelectric device at the same temperature span, the central outperformance claim would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that all three historical limitations of thermoelastic harvesters are engineering choices, not material limits, and removing them unlocks competitive power. The device runs a four-stage thermodynamic cycle on the stress–strain plane of NiTi: strain the cold martensitic wire, heat it into stiff austenite, let it contract under load, then cool and repeat. Two wire bundles are coupled by a seesaw so the hot contracting side mechanically prestrains the cold side (protagonist–antagonist recovery), a movable central bearing makes the prestrain a continuously tunable control parameter, and water flows transversally across the wires so heat-exchange time no longer grows with wire length. The authors measure force and displacement directly, compute output power as the time average of $F_i \dot{x}$ summed over both sides, and report $\bar{P}=190$ mW mechanical output at a peak of 370 mW; with an active SMA volume of 0.518 cm³ this is 366 mW/cm³. Against published devices with directly measured output, this is the highest power density of any thermoelastic, thermomagnetic, or pyroelectric harvester in the sub-140°C benchmark, and exceeds the benchmarked thermoelectric generators both per active-material volume and per raw-material cost. The electrical step is not built in; the paper assumes standard electromagnetic conversion at 90% or better.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the device outperforms thermoelectric generators depends on treating the directly measured mechanical power of the harvester as comparable to the electrical power of the benchmarked generators, because the paper assumes 90% conversion efficiency and uses a 7.5°C cold side that is below typical ambient conditions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Because transversal flow removes the length–frequency coupling, output power should scale with both the number and length of SMA wires, so the same device rules transfer to larger active volumes.
  • The prestrain mechanism turns the force–strain balance into a tunable operating parameter, so a single device can be re-optimized for different hot and cold temperatures and loads instead of being fixed by geometry.
  • The companion simulation reaching 51.6% of Carnot (near the Curzon–Ahlborn ceiling for maximum power) means the standard NiTi material is not the bottleneck; better heat exchange between water and wire is the remaining lever.
  • The first-order transition's large hysteresis requires temperature spans of order 60 K for best performance; thermomagnetic generators, with nearly hysteresis-free transitions, remain better suited to spans below 30 K.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanical power is converted at the stated 90% generator efficiency, the electrical power density would be about 330 mW/cm³; measuring this with a real electrical load at a cold side near 20°C would test whether the outperformance over TEGs survives outside the lab's chilled conditions.
  • The benchmark excludes thermomagnetic microsystems (118 mW/cm³) and uses a 7.5°C cold side, so the headline outperformance over thermoelectric generators is framed by those choices; a broader or more ambient-condition comparison could change the ranking.
  • Because NiTi transformation temperatures can be tuned by composition or heat treatment, the same architecture could be adapted to different waste-heat windows, including smaller temperature spans if hysteresis is reduced.
  • The cost comparison uses raw element prices only, not installed system cost; a full system-level cost analysis would be needed before claiming economic competitiveness with photovoltaics or TEG modules.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a thermoelastic harvester based on NiTi shape-memory-alloy wires in a protagonist–antagonist configuration with transversal water flow and a continuously tunable prestrain mechanism. The authors directly measure force and displacement to obtain a time-averaged mechanical output power of 190 mW, corresponding to a power density of 366 mW/cm³ with respect to the active SMA volume. They benchmark this value against previously reported thermoelastic, thermomagnetic, pyroelectric, and thermoelectric generators, claiming that the device outperforms all of them in both power density and power-per-material-cost in the sub-100°C regime. The paper also presents systematic parameter sweeps (prestrain, cycle frequency, hot/cold temperatures, throttle opening) that map the device's operating space and identify the optimum operating point.

