Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Uncertainty-Aware Prediction and Application in Planning for Autonomous Driving: Definitions, Methods, and Comparison

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.02297 v1 pith:B7Q5SHJG submitted 2024-03-04 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords uncertaintymethodsplanningautonomousdrivingframeworkmodelingmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Autonomous driving systems face the formidable challenge of navigating intricate and dynamic environments with uncertainty. This study presents a unified prediction and planning framework that concurrently models short-term aleatoric uncertainty (SAU), long-term aleatoric uncertainty (LAU), and epistemic uncertainty (EU) to predict and establish a robust foundation for planning in dynamic contexts. The framework uses Gaussian mixture models and deep ensemble methods, to concurrently capture and assess SAU, LAU, and EU, where traditional methods do not integrate these uncertainties simultaneously. Additionally, uncertainty-aware planning is introduced, considering various uncertainties. The study's contributions include comparisons of uncertainty estimations, risk modeling, and planning methods in comparison to existing approaches. The proposed methods were rigorously evaluated using the CommonRoad benchmark and settings with limited perception. These experiments illuminated the advantages and roles of different uncertainty factors in autonomous driving processes. In addition, comparative assessments of various uncertainty modeling strategies underscore the benefits of modeling multiple types of uncertainties, thus enhancing planning accuracy and reliability. The proposed framework facilitates the development of methods for UAP and surpasses existing uncertainty-aware risk models, particularly when considering diverse traffic scenarios. Project page: https://swb19.github.io/UAP/.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Uncertainty-aware Accurate Elevation Modeling for Off-road Navigation via Neural Processes

    cs.RO 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A semantic-conditioned neural process with local ball-query attention estimates off-road terrain elevation and uncertainty more accurately than prior baselines.

  2. CooperRisk: A Driving Risk Quantification Pipeline with Multi-Agent Cooperative Perception and Prediction

    cs.RO 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    CooperRisk couples V2X cooperative perception with scene-consistent multi-agent trajectory prediction to produce temporal risk maps that reduce planned conflicts by about half on the V2XPnP dataset.

  3. Uncertainty Propagation within Chained Models for Machine Learning Reconstruction of Neutrino-LAr Interactions

    physics.data-an 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a simulated LArTPC reconstruction chain, feeding upstream uncertainty estimates to a GNN improves edge classification accuracy and confidence but barely changes node classification.

Pith tools