Significance. If the reported performance and comparisons are sound, this is an important advance for thermoelastic harvesting, which has lagged behind thermomagnetic and pyroelectric routes. The direct force and displacement measurement of mechanical work is a methodological strength, and the systematic parameter sweeps provide useful design rules for the community. The stated power density would be a new benchmark for bulk thermoelastic harvesters, and the comparison to thermoelectric generators addresses a practically relevant question. However, the central comparative claims currently rest on several comparability assumptions that need to be clarified or corrected before the headline conclusions can be accepted.

major comments (5)
  1. [Benchmarking and discussion, Fig. 4; Abstract; Introduction] The paper compares the directly measured mechanical output power (190 mW, 366 mW/cm³) to the electrical output power of thermoelectric, pyroelectric, and thermomagnetic generators without applying the stated conversion efficiency from mechanical to electrical work. The text states that 'conversion of the extracted mechanical work to electricity can be solved by standard electromagnetic generators with efficiencies of 90% and more, and is therefore not part of this work' (Results, first section), yet Fig. 4 and the abstract report the raw mechanical value. For a fair comparison, the TEH values should be derated by at least a factor of 0.9, yielding approximately 171 mW and 329 mW/cm³. Even after this derating the TEH would still exceed the TEG benchmark of 205 mW/cm³, so the conclusion may survive, but as presented the comparison is between unequal quantities and the headline 'outperforming' claim is not directly supported by the data shown.
  2. [Title; Abstract; Benchmarking and discussion] The title and abstract claim performance 'below 100°C', but the benchmark includes a thermoelectric generator (Ref. [43]) that operates with a hot side up to 140°C, as acknowledged in the text: 'We take 140°C as the upper limit of low-grade waste heat in this benchmark, just enough to include one well-characterized TEG as the strongest competitive reference.' The TEH itself is characterized at Thot = 73.7°C, so the reported comparison is not made within the stated 'below 100°C' range. The authors should either include a TEG benchmark with Thot below 100°C or revise the title and abstract to reflect the actual temperature range of the comparison.
  3. [Methods, Fluid circuit and thermal control; Results, 'From actuation to work'; Fig. 3c] The demonstration uses a chilled cold side at Tcold = 7.5°C, which is well below typical ambient conditions of 20–25°C. The paper's own data in Fig. 3c show that output power decreases linearly as Tcold is increased. The benchmark TEGs are likely operated with an ambient cold side, so the comparison is not on an equal thermal basis. The authors should report the device performance at a representative ambient cold-side temperature (e.g., 20°C) or explicitly state that the headline power density requires an artificially cooled cold sink, which is not realistic for waste-heat harvesting applications.
  4. [Methods, data analysis; Benchmarking and discussion; Supplementary Table S3] The 'power per material cost' comparison (4.9 W/€ for the TEH vs. 2.78 W/€ for the best TEG) is based on raw element market prices from metal.com, not on the actual cost of the processed functional materials. For NiTi, the raw elements nickel and titanium are inexpensive, but the cost of producing NiTi wire is substantially higher; similarly, Bi2Te3 thermoelectric elements carry significant processing costs. The authors acknowledge this is a 'first-order proxy' and that a full-system cost comparison is premature, but the abstract presents the cost-normalized power as a decisive advantage. Unless the cost basis is made more realistic (e.g., using quoted alloy or wire prices), the cost superiority claim should be softened.
  5. [Benchmarking and discussion, Fig. 4a] The paper excludes thermomagnetic microsystems, specifically Ref. [9] with a power density of 118 mW/cm³, because 'microtechnology is not suited to harvesting the bulk of low-grade waste heat'. Although this scope choice is defensible, the abstract's broader statement that the device is 'ahead of every reported thermomagnetic and pyroelectric generator' is then too strong. Since 118 mW/cm³ is still below the TEH value even after derating, this issue does not affect the headline conclusion, but the wording should be qualified to 'bulk' or 'macroscale' devices.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. S1] The text states that the force and displacement are phase-shifted by approximately 90° 'as expected at the optimum mechanical load.' It would be helpful to quantify this phase shift or provide a brief explanation of why the dissipative-load signature implies a 90° phase shift.
  2. [Results, 'From actuation to work'] The reported system efficiency, ηsys/ηCarnot = 3.3×10⁻²%, is extremely low. The authors may want to clarify whether this is the efficiency relative to Carnot (as stated) and to note explicitly that the low value stems predominantly from incomplete heat exchange, which is only addressed later in the conclusion.
  3. [Methods, Sensors and data acquisition] The Savitzky–Golay filtering of the force and displacement signals could in principle bias the computed average power. Since raw signals are retained, a brief sensitivity check (e.g., comparing filtered vs. unfiltered average power at the optimum point) would strengthen confidence in the reported 190 mW value.
  4. [Benchmarking and discussion, Fig. 4] The figure would be more informative if the TEH value were plotted with an error bar or a range reflecting the wire-to-wire spread (about 10%) reported in the frequency series, so that the separation from the TEG benchmark can be assessed.
  5. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrase 'in this temperature range' in the abstract is ambiguous: it is not clear whether it refers to the hot-side temperature below 100°C, the temperature span, or the benchmark range up to 140°C. Please make the intended meaning explicit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation found: the central 366 mW/cm³ result is a direct force/displacement measurement, and the self-citations are component-level rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, a directly measured thermoelastic harvesting power density of 366 mW/cm³, is obtained from measured forces F_i(t), measured displacement x(t), and the time-averaged product P = (1/T_m) ∫ [P1(t)+P2(t)] dt. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no equation defines the output in terms of the benchmark values it is compared against. The prestrain, frequency, and temperature sweeps are experimental optimizations, not fits that are then re-predicted. The self-citations to the authors' prior transversal-flow chamber [36], prestrain mechanism [34], and companion simulation [37] describe components and a material-side efficiency bound; they are not used as the source of the measured power or as a uniqueness argument forcing the result. The main legitimate concern is not circularity but comparability: the headline comparison treats the measured mechanical output (190 mW) as directly comparable to electrical outputs of TEG/PEG/TMG benchmarks while the paper itself states that mechanical-to-electrical conversion 'can be solved by standard electromagnetic generators with efficiencies of 90% and more' and is 'not part of this work.' That is a benchmarking fairness issue, not a self-referential derivation. Similarly, excluding thermomagnetic microsystems and choosing 140°C as the benchmark upper limit are scope choices, not circular reductions. Accordingly, no specific circular step can be quoted, and the score reflects only the presence of minor, non-load-bearing self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger shows the device relies on manufacturer material data, a chilled cold side, and the benchmarking premise; no new physical entities are introduced. The operating point parameters (frequency, load, prestrain, temperatures, flow) are chosen by experimental optimization rather than derived.

free parameters (5)
  • cycle frequency f = 1 Hz at optimum output power
    Chosen by joint sweep with throttle opening (Fig. 3b).
  • throttle opening b = 60 a.u.
    Optimum in the joint sweep with frequency (Fig. 3b). The valve is not calibrated, so the value is an arbitrary control input.
  • prestrain epsilon_0 = 3.6% (saturation above about 3.2%)
    Selected to maximize output power (Fig. 3d).
  • hot and cold water temperatures = Thot = 73.7°C, Tcold = 7.5°C
    Operating point at maximum power, limited by chiller capability; not an ambient sink.
  • water flow rate = 0.65 L/min (maximum available)
    Maximum flow from the thermostats; power and efficiency increase with flow up to this limit (Fig. S2).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Manufacturer transformation temperatures for the NiTi wires are accurate (Mf=-32°C, Ms=-12°C, As=-8°C, Af=12°C).
    Used to interpret the temperature span and the asymmetry in Fig. 2c; not independently measured in this paper.
  • standard math Stress-induced martensite follows a Clausius-Clapeyron relation that raises transformation temperatures under load.
    Invoked to explain why the wires transform at operating temperatures well above Af, in the discussion of Fig. 2c.
  • domain assumption Density and heat capacity of NiTi from the supplier data sheet are correct.
    Used to compute the thermal input Q_dot_in and active volume.
  • domain assumption The reported power values of all benchmarked devices are directly measured and comparable.
    Stated as an inclusion criterion, but the paper does not re-verify the other devices' measurement methods.
  • standard math The Curzon-Ahlborn limit (about 52% of Carnot at maximum power) is the appropriate efficiency ceiling for the material comparison.
    Used to argue the material already operates near the thermodynamic maximum at the tested conditions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermoelastic Harvesting Outperforming Thermoelectric Generators Below 100 {\deg}C." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B6VCHC3U

@misc{pith2026260812092,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermoelastic Harvesting Outperforming Thermoelectric Generators Below 100 \degC},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B6VCHC3U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12092}
}
read the original abstract

Low-grade waste heat below 100 degC is one of the largest untapped opportunities in solid-state energy conversion. Three ferroic routes are candidates for recovering this resource: thermomagnetic, pyroelectric, and thermoelastic harvesters. The last has remained the most unexplored, despite decades of progress on the underlying NiTi shape-memory alloy wires. Three system-design changes close this gap: a protagonist-antagonist architecture that recovers the energy for prestraining, a continuously tunable prestrain mechanism that sets the force-strain balance, and transversal water flow that decouples cycle frequency from wire length. The resulting harvester delivers a directly measured power density of 366 mW/cm^3 with respect to the active material, about 1.7 times the next-best thermoelastic device, ahead of every reported thermomagnetic and pyroelectric generator, and outperforming the best thermoelectric generators in this temperature range also with respect to power per material cost. The system maps the parameter space directly through force and displacement measurements, without using material-property estimates, giving a quantitative picture of how the alloy responds while the device is doing work.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.12092 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. From the thermoelastic harvesting cycle to a powerful thermoelastic harvester of low-grade waste heat using shape memory alloys (SMA). a) Four stages of a thermoelastic cycle, which is driven by waste heat with a temperature Thot with respect to ambient Tcold to actuate SMA. b) A schematic temperature dependent stress-strain diagram illustrates, how these four stages create mechanical work Wmech. c) Sketch of a prot… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Maximizing the strain amplitude ∆ϵ of a TEH without load. a) The prestrain quantifies how far the SMA wire is extended from its initial state. Cycling the temperature between hot and cold then yields the strain amplitude ∆ϵ. b) Influence of the cycling frequency f. These experiments were repeated with four different wires, marked by their number. The inset shows the underlying time dependence of the seesaw displacem… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Optimizing output power and efficiency of our TEH by varying process parameters. a) Quantifying instantaneous output power by measuring displacement x and forces Fi at both sides of the protagonist-antagonist TEH. This representative measurement was performed at optimum average output power P¯ of 190 mW. b) Identifying optimum frequency and throttle opening for maximum output power. c) Influence of hot and cold wate… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Benchmarking thermoelastic harvester (TEH), pyroelectric generators (PEG), thermomagnetic generators (TMG), and thermoelectric generators (TEG) for harvesting low-grade waste heat. a) Power density relative to the volume of active material required. b) Output power per…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [43]

    Thermoelectric heat recovery in a real industry: From laboratory optimization to reality.Applied Thermal Engineering, 184:116275, 2021

    Álvaro Casi, Miguel Araiz, Leyre Catalán, and David Astrain. Thermoelectric heat recovery in a real industry: From laboratory optimization to reality.Applied Thermal Engineering, 184:116275, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020. 116275

    doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020 2021

  2. [9]

    High-performance thermomagnetic generators based on heusler alloy films.Advanced Energy Materials, 7(5):1601879, 2017

    Marcel Gueltig, Frank Wendler, Hinnerk Ossmer, Makoto Ohtsuka, Hiroyuki Miki, Toshiyuki Takagi, and Manfred Kohl. High-performance thermomagnetic generators based on heusler alloy films.Advanced Energy Materials, 7(5):1601879, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201601879

    doi:10.1002/aenm.201601879 2017

  3. [1]

    Rising air-conditioning use intensifies global warming.Nature Communications, 17(1): 1961, 2026

    Hongzhi Zhang, Yuli Shan, Ruoqi Li, Rui Xue, Junhua Ma, Jarmo Kikstra, Zongbo Shi, Zhaohua Wang, Bin Zhang, Bo Wang, Shuai Fang, Fan Yang, and Klaus Hubacek. Rising air-conditioning use intensifies global warming.Nature Communications, 17(1): 1961, 2026. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-69393-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-026-69393-1 1961

  4. [2]

    Estimating the global waste heat potential.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57:1568–1579, 2016

    Clemens Forman, Ibrahim Kolawole Muritala, Robert Pardemann, and Bernd Meyer. Estimating the global waste heat potential.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57:1568–1579, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.192

    doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.192 2016

  5. [3]

    Skokov, James D

    Jian Liu, Tino Gottschall, Konstantin P. Skokov, James D. Moore, and Oliver Gut- fleisch. Giant magnetocaloric effect driven by structural transitions.Nature Materials, 11(7):620–626, 2012. doi: 10.1038/nmat3334

    doi:10.1038/nmat3334 2012

  6. [4]

    High cooling performance in a double-loop electrocaloric heat pump.Science, 382(6673):801–805,

    Junning Li, Alvar Torelló, Veronika Kovacova, Uros Prah, Ashwath Aravindhan, Torsten Granzow, Tomoyasu Usui, Sakyo Hirose, and Emmanuel Defay. High cooling performance in a double-loop electrocaloric heat pump.Science, 382(6673):801–805,

    work page

  7. [5]

    A regenerative elastocaloric heat pump.Nature Energy, 1(10):16134, 2016

    Jaka Tušek, Kurt Engelbrecht, Dan Eriksen, Stefano Dall’Olio, Janez Tušek, and Nini Pryds. A regenerative elastocaloric heat pump.Nature Energy, 1(10):16134, 2016. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2016.134. 22

    doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.134 2016

  8. [6]

    Rößler, Oliver Kastner, Jürgen Eckert, Gunther Eggeler, Heike Emmerich, Peter Entel, Stefan Müller, Eckhard Quandt, and Karsten Albe

    Sebastian Fähler, Ulrich K. Rößler, Oliver Kastner, Jürgen Eckert, Gunther Eggeler, Heike Emmerich, Peter Entel, Stefan Müller, Eckhard Quandt, and Karsten Albe. Caloric effects in ferroic materials: New concepts for cooling.Advanced Engineering Materials, 14(1–2):10–19, 2012. doi: 10.1002/adem.201100178

    work page doi:10.1002/adem.201100178 2012

Show all 52 references
  1. [7]

    Bahl, Kurt Engelbrecht, Arendse Gideon, Mikael Alexander Vinogradov Levy, Jacob Birkjær Marcussen, Carlos Imbaquingo, and Rasmus Bjørk

    Christian R.H. Bahl, Kurt Engelbrecht, Arendse Gideon, Mikael Alexander Vinogradov Levy, Jacob Birkjær Marcussen, Carlos Imbaquingo, and Rasmus Bjørk. Design, optimization and operation of a high power thermomagnetic harvester.Applied Energy, 376:124304, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.a...

    2024

  2. [8]

    Energy harvesting near room temperature using a thermomagnetic generator with a pretzel-like magnetic flux topology.Nature Energy, 4:68–74, 2019

    Anja Waske, Daniel Dzekan, Kai Sellschopp, Dietmar Berger, Alexander Stork, Kor- nelius Nielsch, and Sebastian Fähler. Energy harvesting near room temperature using a thermomagnetic generator with a pretzel-like magnetic flux topology.Nature Energy, 4:68–74, 2019. doi: 10.1038...

    2019 doi

  3. [10]

    Large harvested energy with non-linear pyroelectric modules

    Pierre Lheritier, Alvar Torelló, Tomoyasu Usui, Youri Nouchokgwe, Ashwath Ar- avindhan, Junning Li, Uros Prah, Veronika Kovacova, Olivier Bouton, Sakyo Hirose, and Emmanuel Defay. Large harvested energy with non-linear pyroelectric modules. Nature, 609(7928):718–721, 2022. doi...

    2022 doi

  4. [11]

    Goldstein and Leo J

    David M. Goldstein and Leo J. McNamara, editors.Proceedings of the NITINOL Heat Engine Conference, Silver Spring, Maryland, 1978

    1978

  5. [12]

    Characteristics of a new power generation system with application of a shape memory alloy engine.Electrical Engineering in Japan, 165(3):8–15, 2008

    Yoshihisa Sato, Naotsugu Yoshida, Yukinori Tanabe, Hideki Fujita, and Norio Ooiwa. Characteristics of a new power generation system with application of a shape memory alloy engine.Electrical Engineering in Japan, 165(3):8–15, 2008. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1002/eej.20620

    2008 doi

  6. [13]

    Stewart, Reza Mirzaeifar, Eckhard Quandt, and Shashank Priya

    Prashant Kumar, Ravi Anant Kishore, Deepam Maurya, Colin J. Stewart, Reza Mirzaeifar, Eckhard Quandt, and Shashank Priya. Shape memory alloy engine for high efficiency low-temperature gradient thermal to electrical conversion.Applied Energy, 251:113277, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.ap...

    2019 doi

  7. [14]

    Polaris: from laboratory prototypes to market-ready sustainable mag- netic beverage coolers.Applied Thermal Engineering, 284:129144, 2026

    Jierong Liang, Jeffrey Pickett, Sarah Hermann, Tim Sittig, Thomas Reichert, Mar- tin Lehmann, Jonas Stötzer, Jens-Peter Zwick, Max Greifenstein, Milan Strauch, Konstantin Skokov, Oliver Gutfleisch, Tino Gottschall, Maximilian Fries, and Dim- itri Benke. Polaris: from laborator...

    2026

  8. [15]

    The future of cooling: Opportunities for energy- efficient air conditioning

    International Energy Agency. The future of cooling: Opportunities for energy- efficient air conditioning. Technical report, OECD/IEA, Paris, 2018. URLhttps: //www.iea.org/reports/the-future-of-cooling

    2018

  9. [16]

    Quantification of global waste heat and its environmental effects.Applied Energy, 235:1314–1334, 2019

    Anton Firth, Bo Zhang, and Aidong Yang. Quantification of global waste heat and its environmental effects.Applied Energy, 235:1314–1334, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy. 2018.10.102. 23

    2019 doi

  10. [17]

    Michael Papapetrou, George Kosmadakis, Andrea Cipollina, Umberto La Commare, and Giorgio Micale. Industrial waste heat: Estimation of the technically available resource in the eu per industrial sector, temperature level and country.Applied Thermal Engineering, 138:207–216, 201...

    2018 doi

  11. [18]

    Data centers waste heat recovery technologies: Review and evaluation

    Yueting Hao, Haojie Zhou, Tong Tian, Wei Zhang, Xin Zhou, Qingfei Shen, Tong Wu, and Ji Li. Data centers waste heat recovery technologies: Review and evaluation. Applied Energy, 384:125489, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025. 125489

    2025 doi

  12. [19]

    Data center waste heat for district heating networks: A review.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 219:115863, 2025

    Xiaolei Yuan, Jiayi Liu, Sijia Sun, Xiaojie Lin, Xiaojun Fan, Weixin Zhao, and Risto Kosonen. Data center waste heat for district heating networks: A review.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 219:115863, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. rser.2025.115863

    2025

  13. [20]

    A comprehensive review of thermoelectric generators: Technologies and common applications.Energy Reports, 6:264–287, 2020

    Nesrine Jaziri, Ayda Boughamoura, Jens Müller, Brahim Mezghani, Fares Tounsi, and Mohammed Ismail. A comprehensive review of thermoelectric generators: Technologies and common applications.Energy Reports, 6:264–287, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2019. 12.011

    2020 doi

  14. [21]

    A thermoelectric waste-heat-recovery system for portland cement rotary kilns

    Qi Luo, Peng Li, Lanlan Cai, Pingwang Zhou, Di Tang, Pengcheng Zhai, and Qingjie Zhang. A thermoelectric waste-heat-recovery system for portland cement rotary kilns. Journal of Electronic Materials, 44(6):1750–1762, December 2014. doi: 10.1007/ s11664-014-3543-1

    2014

  15. [22]

    Thermoelectric generators: A review of applications.Energy Conversion and Management, 140:167–181, 2017

    Daniel Champier. Thermoelectric generators: A review of applications.Energy Conversion and Management, 140:167–181, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.02. 070

    2017 doi

  16. [23]

    A review on low-grade thermal energy harvesting: Materials, methods and devices.Materials, 11(8):1433, 2018

    Ravi Anant Kishore and Shashank Priya. A review on low-grade thermal energy harvesting: Materials, methods and devices.Materials, 11(8):1433, 2018. doi: 10. 3390/ma11081433

    2018

  17. [24]

    Saufi Sulaiman, B

    M. Saufi Sulaiman, B. Singh, and W.A.N.W. Mohamed. Experimental and theo- retical study of thermoelectric generator waste heat recovery model for an ultra- low temperature pem fuel cell powered vehicle.Energy, 179:628–646, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.022

    2019 doi

  18. [25]

    Sanders, Swapnil Dubey, Fook Hoong Choo, and Fei Duan

    Kai Wang, Seth R. Sanders, Swapnil Dubey, Fook Hoong Choo, and Fei Duan. Stirling cycle engines for recovering low and moderate temperature heat: A review.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62:89–108, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.031

    2016 doi

  19. [26]

    Jingyu Cao, Ling Zheng, Zhanying Zheng, Jinqing Peng, Mingke Hu, Qiliang Wang, and Michael K. H. Leung. Recent progress in organic Rankine cycle targeting utilisation of ultra-low-temperature heat towards carbon neutrality.Applied Thermal Engineering, 231:120903, 2023. doi: 10...

    2023

  20. [27]

    W. J. Buehler, J. V. Gilfrich, and R. C. Wiley. Effect of low-temperature phase changes on the mechanical properties of alloys near composition TiNi.Journal of Applied Physics, 34(5):1475–1477, 1963. doi: 10.1063/1.1729603. 24

    1963 doi

  21. [28]

    Ultralow-fatigue shape memory alloy films.Science, 348(6238):1004–1007, 2015

    Christoph Chluba, Wenwei Ge, Rodrigo Lima de Miranda, Julian Strobel, Lorenz Kienle, Eckhard Quandt, and Manfred Wuttig. Ultralow-fatigue shape memory alloy films.Science, 348(6238):1004–1007, 2015. doi: 10.1126/science.1261164

    2015 doi

  22. [29]

    Johnson, Suxin Qian, Cheikh Cissé, Drew Stasak, Naila Al Hasan, Lin Zhou, Yunho Hwang, Reinhard Radermacher, Valery I

    Huilong Hou, Emrah Simsek, Tao Ma, Nathan S. Johnson, Suxin Qian, Cheikh Cissé, Drew Stasak, Naila Al Hasan, Lin Zhou, Yunho Hwang, Reinhard Radermacher, Valery I. Levitas, Matthew J. Kramer, Mohsen Asle Zaeem, Aaron P. Stebner, Ryan T. Ott, Jun Cui, and Ichiro Takeuchi. Fatig...

    2019 doi

  23. [30]

    Otsuka and C

    K. Otsuka and C. M. Wayman.Shape Memory Materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999. ISBN 9780521663847

    1999

  24. [31]

    J. E. Huber, N. A. Fleck, and M. F. Ashby. The selection of mechanical actuators based on performance indices.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 453(1965):2185–2205, 1997. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1997.0117

    1965

  25. [32]

    Memory alloy heat engine and method of operation

    Alfred Davis Johnson. Memory alloy heat engine and method of operation. U.S. Patent 4,055,955, 1976

    1976

  26. [33]

    Working characteristics of a reciprocating-type heat engine using shape memory alloys.JSME International Journal Series B, 41(2): 344–350, 1998

    Toshio Sakuma and Uichi Iwata. Working characteristics of a reciprocating-type heat engine using shape memory alloys.JSME International Journal Series B, 41(2): 344–350, 1998. doi: 10.1299/jsmeb.41.344

    1998 doi

  27. [34]

    Neumann and S

    B. Neumann and S. Fähler. Einrichtung zur nutzung thermischer energie. Patent DE 10 2020 118 363.1 (filed 2020), 2020

    2020

  28. [35]

    Neumann and S

    B. Neumann and S. Fähler. Vorrichtung zur wandlung thermischer fluidströmung und mechanischer arbeit. Patent DE 10 2023 208 685.9 (granted 2024), 2024

    2023

  29. [36]

    The power of thermoelastic harvesting of low-grade waste heat: A question of timing the heat exchange.APL Energy, 3(4), 2025

    Bruno Neumann, Giovanna Jocobi, Ali Izadi, Andreas Henschke, and Sebastian Fähler. The power of thermoelastic harvesting of low-grade waste heat: A question of timing the heat exchange.APL Energy, 3(4), 2025. doi: 10.1063/5.0293442

    2025 doi

  30. [37]

    Design guidelines for efficient thermoelastic harvesting of low-grade waste heat.Energy Conversion and Management: X, 27: 101099, 2025

    Bruno Neumann and Sebastian Fähler. Design guidelines for efficient thermoelastic harvesting of low-grade waste heat.Energy Conversion and Management: X, 27: 101099, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101099

    2025

  31. [38]

    Chapman.Electric Machinery Fundamentals

    Stephen J. Chapman.Electric Machinery Fundamentals. McGraw-Hill, 5 edition, 2012

    2012

  32. [39]

    On the effect of alloy composition on martensite start temperatures and latent heats in Ni–Ti-based shape memory alloys.Acta Materialia, 90:213–231, 2015

    Jan Frenzel, Andreas Wieczorek, Ingo Opahle, Björn Maaß, Ralf Drautz, and Gunther Eggeler. On the effect of alloy composition on martensite start temperatures and latent heats in Ni–Ti-based shape memory alloys.Acta Materialia, 90:213–231, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.02.029

    2015 doi

  33. [40]

    Khalil-Allafi, A

    J. Khalil-Allafi, A. Dlouhy, and G. Eggeler. Ni4Ti3-precipitation during aging of NiTi shape memory alloys and its influence on martensitic phase transformations.Acta Materialia, 50(17):4255–4274, 2002. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00257-4

    2002 doi

  34. [41]

    Ramanujan, Fengxia Hu, Ke Chu, Yi Long, and Hu Zhang

    Xianliang Liu, Haodong Chen, Jianyi Huang, Kaiming Qiao, Ziyuan Yu, Longlong Xie, Raju V. Ramanujan, Fengxia Hu, Ke Chu, Yi Long, and Hu Zhang. High- performance thermomagnetic generator controlled by a magnetocaloric switch.Nature Communications, 14(1):4811, 2023. doi: 10.103...

    2023 doi

  35. [42]

    Jeffrey Snyder and Eric S

    G. Jeffrey Snyder and Eric S. Toberer. Complex thermoelectric materials.Nature Materials, 7(2):105–114, 2008. doi: 10.1038/nmat2090

    2008 doi

  36. [44]

    Accessed: 2026-01-07

    Shanghai Metals Market.https://www.metal.com/, 2026. Accessed: 2026-01-07

    2026

  37. [45]

    Photovoltaics re- port

    Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE. Photovoltaics re- port. https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/ise/de/documents/ publications/studies/Photovoltaics-Report.pdf, 2026. Updated 22 June 2026; retrieved 2026-07-01

    2026

  38. [46]

    F. L. Curzon and B. Ahlborn. Efficiency of a Carnot engine at maximum power output.American Journal of Physics, 43(1):22–24, 1975. doi: 10.1119/1.10023

    1975 doi

  39. [47]

    Efficient and affordable thermomagnetic materials for harvesting low grade waste heat.APL Materials, 9:011105, 2021

    Daniel Dzekan, Anja Waske, Kornelius Nielsch, and Sebastian Fähler. Efficient and affordable thermomagnetic materials for harvesting low grade waste heat.APL Materials, 9:011105, 2021. doi: 10.1063/5.0033970

    2021 doi

  40. [48]

    High-performance elastocaloric materials for the engineering of bulk- and micro-cooling devices.MRS Bulletin, 43(4):280–284, 2018

    Jan Frenzel, Gunther Eggeler, Eckhard Quandt, Stefan Seelecke, and Manfred Kohl. High-performance elastocaloric materials for the engineering of bulk- and micro-cooling devices.MRS Bulletin, 43(4):280–284, 2018. doi: 10.1557/mrs.2018.67

    2018 doi

  41. [49]

    Wieczorek, J

    A. Wieczorek, J. Frenzel, M. Schmidt, B. Maaß, S. Seelecke, A. Schütze, and G. Eggeler. Optimizing Ni–Ti-based shape memory alloys for ferroic cooling.Functional Materials Letters, 10(01):1740001, 2017. doi: 10.1142/S179360471740001X

    2017 doi

  42. [50]

    Lollobrigida, V

    V. Lollobrigida, V. Basso, F. Borgatti, P. Torelli, M. Kuepferling, M. Coïsson, E. S. Olivetti, F. Celegato, L. Tortora, G. Stefani, G. Panaccione, and F. Offi. Chemical, electronic, and magnetic structure of LaFeCoSi alloy: Surface and bulk properties. Journal of Applied Phys...

    2014 doi

  43. [51]

    J. Lim, J. M. Xue, and J. Wang. Ferroelectric lead scandium tantalate from mechanical activation of mixed oxides.Materials Chemistry and Physics, 75(1–3):157–160, 2002. doi: 10.1016/S0254-0584(02)00046-9. 26

    2002 doi

  44. [2023]

    doi: 10.1126/science.adi5477

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.